Skip to main content
Log in

The Hydrogen Atom: Consideration of the Electron Self-Field

  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We substantiate the need for a “nonperturbative” account of the self-interaction of the electron with its own electromagnetic field in the canonical hydrogen problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. Mathematically, the problem is reduced to determination of the spectrum of everywhere regular axially symmetric solutions to the self-consistent system of Dirac and Maxwell equations, the classical analog of operator equations of quantum electrodynamics, in the presence of an external Coulomb potential. We demonstrate that only particular classes of solutions, “nonlinear” analogs of s- and p-states, can be obtained via expansion of a solution in a series over the fine structure constant \(\alpha \). In the zero approximation for \(\alpha \to 0\), we have the reduction to the self-consistent nonrelativistic system of Schrödinger–Poisson equations. The solutions corresponding to the ground state and a large set of excited states are obtained for this system using both numerical and variational methods. The spectrum of binding energies with remarkable accuracy reproduces the “Bohrian” dependence \({{W}_{n}} = {W \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {W {{{n}^{2}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{n}^{2}}}}\). In this case, the ionization energy \(W\) proves to be universal, yet about twice as small as its observed value. The problem of calculation of relativistic corrections to the binding energies and a relation between the model and the ideas and methods of quantum electrodynamics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Or on field structures with “natural” nonlinearity, Yang–Mills and/or Einstein equations.

  2. In the linear problem, normalization is achieved by multiplication by an appropriate constant, which does not affect energy levels. In our nonlinear case, for the normalization condition to be satisfied, a nontrivial procedure is required (see Section 5 for details), and the parameters of normalized and nonnormalized solutions differ.

  3. It is not clear whether the wave function normalization was preserved during iterations. Besides, the expression for the binding energy, along with the term corresponding to the eigenvalues of the “customary” quantum mechanical energy ε, should include the self-energy of the electron field, see (35) below.

  4. It will be seen below that the numerical value of the parameter \(\varepsilon \) for all regular solutions is very small (\(\varepsilon \ll 1\)), so that the deviation of the magnetic moment from the Dirac value is smaller by many orders of magnitude than the observed and QED-predicted value of \(({\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha {2\pi }}} \right. \kern-0em} {2\pi }})\).

  5. The relation between the total angular momentum and electric charge of regular axially symmetric solutions has a universal character, and in the case of absence of an external potential, it was obtained in [24] in the form \(J = ({Q \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {Q e}} \right. \kern-0em} e})m\hbar ,\,\,\,\,m = 1,2,...\). Thus, the models of the considered class can, in principle, describe charged fermions with any half-integer spin.

  6. We are deeply grateful to the referee for attentiveness, important remarks, and sending us paper [31].

  7. According to our calculations (compare with (51)), a more accurate value is as follows: \({{X}^{2}} \approx {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {0.48}}} \right. \kern-0em} {0.48}} \approx 2.078\), and according to the data for the three first s-levels in [31], \({{X}^{2}} \approx 2.0453\).

REFERENCES

  1. G. A. Zaitsev, Algebraic Problems of Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, (Nauka, Moscow, 1974), [in Russian], pp. 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Wipf, A. Kirchgerg, D. Lange, “Algebraic solution of the supersymmetric hydrogen”, Bulg. J. Phys. 11, 206–216 (2006); arXiv:0511.1231 [hep-th].

  3. L. de la Peria, A. M. Cetto, A. Valdes-Hernandes, “The zero-point field and the emergence of the quantum”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23(09), 145009 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. P. Rybakov, “Solitons and quantum mechanics”, Dynam. Compl. Syst. 4, 3–15 (2009);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. P. Rybakov, B. Saha, “Interaction of a charged 3D soliton with a Coulomb center”, Phys. Lett. A. 222, 5–13 (1996); arXiv:9603004 [atom-ph].

  6. J.-P. Vigier, “An electromagnetic theory of strong interactions”, Phys. Lett. A. 319, 246–250 (2003).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. N. V. Samsonenko, D. V. Tahti, F. Ndahayo, “On the Barut–Vigier model of the hydrogen atom”, Phys. Lett. A 220, 297–301 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Vlasov, “The Shrödinger atom”, Phys. Usp. 36, 94–99 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. P. Pitaevskii, “On the problem of the ‘Shrödinger atom’”, Phys. Usp. 36, 760–761 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Diosi, “Gravitation and quantum-mechanical localization of macroobjects”, Phys. Lett. A 105, 199–202 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Penrose, “On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction”, Gen. Relat. Grav. 28, 581-600 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. I. M. Moroz, R. Penrose, K. P. Tod, “Spherically symmetric solutions of the Schrödinger–Newton equations”, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 2733–2742 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation (Oxford University Press, 1936).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Akhiezer, V. B. Berestetskii, Quantum Electrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. P. J. Mohr, “Self-energy correction to one-electron energy levels in a strong Coulomb field”, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4421–4424 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. O. Barut, Y. I. Salamin, “Relativistic theory of spontaneous emission”, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2284–2296 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. O. Barut, J. Kraus, Y. Salamin, N. Ünal, “Relativistic theory of the Lamb shift in self-field quantum electrodynamics”, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7740–7745 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Acikgoz, A. O. Barut, J. Kraus, N. Ünal, “Self-dual quantum electrodynamics without infinities. A new calculation of vacuum polarization”, Phys. Lett. A 198, 126–130 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. N. Afanas’ev, V. G. Kartavenko, A. B. Pestov, “Coulomb self-action effect on shift of atomic levels”, Bull. Rus. Acad. Sci. Phys. 58, 738 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Rosen, “A field theory of elementary particles”, Phys. Rev. 55, 94–101 (1939).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Wakano, “Intensely localized solutions to the classical Dirac–Maxwell field equations”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 1117–1141 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. V. V. Kassandrov, “Spin and charge of solitons in the model of interacting electromagnetic and spinor fields”, Vest. Ross. Univ. Druzh. Nar. 3 168–174 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. P. Kostyuk, I. M. Chepilko, “Spherically symmetric electrostatic solitons of Klein–Gordon and Dirac fields”, Phys. At. Nucl. 56, 233–247 (1993).

  24. C. Seam Bohum, F. I. Cooperstock, “Dirac-Maxwell solitons”, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4291-4300 (1999); arXiv: 0001038 [physics].

  25. V. V. Kassandrov, Discrete Characteristics of Particles in Nonlinear Classical Field Theories, Candidate’s Dissertation (Peoples Friendsh. Univ., Moscow, 1977).

  26. V. V. Kassandrov, “Solitons of classical spinor electrodynamics in the presence of an external field”, in Statistical Physics and Field Theory, Ed. by Ts. I. Gutsunaev (Univ. Druzh. Nar., Moscow, 1990), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. V. Biguaa, V. V. Kassandrov, “Soliton model of the hydrogen atom”, in Proceedings of LV All-Russian Conference on the Problems of Dynamics, Particle Physics, Plasma Physics, and Optoelectronics, Moscow,2018 (Ros. Univ. Druzh. Nar., Moscow, 2018), 17–21.

  28. E. Schrödinger, Selected Papers on Quantum Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. H. Bernstein, E. Giladi, K. R. W. Jones, “Eigenstates of the gravitational Schrödinger equations”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 2327–2336 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Ivanenko, A. Sokolov, Classical Field Theory (New Problems) (GITTL, Moscow, 1949) [in Russian], Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Soler, “Classical electrodynamics for a nonlinear spinor field: Perturbative and exact approaches”, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3424–3429 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. F. Ranãda, J. M. Uson, “Bound states of a classical charged nonlinear Dirac field in a Coulomb potential”, J. Math. Phys. 22, 2533–2538 (1981).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A.B. Pestov, Yu.P. Rybakov, and B.N. Frolov for helpful discussions and bibliographic indications.

Funding

The work was supported by the “University program 5‑100” of the Russian Peoples’ Friendship University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. V. Biguaa or V. V. Kassandrov.

Additional information

Translated by E. Baldina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biguaa, L.V., Kassandrov, V.V. The Hydrogen Atom: Consideration of the Electron Self-Field. Phys. Part. Nuclei 51, 965–978 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779620050020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779620050020

Keywords:

Navigation