Elsevier

Engineering Geology

Volume 278, 5 December 2020, 105830
Engineering Geology

An overview on the compaction characteristics of soils by laboratory tests

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105830Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Several data have been considered regarding the compaction properties of soils.

  • Correlations exist between maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum water content.

  • Correlations exist between optimum water content (OWC) and plastic limit (PL).

Abstract

Soil compaction involves a densification and a relative variation of physical and mechanical characteristics of soils. Evaluating laboratory compaction parameters such as maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum water content (OWC) is a very important task to control field compaction for all earth-works structures. In this note over 400 publications and newly laboratory tests have been reviewed to give an overview regarding the correlations among maximum dry density, optimum water content, plastic limit, optimum degree of saturation and degree of compaction. The review confirms that viable correlations exist among maximum dry density versus optimum water content, maximum dry density against plastic limit and between optimum water content plotted against plastic limit. The correlation between optimum degree of saturation and optimum water content shows that OWC is lower for soils with larger maximum dry density. Besides with optimum water content less than 40% the relationship between optimum degree of saturation and OWC depends very much on soil type and particle size. This research comprises of a large number of soil types, various compaction energy level and methods and operators over the world.

Introduction

During the construction of road embankments, railway subgrade, earth-dams, or compacted clay liners for waste disposals, it is necessary to compact the fill material, to reduce the intergranular voids so as to reach a high density (Raviolo, 1993; Shimobe and Spagnoli, 2020). In this way, the compressibility (i.e. settlement) of the soil decreases, the shear strength increases, the permeability and the tendency to absorb water are reduced. The compaction of soils is not a fundamental property of the soils, though (Carter and Bentley, 1991). As a matter of facts, it is influenced by mineralogy, gradation, classification, water content, and mechanical variables as type as well as degree of compaction (Korfiatis and Manikopoulos, 1982). The construction of structures on fine-grained soils is considered as one of the challenging tasks in geotechnical engineering, as structures have to be built on good soils in order to be safe (Prasanna et al., 2017) and for waste disposal compacted clay liners had to provide low permeability and relatively high undrained shear strength (Rubinos et al., 2015). Besides, optimum water content (OWC), wopt, and maximum dry density (MDD), ρdmax, are necessary prior to the field compaction. These two parameters are very important, because they help to determine the maximum dry density, i.e. where soils have a larger bearing capacity due to the maximum soil densification, throughout the optimum water content. The optimum water content of soil is the water content at which a maximum dry density can be achieved after a given compaction effort. It is in fact minimum amount of water required to form a film of water on the surfaces of the soil particles, which is just sufficient to support sliding movement of the soil particles. Compressing a soil to its greatest theoretical density means discharging all the gases from within the soil through the voids (Ren et al., 2015). In general, the hydraulic conductivity under a specified compactive effort takes its minimum value at the wet side of wopt (e.g. Mitchell et al., 1965; Kimura and Kusakabe, 1993), although Colombo and Colleselli (1996) report the permeability to be at lowest at wopt.

Several correlations were performed in the past among optimum water content, maximum dry density and Atterberg limits. Wesley (2003) and Ramesh et al. (2010) showed, for instance, that Atterberg limits and laboratory compaction have been found to be reliable in order to characterize and explain the behavior of fine-grained soils for engineering applications, because both test methodologies depend on the same factors such as type and proportion of clay mineral, shape and grain size distribution (e.g. Carter and Bentley, 1991; Mitchell and Soga, 2005). Atterberg (or consistency) limits, have considerable effects on the compaction characteristics (e.g. Zhang and Frederick, 2017). Several studies were performed in order to relate the Atterberg limits and compaction parameters for fine-grained soils, particularly natural soils (e.g. Jumikis, 1946; Davidson and Gardiner, 1949; Joslin, 1959; Morin and Todor, 1977; Blotz et al., 1998; Sivrikaya et al., 2008; Di Matteo et al., 2009; Terzaghi and Peck, 2010). For instance, Gurtug and Sridharan (2002) proposed correlations based on plastic limit (PL) to determine optimum water content and maximum dry density at varying compaction energy, showing that ρdmax was 0.98 times the dry density at PL and wopt was 0.92 times PL. Sridharan and Nagaraj (2005) predicted that PL shows better correlation with compaction parameters than liquid limit, LL, and plasticity index, PI, whereas Noor et al. (2011) suggested correlations for predicting compaction parameters from specific gravity, Gs, PI and LL for 106 fine-grained soils from India. Farooq et al. (2016) proposed predictive curves for quick estimation of maximum dry density and optimum water content based on LL, PI and compaction energy without performing laboratory compaction tests. Recently Tatsuoka (2015) and Tatsuoka and Gomes Correia (2018) also considered the compaction characteristics taking into account matric suction and physical properties of compacted soils controlled by the degree of saturation. They analyzed a large amount of results from laboratory and field compaction tests, CBR tests and laboratory stress-strain (shear strength, cyclic strength and elastic shear modulus) and permeability tests of compacted soils and found out the importance of controlling the degree of saturation in soil compaction connected to soil structure design such as backfill and fill dam. In addition, they proposed the soil structure compaction control based on dry density and degree of saturation measured at compaction.

The main driver for the scientific interest in correlating the compaction characteristics with Atterberg limits, is due to the fact that laboratory determination of compaction parameters requires considerable time which can be saved through the use of empirical correlations during early stages of a project (e.g. Gurtug and Sridharan, 2002; Farooq et al., 2016; Prasanna et al., 2017; Khalid and ur Rehman, 2018).

Besides, several correlations exist between maximum dry density and optimum water content of soil (e.g. Mori, 1962; Ekwue and Stone, 1997; Sivrikaya et al., 2008; Shimobe, 2012). Mori (1962) obtained the following relation considering 380 different soils (from clays to sandy soils including gravels less than 4.76 mm particle size).ρdmax=10.0107wopt+0.400

which corresponds to the typical relational expressions among various conventional proposed equations. Blotz et al. (1998) studied the relationship between compaction effort and maximum dry density describing a method combining LL. Sivrikaya et al. (2008) proposed the relation of maximum dry unit weight, γdmax, to wopt for 156 fine-grained soils:γdmax=23.45e0.018woptinkN/m3where γdmax is the maximum dry unit weight and can be converted to ρdmax (=γdmax/9.81). From the engineering point of view, the correlation between the degree of saturation, Sr, in the optimum compaction state, referred as Sopt and the optimum compaction state (wopt, ρdmax) is interesting, whereby optimum degree of saturation of soil is generally said to be 85%≦Sopt≦95%, 10%≦air porosity, na≦20% (Inaba et al., 1976; Oka et al., 2015).

In this paper data from several sources in literature and novel test results provided by the authors, are discussed considering the relation between wopt, ρdmax, PL and the optimum degree of saturation, referred as Sopt, in order to provide a general overview regarding the relationships occurring between maximum dry density, optimum water content and plastic limits of different soils.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Over 400 research publications have been evaluated and analyzed by the authors considering more than 1000 different types of soil from around the world. In order to select the most appropriate publications, search engines such as Google Scholar, Scopus, complemented with Springer Link, Taylor & Francis Online and Research Gate platforms were used. The search comprised both indexed Journal and conference papers. Reports, special technical publications, symposium papers, academic lectures and

Correlation between maximum dry density and optimum water content

The aim of laboratory soil compaction test is to determine a compaction curve (dry density, ρd-water content, w relation), MDD and OWC of the target soil under a specific condition. The establishment (in advance) of a relationship between MDD and OWC of various soils is very effective for the practical use in earthwork construction, for instance, considering the soil type and compaction effort are desirable. As an typical example, the Ohio's compaction curves (Joslin, 1959; see Fig. 2)

Conclusions

This review considered over 400 publications and recent laboratory tests to give an overview about the correlations existing among maximum dry density, optimum water content, plastic limit, optimum degree of saturation and degree of compaction. A very clear correlation exists between the maximum dry density and optimum water content also considering other compaction tests at different compaction levels rather than the standard Proctor only, with the general trend of ρdmax=1woptSoptρw+1ρs=1Awopt+

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (116)

  • K.V. Bicalho et al.

    Single-function approach to calibrating Whatman no. 42 filter paper based on suction versus water content relationships

    Geotech. Test. J.

    (2015)
  • L.R. Blotz et al.

    Estimating optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight for Compacted Clays

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron.

    (1998)
  • L.S. Bryson et al.

    Determination of selected geotechnical properties of soil using electrical conductivity testing

    Geotech. Test. J.

    (2009)
  • M. Carter et al.

    Correlation of Soil Properties

    (1991)
  • J. Chacko et al.

    Study on strength characteristics of Kuttanad clay based on its water content and consistency limits

    Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol.

    (2018)
  • P. Colombo et al.

    Elementi di Geotecnica

    (1996)
  • D.T. Davidson et al.

    Calculation of standard proctor density and optimum moisture content from mechanical, analysis, shrink-age and factors and plasticity index

  • L. Di Matteo et al.

    Best-fit models to estimate modified proctor properties of compacted soil

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron.

    (2009)
  • L. Di Matteo et al.

    Effects of fall-cone test on classification of soils: some considerations from study of two engineering earthworks in Central Italy

    Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.

    (2016)
  • V.P. Drnevich et al.

    Real-time determination of soil type, water content, and density using electromagnetics

  • E.I. Ekwue et al.

    Density-moisture relations of some Trinidadian soils incorporated with sewage sludge

    Trans. ASAE

    (1997)
  • A. Ezaoui et al.

    Effects of compaction and cement content on the strength and yielding characteristics of cement-mixed granular soil

  • K. Farooq et al.

    Prediction of compaction characteristics of fine-grained soils using consistency limits

    Arab. J. Sci. Eng.

    (2016)
  • C.A. Farulla et al.

    Shear strength of a compacted scaly clay from suction-controlled triaxial tests

  • M. Fukuoka et al.

    New editing soil engineering

    (1984)
  • J.T. Germaine et al.

    Geotechnical Laboratory Measurements for Engineers

    (2009)
  • T.S. Göksan

    An approach for determining the suction properties of soils

  • Y. Gurtug et al.

    Prediction of compaction characteristics of fine grained soil

    Géotechnique

    (2002)
  • Y. Gurtug et al.

    Prediction of compaction behaviour of soils at different energy levels

    Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev.

    (2015)
  • Y. Gurtug et al.

    Simplified method to predict compaction curves and characteristics of soils

    Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civil Eng.

    (2018)
  • N. Hatakeyama

    The Newest Soil Mechanics

    (1992)
  • T. Hatsumi

    Kanto loam: Construction examples especially on earthwork - an example of Narita airport. Special issue: local soils in Japan - from basic properties to design and construction

  • K.H. Head

    Manual of soil laboratory testing

  • A.G. Heydinger et al.

    Analysis of variations of pavement subgrade soil water content

  • R.D. Holtz et al.

    An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering

    (1981)
  • T. Hori

    Damage of small earth dams for irrigation induced by heavy rainfall

  • S. Horpibulsuk

    Strength and microstructure of cement stabilized clay

    (2012)
  • S. Horpibulsuk et al.

    Modified Ohio’s curves: a rapid estimation of compaction curves for coarse-and fine-grained soils

    Geotech. Test. J.

    (2009)
  • T. Inaba et al.

    Compaction characteristics and its relationship with physical properties of impervious materials for fill dam

  • I. Ishibashi et al.

    Soil Mechanics Fundamentals

    (2011)
  • H. Ishida

    Iwate loam: basic properties and stabilization method. Special issue: local soils in Japan - from basic properties to design and construction

  • Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)

    Soil compaction

  • Japanese Standards Association

    JIS A 1202:2009 Test Method for Density of Soil Particles

    (2009)
  • Japanese Standards Association

    JIS A 1203:2009 Test Method for Water Content of Soils

    (2009)
  • Japanese Standards Association

    JIS A 1204:2009 Test Method for Particle Size Distribution of Soils

    (2009)
  • Japanese Standards Association

    JIS A 1205:2009 Test Method for Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Soils

    (2009)
  • Japanese Standards Association

    JIS A 1210:2009 Test Method for Soil Compaction Using a Rammer

    (2009)
  • J.C. Joslin

    Ohio’s typical water-density curves

  • JSSMFE

    Manual of Soil Testing: 2nd Revised Edition

    (1991)
  • A.R. Jumikis

    Geology and soils of the Newark (NJ) metropolitan area

    J. Soil Mech. Found. Div.

    (1946)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Vibratory compaction response based on the contact model of roller-subgrade system

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Common subgrade materials include soil subgrade, soil-stone mixed subgrade, and asphalt subgrade. The variety of materials determines the modeling approach and the inherent properties of the materials such as modulus of elasticity, maximum dry density, moisture content, and inherent frequency [11,12]. By establishing the structure of elastic and viscoelastic asphalt layers, Mejłun et al. [13] compared the deformation and strain of Burgers and Huet-Sayegh viscoelastic models and Hooke elastic model under high temperature conditions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text