Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis and decision based on specialist self-assessment for prognosis factors of acute leukemia integrating data-driven Bayesian network and fuzzy cognitive map

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to analyze the prognostic factors of acute leukemia and to construct a decision model based on a causal relationship between the factors of this disease to assist medical specialists. In medical decisions, to reach effective, quick, and reliable results, there is a need for a simple decision-making model based on a specialist’s self-assessment. It may help the medical team before final diagnosis by costly and time-consuming procedures such as bone marrow sampling and pathological test as well as provide an appropriate prognosis and diagnosis tool. Because of the complex and not the well-defined structure of medical data, the use of intelligent methods must be considered. For this purpose, first, a data-driven Bayesian network (BN) and Greedy algorithm are employed to determine causal relationships and probability between nodes using the real set of data. Then, these causal relationships will form based on the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM). Finally, according to scenarios defined, the results are analyzed. These analyses are also repeated for each type of acute leukemia including acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and acute myelocytic leukemia (AML).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphocytic leukemia

AML:

Acute myelocytic leukemia

ADR:

Adverse drug reaction

ANN:

Artificial neural network

ASD:

Autism spectrum disorder

BHMM:

Bayesian hidden Markov model

BN:

Bayesian network

BF:

Bootstrap forest

CBFCM:

Case-based fuzzy cognitive maps

CSONN:

Cat swarm optimization neural network

CNS:

Central nervous system

CXR:

Chest X-ray

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CML:

Chronic myelogenous leukemia

CBC:

Complete blood count

CT:

Computed tomography

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

DSS:

Decision support system

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EEG:

Electroencephalogram

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

EBP:

Evidence-based practice

FCM:

Fuzzy cognitive map

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Hb:

Hemoglobin

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

LSTM:

Long short-term memory network

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MCH:

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin

MCV:

Mean corpuscular volume

MDSS:

Medical decision support system

NHL:

Nonlinear Hebbian learning

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

Plt:

Platelet

PC:

Prototypical constraint-based

RNN:

Recurrent neural network

RBC:

Red blood cell count

SVM:

Support vector machine

TAN:

Tree augmented naïve

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

WBC:

White blood cell

References

  1. Lappenschaar M, Hommersom A, Lucas PJ, Lagro J, Visscher S (2013) Multilevel Bayesian networks for the analysis of hierarchical health care data. Artif Intell Med 57(3):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oniśko A, Druzdzel MJ (2013) Impact of precision of Bayesian network parameters on accuracy of medical diagnostic systems. Artif Intell Med 57(3):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Constantinou AC, Yet B, Fenton N, Neil M, Marsh W (2016) Value of information analysis for interventional and counterfactual Bayesian networks in forensic medical sciences. Artif Intell Med 66:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Constantinou AC, Fenton N, Marsh W, Radlinski L (2016) From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian network models for medical decision support. Artif Intell Med 67:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrigues PP, Ferreira-Santos D, Silva A, Polónia J, Ribeiro-Vaz I (2017) Implementing guidelines for causality assessment of adverse drug reaction reports: A bayesian network approach. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe. Springer, Cham, (pp. 55–64)

  6. Myte R, Gylling B, Häggström J, Schneede J, Ueland PM, Hallmans G et al (2017) Untangling the role of one-carbon metabolism in colorectal cancer risk: a comprehensive Bayesian network analysis. Sci Rep 7:43434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manogaran G, Vijayakumar V, Varatharajan R, Kumar PM, Sundarasekar R, Hsu CH (2018) Machine learning based big data processing framework for cancer diagnosis using hidden Markov model and GM clustering. Wirel Pers Commun 102(3):2099–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu S, Thompson W, Ancoli-Israel S, Liu L, Palmer B, Natarajan L (2018) Cognition, quality-of-life, and symptom clusters in breast cancer: using Bayesian networks to elucidate complex relationships. Psycho-oncology 27(3):802–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNally RJ, Heeren A, Robinaugh DJ (2017) A Bayesian network analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse. Eur J Psychotraumatol 8(sup3):1341276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papageorgiou E, Stylios C, Groumpos P (2006) A combined fuzzy cognitive map and decision trees model for medical decision making. In: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, (pp. 6117–6120)

  11. Giles BG, Findlay CS, Haas G, LaFrance B, Laughing W, Pembleton S (2007) Integrating conventional science and aboriginal perspectives on diabetes using fuzzy cognitive maps. Soc Sci Med 64(3):562–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papageorgiou EI (2011) A new methodology for decisions in medical informatics using fuzzy cognitive maps based on fuzzy rule-extraction techniques. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Douali N, Papageorgiou EI, De Roo J, Jaulent MC (2011) Case based fuzzy cognitive maps (CBFCM): new method for medical reasoning: comparison study between CBFCM/FCM. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011). IEEE, (pp. 844–850)

  14. Subramanian J, Karmegam A, Papageorgiou E, Papandrianos N, Vasukie A (2015) An integrated breast cancer risk assessment and management model based on fuzzy cognitive maps. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 118(3):280–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Büyükavcu A, Albayrak YE, Göker N (2016) A fuzzy information-based approach for breast cancer risk factors assessment. Appl Soft Comput 38:437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarabai DT, Arthi K (2016) Efficient breast cancer classification using improved fuzzy cognitive maps with Csonn. Int J Appl Eng Res 11(4):2478–2485

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amirkhani A, Papageorgiou EI, Mohseni A, Mosavi MR (2017) A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: taxonomy, methods, and applications. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 142:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FE, Mazzuto G (2018) Fuzzy cognitive maps for adverse drug event risk management. Saf Sci 102:194–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakraborti D, Nandi S (2018) Mathematical modelling of affected diseases due to HIV infection using fuzzy cognitive maps. Adv Fuzz Math 13(1):1–7

  20. Rezaee MJ, Yousefi S, Hayati J (2018) A decision system using fuzzy cognitive map and multi-group data envelopment analysis to estimate hospitals’ outputs level. Neural Comput & Applic 29(3):761–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahimi N, Jetter AJ, Weber CM, Wild K (2018) Soft data analytics with fuzzy cognitive maps: modeling health technology adoption by elderly women. In: Advanced Data Analytics in Health. Springer, Cham, (pp. 59–74)

  22. Topuz K, Zengul FD, Dag A, Almehmi A, Yildirim MB (2018) Predicting graft survival among kidney transplant recipients: a Bayesian decision support model. Decis Support Syst 106:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shree SB, Sheshadri HS (2018) Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using naive Bayesian classifier. Neural Comput & Applic 29(1):123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amirkhani A, Mosavi MR, Mohammadi K, Papageorgiou EI (2018) A novel hybrid method based on fuzzy cognitive maps and fuzzy clustering algorithms for grading celiac disease. Neural Comput & Applic 30(5):1573–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu H, Geng F, Guo Q, Zhang C, Zhang C (2018) A fast weak-supervised pulmonary nodule segmentation method based on modified self-adaptive FCM algorithm. Soft Comput 22(12):3983–3995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leclerc V, Ducher M, Bleyzac N (2018) Bayesian networks: a new approach to predict therapeutic range achievement of initial cyclosporine blood concentration after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Drugs R D 18(1):67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Duneja A, Puyalnithi T, Vankadara MV, Chilamkurti N (2019) Analysis of inter-concept dependencies in disease diagnostic cognitive maps using recurrent neural network and genetic algorithms in time series clinical data for targeted treatment. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(10):3915–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Puerto E, Aguilar J, López C, Chávez D (2019) Using multilayer fuzzy cognitive maps to diagnose autism spectrum disorder. Appl Soft Comput 75:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cypko MA, Stoehr M (2019) Digital patient models based on Bayesian networks for clinical treatment decision support. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 28(2):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leng M, Zhao Y, Wang Z (2020) Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on agitation in people with dementia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 102:103489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy K (1998) A brief introduction to graphical models and Bayesian networks. Available electronically at https://www.cs.ubc.ca/∼murphyk/Bayes/bnintro.html

  32. Korb KB, Nicholson AE (2010) Bayesian artificial intelligence. CRC press. Boca Raton, USA

  33. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24(1):65–75

  34. The Bayesian search algorithm description by GeNIe software (2018) https://support.bayesfusion.com/docs/GeNIe

  35. Su CL, Deng TR, Shang Z, Xiao Y (2015) JARID2 inhibits leukemia cell proliferation by regulating CCND1 expression. Int J Hematol 102(1):76–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Malani PN (2012) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. JAMA 308(17):1813–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fathi E, Rezaee MJ, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Alizadeh A, Montazer A (2020) Design of an integrated model for diagnosis and classifying of pediatrics acute leukemia using machine learning. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 234(10):1051–1069

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Jahangoshai Rezaee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahangoshai Rezaee, M., Sadatpour, M., Ghanbari-ghoushchi, N. et al. Analysis and decision based on specialist self-assessment for prognosis factors of acute leukemia integrating data-driven Bayesian network and fuzzy cognitive map. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 2845–2861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02267-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02267-w

Keywords

Navigation