A prognosis is made of the radiation impact of planned atmospheric emissions and liquid discharges from NPP with VVER-1200 on native ecosystems. The ERICA assessment tool was used to assess the dose loads for ICRP-recommended representative organisms. The expected irradiation dose from NPP for representatives of the biota is compared with the dose from the existing irradiation, evaluated on the basis of radioecological inspection in the locale of power plants in Kaliningrad region. The dose loads on the biota are expected to be below the threshold levels of irradiation. Planned emissions and discharges from the NPP will not have an appreciable impact on the native ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Saf. Standards Ser. No. GSR, Pt. 3, IAEA, Vienna (2014).
Environmental Protection – the Concept and Use for Reference Animals and Plants, ICRP Publication 108, Ann. ICRP, 38, No. 4–6 (2008).
Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations, New York (2000).
N. Beresford, C. Barnett, D. Jones, et al., “Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales,” J. Environ. Radioact., 99, 1430–1439 (2008).
A. Hosseini, N. Beresford, J. Brown, et al., “Background dose-rates to reference animals and plants arising from exposure to naturally occurring radionuclides in aquatic environments,” J. Radiol. Protect., 30, 235–264 (2010).
International Peer Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Performed for the Licence Application of the Baltic-1 Nuclear Power Plant, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation, IAEA, Vienna (2017).
J. Brown, B. Alfonso, R. Avila, et al., “The ERICA tool,” J. Environ. Radioact., 99, 1371–1383 (2008).
C. Larsson, “An overview of the ERICA integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants,” J. Environ. Radioact., 99, No. 9, 1364–1370 (2008).
Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment, Saf. Rep. Ser. No. 19, IAEA, Vienna (2001).
J. Vives i Batlle, S. Jones, and D. Copplestone, “A method for estimating 41Ar, 85,88Kr and 131m, 133Xe doses to non-human biota,” J. Environ. Radioact., 144, 152–161 (2015).
Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer to Wildlife, Techn. Rep. Ser. No. 479, IAEA, Vienna (2014).
Environmental Protection: Transfer Parameters for Reference Animals and Plants, ICRP Publication 114, Ann. of the ICRP, 39, No. 6 (2009).
Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations, New York (2011).
D. Copplestone, N. Beresford, J. Brown, and T. Yankovich, “An international database of radionuclide concentration ratios for wildlife: development and uses,” J. Environ. Radioact., 126, 288–298 (2013).
Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments, Techn. Rep. Ser. No. 472, IAEA, Vienna (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 232–238, April, 2020.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nushtaeva, V.E., Spiridonov, S.I., Mikailova, R.A. et al. Radiation Dose Assessment for Representative Biota Organisms in the Locale of NPP with VVER-1200. At Energy 128, 251–258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-020-00684-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-020-00684-6