Abstract
In the 2010s, it was impossible not only to increase but also to maintain at a previously achieved level one of the key indicators of technological development—Russia’s place by the number of patent applications filed in the world and its share in license payments for granting the right to use intellectual property results. In the course of studying the global dynamics of granted patents in all areas of scientific and technical activity and the correlation analysis of the technological development vectors of leading countries, the most promising technological areas for the Russian economy have been identified and the need for their development within the framework of technological clusters has been substantiated. A new approach to the development of Russia’s national innovation system is presented in conjunction with the most pressing tasks of its socioeconomic development. The inexpediency of transferring into the domestic economy the laws characteristic of countries that promote the so-called concept of catch-up development is justified.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
V. L. Makarov and G. B. Kleiner, Knowledge Microeconomy (Ekonomika, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].
E. Mansfield, “Academic research and industrial innovation,” Res. Policy 20 (1), 1–12 (1991).
W. M. Cohen, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh, “Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D,” Manag. Sci. 48 (1) 1–23 (2002).
I. D. Grachev and S. A. Nekrasov, “Administrating innovation growth in Russia’s economy: A new approach,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 81 (3), 310–320 (2011).
S. A. Nekrasov, “Economic growth through the prism of patent activity,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30 (2), 1923–197 (2019).
N. I. Komkov, “Reform of Russian science: Conditions and directions,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 16 (3), 227–236 (2005).
O. G. Golichenko, The Main Factors of Development of a National Innovation System: Lessons for Russia (Nauka, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].
Science and Innovations: Choosing Priorities (IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].
L. M. Gokhberg and T. E. Kuznetsova, “Strategy 2020: New outlines of Russian innovation policy,” Foresight 5 (4), 8–30 (2011).
http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449.
O. G. Golichenko, “National innovation system: From conception toward the methodology of analysis,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 7, 35–51 (2014).
N. I. Ivanova, “Innovation policy: Theory and practice,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 60 (1), 5–16 (2016).
O. N. Andreichikova and A. N. Kozyrev, “Patent activity and economic leadership,” Cloud Sci., No. 2, 263–289 (2016).
V. B. Kondrat’ev, “Reshoring as a form of reindustrialization,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 61 (9), 54–65 (2017).
I. V. Kirichenko, “Support for ‘breakthrough’ technologies in Finland,” Sovr. Evr., No. 1, 39–50 (2016).
http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/43027. Cited December 19, 2019.
V. V. Ivanter, “Prospects of economic development in Russia,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 29 (3), 225–227 (2018).
G. B. Kleiner, Yu. A. Korablev, and S. Yu. Shchepetova, “Man in a digital economy,” Ekon. Nauk. Sovr. Ross., No. 2, 169–175 (2018).
S. S. Gubanov, “Neoindustrial paradigm of development: Fundamentals and significance,” in Russia’s New Industrialization: The Country’s Strategic Priorities and the Urals’ Opportunities (Ural. Gos. Ekon. Univ., Yekaterinburg, 2018) [in Russian].
https://www.bcg.com/documents/file84471.pdf. Cited December 19, 2019.
V. B. Kondrat’ev, “Problems of deindustrialization in the USA,” Perspektivy, No. 3, 130–147 (2019).
S. S. Gubanov, “Neoindustrialization plus vertical integration (Russia’s formula of development),” Ekonomist, No. 9, 3–27 (2008).
Russia’s New Course, Ed. by S. S. Gubanov (Paleya, Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].
V. L. Inozemtsev, “Russia’s future is new industrialization,” Ekonomist, No. 11, 3–4 (2010).
S. S. Gubanov, “On systemic fundamentals of Russia’s economic security,” Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, No. 4, 49–61 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by B. Alekseev
Ivan Dmitrievich Grachev, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), is Chief Researcher of the Laboratory for Experimental Economics of the RAS Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (CEMI RAS). Sergei Aleksandrovich Nekrasov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.) and Cand. Sci. (Eng.), is a Senior Researcher of the same laboratory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grachev, I.D., Nekrasov, S.A. Relying on the National Innovation System as a Necessary Condition to Implement National Projects. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 90, 406–416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620040097
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620040097