Microstructuring glass surfaces using a combined masking and microslurry-jet machining process
Introduction
A variety of manufacturing processes have been developed and evaluated for structuring engineering surfaces at the microscale. Applications range from modifying tribological properties, for which the relationship between friction and surface textures is researched [1,2], to inducing hydrophobicity by microstructuring surfaces [3], where contact angle measurements are used to assess the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the surfaces. Convex microstructural features might offer additional advantages in this context [4]. The manufacturing processes for engineering surfaces can involve techniques such as spraying, where material is added to surfaces for generating random or hierarchical roughness [5]; these manufacturing processes can also involve removing material such as in polymers that are microstructured using photolithographic techniques [6]. The latter manufacturing process uses a masking pattern with a high-resolution microstructure attached to the substrate surface before chemical etching [7,8]. Etching is also applicable to glass substrates [9]; however, material removal might be more cost-effective and time-efficient with a mechanical process. Furthermore, influence of side-etching should be considered to obtain a high-resolution microstructure. Current mechanical structuring processes for engineering glass surfaces lack sufficient detail at the microscale [10] owing to the brittleness of glass.
Therefore, in this research, an abrasive slurry-jet [11], more specifically a microslurry-jet (MSJ) [12], was used for microstructuring of glass surfaces. The MSJ process is a wet blasting process, where a water jet comprising small and hard particles with micrometre dimensions (slurry) was sprayed onto the substrates. Earlier studies have shown that applying the MSJ method could structure engineering surfaces (surfaces made of alloys, plastics, glass, and ceramics) to the order of nanometers in the vertical direction without the occurrence of microscopic cracks and microstructural defects on these surfaces [13,14]. Moving the MSJ nozzle during the machining process can provide continuously curved surface textures; however, the surface structures in the horizontal direction depend on the size of the nozzle, causing limitations in the machining resolution [15]. Hence, to compensate for this limitation, the combined application of a conventional photoresist masking process and the MSJ mechanical removal process was considered [16,17].
The aim of the current study was to research and assess the feasibility of using this combined masking and MSJ process for mircostructuring glass surfaces in terms of the machining accuracy and changes in the hydrophobic/hydrophilic characteristics of the machined surfaces.
Section snippets
Micromachining of glass surface by combined masking and MSJ process
Fig. 1 illustrates the micromachining process. Flat glass composed of SiO2 with 13% Na2O and 10% CaO was the material used for processing; it was ultrasonically cleaned using methanol, acetone, and ultrapure water. The organic compounds and other contaminants on the glass surface were also removed using piranha solution (a 3:1 mixture of sulfuric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide, and up to 40% hydrogen fluoride) [18,19].
In the resist coating process, SU-8 3050, a photocurable epoxy resin (KAYAKU
Results and discussion
Fig. 4 shows the glass surfaces after the masking processes, with the sacrificial patterns formed as indicated in Fig. 1(4) and Fig. 2. The photoresist was precisely patterned to obtain the Type-A, Type-B, and Type-C patterns shown in Fig. 2. Confocal laser microscopy analysis confirmed that the target heights of the sacrificial patterns, namely 15, 30, and 60 μm, were achieved.
Fig. 5 shows the processed glass surface after the MSJ process (see Fig. 1(6) for a schematic representation of this
Conclusions
The combined application of the photoresist masking and MSJ mechanical removal processes for creating microstructures can be directly applied for processing numerous engineering materials to create structured surfaces. The results of this work showed that this process can be applied successfully to glass. The resulting convex microstructural features up to 30 μm in diameter and 4 μm in height are beneficial in enhancing the hydrophobicity of glass surfaces. Post-treatment, such as removal of
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19KK0096, the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (1–1908) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, and the Interdisciplinary Research Project of the Institute of Industrial Nanomaterials (IINa), Kumamoto University.
References (28)
- et al.
An empirical approach for the determination of skin elasticity: finger pad friction against textured surfaces
Biotribology
(2019) - et al.
Lotus effect in wetting and self-cleaning
Biotribology
(2016) - et al.
Fabrication of superoleophobic surfaces by mask-assisted electrospray
Appl Surf Sci
(2017) - et al.
Production of carbonized micro-patterns by photolithography and pyrolysis
Precis Eng
(2019) - et al.
A facile synthesis of silicon nanowires/micropillars structure using lithography and metal-assisted chemical etching method
J Solid State Chem
(2018) - et al.
Fabrication of micro/nano hierarchical structures with analysis on the surface mechanics
Appl Surf Sci
(2016) - et al.
Fabrication of microstructure on glass surface using micro-indentation and wet etching process
Appl Surf Sci
(2008) - et al.
Parametric glass milling with simultaneous control
J Manuf Process
(2013) - et al.
Characteristics of abrasive slurry jet micro-machining: a comparison with abrasive air jet micro-machining
J Mater ProcessTechnol
(2013) - et al.
Fracture-free surfaces of CAD/CAM lithium metasilicate glass-ceramic using micro-slurry jet erosion
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2018)
Influence of surface profile of Co-28Cr-6Mo alloy on wear behaviour of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene used in artificial joint
Tribol Int
Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion
Int J Adhesion Adhes
Effects of coupling agents on the mechanical properties improvement of the TiO2 reinforced epoxy system
Mater Lett
A novel enzyme entrapment in SU-8 microfabricated films for glucose micro-biosensors
Biosens Bioelectron
Cited by (14)
Droplet pinning on the tilted surface processed by a grinding machine
2023, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsGeneration of Nano/Microplastics for Immunological Assessments
2023, BiotribologyImprovement of process repeatability and resolution in abrasive air jet machining via viscous slurry entrainment
2022, Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesCitation Excerpt :Abrasive jet machining (AJM) has become one of the most potential non-traditional machining technologies because it provides a lot of advantages over other methods, including relatively high material removal rate on brittle materials, negligible thermal effect [1], relatively low cost, low machining force, high flexibility and high processing capabilities for ceramics [2,3] and composites [4,5], which are usually difficult to be machined by common methods. Currently, AJM has been conducted to perform a wide variety of tasks, typically including the milling of large planar areas [6], machining of shallow micro-features used for tribological improvement [7,8], smoothing of structured surfaces (i.e., deburring) [9], removal of diamond milling/turning marks [10], polishing of EDM-machined surfaces [11], etc. In general, AJM is divided into abrasive air jet machining (AAJM), abrasive slurry jet machining (ASJM) and abrasive water jet machining (AWJM).
Friction behaviors of elastic materials sliding on textured glass surfaces
2022, Tribology InternationalCitation Excerpt :The surface profiles (surface roughness and radius of curvature at the tip) of each writing-tip specimen were measured using a laser microscope (LEXT OLS5000-SAT, Olympus Corporation, Japan). Fig. 2 shows a schematic of the preparation and processing of the textured glass surface, realized via micro-slurry-jet processing [20–22]. First, flat glass plates with dimensions of 70 mm (length) × 70 mm (breadth) × 0.4 mm (thickness) were prepared.
Micro-abrasive glass surface for producing microplastics for biological tests
2021, WearCitation Excerpt :On the type D surface, circular cylinders of 60 μm in diameter were processed with a pitch of 120 μm with a height of 1 μm. Types C and D were processed by the combined application of a conventional photoresist masking process and the mechanical removal MSJ process [35]. Masking patterns made of a photocurable resin were created on the glass, and both the photocurable resin patterns and the exposed glass surface were simultaneously removed using the MSJ.