Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting smartphone online activity use in South Korea: with a focus on the moderating effect of disability status

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse whether motivation, Internet attitudes, Internet skills, social support resources, and disability status impact users’ online engagement levels by examining the Internet activity of smartphone users based on certain variables and disability status. The study also reports on the effects of these independent variables according to disability status. Secondary data from the 2017 Digital Divide survey conducted by the National Information Society Agency in Korea were used for the analysis. The sample included 1649 persons with disabilities and 5798 persons without disabilities. We found that higher levels of motivation, positive Internet attitudes, and better Internet skills increased the online engagement of smartphone users regardless of the presence or absence of their disabilities. In terms of interaction effects, persons with disabilities (PWD) who had positive Internet attitudes as well as access to better social support resources were more likely to engage in online activities than persons without disabilities. These results support the importance of policies, ensuring that high-quality smartphones and user support are available to PWD. Moreover, web developers should adhere to universal design to maximise the proliferation of information to everyone. This study also underscores the necessity of tailored technical training for PWD with the hope of fostering positive Internet attitudes by improving access to Internet-ready devices and by increasing the Internet’s perceived enjoyment value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

2017 Digital Divide survey.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Adam, A., Kreps, D.: Disability and discourses of web accessibility. Inf. Commun. Soc. 12(7), 1041–1058 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., Reno, R.R.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amado, A.N., Stancliffe, R.J., McCarron, M., McCallion, P.: Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 51, 360–375 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, C.: Attitudes and Language. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, PA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, J., De Zuniga, H.G., Rojas, H., Shah, D.V.: Beyond access: the digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT Soc. 1(4), 46–72 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cisco: Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update. Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_in/innovation/enterprise/assets/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.pdf (2016). Accessed 3 July 2019

  7. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., Shafer, S.: From unequal access to differentiated use: a literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Soc. Inequal. 1, 355–400 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: The disability divide in internet access and use. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(3), 313–334 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: The unrealized potential: exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics 9(3), 18–28 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duplaga, M.: Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0179825 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Durndell, A., Haag, Z.: Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Comput. Hum. Behav. 18(5), 521–535 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eastin, M.S., LaRose, R.: Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 6(1), 611 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on National Informatization. Article 45: Fact-Finding Surveys (2018)

  15. Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on National Informatization. Article 46: Development and Distribution of Indices (2018)

  16. Framework Act on National Informatization. Article 48: Annual Reports (2018)

  17. Framework Act on National Informatization. Article 49: Surveys on Indices (2018)

  18. Goggin, G.: Disability and digital inequalities: rethinking digital divides with disability theory. In: Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.W. (eds.) Theorizing Digital Divides, pp. 69–80. Routledge, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hargittai, E.: Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people’s online skills. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0109068 (2001)

  20. Hargittai, E., Hinnant, A.: Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Commun. Res. 35(5), 602–621 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hargittai, E.: Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the ‘Net Generation’. Sociol. Inq. 80(1), 92–113 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helsper, E.J., van Deursen, A.J.A.M.: Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(5), 700–714 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong, K.S., Ridzuan, A.A., Kuek, M.K.: Students’ attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning: a study at a university in Malaysia. Educ. Technol. Soc. 6(2), 45–49 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kang, Y.S., Lee, H.: Understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: an extended perspective of user satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(3), 353–364 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Katz, J.E., Rice, R.E.: Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction. MIT press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, K., Kim, D., Shin, Y., Yoo, D.: Social exclusion of people with disabilities in Korea. Soc. Indic. Res. 129(2), 761–773 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, K., Shin, Y., Yu, D., Kim, D.: The meaning of social inclusion for people with disabilities in South Korea. Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ. 64(1), 19–32 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, K., Lee, B.: Risk factors associated with domestic abuse directed at adults with disabilities in South Korea. Disabil. Health J. 9(3), 491–497 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, K.M., Hwang, J.H.: Exploring gaps in the online economic inclusion of persons with disabilities in Korea. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22(4), 570–581 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K., Chen, Z.: Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf. Manag. 42(8), 1095–1104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Litt, E.: Measuring users’ internet skills: a review of past assessment and a look toward the future. New Media Soc. 15(4), 612–630 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Livingstone, S., Helsper, E.: Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media Soc. 9(4), 671–696 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. MacDonald, S.J., Clayton, J.: Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disabil. Soc. 28(5), 702–718 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morse, B.J., Gullekson, N.L., Morris, S.A., Popovich, P.M.: The development of a general Internet attitudes scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 480–489 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. National Information Society Agency: The Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Seoul, Korea (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Papacharissi, Z., Rubin, A.M.: Predictors of Internet use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 44(2), 175–196 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson, J.P., DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E.: New social survey perspectives on the digital divide. It Soc. 1(5), 1–22 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scholz, F., Yalcin, B., Priestley, M.: Internet access for disabled people: understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 11(1), 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shibchurn, J., Yan, X.: Information disclosure on social networking sites: an intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 44, 103–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsai, C.C., Lin, S.S., Tsai, M.J.: Developing an Internet attitude scale for high school students. Comput. Educ. 37(1), 41–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tsetsi, E., Rains, S.A.: Smartphone Internet access and use: extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mob. Media Commun. 5(3), 239–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917708329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Dev. Psychol. 43(2), 267 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  50. van Deursen, A.J., van Dijk, J.A.: Using the Internet: skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interact. Comput. 21(5–6), 393–402 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. van Deursen, A.J., van Dijk, J.A., Peters, O.: Rethinking Internet skills: the contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics 39(2), 125–144 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  52. van Deursen, A.J., van Dijk, J.A.: The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media Soc. 16(3), 507–526 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  53. van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Toward a multifaceted model of Internet access for understanding digital divides: an empirical investigation. Inf. Soc. 31(5), 379–391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. van Deursen, A.J., van Dijk, J.A.: The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 21(2), 354–375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. van Dijk, J.A.: The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage Publications, Ne York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vicente, M.R., Lopez, A.J.: A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: some evidence for Internet use. Inf. Soc. 26, 48–64 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zafeiridi, P., Paulson, K., Dunn, R., et al.: A web-based platform for people with memory problems and their caregivers (CAREGIVERSPRO-MMD): mixed-methods evaluation of usability. JMIR Formative Res. 2(1), e4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/formative.9083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zickuhr, K., Madden, M.: Older adults and internet use. Pew Internet & American Life Project 6, 1–23.XX (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zillien, N., Hargittai, E.: Digital distinction: Status specific types of internet usage. Soc. Sci. Q. 90(2), 274–291 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Welfare, Soongsil University, Sangdo-Ro 369, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06978, Korea

    Kyung Mee Kim

  2. The Social Policy Center for Persons with Disability Department, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA), Building D, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong City, 30147, Korea

    Ju Hee Hwang

Authors
  1. Kyung Mee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ju Hee Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ju Hee Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K.M., Hwang, J.H. Factors affecting smartphone online activity use in South Korea: with a focus on the moderating effect of disability status. Univ Access Inf Soc 21, 109–119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00758-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00758-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation