Measurement of fragment-mass distributions from fission of At214 following the Be9+Tl205 reaction

D. Paul, A. Sen, T. K. Ghosh, Md. Moin Shaikh, K. Atreya, S. Kundu, K. Banerjee, C. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharya, J. K. Meena, D. C. Biswas, B. N. Joshi, N. Kumar, G. K. Prajapati, Y. K. Gupta, K. Mahata, K. Ramachandran, and S. Pal
Phys. Rev. C 102, 054604 – Published 9 November 2020

Abstract

Background: The recent surprising experimental discovery of asymmetric fission in the nucleus Hg180 at low excitation energy has renewed interest concerning our understanding of the role of nuclear shell effects in the dynamics of the fission process. New theoretical models have been developed that claim to successfully explain the observed asymmetric fission of Hg180 and also predict the nature of mass distributions of several other preactinide nuclei for which experimental data are scarce.

Purpose: We investigated fragment-mass distributions in the fission of the preactinide nucleus At214 at different excitation energies near the Coulomb barrier. The present results were compared with the predictions from a recent state-of-the-art theoretical calculation, as well as with our previous measurement for the nearby nucleus Po210.

Methods: A pulsed heavy-ion beam was used in the experiment. Fission fragments were detected with two large-area position-sensitive multiwire proportional counters placed at the folding angle. Mass distributions were extracted from time-of-flight differences and position information (θ,ϕ) for the fission fragments.

Results: An asymmetry in fragment-mass distribution in the fission of At214 was observed at an excitation energy of 31 MeV, where a shell effect is found to influence the potential energy surface. At higher excitation energies, mass distributions are predominantly symmetric indicating the absence of shell effects.

Conclusion: This finding is consistent with the prediction of a recent macroscopic-microscopic dynamical model. However, for the preactinides, static models with nascent fragment shell structure are likely to produce similar results.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 4 June 2020
  • Accepted 22 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054604

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

D. Paul1,2, A. Sen1,2, T. K. Ghosh1,2,*, Md. Moin Shaikh1,†, K. Atreya1,2, S. Kundu1,2, K. Banerjee1,2, C. Bhattacharya1,2, S. Bhattacharya1,‡, J. K. Meena1, D. C. Biswas2,3,‡, B. N. Joshi3, N. Kumar2,3, G. K. Prajapati2,3, Y. K. Gupta2,3, K. Mahata2,3, K. Ramachandran3, and S. Pal4

  • 1Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, 1/AF, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata 700064, India
  • 2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai - 400094, India
  • 3Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
  • 4Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Navy Nagar, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India

  • *tilak@vecc.gov.in
  • Present address: Dept. of Physics, Chanchal College, Chanchal, Malda, West Bengal 732123, India.
  • Retired.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 5 — November 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×