Elsevier

Atmospheric Research

Volume 249, February 2021, 105288
Atmospheric Research

A comparative study of mesoscale flow-field modelling in an Eastern Alpine region using WRF and GRAMM-SCI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105288Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Successful coupling of GRAMM-SCI with ERA5 reanalysis data

  • Reasonable model simulations of mountain wind systems in the Alps

  • Comparable modelling results between GRAMM-SCI and WRF demonstrated

  • Research needs for modelling radiation fog illustrated

  • New modelling quality objective for wind direction in complex terrain suggested

Abstract

Recently, the mesoscale model GRAMM-SCI has been further developed to make use of the freely available global ERA5 reanalysis dataset issued by the ECMWF. In this study, first results are discussed for the federal state of Styria, which is situated in the eastern Alps of Austria. Additional simulations were made with the mesoscale model WRF, which serve as a benchmark in this work. The model runs covered one week in summer and another one in winter dominated by fair weather conditions. These were characterized by the development of complex mountain wind systems in the Alps, which play an important role for the dispersion of pollutants. Regarding the bias and the root mean square error both models perform very well in comparison with existing studies for Alpine areas and are able to capture the main features of observed surface flows such as valley-wind systems or katabatic flows at slopes. In addition, observed calm wind conditions at many stations during the winter period were reproduced by the models. However, the correct simulation of wind directions in these conditions was found to be extremely challenging. Existing model quality criteria for wind direction seem to be too strict for low-wind-speed conditions. Therefore, based on theoretical and empirical considerations, a new model evaluation benchmark for wind direction is proposed, which takes into account the random nature of horizontally meandering flows in stagnant weather situations.

Introduction

The main motivation for this study has its origin in the need for reliable wind fields for routine air quality assessments in the eastern Alps (Federal State of Styria, Austria). Typically, several hundreds of air pollution and odour assessments are carried out at the Air Quality Department of Styria each year. Due to the highly complex terrain, the prognostic, nonhydrostatic mesoscale model GRAMM has been in use since more than a decade now. Legislation in Austria requires air pollution concentrations being permanently kept below national thresholds. Therefore, air quality assessments are carried out for a reference year in the past with unfavourable dispersion conditions. This led to the development of so-called wind-field libraries established for a single calendar year in many regions in Austria (e.g. Oettl, 2014), whereby the horizontal resolution is 200 m in the current library for the reference year 2015. It should be noted that the establishment of wind-field libraries for practical purposes seems to become increasingly popular. For instance, the US-EPA makes available a nationwide dataset for dispersion modelling applications, where WRF was run at 12-km horizontal resolution (Misenis et al., 2019). Berchet et al., 2017a, Berchet et al., 2017b established wind-field libraries for the cities of Lausanne and Zurich, Switzerland, with a horizontal resolution of 100 m using GRAMM. Another example, though in a different context than dispersion modelling, is outlined in Bernhardt et al. (2008), who used MM5 with a horizontal resolution of 200 m for generating a library consisting of 220 wind fields used to drive a snow transport model in an Alpine area.

It is remarkable that the number of mesoscale meteorological modelling studies in highly complex terrain like the Alps with horizontal resolutions in the sub-kilometre range, which are necessary for local air quality assessments, is still rather low (most of the relevant studies will be discussed later in this work). This might be an indication of the difficulties involved in obtaining reasonable and numerically stable results in such regions. For instance, Cantelli et al. (2017) reported about numerical problems at steep slopes when applying WRF with a horizontal resolution of 370 m in an alpine region. Moreover, there is certainly a lack in knowledge regarding turbulent exchange processes in highly complex terrain, which introduces uncertainty in subsequent simulations of dispersion processes when turbulence quantities are based on the output of numerical weather models. In such applications, tailored modifications of the turbulence parametrization are needed to accurately estimate, for instance, the standard deviation of wind velocity components and the Lagrangian time scales (Tomasi et al., 2019). In addition, the understanding of the surface energy balance and the prediction of surface wind fields become even more challenging when regions with complex topography like the Alps, are characterized by the presence of urbanized areas that may cause a nocturnal urban heat island. Giovannini et al. (2014) demonstrated that the WRF model applied in the Alpine Adige Valley at 500 m resolution, combined with suitable urban parametrization scheme could improve the understanding of local valley winds when urbanized areas are present in complex inhomogeneous terrain. Another attempt to reduce numerical model deficiencies in reproducing atmospheric turbulence phenomena are long-term observations of near-surface exchange processes carried out in the Inn valley in Tyrol, Austria, by the University of Innsbruck (e.g. Rotach et al., 2017) for example.

The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the mesoscale model GRAMM, which has been further developed to make use of the ERA5 reanalysis data (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2017) issued by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). ERA5 is a global climate reanalysis dataset, currently covering the period from 1979 to present on a spatial grid of 0.25 deg. Data is generally provided either at 37 pressure levels or at 137 model levels, the latter are used in GRAMM currently.

For comparison purposes, simulations have been performed with the WRF model, too. These results are used as benchmark for GRAMM-SCI, because WRF undoubtedly is one of the most advanced mesoscale models available to the public and most modelling studies in Alpine regions have been using WRF in recent times. The focus of the model evaluations are the simulated surface winds, as this is the most important input to dispersion models for air quality assessments for regulatory purposes. In addition, 2 m-temperatures were compared with observations as it allows an indirect insight in the capability of the models to calculate near-surface exchange processes (e.g. heat fluxes, radiation). Large deviations between observed and modelled temperatures would quite certainly indicate deficiencies with regard to this exchange processes.

Section snippets

GRAMM-SCI

The Graz Mesoscale Model - Scientific (GRAMM-SCI) is a new branch of the public and open source version GRAMM 20.01 (Oettl, 2020). It has been further developed and is capable of using ERA5 reanalysis data for initialization and for prescribing transient boundary conditions. The origin of GRAMM dates back to the early 1990s and was then carried out at the Graz University of Technology (e.g. Almbauer et al., 1995) until 2006. Since then GRAMM has been mainly further developed at the Air Quality

Study area

Fig. 2 illustrates the approximate location of the innermost WRF and GRAMM-SCI modelling domains. It covers the eastern Alps in Austria, where the highest ridges exceed 3.000 m. To the southeast the alpine foreland stretches out, which is characterized by hilly terrain with heights varying between 100 and 300 m above the valley floors. Typically, diurnal mountain winds develop during fair weather conditions. For instance, valley wind systems, mountain-plain wind systems, or slope winds as

Results

The following model quality objectives (MQO) have been used for evaluating model results:

Pearson correlation coefficient (r):r=i=1nMiM¯OiO¯i=1nMiM¯2i=1nOiO¯2

Mean error:BIAS=1ni=1nMiOi

Root mean square error:RMSE=1ni=1nOiMi2

Mean wind direction error or gross error:BIASdir=i=1nminMiOiMiOi+360MiOi360n

If not stated otherwise the model runs taken for comparison purposes were WRF1000 and GRAMM1000.

Conclusions

By taking WRF simulation results as benchmark, it can be stated safely that GRAMM-SCI has been successfully coupled with ERA5 reanalysis data. Both models perform quite similar based on the model quality objectives used in this work. As the selected episodes were dominated most of the time by fair weather conditions and weak synoptic-scale forcing, the majority of monitoring stations were influenced by mountain wind systems. Under such conditions nesting techniques become less important

Author statement

The contribution of the authors were as follows:

Dietmar Oettl: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing

Giogio Veratti: Methodology, Validation, Visualisation, Wirting.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

References (64)

  • R.A. Almbauer

    A new finite volume discretisation for solving the Navier-Stokes-equations

    Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow

    (1995)
  • R.A. Almbauer et al.

    Estimation of the pollution concentration in the vicinity of a cellulose plant in an alpine valley using the non-hydrostatic mesoscale model GRAMM. Air Pollution III

    (1995)
  • R.A. Almbauer et al.

    Analysis of the daily variations of wintertime air pollution concentrations in the city of Graz-Austria

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2000)
  • D. Belušić et al.

    Can mesoscale models reproduce meandering motions?

    Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2010)
  • A. Berchet et al.

    Evaluation of high-resolution GRAMM–GRAL (v15.12/v14.8) NOx simulations over the city of Zürich, Switzerland

    Geosci. Model Dev

    (2017)
  • M. Bernhardt et al.

    Using wind fields from a high-resolution atmospheric model for simulating snow dynamics in mountainous terrain

    Hydrol. Process.

    (2008)
  • A. Cantelli et al.

    Numerical simulations of mountain winds in an alpine valley

    Wind Struct.

    (2017)
  • F. Chen et al.

    Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system, part I: model description and implementation

    Mon. Weather Rev.

    (2001)
  • Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)

    ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate

  • A. De Meij et al.

    The impact of MM5 and WRF meteorology over complex terrain on CHIMERE model calculations

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2009)
  • Doms, G., And M. Baldauf (2018) A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO-Model. Part I: Dynamics and...
  • J.A. Dutton et al.

    Approximate equations of motion for gases and liquids

    J. Atmos. Sci.

    (1969)
  • EEA

    The application of models under the European Union’s Air Quality Directive: A technical reference guide

    Rep. Nr. 10/2011

    (2011)
  • J.H. Ferziger et al.

    Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics

    (2002)
  • L. Giovannini et al.

    Numerical simulations of boundary-layer processes and urban-induced alterations in an Alpine valley

    Int. J. Climatol.

    (2014)
  • B. Goger et al.

    The Impact of Three-Dimensional Effects on the simulation of Turbulence Kinetic Energy in a Major Alpine Valley

    Boundary-Layer Meterol.

    (2018)
  • J.J. Gómez-Navarro et al.

    Sensitivity of the WRF model to PBL parametrisations and nesting techniques: evaluation of wind storms over complex terrain

    Geosci. Model Dev.

    (2015)
  • G.A. Grell et al.

    A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2014)
  • W. Greuell et al.

    Elevational changes in meteorological variables along a mid-latidtude glacier during summer

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1997)
  • S. Hanna

    Diurnal variation of horizontal wind direction fluctuations in complex terrain at Geysers

    California. Bound.-Layer Meteor.

    (1981)
  • S.-Y. Hong

    A new stable boundary-layer mixing scheme and its impact on the simulated East Asia summer monsoon Q. J. R

    Meteorol. Soc.

    (2010)
  • G. Kirkil et al.

    Implementation and Evaluation of Dynamic Subfilter-Scale stress Models for Large-Eddy simulation using WRF Mon

    Wea. Rev.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Urban population exposure forecast system to predict NO<inf>2</inf> impact by a building-resolving multi-scale model approach

      2021, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Observed wind speed and direction at the same three urban stations have been used to validate modelled wind fields by both WRF-Chem and Micro-SWIFT. The temporal correlation of simulated wind speed with observations is between 0.50 and 0.54 for both the models, which is comparable to the values obtained in simulations carried out in other European cities (Gsella et al., 2014; Kuik et al., 2016; Oettl and Veratti, 2021). Wind speed is overestimated at all the three sites with MB between +0.18 and + 0.99 m s−1 (corresponding to +7% and +44% of NMB), respectively at OSS and POL stations for WRF-Chem and PMSS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text