Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring ecosystem services based on government intentions for future land use in Hubei Province: implications for sustainable landscape management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Exploring how ecosystem service values (ESV) are likely to change based on government intentions to develop and protect land is essential for sustainable landscape management.

Objectives

(1) Simulate land use change under future baseline (BAS), resource consumption (CON), and resource protection (PRO) scenarios, based on forecasted land expropriation prices implemented by the government of Hubei Province. (2) Measure changes in ecosystem services influenced by future land use. (3) Provide sustainable landscape management strategies to control the risk of ecosystem service loss.

Methods

This research couples Computable General Equilibrium of Land Use Change and Dynamics of Land System (CGELUC-DLS) models to simulate land use changes and calculated ESV using the equivalent factor method.

Results

(1) Predicted areas of cultivated land, forest, and grassland throughout Hubei Province declined under the three scenarios between 2015 and 2025. (2) Compared with 2015, equivalent values per unit area of ecosystem services (ESVe) decreased by 2.27%, 4.01%, and 1.67% in 2025 under BAS, CON, and PRO scenarios, respectively. The future trend in ESVe reduction across western Hubei Province did abate in the PRO scenario. (3) Reasonably adjusting land expropriation prices is a regulatory approach that can serve to strengthen sustainable landscape management in China.

Conclusions

ESV will inevitably decline in the future due to continuous land use changes across Hubei Province. The government should implement diversified strategies to control ecosystem services loss, including adjusting land expropriation prices, adopting regional differentiated management strategies, and implementing intensive but sustainable land use policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R (2013) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst Serv 5:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Petrosillo I, Costanza R (2010) Ecosystem services—bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecol Complex 7:257–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Gasparatos A, Blasiak R (2020) Multiple values for the management and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 41:101047

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MQ, Lu YF, Ling L, Wan Y, Luo ZJ, Huang HS (2015) Drivers of changes in ecosystem service values in Ganjiang upstream watershed. Land Use Policy 47:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SR, Feng YJ, Tong XH, Liu S, Xie H, Gao C, Lei ZK (2020a) Modeling ESV losses caused by urban expansion using cellular automata and geographically weighted regression. Sci Total Environ 712:136509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WX, Zhao HB, Li JF, Zhu LJ, Wang ZY, Zeng J (2020b) Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method. Sci Total Environ 701:134690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dendoncker N, Turkelboom F, Boeraeve F, Boerema A, Broekx S, Fontaine C, Demeyer R, De Vreese R, Devillet G, Keune H, Janssens L, Liekens I, Lord-Tarte E, Popa F, Simoens I, Smeets N, Ulenaers P, Van Herzele A, Van Tichelen K, Jacobs S (2018) Integrating ecosystem services values for sustainability? Evidence from the belgium ecosystem services community of practice. Ecosyst Serv 31:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng XZ, Wen X (2011) Research on computer-based simulation for the dynamics of land system. In: Jin D, Lin S (eds) Advances in computer science, intelligent system and environment. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng XZ, Huang JK, Rozelle S, Zhang JP, Li ZH (2015) Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China. Land Use Policy 45:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Du JF, Thill JC, Peiser RB (2016) Land pricing and its impact on land use efficiency in post-land-reform China: a case study of Beijing. Cities 50:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber JH, van Wensem J (2012) Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils. Sci Total Environ 415:3–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ (2020) Promoting geography for sustainability Geogr Sustain 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Fröberg M, Stendahl J, Philipson CD, Mikusiński G, Andersson E, Westerlund B, Andrén H, Moberg F, Moen J, Bengtsson J (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4:1340

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geng B, Zheng XQ, Fu MC (2017) Scenario analysis of sustainable intensive land use based on SD model. Sustain Cities Soc 29:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano L, Portacci G, Caroppo C (2019) Multidisciplinary tools for sustainable management of an ecosystem service: the case study of mussel farming in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Mediterranean, Ionian Sea). Ocean Coast Manag 176:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Grima N, Singh SJ (2020) The self-(in) sufficiency of the Caribbean: ecosystem services potential Index (ESPI) as a measure for sustainability. Ecosyst Serv 42:101087

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgström S, Breuste J, Gomez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Hamstead Z, Hansen R, Kabisch N, Kremer P, Langemeyer J, Rall EL, McPhearson T, Pauleit S, Qureshi S, Schwarz N, Voigt A, Wurster D, Elmqvist T (2014) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43:413–433

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hubei Bureau of Statistics (2019) Hubei Statistics Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubei Provincial People's Government (2018) Circular of the provincial people's government on issuing the red line of ecological protection in Hubei Province, https://www.hubei.gov.cn/govfile/ezf/201808/t20180803_1326892.shtml.

  • Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Sunny AR, Hossain MM, Friess DA (2018) Drivers of mangrove ecosystem service change in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh. Singap J Trop Geogr 39:244–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalkanen J, Toivonen T, Moilanen A (2020) Identification of ecological networks for land-use planning with spatial conservation prioritization. Landsc Ecol 35:353–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Chen K, Wang P, Guo BS, Dong Y, Yang J (2019) Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Guo B, Deng X (2020) Is there a decoupling relationship between CO2 emission reduction and poverty alleviation in China? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 151:119856

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Anderson S, Sutton P (2017) The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications. Ecosyst Serv 26:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (2012) Epilogue: the challenge of sustainability: lessons from an evolutionary perspective. In: Weinstein M, Turner R (eds) Sustainability science. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li GD, Fang CL, Pang B (2014) Quantitative measuring and influencing mechanism of urban and rural land intensive use in China. J Geogr Sci 24:858–874

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin GCS, Yi F (2011) Urbanization of capital or capitalization on urban land? Land development and local public finance in urbanizing China. Urban Geogr 32:50–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin XQ, Wang Y, Wang SJ, Wang D (2015) Spatial differences and driving forces of land urbanization in China. J Geogr Sci 25:545–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Qin Y, Yang Y, Zhu H (2020) Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 81:103501

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhang L, Wei X, Xie P (2016) Integrating the spatial proximity effect into the assessment of changes in ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation. Ecol Indic 70:382–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZF, He CY, Yang YJ, Fang ZH (2020) Planning sustainable urban landscape under the stress of climate change in the drylands of northern China: a scenario analysis based on LUSD-urban model. J Clean Prod 244:118709

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Swinton SM (2011) Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices. Ecol Econ 70:1649–1659

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukul SA, Sohel MSI, Herbohn J, Inostroza L, König H (2017) Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: a Bangladesh case study. Ecosyst Serv 26:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Hu XX, Wang XY, Meersmans J, Liu YX, Qiu SJ (2019) Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan. China Ecosyst Serv 39:100998

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Pan YJ, Liu YX, Zhao HJ, Wang YL (2018) Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat Int 71:110–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Fang C, Wang Y, Li G, Wang S (2015) Evaluation of three-dimensional urban expansion: a case study of Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. Chin Geogra Sci 25:224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rova S, Mueller F, Meire P, Pranovi F (2019) Sustainability perspectives and spatial patterns of multiple ecosystem services in the Venice lagoon: possible roles in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic 98:556–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo S, Sil I, Dhar A, Debsarkar A, Das P, Kar A (2018) Future scenarios of land-use suitability modeling for agricultural sustainability in a river basin. J Clean Prod 205:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck T, Deckmyn G, Giot O, Campioli M, Vanpoucke C, Verheyen K, Rugani B, Achten W, Verbeeck H, Dewulf J, Muys B (2016) Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios; a case study of a Scots pine forest. J Environ Manag 173:79–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Tang BS (2020) Institutional change and diversity in the transfer of land development rights in China: the case of Chengdu. Urban Stud 57:473–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Song CH, Zhang YL, Mei Y, Liu H, Zhang ZQ, Zhang QF, Zha TG, Zhang KR, Huang CL, Xu XN, Jagger P, Chen XD, Bilsborrow R (2014) Sustainability of forests created by China's Sloping Land Conversion Program: a comparison among three sites in Anhui, Hubei and Shanxi. For Policy Econ 38:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Deng XZ (2017) Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci Total Environ 576:705–719

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Su SL, Xiao R, Jiang ZL, Zhang Y (2012) Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Appl Geogr 34:295–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton PC, Anderson SJ, Costanza R, Kubiszewski I (2016) The ecological economics of land degradation: impacts on ecosystem service values. Ecol Econ 129:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan J, Li AN, Lei GB, Xie XY (2019) A SD-MaxEnt-CA model for simulating the landscape dynamic of natural ecosystem by considering socio-economic and natural impacts. Ecol Model 410:108783

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landsc Ecol 24:1037–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner KG, Anderson S, Gonzales-Chang M, Costanza R, Courville S, Dalgaard T, Dominati E, Kubiszewski I, Ogilvy S, Porfirio L, Ratna N, Sandhu H, Sutton PC, Svenning J, Turner GM, Varennes Y, Voinov A, Wratten S (2016) A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. Ecol Model 319:190–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Jiang Q, Shao Y, Sun S, Xiao L, Guo J (2019b) Ecological environment assessment based on land use simulation: a case study in the Heihe River Basin. Sci Total Environ 697:133928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SL, Tan SK, Yang SF, Lin QW, Zhang L (2019a) Urban-biased land development policy and the urban-rural income gap: evidence from Hubei Province. China Land Use Policy 87:104066

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li XM, Zhang Q, Li JF, Zhou XW (2018) Projections of future land use changes: multiple scenarios -based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan city, China. Ecol Indic 94:430–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Werling BP, Dickson TL, Isaacs R, Gaines H, Gratton C, Gross KL, Liere H, Malmstrom CM, Meehan TD, Ruan L, Robertson BA, Robertson GP, Schmidt TM, Schrotenboer AC, Teal TK, Wilson JK, Landis DA (2014) Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. PNAS 111:1652–1657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2019) Linking landscape, land system and design approaches to achieve sustainability. J Land Use Sci 14:173–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu KY, Ye XY, Qi ZF, Zhang H (2013) Impacts of land use/land cover change and socioeconomic development on regional ecosystem services: the case of fast-growing Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Cities 31:276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Tao Y, Yang G, Ou W, Pueppke S, Sun X, Chen G, Tao Q (2019) Impact of land use change on multiple ecosystem services in the rapidly urbanizing Kunshan City of China: past trajectories and future projections. Land Use Policy 85:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie GD, Zhang CX, Zhen L, Zhang LM (2017) Dynamic changes in the value of China's ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 26:146–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie HL, Zhang YW, Zeng XJ, He YF (2020) Sustainable land use and management research: a scientometric review. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01002-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YT, Huang XJ, Bao HXH, Ju X, Zhong TY, Chen ZG, Zhou Y (2018a) Rural land rights reform and agro-environmental sustainability: empirical evidence from China. Land Use Policy 74:73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XB, Jiang B, Tan Y, Costanza R, Yang GS (2018b) Lake-wetland ecosystem services modeling and valuation: progress, gaps and future directions. Ecosyst Serv 33:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang YY, Bao WK, Liu YS (2020) Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy 96:104677

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Wu AM (2014) Urbanization, land development, and land financing: evidence from Chinese Cities. J Urban Affairs 36:354–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye YQ, Bryan BA, Zhang JE, Connor JD, Chen LL, Qin Z, He MQ (2018) Changes in land-use and ecosystem services in the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area, China from 1990 to 2010: Implications for sustainability under rapid urbanization. Ecol Indic 93:930–941

    Google Scholar 

  • You HY, Yang XF (2017) Urban expansion in 30 megacities of China: categorizing the driving force profiles to inform the urbanization policy. Land Use Policy 68:531–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu GM, Feng J, Che Y, Lin XW, Hu LM, Yang S (2010) The identification and assessment of ecological risks for land consolidation based on the anticipation of ecosystem stabilization: a case study in Hubei Province, China. Land Use Policy 27:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Dang XW, Sun QK, Wang SH (2020) Multi-scenario simulation of urban land change in Shanghai by random forest and CA-Markov model. Sustain Cities Soc 2020:102045

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 71974070].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, G., Chen, K., Liao, T. et al. Measuring ecosystem services based on government intentions for future land use in Hubei Province: implications for sustainable landscape management. Landscape Ecol 36, 2025–2042 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01116-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01116-3

Keywords

Navigation