Abstract
Women at risk of developing ovarian cancer because of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant are candidates for prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). While BSO surgeries are routinely performed, to our knowledge there are no studies that have examined patient-reported experiences following laparoscopic BSO performed in an ambulatory care setting. The objective of this study was to examine whether women undergoing prophylactic laparoscopic BSO felt they were adequately informed about post-operative outcomes. A telephone interview was conducted among 46 women undergoing laparoscopic BSO to collect detailed information regarding surgical outcomes, complications, symptoms, and time to return to daily activities. The average age at surgery was 45.0 years (range 34–66) and 67% of women underwent BSO prior to age 50. The mean reported hospital stay was 7.2 h (range 4–12 h) and at time of discharge, 78% of the women felt well enough to go home. None of the women required a readmission to hospital. Forty-three percent (n = 20) of the women did not feel well informed about what to expect post-operatively. Most of the patient-reported outcomes (including pain, vaginal bleeding, and nausea/vomiting) were expected and patient-reported menopausal symptoms were more common among women who were premenopausal at surgery. In terms of returning to regular activities, premenopausal women (n = 36) resumed sexual activity on average at 43 days (range 2–365), which is later than postmenopausal women (n = 15) at 19 days (range 7–30). On average, women returned to full-time work in 16 days (range 1–56 days). Despite patients receiving pre-surgery counselling, our findings suggest that there is a need to provide supplemental, reinforcing patient materials in preparing patients for what to expect after surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data relevant to the study are included in the article.
References
Xie L, Semenciw R, Mery L (2015) Cancer incidence in Canada: trends and projections (1983–2032). Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 35(Suppl 1):2–186
Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan B et al (2018) Age-specific ovarian cancer risks among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Gynecol Oncol 150:85–91
Armstrong K, Sanford Schwartz J, Randall T, Rubin SC, Weber B (2004) Hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations: a decision analysis. J Clin Oncol 22:1045–1054
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. NCCN Guidelines version 3.2019. Accessed 21 May 2019.
Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A (2011) Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 121:339–343
Dedden SJ, Geomini PMAJ, Huirne JAF, Bongers MY (2017) Vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as an outpatient procedure: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:212–223
Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP et al (2019) Where is the value in ambulatory verses inpatient surgery? Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003578
Lozada Y, Bhagavath B (2017) A Review of laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: technique and perioperative considerations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:364–370
Gendy R, Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Karantanis E (2011) Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:388.e1-8
Yi YX, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo WR, Su Y (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159:1–18
Zhang Z, Zhuang Y, Ouyang F, Zhang A, Zeng B, Gu M (2012) Penehyclidine enhances the efficacy of tropisetron in prevention of PONV following gynecological laparoscopic surgery. J Anesth 26:864–869
Acalovschi I (2002) Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 13:37–43
Tas B, Donatsky AM, Gogenur I (2013) Techniques to reduce shoulder pain after laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review. Gynecol Surg 10:169–175
Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C (2007) A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 62:913–918
Kaloo P, Armstrong S, Kaloo C, Jordan V (2019) Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD011101
Hayden P, Cowman S (2011) Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 11:177–180
Dixon JB, Reuben Y, Halket C, O’Brien PE (2005) Shoulder pain is a common problem following laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery. Obes Surg 15:1111–1117
Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu HS, Ho CM (2000) Prophylactic antiemetic effect of dexamethasone in women undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth 84:459–462
Michelsen TM, Dorum A, Trope CG, Fossa SD, Dahl AA (2009) Fatigue and quality of life after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at increased risk for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:1029–1036
Corney RH, Crowther ME, Everett H, Howells A, Shepherd JH (1993) Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:73–78
Fang CY, Cherry C, Devarajan K, Li T, Malick J, Daly MB (2009) A prospective study of quality of life among women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 112:594–600
Hall E, Finch A, Jacobson M et al (2019) Effects of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on menopausal symptoms and sexual functioning among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Gynecol Oncol 152:145–150
Tucker PE, Bulsara MK, Salfinger SG, Jit-Sun Tan J, Green H, Cohen PA (2016) The effects of pre-operative menopausal status and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on sexuality and quality of life after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Maturitas 85:42–48
Sanders AP, Amir H, Fong CJ, Murji A, Solnik MJ (2020) Returning to work following minimally invasive hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 42:80–83
Bouwsma EVA, Anema JR, Vonk Noordegraaf A, de Vet HCW, Huirne JAF (2017) Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg 17:129
Horvath KJ (2003) Postoperative recovery at home after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 18:324–334
Kleinbeck SVM, Eells KR (1997) Monitoring postdischarge ambulatory surgical recovery costs and outcomes. Surg Serv Manag 3:33–35
Oberle K, Allen M, Lynkowski P (1994) Follow-up of same day surgery patients: a study of patient concerns. AORN J 59:1016–1025
Alshenqeeti H (2014) Interviewing as a data collection method: a critical review. Engl Linguist Res 3:39–45
Acknowledgements
Our sincere gratitude to the women who participated in the study interviews and enabled this research to take place.
Funding
Steven A. Narod is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair (Tier I). Joanne Kotsopoulos is a recipient of a Tier II Canada Research Chair. This study was supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Grant (703058) and the Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers at Women’s College Hospital, in partnership with the Canadian Cancer Society. Funding sources had no involvement in any aspect of study activity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
IRB
February 22, 2019—2019-0006-E.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trister, R., Jacobson, M., Nguyen, P. et al. Patient reported experiences following laparoscopic prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy in an ambulatory care hospital. Familial Cancer 20, 103–110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-020-00208-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-020-00208-y