Skip to main content
Log in

Relying on the National Innovation System as a Necessary Condition to Implement National Projects

  • Point of View
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 2010s, it was impossible not only to increase but also to maintain at a previously achieved level one of the key indicators of technological development—Russia’s place by the number of patent applications filed in the world and its share in license payments for granting the right to use intellectual property results. In the course of studying the global dynamics of granted patents in all areas of scientific and technical activity and the correlation analysis of the technological development vectors of leading countries, the most promising technological areas for the Russian economy have been identified and the need for their development within the framework of technological clusters has been substantiated. A new approach to the development of Russia’s national innovation system is presented in conjunction with the most pressing tasks of its socioeconomic development. The inexpediency of transferring into the domestic economy the laws characteristic of countries that promote the so-called concept of catch-up development is justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. L. Makarov and G. B. Kleiner, Knowledge Microeconomy (Ekonomika, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Mansfield, “Academic research and industrial innovation,” Res. Policy 20 (1), 1–12 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. M. Cohen, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh, “Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D,” Manag. Sci. 48 (1) 1–23 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. I. D. Grachev and S. A. Nekrasov, “Administrating innovation growth in Russia’s economy: A new approach,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 81 (3), 310–320 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Nekrasov, “Economic growth through the prism of patent activity,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30 (2), 1923–197 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. I. Komkov, “Reform of Russian science: Conditions and directions,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 16 (3), 227–236 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. G. Golichenko, The Main Factors of Development of a National Innovation System: Lessons for Russia (Nauka, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Science and Innovations: Choosing Priorities (IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

  9. L. M. Gokhberg and T. E. Kuznetsova, “Strategy 2020: New outlines of Russian innovation policy,” Foresight 5 (4), 8–30 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449.

  11. O. G. Golichenko, “National innovation system: From conception toward the methodology of analysis,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 7, 35–51 (2014).

  12. N. I. Ivanova, “Innovation policy: Theory and practice,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 60 (1), 5–16 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. N. Andreichikova and A. N. Kozyrev, “Patent activity and economic leadership,” Cloud Sci., No. 2, 263–289 (2016).

  14. V. B. Kondrat’ev, “Reshoring as a form of reindustrialization,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 61 (9), 54–65 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. V. Kirichenko, “Support for ‘breakthrough’ technologies in Finland,” Sovr. Evr., No. 1, 39–50 (2016).

  16. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/43027. Cited December 19, 2019.

  17. V. V. Ivanter, “Prospects of economic development in Russia,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 29 (3), 225–227 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. B. Kleiner, Yu. A. Korablev, and S. Yu. Shchepetova, “Man in a digital economy,” Ekon. Nauk. Sovr. Ross., No. 2, 169–175 (2018).

  19. S. S. Gubanov, “Neoindustrial paradigm of development: Fundamentals and significance,” in Russia’s New Industrialization: The Country’s Strategic Priorities and the Urals’ Opportunities (Ural. Gos. Ekon. Univ., Yekaterinburg, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. https://www.bcg.com/documents/file84471.pdf. Cited December 19, 2019.

  21. V. B. Kondrat’ev, “Problems of deindustrialization in the USA,” Perspektivy, No. 3, 130–147 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. S. Gubanov, “Neoindustrialization plus vertical integration (Russia’s formula of development),” Ekonomist, No. 9, 3–27 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Russia’s New Course, Ed. by S. S. Gubanov (Paleya, Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. L. Inozemtsev, “Russia’s future is new industrialization,” Ekonomist, No. 11, 3–4 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. S. Gubanov, “On systemic fundamentals of Russia’s economic security,” Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, No. 4, 49–61 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to I. D. Grachev or S. A. Nekrasov.

Additional information

Translated by B. Alekseev

Ivan Dmitrievich Grachev, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), is Chief Researcher of the Laboratory for Experimental Economics of the RAS Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (CEMI RAS). Sergei Aleksandrovich Nekrasov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.) and Cand. Sci. (Eng.), is a Senior Researcher of the same laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grachev, I.D., Nekrasov, S.A. Relying on the National Innovation System as a Necessary Condition to Implement National Projects. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 90, 406–416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620040097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620040097

Keywords:

Navigation