Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recent trends in the rural–urban suicide disparity among veterans using VA health care

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an elevated risk of suicide among people living in rural areas, and the rural–urban disparity in death by suicide is growing in the general United States population. The department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented programs targeting rural health in 2007 and suicide prevention in 2008. Rural–urban differences in suicide rates among VA users have not been examined since 2010. We sought to understand whether the rural–urban disparity in suicide risk among VA users decreased during a time of contemporaneous VA efforts to improve access to mental health care for rural Veterans and to improve the effectiveness of mental health services at preventing suicide. We performed a retrospective cohort study examining differences in the raw and adjusted annual suicide rate among rural and urban VA users between 2003 and 2017. All VHA users 2003–2017. Descriptive statistics are presented for all VHA users in 2017. This includes 6,120,355 unique VA users, 32.0% (n = 1,955,935) of whom lived at a rural address. Raw rates of death by suicide were higher in rural VA users than urban VA users overall (33.3 vs. 29.1 deaths per 100,000 population) and across years, but the age, sex, and race-adjusted rates converged in 2005. White VA users had over triple the rate of death by suicide as black VA users, and lived disproportionally in rural areas. The rural–urban suicide disparity among VA users persists. However, the disparity appears to be driven by differences in the racial composition of rural and urban patients, which were not accounted for in prior studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was sponsored by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs Office of Rural Health (ORH15533) and the National Center for Patient Safety Center of Inquiry Program (PSCI-WRJ-SHINER). Opinions are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Office of Rural Health, or the National Center for Patient Safety.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Shiner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national VA research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Veterans IRB of Northern New England (VINNE) approved this study. The VA National Data Systems approved the use of VA data for this study.

Informed consent

A waiver of informed consent was obtained for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 3.

Table 3 Diagnostic codes used for mental and physical health comorbidity indexes

Appendix 2

See Table 4.

Table 4 Suicide deaths among VA patients, by rurality and method, 2003–2017

Appendix 3

See Table 5.

Table 5 Raw and adjusted proportional hazards models for rural versus urban suicide rates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiner, B., Peltzman, T., Cornelius, S.L. et al. Recent trends in the rural–urban suicide disparity among veterans using VA health care. J Behav Med 44, 492–506 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00176-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00176-9

Keywords

Navigation