Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sealed Bid Single Price Auction Model (SBSPAM)-Based Resource Allocation for 5G Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid increase in the number of devices associated with the cellular network; fulfilling their demands is one of the significant challenges for next-generation networks (5G). The existing schemes improve the network throughput by allowing to share the channels between the cellular user (CU) and device-to-device (D2D) users in one-to-one or one-to-many manners. However, none of the existing schemes does deal with minimizes the usage of resource blocks as well as improve network throughput. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a sealed bid single price auction model-based resource allocation scheme for 5G networks. The proposed scheme is divided into two steps. In the first step, cellular user broadcast a beacon packet into a network for identifying the nearby cellular users those are in the same mode. Nearby cellular users responded immediately to the broadcasted cellular user for forming a group. In the second step, the base station will perform a sealed bid single price auction model among participant cellular users with the amount of data to be transferred at the base station side and signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) as their valuations for bidding. The winner of this auction model forms a D2D pair with broadcasted cellular users, and both cellular users will send data with a single resource block. The proposed scheme not only reduces the usage of resource block it also increases the throughput of the network. Moreover, our results show that the proposed scheme achieves a performance gain in terms of the average system sum rate compared to existing resource allocation schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peng, M., et al. (2015). System architecture and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Network, 29, 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, L. (2016). Mobile device-to-device video distribution: Theory and application. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Z., et al. (2014). Energy efficiency based on joint mobile node grouping and data packet fragmentation in short-range communication system. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27, 534–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, J., et al. (2017). Trust-oriented partner selection in D2D cooperative communications. IEEE Access, 5, 3444–3453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, R., et al. (2016). Social overlapping community-aware neighbor discovery for D2D communications. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, C., et al. (2013). Energy-efficient distributed relay and power control in cognitive radio cooperative communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31, 2442–2452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, D., et al. (2017). Social attribute aware incentive mechanism for device-to-device video distribution. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19, 1908–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Index, C. V. N. (2017). Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016–2021. White Paper, 7.

  9. Liu, J., et al. (2014). Device-to-device communication in LTE-advanced networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17, 1923–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishiyama, H., et al. (2014). Relay-by-smartphone: realizing multihop device-to-device communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra, P. K., et al. (2018). Device-centric resource allocation scheme for 5G networks. Physical Communication, 26, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Osseiran, A., et al. (2014). Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: The vision of the METIS project. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng, M., et al. (2014). Heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: A new perspective for enhancing spectral and energy efficiencies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kela, P., et al. (2017). Connectionless access for massive machine type communications in ultra-dense networks. In 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), 2017, pp. 1–6.

  15. Chen, S., et al. (2016). User-centric ultra-dense networks for 5G: Challenges, methodologies, and directions. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pantisano, F., et al. (2012). Spectrum leasing as an incentive towards uplink macrocell and femtocell cooperation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30, 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kebriaei, H., et al. (2015). Double-sided bandwidth-auction game for cognitive device-to-device communication in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65, 7476–7487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han, Z., et al. (2011). Repeated auctions with Bayesian nonparametric learning for spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10, 890–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, C., et al. (2013). Efficiency resource allocation for device-to-device underlay communication systems: A reverse iterative combinatorial auction based approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31, 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Niyato, D., & Hossain, E. (2008). Competitive pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: Dynamic game, inefficiency of nash equilibrium, and collusion. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sartono, H., et al. (2009). Joint demand and supply auction pricing strategy in dynamic spectrum sharing. In 2009 IEEE 20th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, 2009, pp. 833–837.

  22. Li, A., et al. (2014) A spectrum allocation algorithm for device-to-device underlaying networks based on auction theory. In 2014 Sixth international conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP), 2014, pp. 1–6.

  23. Hasan, M., & Hossain, E. (2015). Distributed resource allocation in D2D-enabled multi-tier cellular networks: An auction approach. In 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), 2015, pp. 2949–2954.

  24. Swain, S., et al. (2016). Spectrum sharing for D2D communication in 5G cellular networks: An auction-based model. In 2016 IEEE annual India conference (INDICON), 2016, pp. 1–6.

  25. Wu, F., et al. (2016). A strategy-proof auction mechanism for adaptive-width channel allocation in wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34, 2678–2689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhavsar, T., & Sharma, R. (2016). Spectrally efficient resource allocation for device to device communication underlying cellular network: Sum rate priority iterative auction based approach. In 2016 International conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), 2016, pp. 0858–0861.

  27. Feng, X., et al. (2012). TAHES: Truthful double auction for heterogeneous spectrums. In 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2012, pp. 3076–3080.

  28. Liu, J., & Wang, B. (2014). Energy-efficient radio resource allocation for device-to-device underlay communication using combinatorial auction. In 2014 International conference on anti-counterfeiting, security and identification (ASID), 2014, pp. 1–5.

  29. Hoang, T. D., et al. (2016). Resource allocation for D2D communication underlaid cellular networks using graph-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15, 7099–7113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research work is supported by Science and Engineering Research Board under the Early Carrier Research Award (DST-ECRA) scheme project Grant Number is ECR/2017/002314.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, 492010, India

    Panduranga Ravi Teja & Pavan Kumar Mishra

Authors
  1. Panduranga Ravi Teja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavan Kumar Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavan Kumar Mishra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teja, P.R., Mishra, P.K. Sealed Bid Single Price Auction Model (SBSPAM)-Based Resource Allocation for 5G Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 116, 2633–2650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07814-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07814-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation