Volume 34, Issue 6 p. 809-830
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Paaliup Qarmangit 1 site geoarchaeology: Taphonomy of a Thule-Inuit semi-subterranean dwelling in a periglacial context in northeastern Hudson Bay

Héloïse Barbel

Corresponding Author

Héloïse Barbel

Departement de géographie and Centre d’études Nordiques, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

Correspondence Héloïse Barbel, Departement de géographie, and Centre d’études Nordiques, Pavillon Abitibi Price, Université Laval, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada.

Email: heloise.barbel.1@ulaval.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Najat Bhiry

Najat Bhiry

Departement de géographie and Centre d’études Nordiques, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Dominique Todisco

Dominique Todisco

UMR 6266 IDEES, Département de géographie, Université de Rouen, Mont Saint Aignan, France

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Desrosiers

Pierre Desrosiers

Central Archaeology, First Peoples and Early Canada Division, Canadian Museum of History, Gatineau, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Dominique Marguerie

Dominique Marguerie

CNRS, UMR 6553 ECOBIO, Université Rennes 1, Beaulieu, Rennes, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 August 2019
Citations: 4

Scientific editing by Sarah Sherwood

Abstract

A multidisciplinary geoarchaeological investigation was performed at Paaliup Qarmangit 1 site (JjGj-14), located in a valley affected by periglacial processes in Nunavik, Canada. A taphonomic approach was carried out to document site formation processes on the site of a single-family semi-subterranean winter Thule-Inuit house. Off-site geomorphological and stratigraphical analyses enabled us to reconstruct the sedimentary environment in the valley since the last glaciation. Valley shoreline sediments deposited during the marine regression were reworked by eolian, runoff, and periglacial processes. The site was first used by Dorset people after 143-327 cal A.D. and then by the Thule-Inuit between 1317–1413 cal A.D. and 1466–1642 cal A.D. Strategic features of the site, such as the availability of building material, food, and water resources may explain its sucessive use by two different cultures. On-site, stratigraphical, micromorphological, and macrofossil analyses showed the predominance of niveo-eolian and nivation processes in landscape and site formations. The archaeological record reveals the action of niveo-eolian processes throughout the Medieval Climatic Optimum and the Little Ice Age, likely due to local factors, site location, and the bowl-shape of the semi-subterranean house. Macrofossil data and radiocarbon dating indicate postdepositional natural and/or anthropogenic reworking of Dorset artefacts.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.