Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical thinking and its impact on operational performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical study

  • Original - Survey or Exposition
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical thinking (ST) is a concept that has been discussed in the literature as principles and concepts disseminated in companies to conduct a statistical approach and it is often associated with using continuous improvement programs (CIPs), such as Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma since the 1990s. There is a lack of empirical studies in the literature that address this topic concerning the impacts generated by ST in operational performance (OP) of industrial companies, as well as the relationships between ST and CIPs. The paper proposes and tests the hypothesis that the use of ST principles is positively associated with OP in manufacturing companies in the context of CIPs. The empirical research was conducted in a sample of 243 manufacturing companies and used structural equation modelling—partial least squares for data analysis. Positive and statistically significant relationships between ST and OP were observed. ST principles can reduce non-conformities, lower production costs and increase the stability of the process. The findings also support that CIPs have a positive effect on the use of ST principles and a positive effect on OP. This indicates the managerial importance of implementing CIPs, including Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, lean and total quality management, and the emphasis on developing mechanisms that operationalize the understanding and practice of the ST principles and statistical techniques for better OP in the manufacturing environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, B. (2005). Statistics in business and industry: Implementation. International Statistical Review, 73(2), 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, G., Ward, P. T., Tatikonda, M. V., & Schilling, D. A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. Journal of Operations Management, 27(6), 444–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Cook, C. M., Lu, L., Clark, G., DeHart, S. P., Hoerl, R., Jones, B., et al. (2012). Statistical engineering—Forming the foundations. Quality Engineering, 24(2), 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. (2009). Six sigma vs TQM: Some perspectives from leading practitioners and academics. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(3), 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. (2011). Six sigma vs lean: Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(2), 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. (2014). Design of experiments for engineers and scientists (2nd ed.). Chennai: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J., & Desai, D. A. (2009). Assessing the status of Six Sigma implementation in the Indian industry: Results from an exploratory empirical study. Management Research News, 32(5), 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J., Vinosh, S., & Gijo, E. V. (2016). Lean six sigma for small and medium sized enterprises. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuelas, R., Antony, J., & Brace, M. (2005). An application of Six Sigma to reduce waste. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(6), 553–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baril, C., Gascon, V., Miller, J., & Côté, N. (2016). Use of a discrete-event simulation in a Kaizen event: A case study in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2014). The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5346–5366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento, G. D. S., & Tontini, G. (2019). Maturity of lean practices in Brazilian manufacturing companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(sup1), S114–S128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernegger, P. M., & Webster, S. (2014). Fixed-cycle smoothed production improves lean performance for make-to-stock manufacturing. Interfaces, 44(4), 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, N., & Baghel, A. (2005). An overview of continuous improvement: From the past to the present. Management Decision, 43(5), 761–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E., & Woodall, W. H. (2012). Innovation, quality engineering, and statistics. Quality Engineering, 24(1), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, N. (1999). Sampling for internet surveys. An examination of respondent selection for Internet research. Market Research Society Journal, 41(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian National Confederation of Industry Brazil. (2019). Brazilian economy 2019–2020. Brasília: CNI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britz, G. C., Emerling, D. W., Hare, L. B., Hoerl, R. W., Janis, S. J., & Shade, J. E. (2000). Improving performance through statistical thinking. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiado, R. G. G., Quelhas, O. L. G., Nascimento, D. L. D. M., Anholon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2019). Towards sustainability by aligning operational programmes and sustainable performance measures. Production Planning & Control, 30(5–6), 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. O., & Tay, H. L. (2018). Combining lean tools application in kaizen: A field study on the printing industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(1), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015). Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. S. (2019). Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03242-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipp, K., Goldman, M., & Kleyn, N. (2007). What they really think: Resolving methodological issues in supply chain ethics research. Professional Accountant, 7(1), 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. Y. (2013). Statistical thinking in the quality movement ± 25 years. The TQM Journal, 25(6), 597–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P., & Miller, P. V. (2008). Web survey methods: Introduction. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 831–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public opinion quarterly, 65(2), 230–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresch, A., Veit, D. R., de Lima, P. N., Lacerda, D. P., & Collatto, D. C. (2019). Inducing Brazilian manufacturing SMEs productivity with Lean tools. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elg, M., Olsson, J., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2008). Implementing statistical process control: An organizational perspective. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(6), 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2002). The management and control of quality. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Ashebor, NC: Statistical Publishing Associates (Statistical Associates Blue Book Series 10).

  • Garza-Reyes, J. A., Villarreal, B., Kumar, V., & Diaz-Ramirez, J. (2019). A lean-TOC approach for improving Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport and logistics operations. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(3), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M. (2013). Lean manufacturing performance in Indian manufacturing plants. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijo, E. V., & Antony, J. (2014). Reducing patient waiting time in outpatient department using lean six sigma methodology. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(8), 1481–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, T. N. (2010). Six triumphs and six tragedies of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering, 22(4), 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, T. N. (2011a). Si jeunesse savait; si vieillesse pouvait–Six Sigma practitioners need not lament. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, T. N. (2011b). Six Sigma in industry: Some observations after twenty-five years. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27(2), 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, T. N. (2015). Emerging megatrends in quality engineering and the “New 5S” response. Quality Engineering, 27(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2015.1036294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, N. P., & Walls, L. (2007). Developing statistical thinking for performance improvement in the food industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(4), 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Sharma, P., Jain, A., Xue, H., Malik, S. C., & Jha, P. C. (2019). An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Christian, M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellsten, U., & Klefsjö, B. (2000). TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), 238–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Hill, J., Thomas, A. J., Mason-Jones, R. K., & El-Kateb, S. (2018). The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 26–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., & Snee, R. D. (1995). Redesigning the introductory statistics course. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., & Snee, R. D. (2009). Post financial meltdown: What do the services industries need from us now? Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 25(5), 509–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., & Snee, R. D. (2010). Statistical thinking and methods in quality improvement: A look to the future. Quality Engineering, 22(3), 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., & Snee, R. D. (2012). Statistical thinking: Improving business performance (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., Snee, R. D., & Veaux, R. D. (2014). Applying statistical thinking to ‘Big Data’ problems. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 6(4), 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2016). Pesquisa de inovação : 2014. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=299007.

  • Jayaram, J., Ahire, S. L., & Dreyfus, P. (2010). Contingency relationships of firm size, TQM duration, unionization, and industry context on TQM implementation—A focus on total effects. Journal of Operations Management, 28(4), 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W. A. (2019). Statistics analytics? Quality Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1633670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. B., Ahire, S. L., & Malhotra, M. K. (2013). Trane/Ingersoll Rand combines lean and operations research tools to redesign feeder manufacturing operations. Interfaces, 43(4), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W., Anderson-Cook, C., Costello, J. A., Doganaksoy, N., Hoerl, R. W., Janis, S., et al. (2012). Statistics to facilitate innovation: A panel discussion. Quality Engineering, 24(1), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, P., Dahiya, V., & Mittal, K. (2017). Statistics for industries: A sophisticated approach. Management Science Letters, 7(8), 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, G., Johnson, M., & Warwood, S. (2004). Medicated sweet variability: A six sigma application at a UK food manufacturer. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, G., Jiang, L., Yin, X., Wang, T., Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., et al. (2018). Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment. Annals of Operations Research, 271(2), 679–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., Antony, J., Madu, C. N., Montgomery, D. C., & Park, S. H. (2008). Common myths of Six Sigma demystified. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(8), 878–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, L., Pasin, F., & Limam, M. (2006). Quality management practices and their impact on performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(6), 625–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. A. H., Antony, J., & Albliwi, S. (2014). Statistical Process Control (SPC) in the food industry—A systematic review and future research agenda. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 37(2), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. A., Antony, J., Arshed, N., & Albliwi, S. (2017). A systematic review of statistical process control implementation in the food manufacturing industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(1–2), 176–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Laux, C., & Antony, J. (2017). Lean Six Sigma leadership in higher education institutions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(5), 638–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundkvist, P., Bergquist, B., & Vanhatalo, E. (2020). Statistical methods–still ignored? The testimony of Swedish alumni. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3–4), 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrymichalos, M., Antony, J., Antony, F., & Kumar, M. (2005). Statistical thinking and its role for industrial engineers and managers in the 21st century. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(4), 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1999). Marketing research. An applied orientation. International edition (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marodin, G. A., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Fetterman, D. C. (2019). Lean production and operational performance in the Brazilian automotive supply chain. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(3–4), 370–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maware, C., & Adetunji, O. (2019). Lean manufacturing implementation in Zimbabwean industries: Impact on operational performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C., & Hubele, N. S. (2010). Engineering statistics (5th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrão, L. L. L., Godinho Filho, M., Ganga, G. M. D., Chopra, S., Thürer, M., Neto, M. S., et al. (2019). Lean manufacturing implementation in regions with scarce resources. Management Decision, 58(2), 313–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan, B., Rubio, J. F., Hassan, M. K., & Davis, J. R. (2017). Six Sigma, stock returns and operating performance. Management Research Review, 40(3), 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, M., Kim, J. J. Y., Kwon, K. M., & Yu, G. J. (2017). Process control and economic cost design for total quality management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(7–8), 858–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 17–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, A. C., Nguyen, H. A., Trieu, P. D., Nguyen, H. T., & Matsui, Y. (2019). Impact of supply chain quality management practices on operational performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing companies in Vietnam. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(6), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2018-0445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Hong, S. W. (2008). The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation, 28(12), 855–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance—the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, N., & Ravi, A. (2013). TQM tools and techniques in promoting team working culture in the manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 12(4), 466–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S., Das, P., Bhattacharyay, B. K., & Antony, J. (2013). Measuring Six Sigma project effectiveness using fuzzy approach. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 29(3), 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R., Lemak, D. J., & Montgomery, J. C. (1996). Beyond process: TQM content and firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.

  • Salah, S., Rahim, A., & Carretero, J. A. (2010). The integration of Six Sigma and lean management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461011075035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, R. A., Sweis, R. J., & Saleh, F. I. M. (2018). Investigating the impact of hard total quality management practices on operational performance in manufacturing organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(7), 2040–2064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L., & Blanco, B. (2014). Three decades of continuous improvement. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9–10), 986–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuermann, L., Zhu, Z., & Scheuermann, S. B. (1997). TQM success efforts: Use more quantitative or qualitative tools? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 97(7), 264–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEBRAE—Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2017). Anuário do trabalho nos pequenos negócios: 2015 (8 ed.). Brasília, DF: DIEESE.

  • Shafer, S. M., & Moeller, S. B. (2012). The effects of Six Sigma on corporate performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7–8), 521–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Modgil, S. (2019). TQM, SCM and operational performance: An empirical study of Indian pharmaceutical industry. Business Process Management Journal, 26(1), 331–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, A. B., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Ramayah, T. (2015). Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D. (1990). Statistical thinking and its contribution to total quality. The American Statistician, 44(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D. (1998). Getting better business results. Using statistical thinking and methods to shape the bottom line. Quality Progress, 31(6), 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D. (2004). Six–Sigma: The evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssca.2004.005274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D., & Hoerl, R. W. (2010). Further explanation. Quality Progress, 43(12), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, M. V. (2015). Corporate perspectives: Commonalities and differences between Six Sigma and lean. Sigma, 6(3), 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, J. C., Gonzalez, R. V. D., Lizarelli, F. L., & Pelegrino, R. A. (2019). Lean production system development through leadership practices. Management Decision, 57(5), 1184–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, J. C., Lizarelli, F. L., & Santana Junior, M. B. (2017). Success factors in the implementation of statistical process control: Action research in a chemical plant. Production, 27, e.20162208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrin, Á., Bruque-Cámara, S., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2017). Lean production, workforce development and operational performance. Management Decision, 55(1), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uluskan, M. (2019). Analysis of Lean Six Sigma tools from a multidimensional perspective. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(9–10), 1167–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal, B., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2016). Lean road transportation–a systematic method for the improvement of road transport operations. Production Planning & Control, 27(11), 865–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, G., Kulahci, M., & Pedersen, S. (2016). Recent advances and future directions for quality engineering. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. K., & Chen, K. S. (2012). Application of Lean Six Sigma to a panel equipment manufacturer. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(3–4), 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, V., Lee, H., & Woodard, R. (2020). Writing assignments to assess statistical thinking. Journal of Statistics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1696257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Xu, Z. (2016). A multiple attribute group decision making framework for the evaluation of lean practices at logistics distribution centers. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 735–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, M., & Goh, T. N. (1999). Statistical techniques for quality. The TQM Magazine, 11(4), 238–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, M. A., & Youssef, E. M. (2018). The synergistic impact of ISO 9000 and TQM on operational performance and competitiveness. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(3), 614–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, B. (2016). Lean principles, practices, and impacts: A study on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 457–474.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grant No. 2013/12910-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Production Engineering, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 13565-905, Brazil

    Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli & José Carlos Toledo

  2. Department of Business Management, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK

    Jiju Antony

Authors
  1. Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiju Antony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Carlos Toledo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 Constructs and observed variables
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lizarelli, F.L., Antony, J. & Toledo, J.C. Statistical thinking and its impact on operational performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical study. Ann Oper Res 295, 923–950 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03801-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03801-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation