Skip to main content
Log in

The Pushout Test of Seismic Reinforcement System (SRM) Connection that Respond to Earthquake Extensive Level

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a state-of-the art seismic retrofit method (SRM) that has the resistance mechanism of eccentrically braced frames (EBF). In EBF, local failure is induced to the link beam such that other members remain in the elastic state when an earthquake load is applied. SRM works by attaching to an existing building in the form of an external frame to enhance its seismic performance. The seismic reinforcement of medium- and low-rise reinforced concrete buildings has a small inter-story drift; hence, the adhesion between the two materials has a great influence on the seismic reinforcement effect. In this study, a push-out test was performed to show the adhesion performance under various conditions. The performance of various attachment methods was also explored to improve adhesion with the RC structure for securing the performance of the SRM system. Additionally, this study proposes a shear strength equation that considers the influence of the contact direction of steel, increase in plate thickness, and anchor yield strength. The test results indicated that it can be used as a new shear strength equation as the error rate is within 10% compared to the experimental results. Although the web direct bonding method using end plates is disadvantageous in terms of processability, it showed the highest strength improvement results. Furthermore, the chemical anchor (Hilti) connection exhibited stable performance results regardless of the bonding method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bae J, Karavasilis TL (2018) Seismic design and assessment of steel frames with visco-plastic dampers. Int J Earthq Impact Eng 2(4):282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takewaki I (1997) Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(11):1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiomi T, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2018) Dual hysteretic damper system effective for broader class of earthquake ground motions. Int J Earthq Impact Eng 2(3):175–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahmani M, Zahrai SM (2019) Application of a comprehensive seismic retrofit procedure for steel buildings using nonlinear viscous dampers. Int J Civ Eng 17(8):1261–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Massumi A, Sadeghi K, Nekuei M (2017) A novel multi-objective structural system against earthquake and uncommon environmental loads. Int J Civ Eng 15(5):737–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo Z, Zheng S, Xu Z, Sun W (2019) Experimental study on seismic performance of ungrouted confined concrete masonry walls with unbonded tendons. Int J Civ Eng 17(3):333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2015) 2nd step (2016–2020) Basic plan for seismic reinforcement of existing public facilities

  8. Korea Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (2013) Assessment of seismic performance of existing facilities (buildings)

  9. Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Korea Land and Housing Corporation (2006) Small building seismic reinforcement point 20

  10. Korean Institute of Architects (2016) Building structural standards (KBC2016) and commentary

  11. Berthet JF, Yurtdas I, Delmas Y, Li A (2011) Evaluation of the adhesion resistance between steel and concrete by push out test. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(2):75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oguejiofor EC, Hosain MU (1994) A parametric study of perfobond rib shear connectors. Can J Civ Eng 21(4):614–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diógenes HJ, El Debs ALH, Valente IB (2015) Experimental analysis of new interfaces for connections by adhesion, interlocking and friction. J Constr Steel Res 110:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang F, Liu Y, Li Y (2018) Push-out tests on large diameter and high strength welded stud connectors. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4780759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shim CS, Lee PG, Yoon TY (2004) Static behavior of large stud shear connectors. Eng Struct 26(12):1853–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xue D, Liu Y, Yu Z, He J (2012) Static behavior of multi-stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridge. J Constr Steel Res 74:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam D, El-Lobody E (2005) Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam. J Struct Eng 131(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pallarés L, Hajjar JF (2010) Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures, part i: shear. J Constr Steel Res 66(2):198–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YJ, Bae JH, Ahn TS, Jang DW (2014) Push-out test on welded angle shear connectors used in composite beams. J Korean Soc Steel Constr 26(3):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prakash A, Anandavalli N, Madheswaran CK, Lakshmanan N (2012) Modified push-out tests for determining shear strength and stiffness of HSS stud connector-experimental study. Int J Compos Mater 2(3):22–31

    Google Scholar 

  21. An L, Cederwall K (1996) Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete. J Constr Steel Res 36(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Colajanni P, La Mendola L, Latour M, Monaco A, Rizzano G (2015) FEM analysis of push-out test response of hybrid steel trussed concrete beams (HSTCBs). J Constr Steel Res 111:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen HT, Kim SE (2009) Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors. J Constr Steel Res 65(10–11):1909–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su Q (2012) Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. J Constr Steel Res 72:84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ji-Wook M, Eui-Yong L (2018) Introduction to SRM for promoting the seismic performance of existing buildings. J Korean Soc Steel Constr 30(5):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  26. KS B 0801 (2007) Test pieces for tensile test for metallic materials. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Ministry of Knowledge Economy

  27. KS B 0802 (2013) Method of tensile test for metallic materials. Korean Standard Information Center, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barker RM, Puckett JA (1987) Design of highway bridges based on AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  29. EN B (1994) 1-1: 2004 Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings BSI

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is a part of the seismic reinforcement system (SRM) experiments of Korea Disaster Prevention Technology Co., LTD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaehoon Bae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, Jh., Ock, Jh., Kim, Y. et al. The Pushout Test of Seismic Reinforcement System (SRM) Connection that Respond to Earthquake Extensive Level. Int J Civ Eng 18, 1347–1363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00544-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00544-1

Keywords

Navigation