Elsevier

Annals of Physics

Volume 422, November 2020, 168310
Annals of Physics

Dual fermion method as a prototype of generic reference-system approach for correlated fermions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168310Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dual fermion theory is accurately derived from a weak-coupling diagrammatic expansion.

  • Generalization for an arbitrary reference system is straightforward.

  • Dual denominator in the self-energy is essential for any approximation of the theory.

  • Simple reference system of an isolated 2x2 cluster provides promising results.

Abstract

We present a purely diagrammatic derivation of the dual fermion scheme (Rubtsov et al., 2008). The derivation makes particularly clear that a similar scheme can be developed for an arbitrary reference system provided it has the same interaction term as the original system. Thereby no restrictions are imposed by the locality of the reference problem or by the nature of the original problem as a lattice one. We present new arguments in favour of keeping the dual denominator in the expression for the lattice self-energy independently of the truncation of the dual interaction. As an example we present the computational results for the half-filled 2D Hubbard model with the choice of a 2 × 2 plaquette with periodic boundary conditions as a reference system. We observe that obtained results are in a good agreement with numerically exact lattice quantum Monte Carlo data.

Introduction

The dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) [1] has opened new ways in theory of correlated electron systems, in particular, due to its implementation into electronic structure calculations and the related progress in description and understanding the properties of real materials [2], [3], [4]. It originates from the consideration of a rather artificial limit of infinite dimensionality [5] and strictly speaking is exact only in this limit. Viewing the DMFT approximation in terms of the Luttinger–Ward functional [4] sheds light on the question why it works surprisingly well for real systems that are three- or sometimes even two-dimensional. The dual fermion (DF) approach [6] gave a different view on the DMFT. In this approach a change of variables in the path integral over fermionic degrees of freedom is suggested (which can be considered as a functional analog of Fourier transformation) such that in the new variables DMFT Green’s function is just the bare Green’s function, and a regular diagrammatic expansion starting from this new zeroth-order approximation is possible. Specific applications of DF as well as other diagrammatic approaches beyond DMFT are reviewed in Ref. [7]. Here we rederive DF theory by a completely different approach, using topological analysis of Feynman diagrams instead of explicit manipulations with the functional integrals. The advantage of this view is that it allowed for new insights and possible nontrivial generalizations. We consider DF as a particular case of the reference system ideology where one relates the initial system described by the Hamiltonian H to some auxiliary system, easier to treat, described by the Hamiltonian H as was initially proposed in Peierls–Feynman–Bogoliubov variational principle [8], [9], [10] (for recent applications of this method to correlated fermions see [11], [12]). The problem with variational approaches is that generally speaking there is no regular way to improve them systematically. Instead, we develop here a diagrammatic approach to the reference system, with two types of Green’s functions, related to the system with the Hamiltonian H and to the system with the Hamiltonian H. We show that DF can be considered as a particular case of this approach when H corresponds to the effective impurity i.e. a lattice site plus a bath [1]. We consider here a generalization of this approach. As a simple numerical test we use the Hubbard model on the square lattice as an example, with a plaquette playing the role of the reference system [13]. The results look promising. The approach developed here can have more applications, for example, it may potentially help to solve the famous sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations [14], by mapping of the system with sign problem (e.g., tt Hubbard model on a bipartite lattice with finite doping) onto the model without sign problem (e.g., the same problem with t and doping being equal to zero).

The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we give a brief review of the DF formalism and outline some concepts used further. In Section 3 we give a detailed derivation of the generalized DF from the diagrammatic point view. Section 4 is devoted to a discussion of the truncation of the DF scheme. In Section 5 we show numerical results for a simple test problem and compare it with diagrammatic-QMC results [15]. Finally in Section 6 we give conclusions and a brief outlook.

Section snippets

Dual fermions

The dual fermion technique [6] was primarily developed as a tool to go beyond the well-established DMFT approximation [1]. It allows to systematically calculate non-local corrections to the (by definition) local self-energy of DMFT. The approach was derived using a Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation of the non-local part of the action. It is done by separating the action of the Hubbard model S=k,ν,σckνσiν+μεkckνσ+Uinini,into the impurity part Simp and the remainder Srem: Simp=i,ν,σci

Diagrammatic derivation of the dual technique

Up to now we have shown that the correction to the impurity self-energy that gives the full self-energy is nothing else than the g-irreducible part of the dual self-energy. This has been shown using the exact relation between the above-mentioned quantities and by diagrammatic interpretation of this relation. In the following we will examine the diagrams that contribute to Σ and gain a diagrammatic insight of why those diagrams indeed sum up to the g-irreducible part of the dual self-energy.

At

Truncation of the dual fermion scheme

The proposed scheme in its complete form is clearly unsuitable for practical applications. As mentioned above, going beyond the γ(4) vertex in the dual interaction is computationally extremely difficult, not to mention considering the whole infinite row of interaction vertices. So for any practical implementations of the scheme a truncation is necessary. Strictly speaking any truncation would destroy the consistency of the theory in the sense that one will no longer be able to identify the

General reference system: Plaquette example

As mentioned earlier the dual fermion technique has the reputation of “beyond DMFT” extension. We wish to once again draw the reader’s attention to the fact that becomes particularly clear due to the diagrammatic derivation above, that the reference system for its construction is in no way restricted to the Anderson impurity model.

For a simple numerical example we choose a 2 × 2 plaquette as a reference system (13) to describe the half-filled two-dimension Hubbard model (1). We choose

Conclusions and outlook

We have provided a diagrammatic derivation of the dual fermion formalism starting from the conventional weak-coupling diagrammatics. The derivation is based on the skeleton diagram approach and basically consists of splitting the fermionic lines of the original system into the “impurity” line and the residual line. Upon this the contributions are regrouped to single out n-particle vertices of the impurity problems as the elements of the dual technique. Finally it is shown that the obtained

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Andrei Katanin for useful comments. S.B and A.I.L acknowledge support by the Cluster of Excellence ‘Advanced Imaging of Matter’ of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - EXC 2056 - project ID 390715994. The work of M.I.K. and A.I.L. is supported by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Synergy Grant No. 854843, project “FASTCOR”).

References (39)

  • DupuisN.

    Nuclear Phys. B

    (2001)
  • GeorgesA. et al.

    Rev. Modern Phys.

    (1996)
  • AnisimovV.I. et al.

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matter

    (1997)
  • LichtensteinA.I. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1998)
  • KotliarG. et al.

    Rev. Modern Phys.

    (2006)
  • MetznerW. et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1989)
  • RubtsovA.N. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2008)
  • RohringerG. et al.

    Rev. Modern Phys.

    (2018)
  • PeierlsR.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1938)
  • FeynmanR.P.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1955)
  • BogolyubovN.N.
  • SchülerM. et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • van LoonE.G.C.P. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2016)
  • LichtensteinA.I. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2000)
  • LohE.Y. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1990)
  • GukelbergerJ. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2017)
  • AbrikosovA.A. et al.

    Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics

    (1975)
  • HafermannH. et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2009)
  • RibicT. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2017)
  • 1

    All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

    View full text