Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:16:16.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prey–predator interaction suggests sacred groves are not functionally different from neighbouring used lands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

M. Hariraveendra ,
T.P. Rajesh ,
Anjana P. Unni  and
Palatty Allesh Sinu Open the ORCID record for Palatty Allesh Sinu [Opens in a new window]
M. Hariraveendra
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala,Periya671 316, Kerala, India
T.P. Rajesh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala,Periya671 316, Kerala, India
Anjana P. Unni
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala,Periya671 316, Kerala, India
Palatty Allesh Sinu*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala,Periya671 316, Kerala, India
*
Author for correspondence: *Palatty Allesh Sinu, Email: sinu@cukerala.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sacred groves (SG) of south India are either relics of primary or secondary forests or swamps, worshipped by the local communities, and distributed in the countrysides (CS) and forest landscapes of India. Studies suggest that SGs harbour a biodiversity different from that of adjoining CS and have a structural similarity to protected forests. Studies also suggest a negative effect of structural complexity of forests on predation. Considering these two expectations, we compared the predation of artificial caterpillars inside SGs and CSs with the hypothesis that predation will be less in SG than in CS. Examining the predation marks, we identified the likely predator and scored the intensity of predation. Bite marks of arthropods, birds, lizards and mammals were observed on caterpillars of both habitats. The predation rate and predation intensity were similar for overall predators and for each predator taxon in both habitats, despite the fact that mammal predation was mostly encountered in SGs. Because the proportion of predated caterpillars is not different between habitats and the intensity of predation is high in SGs, we conclude that SGs may not have a quality of the expected standard.

Keywords

Antsartificial caterpillarherbivoryIndiapredationsacred grovetropics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 220 - 224
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

Anonymous, Wikimedia Commons. Caterpillars of Kannur District. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Caterpillars_of_Kannur_district.Google Scholar
Berkes, F (2009) Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters 2, 20–25.10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00040.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, SA, Kushalappa, CG, Williams, PA and Brown, ND (2005) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecology and Society 10, 8.10.5751/ES-01285-100108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boraiah, KT, Vasudeva, R, Bhagwat, SA and Kushalappa, CG (2003) Do informally managed sacred groves have higher richness and regeneration of medicinal plants than state-managed reserve forests? Current Science 84, 804–808.Google Scholar
Brown, N, Bhagwat, S and Watkinson, S (2006) Macrofungal diversity in fragmented and disturbed forests of the Western Ghats of India. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 11–17.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01107.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrashekara, UM and Sankar, S (1998) Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India. Forest Ecology and Management 112, 165–177.10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00326-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dad, JM, Akbar, SA, Bharti, H and Wachkoo, AA (2019) Community structure and ant species diversity across selected sites of Western Ghats, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, A, Lövei, GL and Nachman, G (2009) Dummy caterpillars as a simple method to assess predation rates on invertebrates in a tropical agroecosystem. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 131, 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, JR, Andersen, AN and Cutter, AD (1998) Ants as bioindicators of habitat disturbance: validation of the functional group model for Australia’s humid tropics. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1627–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lach, L and Hoffmann, BD (2011) Are invasive ants better plant-defense mutualists? A comparison of foliage patrolling and herbivory in sites with invasive yellow crazy ants and native weaver ants. Oikos 120, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry Yuan, F, Ballullaya, UP, Roshnath, R, Bonebrake, TC and Sinu, PA (2020) Sacred groves and serpent-gods moderate human–snake relations. People and Nature 2, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, PA, Sam, K, McArthur, C, Posa, MRC and Hochuli, DF (2014) Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 152, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, ML and Sinu, PA (2017) Can the spiritual values of forests inspire effective conservation? BioScience 68, 688–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magura, T, Tóthmérész, B & Molnár, T (2001) Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 287–300.10.1023/A:1008967230493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoj, K, Rajesh, TP, Prashanth Ballullaya, U, Meharabi, KM, Shibil, VK, Rajmohana, K and Sinu, PA (2017) Diversity of Platygastridae in leaf litter and understory layers of tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot, India. Environmental Entomology 46, 685–692.10.1093/ee/nvx080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muiruri, EW, Rainio, K and Koricheva, J (2016) Do birds see the forest for the trees? Scale-dependent effects of tree diversity on avian predation of artificial larvae. Oecologia 180, 619–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagendra, H and Gokhale, Y (2008) Management regimes, property rights, and forest biodiversity in Nepal and India. Environmental Management 41, 719–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narendra, A, Gibb, H and Ali, TM (2011) Structure of ant assemblages in Western Ghats, India: role of habitat, disturbance and introduced species. Insect Conservation and Diversity 4, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormsby, A (2011) The impacts of global and national policy on the management and conservation of sacred groves of India. Human Ecology 39, 783–793.10.1007/s10745-011-9441-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuri, AM, Madhusudan, MD, Kumar, VS, Chengappa, SK, Kushalappa, CG and Sankaran, M (2014) Spatio-temporal variation in forest cover and biomass across sacred groves in a human-modified landscape of India’s Western Ghats. Biological Conservation 176, 193–199.10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen, M, Heliövaara, K and Väisänen, R (1997) Forest insects and environmental variation in stand edges. Silva Fennica 3, 129–141.Google Scholar
Pocha, TJ and Simonetti, JA (2013) Insectivory in Pinus radiata plantations with different degrees of structural complexity. Forest Ecology and Management 302, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posa, MRC, Sodhi, NS and Koh, LP (2007) Predation on artificial nests and caterpillar models across a disturbance gradient in Subic Bay, Philippines. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashanth Ballullaya, U, Reshmi, KS, Rajesh, TP, Manoj, K, Lowman, M and Sinu, PA (2019) Stakeholder motivation for the conservation of sacred groves in south India: an analysis of environmental perceptions of rural and urban neighbourhood communities. Land Use Policy 89, 104213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajesh, TP, Prashanth Ballullaya, U, Surendran, P and Sinu, PA (2017) Ants indicate urbanization pressure in sacred groves of southwest India: a pilot study. Current Science 113, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajesh, TP, Prashanth Ballullaya, U, Unni, AP, Surendran, P and Sinu, PA (2020) Interactive effects of urbanization and year on invasive and native ant diversity of sacred groves of South India. Urban Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01007-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rath, S, Banerjee, S and John, R. (2020) Greater tree community structure complexity in sacred forest compared to reserve forest land tenure systems in eastern India. Environmental Conservation, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000390.Google Scholar
Richards, LA and Coley, PD (2007) Seasonal and habitat differences affect the impact of food and predation on herbivores: a comparison between gaps and understory of a tropical forest. Oikos 116, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roels, SM, Porter, JL and Lindell, CA (2018) Predation pressure by birds and arthropods on herbivorous insects affected by tropical forest restoration strategy. Restoration Ecology 26, 1203–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs 18, 590–599.Google Scholar
Sam, KB, Koane, B and Novotny, V (2015) Herbivore damage increases avian and ant predation of caterpillars on trees along a complete elevational forest gradient in Papua New Guinea. Ecography 38, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuldt, A, Both, S, Bruelheide, H et al. (2011) Predator diversity and abundance provide little support for the enemies hypothesis in forests of high tree diversity. PLoS ONE 6, e22905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, CL, Lehner, L, Adams, M-O and Fiedler, K (2015) Predation on artificial caterpillars is higher in countryside than near-natural forest habitat in lowland south-western Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 31, 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinu, PA, Kuriakose, G and Chadrashekara, K (2011) Epiphytic orchid diversity in farmer-managed Soppinabetta forests of Western Ghats: implications for conservation. Current Science 101, 1336–1346.Google Scholar
Sinu, PA, Kent, S and Chandrashekara, K (2012 a) Forest resource use and perception of farmers on conservation of a usufruct forest (Soppinabetta) of Western Ghats, India. Land Use Policy 29, 702–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinu, PA, Sinu, N and Chandrashekara, K (2012 b) Ecology and population structure of a terrestrial mycoheterotrophic orchid, Aphyllorchis montana Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae) in Soppinabetta forests of the Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4, 2915–2919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tvardikova, K and Novotny, V (2012) Predation on exposed and leaf-rolling artificial caterpillars in tropical forests of Papua New Guinea. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, Y, Sang, W, Bai, F and Axmacher, JC (2013) Relationships between plant diversity and the abundance of α-diversity of predatory ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a mature Asian temperate forest ecosystem. PLoS ONE 8, e82792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar