Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of ipsilateral translaminar C2 screws insertion for cervical fixation in children with a low laminar profile: a technical note

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The fusion of the upper cervical spine in children is demanding due to its reduced size, its anatomical complexity, or a severe pathology of the cranio-cervical junction. In some pediatric patients with today’s more popular C1–C2 or, occipito-C2 techniques, it is impossible, or very risky to perform a short upper cervical fixation.

Methods

We present the utility and good results of ipsilateral laminar C2 screws insertion technique in two pediatric cases with low C2 laminar profile. Case 1: a 5-year-old child with a C1–C2 unstable subluxation, and a condylar assimilation of C1, where we performed an occipito-C2 fixation using an occipital plate and this modified translaminar C2 screw technique. Case 2: a 8-year-old Down syndrome boy who suffered an unstable subluxation of C1–C2 upon whom we performed a C1–C2 screw fixation using the same technique.

Results

Both cases have been followed up over a period of 7 and 2 years respectively, with good clinical results.

Conclusions

We describe the technique and the feasibility of the ipsilateral insertion of translaminar C2 screws in children with low laminar profiles, as a good alternative to other techniques when the anatomy of the C2 does not permit its use or make them very risky.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ahmed R, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH (2008) Fusions at the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1209–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hedequist D (2015) Modern instrumentation of the pediatric occiput and upper cervical spine: Review Article. HSS J 11(1):9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao L, Xu R, Ma W, Liu G (2014) Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws versus spinous process screws in C2 vertebra A cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop 48(6):550–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Du JY, Aichmair A, Kueper J, Wright T, Lebl DR (2014) Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 22(2):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright NM (2004) Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral , crossing C2 case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson RCE, Ragel BT, Mocco J, Bohman LE, Brockmeyer DL (2007) Selection of a rigid internal fixation construct for stabilization at the craniovertebral junction in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 107(1 SUPPL):36–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhee W-T, You S-H, Jang Y-G, Lee S-Y (2008) Modified trajectory of C2 laminar screw - double bicortical purchase of the inferiorly crossing screw. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43(2):119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dou NN, Lehrman JN, Newcomb AGUS, Kelly BP (2018) A novel C2 screw trajectory: preliminary anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. World Neurosurg 113:e93–e100. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedequist D, Proctor M (2009) Screw fixation to C2 in children. J Pediatr Orthop 29(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jea A, Sheth RN, Vanni S, Green BA, Levi AD (2008) Modification of Wright’s technique for placement of bilateral crossing C2 translaminar screws: technical note. Spine J 8(4):656–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang BW, Glotzbecker MP, Troy M, Proctor MR, Hresko MT, Hedequist DJ (2018) C2 translaminar screw fixation in children. J Pediatr Orthop 38(6):e312–e317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hedequist DJ, Emans JB (2016) Cervical spine instrumentation in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(6):370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brain GC, Program PN (2014) Fixation with C-2 laminar screws in occipitocervical or C1–2 constructs in children 5 years of age or younger: a series of 18 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14(July):87–93.

  14. Sciubba DM, Noggle JC, Vellimana AK, Conway JE, Kretzer RM, Long DM, Garonzik IM (2008) Laminar screw fixation of the axis. J Neurosurg Spine 8(4):327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chern JJ, Chamoun RB, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A (2009) Computed tomography morphometric analysis for axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3(2):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertolizio G, Saint-Martin C, Ingelmo P (2018) Cervical instability in patients with Trisomy 21: the eternal gamble. Paediatr Anaesth 28(10):830–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geck MJ, Truumees E, Hawthorne D, Singh D, Stokes JK, Flynn A (2014) Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(3):E110–E117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia DD, Lin SL, Chen W, Shen ZH, Li Y, Wang XY, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2014) Computed tomography morphometric analysis of C2 translaminar screwfixation of Wright’s technique and a modified technique in the pediatric cervical spine. Eur Spine J 23(3):606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful you all the staff of the library of the University Hospital Miguel Servet, and to David Andrew Brierley for his help with the revision of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JO and LBL conceived the study and develop it in discussion with JMH, JCP, DFM, and BCS. JO, JCP, and BCS collected the data. JO designed the study. JO drafted the manuscript which was reviewed by all the authors. JO drew the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Orduna Martínez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Previous Presentations

One of the cases was presented as a Poster in the EANS (European Association of Neurological Societies) meeting 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orduna Martínez, J., López López, L.B., Moles Herbera, J.A. et al. Usefulness of ipsilateral translaminar C2 screws insertion for cervical fixation in children with a low laminar profile: a technical note. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 291–294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04899-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04899-7

Keywords

Navigation