Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Safety diagnosis of TBM for tunnel excavation and its effect on engineering

  • S.I. : ATCI 2020
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the development of tunnel construction technology, different tunnel excavation technologies have also been derived for different conditions. The safety diagnosis before the TBM mining method is particularly important. With the technology of safety diagnosis, the excavation process has the following effects on the tunnel engineering work. Great guarantee. The purpose of this paper is to study the excavation process of tunnel machinery for safety diagnosis before mining by TBM. It mainly includes step excavation method, full-section excavation method, guide pit excavation method and other technologies. This article uses a city subway construction project as an example to discuss in-depth the study of tunnel machinery excavation technology before the safety diagnosis of the mining method. The specific project is a city subway line with a total length of about 25.464 km and a total of 22 stations, including 9 transfer station. Based on field engineering experiments, the problems encountered in tunnel mechanical excavation are studied. The experimental data show that the results obtained through engineering tests can guarantee the safe and stable construction of the tunnel project, and the safety rate can reach 90%. The experimental results show that the obtained results can ensure the safety of tunnel mechanical excavation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li F, Xiao M, Zhang J et al (2017) Health risk assessment on tunnel workers’ exposure to PM10 based on triangular fuzzy numbers. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1820, no 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 040011

  2. Sturk R, Olsson L, Johansson J (2015) Risk and decision analysis for large projects as applied to the Stockholm ring road tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space 11(2):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heinz D (2016) Challenges to tunneling engineers. Tunn Undergr 11(1):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kampmann J, Eskesen SD (2016) Summers risk assessment helps select the contractor for the Copenhagen Metro System. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 98 on Tunnels and Metropolises, no 1, pp 123–128

  5. Greblicki W, Pawlak M (2017) Hammerstein system identification with the nearest neighbor algorithm. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 63(8):4746–4757

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Poudel J, Wang L, Anastasio M (2019) Iterative image reconstruction algorithm for transcranial photoacoustic tomography applications. J Acoust Soc Am 145(3):1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arahal MR, Martin C, Barrero F (2019) Assessing variable sampling time controllers for five-phase induction motor drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electron PP(99):1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman CB (2015) Design engineering a need to rethink the solution using knowledge based engineering. Knowl-Based Syst 12(6):257–267

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vike EA (2016) Experiences from environmental risk management of chemical grouting agents used during construction of the Romeriksporten tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(4):369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida Y (2020) Portfolio optimization in fuzzy asset management with coherent risk measures derived from risk averse utility. Neural Comput Appl 32:10847–10857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aneziris ON, Papazoglou IA, Kallianiotis D (2015) Occupational risk of tunneling construction. Saf Sci 48(8):964–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beard AN (2015) Tunnel safetyrisk assessment and decision-making. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(1):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nyvlt O, Privaral S (2015) Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(1):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Das S, Choudhury S (2020) Evaluation of effective stiffness of RC column sections by support vector regression approach. Neural Comput Appl 32:6997–7007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuevas E, Díaz P, Avalos O (2017) Nonlinear system identification based on ANFIS-Hammerstein model using Gravitational search algorithm. Appl Intell 48(11):182–203

    Google Scholar 

  16. Du J, Zhang L, Chen J et al (2019) Multi-model predictive control of Hammerstein-Wiener systems based on balanced multi-model partition. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 25(4):333–353

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Eyoh I, John R, Maere GD (2018) Hybrid learning for interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy logic systems as applied to identification and prediction problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst PP(99):1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guruswamy A, Blum R (2016) Ambiguity optimization for frequency-hopping waveforms in MIMO radars with arbitrary antenna separations. IEEE Signal Process Lett 23(9):1231–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deligiannis A, Panoui A, Lambotharan S (2017) Game-theoretic power allocation and the Nash equilibrium analysis for a multistatic MIMO radar network. IEEE Trans Signal Process PP(99):1

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan J, Liu H, Pu W (2016) Joint beam selection and power allocation for multiple target tracking in netted colocated MIMO radar system. IEEE Trans Signal Process PP(99):1

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Avila FR, Duarte LT, Biscainho LWP (2017) On the sparsity-based identification and compensation of Hammerstein systems. IEEE Signal Process Lett PP(99):1

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khachatryan KA, Terdzhyan TÉ, Sardanyan TG (2017) On the solvability of one system of nonlinear Hammerstein-type integral equations on the semiaxis. Ukr Math J 69(3):1287–1305

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo J, Liu H (2017) Hammerstein system identification with quantised inputs and quantised output observations. IET Control Theory Appl 11(4):593–599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu C, Li Q (2018) Disparity refinement iterative algorithm based on gradient domain guided image filtering. Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/J Tianjin Univ Sci Technol 51(6):638–644

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has been supported by National Natural Science of China (Grant No. 41572358).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan, China

    Meng Wei, Yu Song, Xiaoyu Wang & Jialuo Peng

Authors
  1. Meng Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jialuo Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meng Wei or Yu Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There no potential competing interests in our paper. And all authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. We confirm that the content of the manuscript has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, M., Song, Y., Wang, X. et al. Safety diagnosis of TBM for tunnel excavation and its effect on engineering. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 997–1005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05371-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05371-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation