Elsevier

Materials Letters

Volume 282, 1 January 2021, 128708
Materials Letters

Deformed nanotwins promoted by grain refinement in austenitic stainless steel and its characteristics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128708Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The grain refinement induced more deformed nanotwins in austenitic stainless steel.

  • Twice cold rolling and annealing for 316L stainless steel improved the strength and ductility.

  • Deformed nanotwins and strain induced α′-martensite improved the strength and ductility.

Abstract

Although the grain refinement by severe plastic deformation can obtain outstanding mechanical strength, this usually involves sacrificing the plasticity of the materials. This work therefore provided a simple processing route to achieve strength and plasticity by twice cold rolling and reversed transformation annealing for the 316L stainless steel to optimize the recrystallized microstructures. Our study revealed that applied approach of twice cold rolling and reversed transformation annealing dramatically improved strength and retained better ductility in nano/ultrafine grained 316L stainless steel. The results obtained by the transmission electron microscopy indicated that the grain refinement facilitated the forming of deformed nanotwins in austenitic stainless steels. The high strength was attributed to grain refinement, α′-martensite transformation and nanotwin, while excellent ductility resulted from α′-martensite transformation and grain boundary slip or rotation.

Introduction

Metastable austenitic stainless steels have been widely used in the engineering field due to their outstanding mechanical properties and excellent corrosion resistance [1], [2]. Therefore, it is significant interest to pursue the stainless steel with high strength and excellent ductility. Then, the grain refinement of the microstructure has aroused extensive research interest [3]. Various severe plastic deformation technology, such as, equal channel angular pressing [4], accumulative roll bonding [5], and high-pressure torsion [6] have been successfully applied to obtain nano/ultrafine grained stainless steels with high strength. Despite the strength of the nano/ultrafine grained stainless steels was significantly improved [7], it required at the same time undesirable compromises to ductility. The ductility of nano/ultrafine grained stainless steel is lower than the conventional coarse grained one. The nano/ultrafine microstructures could inhibit accumulating and accommodating ability of the dislocations in nano/ultrafine grained stainless steels, which will decrease its corresponding capability of plastic deformation [8]. Recently, a new conception that combined severe plastic deformation and reversed transformation annealing approach was adopted to obtain nano/ultrafine grained metastable austenitic stainless steels [9]. It was found that metastable austenitic stainless steel with bimodal microstructures fabricated by cold rolling and reversed transformation exhibited excellent mechanical strength and high ductility [10]. The strain-induced α′-martensite transformation and deformation twinning enhanced the work-hardening ability and the ductility of metastable austenitic stainless steels [11]. In addition, accommodating more dislocations and secondary twinning inside the nanotwins during deformation process also could improve ductility and hardening ability for annealed nanotwinned steel based on microstructure observations [12]. Therefore, the formation mechanism and thermal stability of nanotwins during severe plastic deformation and subsequent reversed transformation in annealing process both are very important. Recent noteworthy and important findings demonstrated that high density nanotwins could stabilize nanostructured microstructures, which should be thermally induced grain boundary relaxation phenomenon from the nanotwins [13]. Based on the above discussion, this study will investigate the effect of the grain refinement on the formation of nanotwins during twice severe plastic deformation and reversed transformation annealing, as well as the thermal stability of secondary deformation nanotwins during reversed transformation annealing. Moreover, we also compared the effect of the grain refinement and nanotwins on the tensile properties of austenitic stainless steels.

Section snippets

Experimental

The solid solution 316L austenite stainless steel with chemical composition (wt.%) C 0.025, Cr 17.01, Ni 12.03, Mn 1.40, P 0.028, S 0.003, Si 0.40, Mo 2.05 and balance Fe was used. Then the samples were firstly rolled to 95% thickness reduction at room temperature, then were annealed at 800 °C for and 250 s for sufficient reversed transformation The samples were second rolled to 90% thickness reduction at room temperature, then were further annealed at 800 °C for and 200 s. The dog-bone-shaped

Results and discussion

The homogenized 316L stainless steel has coarse grained austenitic phase in Fig. 1. Some annealed twins are observed. It is obvious that different grain orientation affects the corrosion resistance in metallographic etching. Based on metallographic observation, the calculated average grain size of solid solution 316L austenite stainless steel is 31 μm.

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of cold rolled and annealed 316L stainless steels. The solid solution annealed stainless steel has narrow half

Conclusion

The effect of grain refinement on deformed nanotwins during severe plastic deformation and reversed transformation in annealing process was investigated, moreover, the mechanical properties were also evaluated comparatively. The main conclusions were as follows:

  • 1)

    The grain refinement promoted the forming of nanotwins in metastable austenitic stainless steel, especially for nano/ultrafine grained austenitic stainless steel.

  • 2)

    Thermal stability of deformed nanotwins in nano/ultrafine grained

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (21)

  • K.H. Lo et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep.

    (2009)
  • B.B. Li et al.

    Corros. Sci.

    (2020)
  • C.C. Koch

    Scr. Mater.

    (2003)
  • H. Ueno et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2011)
  • J.S. Carpenter et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2015)
  • Y. Mine et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2010)
  • A. Rezaee et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • R.D.K. Misra et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2010)
  • G. Niu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2020)
  • J.X. Zhang et al.

    Materialia

    (2019)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • Investigation of isothermal continuous hot deformation behavior of the new as-cast alumina-forming austenitic alloy

    2022, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recrystallization of the original grains reduces the average grain size and leads to grain homogeneity simultaneously. The grain refinement will significantly improve the mechanical properties and machinability of the alloy [11,12]. However, the segregated phase in the as-cast material tends to promote the creation and disappearance of dislocations, which can significantly affect recrystallization.

  • Superior strength and ductility of 316L stainless steel induced by micro/nano/ultrafine-grains multiphase complex structures

    2022, Materials Science and Engineering: A
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recently, many structural designs have been explored to obtain better synergy of high strength and decent ductility for steel materials, such as gradient [5], domain-dispersed [6], bimodal [7], heterogeneous lamella structures [8], harmonic [9], and so on. Lv Jinlong et al. [10] applied an approach of twice cold rolling and reversed transformation annealing dramatically improved strength and retained better ductility in nano/ultrafine grained 316L stainless steel. And the high strength was attributed to grain refinement, α′ martensite transformation and nano-twins, while good ductility resulted from α′-martensite transformation and grain boundary slip or rotation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text