Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating estimated sediment delivery by Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) in the Talar Watershed, Iran

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) as the most widely used soil erosion model is a challenging issue. Accordingly, the objective of this study is investigating the estimated sediment delivery by the RUSLE method and Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) model. To this end, the Talar watershed in Iran was selected as the study area. Further, 700 paired sediment-discharge measurements at Valikbon and Shirgah-Talar hydrometric stations between the years 1991 and 2011 were collected and used in sediment rating curves. Nine procedures were investigated to produce the required RUSLE layers. The estimated soil erosion by RUSLE was evaluated using sediment rating curve data by two methods including least squares and quantile regression. The average annual suspended sediment load was calculated for each sub-watershed of the study area using the SEDD model. Afterwards, a sediment rating curve was estimated by least squares and quantile regression methods using paired discharge-sediment data. The average annual suspended sediment load values were calculated for two hydrometric stations and were further evaluated by the SEDD model. The results indicated that the first considered procedure, which utilized 15-min rainfall measurements for the rainfall factor (R), and the classification method of SENTINEL-2 MSI image for the cover management factor (C), offered the best results in producing RUSLE layers. Furthermore, the results revealed the advantages of utilizing satellite images in producing cover management layer, which is required in the RUSLE method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beven K, Kirkby M J (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci J, 24(1): 43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Fagherazzi S, Mei X, Gao J (2016). Decline in suspended sediment concentration delivered by the Changjiang (Yangtze) River into the East China Sea between 1956 and 2013. Geomorphology, 268: 123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Liu J T, Wei W, Chen J (2015). Detection of the Three Gorges Dam influence on the Changjiang (Yangtze River) submerged delta. Sci Rep, 4(1): 6600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dregne H E (1992). Erosion and soil productivity in Asia. J Soil Water Conserv, 47: 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Eedy W (1995). The use of GIS in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment, 13(2): 199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathizad H, Karimi H, Alibakhshi S M (2014). The estimation of erosion and sediment by using the RUSLE model and RS and GIS techniques (case study: Arid and semi-arid regions of Doviraj, Ilam province, Iran). Int J Agric Crop Sci, 7: 303

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández C, Vega J A (2016). Evaluation of RUSLE and PESERA models for predicting soil erosion losses in the first year after wildfire in NW Spain. Geoderma, 273: 64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995). Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J, 40(6): 703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Porto P (2000). Sediment delivery distributed (SEDD) model. J Hydrol Eng, 5(4): 411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier F (1960) Climate and erosion: the relationship between soil erosion by water and atmospheric precipitation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Paris: University of France

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan M, Roberge L, Church M, More M, Donner S, Leach J, Ali K (2017). What are the contemporary sources of sediment in the Mississippi River? Geophys Res Lett, 44(17): 8919–8924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iikhchi A A, Hajabbassi M, Jalalian A (2003). Effects of converting range to dry-farming land on runoff and soil loss and quality in Dorahan, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 6(4): 103–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (2012) Quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.98

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46: 33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S E, Kang S H (2014). Geographic information system-coupling sediment delivery distributed modeling based on observed data. Water Sci Technol, 70(3): 495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei X, Dai Z, Darby S E, Gao S, Wang J, Jiang W (2018). Modulation of extreme flood levels by impoundment significantly offset by floodplain loss downstream of the Three Gorges Dam. Geophys Res Lett, 45(7): 3147–3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minacapilli M, Santoro M (2003) Calibrating the SEDD model for Sicilian ungauged basins. Erosion Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Integrating Methods and Techniques, 279: 151

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirakhorlo M S, Rahimzadegan M (2018). Application of sediment rating curves to evaluate efficiency of EPM and MPSIAC using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci, 77(20): 723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S (2018). A comparative study of soil erosion modelling by MMF, USLE and RUSLE. Geocarto Int, 33(1): 89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C, Nearing M (2016). Handbook of Erosion Modelling. London: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies G, McCool D, Yoder D (1997) Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: a Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Washington D C: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol (Amst), 157: 287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley S J, DeGloria S D, Elliot R (1999). A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermt J Sci, 5: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau J T, Chen T J (2015). Quantile regression-based probabilistic estimation scheme for daily and annual suspended sediment loads. Water Resour Manage, 29(8): 2805–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanyaş H, Kolat Ç, Süzen M L (2015). A new approach to estimate cover-management factor of RUSLE and validation of RUSLE model in the watershed of Kartalkaya Dam. J Hydrol (Amst), 528: 584–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Knijff J, Jones R, Montanarella L (2000). Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. European Soil Bureau, European Commission Belgium.

  • Vrieling A (2006) Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: a review. Catena, 65: 2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei L, Kinouchi T, Velleux M L, Omata T, Takahashi K, Araya M (2017). Soil erosion and transport simulation and critical erosion area identification in a headwater catchment contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear accident. J Hydro-environment Res, 17: 18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W H, Smith D D (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. USDA, Science and Education Administration

  • Yang M, Li X, Hu Y, He X (2012) Assessing effects of landscape pattern on sediment yield using sediment delivery distributed model and a landscape indicator. Ecol Indic, 22: 38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zounemat-Kermani M, Kişi Ö, Adamowski J, Ramezani-Charmahineh A (2016). Evaluation of data driven models for river suspended sediment concentration modeling. J Hydrol (Amst), 535: 457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Saeid Mirakhorlo & Majid Rahimzadegan

Authors
  1. Mohammad Saeid Mirakhorlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majid Rahimzadegan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Rahimzadegan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirakhorlo, M.S., Rahimzadegan, M. Evaluating estimated sediment delivery by Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) in the Talar Watershed, Iran. Front. Earth Sci. 14, 50–62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0774-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0774-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation