Abstract
We substantiate the need for a “nonperturbative” account of the self-interaction of the electron with its own electromagnetic field in the canonical hydrogen problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. Mathematically, the problem is reduced to determination of the spectrum of everywhere regular axially symmetric solutions to the self-consistent system of Dirac and Maxwell equations, the classical analog of operator equations of quantum electrodynamics, in the presence of an external Coulomb potential. We demonstrate that only particular classes of solutions, “nonlinear” analogs of s- and p-states, can be obtained via expansion of a solution in a series over the fine structure constant \(\alpha \). In the zero approximation for \(\alpha \to 0\), we have the reduction to the self-consistent nonrelativistic system of Schrödinger–Poisson equations. The solutions corresponding to the ground state and a large set of excited states are obtained for this system using both numerical and variational methods. The spectrum of binding energies with remarkable accuracy reproduces the “Bohrian” dependence \({{W}_{n}} = {W \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {W {{{n}^{2}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{n}^{2}}}}\). In this case, the ionization energy \(W\) proves to be universal, yet about twice as small as its observed value. The problem of calculation of relativistic corrections to the binding energies and a relation between the model and the ideas and methods of quantum electrodynamics are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Or on field structures with “natural” nonlinearity, Yang–Mills and/or Einstein equations.
In the linear problem, normalization is achieved by multiplication by an appropriate constant, which does not affect energy levels. In our nonlinear case, for the normalization condition to be satisfied, a nontrivial procedure is required (see Section 5 for details), and the parameters of normalized and nonnormalized solutions differ.
It is not clear whether the wave function normalization was preserved during iterations. Besides, the expression for the binding energy, along with the term corresponding to the eigenvalues of the “customary” quantum mechanical energy ε, should include the self-energy of the electron field, see (35) below.
It will be seen below that the numerical value of the parameter \(\varepsilon \) for all regular solutions is very small (\(\varepsilon \ll 1\)), so that the deviation of the magnetic moment from the Dirac value is smaller by many orders of magnitude than the observed and QED-predicted value of \(({\alpha \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\alpha {2\pi }}} \right. \kern-0em} {2\pi }})\).
The relation between the total angular momentum and electric charge of regular axially symmetric solutions has a universal character, and in the case of absence of an external potential, it was obtained in [24] in the form \(J = ({Q \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {Q e}} \right. \kern-0em} e})m\hbar ,\,\,\,\,m = 1,2,...\). Thus, the models of the considered class can, in principle, describe charged fermions with any half-integer spin.
We are deeply grateful to the referee for attentiveness, important remarks, and sending us paper [31].
According to our calculations (compare with (51)), a more accurate value is as follows: \({{X}^{2}} \approx {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {0.48}}} \right. \kern-0em} {0.48}} \approx 2.078\), and according to the data for the three first s-levels in [31], \({{X}^{2}} \approx 2.0453\).
REFERENCES
G. A. Zaitsev, Algebraic Problems of Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, (Nauka, Moscow, 1974), [in Russian], pp. 158–163.
A. Wipf, A. Kirchgerg, D. Lange, “Algebraic solution of the supersymmetric hydrogen”, Bulg. J. Phys. 11, 206–216 (2006); arXiv:0511.1231 [hep-th].
L. de la Peria, A. M. Cetto, A. Valdes-Hernandes, “The zero-point field and the emergence of the quantum”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23(09), 145009 (2014).
Yu. P. Rybakov, “Solitons and quantum mechanics”, Dynam. Compl. Syst. 4, 3–15 (2009);
Yu. P. Rybakov, B. Saha, “Interaction of a charged 3D soliton with a Coulomb center”, Phys. Lett. A. 222, 5–13 (1996); arXiv:9603004 [atom-ph].
J.-P. Vigier, “An electromagnetic theory of strong interactions”, Phys. Lett. A. 319, 246–250 (2003).
N. V. Samsonenko, D. V. Tahti, F. Ndahayo, “On the Barut–Vigier model of the hydrogen atom”, Phys. Lett. A 220, 297–301 (1996).
A. D. Vlasov, “The Shrödinger atom”, Phys. Usp. 36, 94–99 (1993).
L. P. Pitaevskii, “On the problem of the ‘Shrödinger atom’”, Phys. Usp. 36, 760–761 (1993).
L. Diosi, “Gravitation and quantum-mechanical localization of macroobjects”, Phys. Lett. A 105, 199–202 (1984).
R. Penrose, “On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction”, Gen. Relat. Grav. 28, 581-600 (1996).
I. M. Moroz, R. Penrose, K. P. Tod, “Spherically symmetric solutions of the Schrödinger–Newton equations”, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 2733–2742 (1998).
W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation (Oxford University Press, 1936).
A. I. Akhiezer, V. B. Berestetskii, Quantum Electrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].
P. J. Mohr, “Self-energy correction to one-electron energy levels in a strong Coulomb field”, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4421–4424 (1992).
A. O. Barut, Y. I. Salamin, “Relativistic theory of spontaneous emission”, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2284–2296 (1988).
A. O. Barut, J. Kraus, Y. Salamin, N. Ünal, “Relativistic theory of the Lamb shift in self-field quantum electrodynamics”, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7740–7745 (1992).
I. Acikgoz, A. O. Barut, J. Kraus, N. Ünal, “Self-dual quantum electrodynamics without infinities. A new calculation of vacuum polarization”, Phys. Lett. A 198, 126–130 (1995).
G. N. Afanas’ev, V. G. Kartavenko, A. B. Pestov, “Coulomb self-action effect on shift of atomic levels”, Bull. Rus. Acad. Sci. Phys. 58, 738 (1994).
N. Rosen, “A field theory of elementary particles”, Phys. Rev. 55, 94–101 (1939).
M. Wakano, “Intensely localized solutions to the classical Dirac–Maxwell field equations”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 1117–1141 (1966).
V. V. Kassandrov, “Spin and charge of solitons in the model of interacting electromagnetic and spinor fields”, Vest. Ross. Univ. Druzh. Nar. 3 168–174 (1995).
A. P. Kostyuk, I. M. Chepilko, “Spherically symmetric electrostatic solitons of Klein–Gordon and Dirac fields”, Phys. At. Nucl. 56, 233–247 (1993).
C. Seam Bohum, F. I. Cooperstock, “Dirac-Maxwell solitons”, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4291-4300 (1999); arXiv: 0001038 [physics].
V. V. Kassandrov, Discrete Characteristics of Particles in Nonlinear Classical Field Theories, Candidate’s Dissertation (Peoples Friendsh. Univ., Moscow, 1977).
V. V. Kassandrov, “Solitons of classical spinor electrodynamics in the presence of an external field”, in Statistical Physics and Field Theory, Ed. by Ts. I. Gutsunaev (Univ. Druzh. Nar., Moscow, 1990), 48–53.
L. V. Biguaa, V. V. Kassandrov, “Soliton model of the hydrogen atom”, in Proceedings of LV All-Russian Conference on the Problems of Dynamics, Particle Physics, Plasma Physics, and Optoelectronics, Moscow,2018 (Ros. Univ. Druzh. Nar., Moscow, 2018), 17–21.
E. Schrödinger, Selected Papers on Quantum Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].
D. H. Bernstein, E. Giladi, K. R. W. Jones, “Eigenstates of the gravitational Schrödinger equations”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 2327–2336 (1998).
D. Ivanenko, A. Sokolov, Classical Field Theory (New Problems) (GITTL, Moscow, 1949) [in Russian], Ch. 4.
M. Soler, “Classical electrodynamics for a nonlinear spinor field: Perturbative and exact approaches”, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3424–3429 (1973).
A. F. Ranãda, J. M. Uson, “Bound states of a classical charged nonlinear Dirac field in a Coulomb potential”, J. Math. Phys. 22, 2533–2538 (1981).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank A.B. Pestov, Yu.P. Rybakov, and B.N. Frolov for helpful discussions and bibliographic indications.
Funding
The work was supported by the “University program 5‑100” of the Russian Peoples’ Friendship University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by E. Baldina
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biguaa, L.V., Kassandrov, V.V. The Hydrogen Atom: Consideration of the Electron Self-Field. Phys. Part. Nuclei 51, 965–978 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779620050020
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779620050020