Abstract
This paper introduces a state-of-the art seismic retrofit method (SRM) that has the resistance mechanism of eccentrically braced frames (EBF). In EBF, local failure is induced to the link beam such that other members remain in the elastic state when an earthquake load is applied. SRM works by attaching to an existing building in the form of an external frame to enhance its seismic performance. The seismic reinforcement of medium- and low-rise reinforced concrete buildings has a small inter-story drift; hence, the adhesion between the two materials has a great influence on the seismic reinforcement effect. In this study, a push-out test was performed to show the adhesion performance under various conditions. The performance of various attachment methods was also explored to improve adhesion with the RC structure for securing the performance of the SRM system. Additionally, this study proposes a shear strength equation that considers the influence of the contact direction of steel, increase in plate thickness, and anchor yield strength. The test results indicated that it can be used as a new shear strength equation as the error rate is within 10% compared to the experimental results. Although the web direct bonding method using end plates is disadvantageous in terms of processability, it showed the highest strength improvement results. Furthermore, the chemical anchor (Hilti) connection exhibited stable performance results regardless of the bonding method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bae J, Karavasilis TL (2018) Seismic design and assessment of steel frames with visco-plastic dampers. Int J Earthq Impact Eng 2(4):282–297
Takewaki I (1997) Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(11):1113–1124
Shiomi T, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2018) Dual hysteretic damper system effective for broader class of earthquake ground motions. Int J Earthq Impact Eng 2(3):175–202
Bahmani M, Zahrai SM (2019) Application of a comprehensive seismic retrofit procedure for steel buildings using nonlinear viscous dampers. Int J Civ Eng 17(8):1261–1279
Massumi A, Sadeghi K, Nekuei M (2017) A novel multi-objective structural system against earthquake and uncommon environmental loads. Int J Civ Eng 15(5):737–746
Guo Z, Zheng S, Xu Z, Sun W (2019) Experimental study on seismic performance of ungrouted confined concrete masonry walls with unbonded tendons. Int J Civ Eng 17(3):333–346
Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2015) 2nd step (2016–2020) Basic plan for seismic reinforcement of existing public facilities
Korea Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (2013) Assessment of seismic performance of existing facilities (buildings)
Korea Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Korea Land and Housing Corporation (2006) Small building seismic reinforcement point 20
Korean Institute of Architects (2016) Building structural standards (KBC2016) and commentary
Berthet JF, Yurtdas I, Delmas Y, Li A (2011) Evaluation of the adhesion resistance between steel and concrete by push out test. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(2):75–83
Oguejiofor EC, Hosain MU (1994) A parametric study of perfobond rib shear connectors. Can J Civ Eng 21(4):614–625
Diógenes HJ, El Debs ALH, Valente IB (2015) Experimental analysis of new interfaces for connections by adhesion, interlocking and friction. J Constr Steel Res 110:170–181
Yang F, Liu Y, Li Y (2018) Push-out tests on large diameter and high strength welded stud connectors. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4780759
Shim CS, Lee PG, Yoon TY (2004) Static behavior of large stud shear connectors. Eng Struct 26(12):1853–1860
Xue D, Liu Y, Yu Z, He J (2012) Static behavior of multi-stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridge. J Constr Steel Res 74:1–7
Lam D, El-Lobody E (2005) Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam. J Struct Eng 131(1):96–107
Pallarés L, Hajjar JF (2010) Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures, part i: shear. J Constr Steel Res 66(2):198–212
Kim YJ, Bae JH, Ahn TS, Jang DW (2014) Push-out test on welded angle shear connectors used in composite beams. J Korean Soc Steel Constr 26(3):155–167
Prakash A, Anandavalli N, Madheswaran CK, Lakshmanan N (2012) Modified push-out tests for determining shear strength and stiffness of HSS stud connector-experimental study. Int J Compos Mater 2(3):22–31
An L, Cederwall K (1996) Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete. J Constr Steel Res 36(1):15–29
Colajanni P, La Mendola L, Latour M, Monaco A, Rizzano G (2015) FEM analysis of push-out test response of hybrid steel trussed concrete beams (HSTCBs). J Constr Steel Res 111:88–102
Nguyen HT, Kim SE (2009) Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors. J Constr Steel Res 65(10–11):1909–1920
Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su Q (2012) Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. J Constr Steel Res 72:84–96
Ji-Wook M, Eui-Yong L (2018) Introduction to SRM for promoting the seismic performance of existing buildings. J Korean Soc Steel Constr 30(5):12–14
KS B 0801 (2007) Test pieces for tensile test for metallic materials. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, Ministry of Knowledge Economy
KS B 0802 (2013) Method of tensile test for metallic materials. Korean Standard Information Center, Seoul
Barker RM, Puckett JA (1987) Design of highway bridges based on AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Wiley, USA
EN B (1994) 1-1: 2004 Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings BSI
Acknowledgements
This research is a part of the seismic reinforcement system (SRM) experiments of Korea Disaster Prevention Technology Co., LTD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, Jh., Ock, Jh., Kim, Y. et al. The Pushout Test of Seismic Reinforcement System (SRM) Connection that Respond to Earthquake Extensive Level. Int J Civ Eng 18, 1347–1363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00544-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00544-1