Abstract
Relying on the local orientation of nanostructures, Pancharatnam–Berry metasurfaces are currently enabling a new generation of polarization-sensitive optical devices. A systematical mesoscopic description of topological metasurfaces is developed, providing a deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms leading to the polarization-dependent breaking of translational symmetry in contrast with propagation phase effects. These theoretical results, along with interferometric experiments contribute to the development of a solid analytical framework for arbitrary polarization-dependent metasurfaces.
1 Introduction
Pancharatnam–Berry (PB) metasurfaces, made of periodic arrangements of subwavelength scatterers or antennas, have been extensively studied over the last few years and are currently considered as a forthcoming substitute of bulky refractive optical components [1], [2]. The reflection and refractive properties of light at interfaces can be efficiently controlled by appropriately designing the phase profile of these surfaces [3]. Several applications of PB metasurfaces, ranging from coloring to the realization of multifunctional tunable/active wavefront shaping devices, have been proposed [4]. As a result of the fascinating degree of the wavefront manipulation offered by metasurfaces, this technology is currently bursting through the doors of industry, particularly driven by their potential application in redefining optical designs, such as lenses [5], [6], [7], [8], holography [9], [10], [11], polarimetry [12], [13], [14] and a variety of broadband optical components, including free-form metaoptics [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].
Despite these applications, significant efforts are currently being made in deriving proper theoretical frameworks to guide the design of complex components. Most of the disruptive attempts in controlling light–matter interactions rely on a fully vectorial Maxwell’s equations, such as effective medium theories [20], [21], [22], and the comprehensive understanding of their polarization responses are generally obtained using extensive numerical simulations, such as finite element method [23] or finite-difference time domain techniques [3], [24], [25], which often provides the quantitative simulation results but lacking of qualitative physical interpretations [26], [27], [28]. Another approach, Green’s function method and diffraction theory for gratings, provides partial interpretation of a few diffractive properties of metasurfaces. The generalized Snell’s law can be then understood as a maximum grating efficiency in a given diffraction order [29], [30]. However, a vectorial theoretical framework is still required to clearly explain why the generalized Snell’s law occurs in the cross-polarized transmitted fields in PB metasurface system in the -1st or 1st diffraction orders only. To overcome these difficulties, the concept of geometric phase (PB phase), which is responsible for the conversion of the polarization state in the linearly birefringent medium [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], is introduced. Several works have shown that the transmission matrix which describes the birefringent response can be separated into co-polarized and cross-polarized beams in the circular basis by applying the PB phase induced by the orientation of nano-antennas [31], [37], [38]. However, this approach does not originate from first-principle derivation and is not capable of explaining other diffractive properties of PB metasurfaces, such as the connection between generalized Snell’s law and polarization conversion. Obviously, each of these approaches just capture a part of the whole physical mechanism. To fill the gap between these concepts and incomplete demonstrations, a theoretical framework is highly needed to interpret all the diffractive properties of PB metasurfaces in a precise and systematic way.
In this letter, we propose a systematic mesoscopic electrodynamical theory to investigate the polarization-dependent metasurface, showing that the transmission of a co-polarized beam only acquires global phase associated with the antenna response, called “the propagation phase delay”, while the transmission of a cross-polarized beam is sensitive to both PB and propagation phases. We extend this phase effect to a more general situation by decomposing the arbitrary polarization of a normally incident light in circular basis, showing that each eigenstate acquires an opposite phase delay due to the topological phase retardation associated with the PB phase (see Eq. (10)). Furthermore, we derive a fully electrodynamical expression and conduct optical measurements to analyze and validate this analytical framework describing the diffractive properties of topological phase gradient metasurfaces [39], [40], including the physical mechanisms of the coexistence of the zero and nonzero phase gradient leading to the ordinary and generalized Snell’s law, and the universal principles of co-polarization and cross-polarization transmission.
2 The mesoscopic model
The topological phase occurring on the converted state of polarization is generated after transmission across a PB metasurface, as shown in Figure 1A. To study these interface phenomena we consider nonmagnetic PB metasurfaces and express the transmitted light starting from Maxwell’s equations for monochromatic light in the media [41] (CGS units)
where we assume that the electric field E with frequency ωi is far detuned from any electric resonance and P denotes the polarization of the metasurface and substrates on both side (see Section S1.A in Supplementary materials [SM] for more details).
The metasurface can be represented by a lattice with a primitive cell consisting of 2N + 1 gallium nitride (GaN) nanopillars distributed along the x coordinate, which corresponds to a reciprocal lattice vector
Here
The translational symmetry of the metasurface dictates the form of the solution which is given by
Considering the thickness lz to be much smaller than the xy dimension of the metasurface, we neglect the Ez and Pz components in the model. An incoming plane wave can be written as
The geometric anisotropy of the nanopillars can be taken into account by replacing the scalar susceptibility χ0 by the diagonal 2 × 2 susceptibility tensor. The tensor components along the x and y axes are given by χx and χy, respectively. Therefore, for the rectangular nanopillar oriented along x and y, the transmission matrix in momentum space is given by
where
According to superposition principle, the transmission matrix of the metasurface can be obtained by summing the contributions of individual nanopillars, given by
Using Pauli algebra for circular polarization basis without explicit factorization of the additional propagation phase, the rotation-dependent transmission matrix reads
Here,
The transmitted field in the coordinate space (the form of
where
2.1 Discussion of analytical results
Analogous to the Bragg scattering in solid crystals, constructive interference of the propagating wave on the subwavelength periodic structure changes the complex amplitude of the refracted and reflected waves due to cumulative scattering from different crystal planes (see Eq. (7)). The evanescent waves emerge when n ≠ 0, whose momentum vectors satisfy
We now calculate the Fresnel coefficient and analyze the chiral transmission properties in the circular polarization (CP) basis:
Here, the coefficients
Antenna rotation | Input | Output (order) | Phase gradient |
---|---|---|---|
Clockwise | σ+ | σ−(+1) | |
σ− | σ+(−1) | ||
LP | σ−(+1) | ||
σ+(−1) | |||
Counterclockwise | σ+ | σ−(−1) | |
σ− | σ+(+1) | ||
LP | σ−(−1) | ||
σ+(+1) |
LP denotes linear polarization.
For an arbitrary input polarization, we can decompose the normally incident light in the CP basis as
where
3 Interferometric measurement of the topological phase
Therefore, the PB phase results in the opposite phase delays on the orthogonal CP components. The relevant phenomena, such as generalized Snell’s law, arbitrary polarization holography [6], [31], optical edge detection [42] and the photonic spin Hall effect [43], [44], can be thus described using our theory. In the following, we focus on topological phase characterization using the polarization-dependent translational symmetry breaking measurement based on the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI). The GaN-based PB metasurface is used as a 50/50 CP beam splitter in the performance of self-phase referencing. To better understand the design of the birefringent nanostructure, we theoretically calculate the copolarized and cross-polarized scattering amplitudes of an array of identical nanopillars as a function of the phase delay between x and y polarization, i.e., tuning the phase difference of the diagonal elements of susceptibility tensor which represents the geometric anisotropy of the metasurface. As shown in Figure 2A, the ratio of the copolarized and cross-polarized transmission amplitude reach 50/50 when the phase difference of the diagonal elements of susceptibility tensor is π/2 or 3π/2. In order to identify GaN nanopillars with π/2 or 3π/2 phase delay between x and y polarizations, full wave numerical simulations is performed to extract the phase retardation between Ex and Ey components and also the transmission efficiency as function of length and width of the nanopillars in Figure 2B and C. The white lines indicate the regions for which the phase delay between x and y polarizations is equal to π/2 and 3π/2, needed to adjust amplitudes for the interferometric characterization of the PB phase. According to these theoretical prediction, dimensions of GaN nanopillars used were length lx = 260 nm, ly = 85 nm and height 800 nm. These dimensions generate phase retardation 3π/4 between Ex and Ey components (see Section S4 for more details). We create the arrays of rotated nanopillars, each rotated by an angle π/5 from its neighboring element as indicated in Figure 1. The whole metasurface is of the size 250 μm × 250 μm array. The nanofabrication of metasurface was realized by patterning a 800 nm thick GaN thin film grown on a double side polished c-plan sapphire substrate via a molecular beam epitaxy RIBER system. The GaN nanopillars were fabricated using a conventional electron beam lithography system (Raith ElphyPlus, Zeiss Supra 40) process with metallic nickel (Ni) hard masks through a lift-off process. To this purpose, a double layer of around 200 nm Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) resists (495A4 then 950A2) was spin-coated on the GaN thin film, prior to baking the resist at a temperature of 125 °C. E-beam resist exposition was performed at 20 keV. Resist development was realized with 3:1 Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA): Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) and a 50-nm thick Ni mask was deposited using E-beam evaporation. After the lift-off process in the acetone solution for 4 h, GaN nanopillar patterns were created using reactive ion etching (RIE, Oxford system) with a plasma composed of Cl2CH4Ar gases. Finally, the Ni mask on the top of GaN nanopillars was removed by using chemical etching with 1:2 solution of HCl: HNO3.
Three gratings were designed and fabricated with different periodic arrangements of rotated nanopillars with periods 2, 2.9 and 4 μm, respectively. The refraction properties of these designed metasurfaces are measured as the experimental verification of theoretically predicted 50/50 PB metasurface beam splitter. The measurements have been realized using a conventional diffraction setup, comprising a Si-detector plugged into a lock-in amplifier to improve the detection signal to noise ratio. Acquiring the refracted signal as a function of the transmission angle, the detector rotates in a circular motion from −30° to 30°. Spectral refraction response was obtained by sweeping the wavelength of a supercontinuum source coupled to a tunable single line filter in the range of 480−680 nm, by intervals of 20 nm. A linear polarizer followed by a quarter waveplate was utilized to select the state of the incident polarization. As shown in Figure 2D (Fig. S5), the designed metasurface can stably realize the function of 50/50 beam splitter in the wavelength range of 480−680 nm. For normal LCP incident light, the zeroth order occurs at 0°. Both diffracted -1st (dominant) and 1st orders (weak residual signals at opposite refraction angle) are a consequence of the PB phase gradient. The amplitudes of these two dominant co-CP and cross-CP remain 50/50 when the incident wavelength changes as shown in Figure 2D. As shown in Figure 2E, the experimentally measured transmission efficiency of cross-polarized beam has two well-resolved peaks around 15° and 48° which is in agreement with analytically predicted diffraction efficiency (red curve).
We have experimentally characterized the topological phase using a self-interferometric measurement in a MZI configuration, replacing a beam splitter by the metasurface as shown in Figure 3A. Phase retardation of the anomalous refracted signal as a function of the lateral displacement of the metasurface, introduced by the shifting of metasurface along the phase gradient along the x axes, is recorded by monitoring the displacement of the interferogram fringes on a CCD camera after careful recombination and adjustment of the polarization handedness. The piezo stage controller is utilized to achieve minute translation of the metasurfaces as required for phase characterization in experiments discussed in Figure 3B. In the present configuration, one arm of the MZI originates from the first order refraction from the metasurface. In addition to the anomalous refraction, the metasurface imposes a phase
which is proportional to the metasurface displacement δ(x) along the phase gradient direction x. We propose to experimentally measure this phase by recombining both arms on a beam splitter, and recording the resulting intensity profile as a function of the translation distance. The transmitted light of RCP/LCP incidence is
Here
4 Conclusion
In summary, we provide an in-depth analysis of topological PB metasurfaces by comparing experimental results obtained with spatially oriented subwavelength birefringent nanostructures, with a mesoscopic theory. This work, which demonstrates the origin of both controllable phase retardation effects, namely the propagation phase and the PB phase, is a first step in developing an intuitive understanding of topological and functional beam splitters for future applications in quantum optics and their implementations in relevant quantum information protocols based on metasurfaces, which is an important future research direction in this field [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51].
Funding source: European Research Council (ERC)
Award Identifier / Grant number: 639109
Funding source: National Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 11934011
Funding source: Zijiang Endowed Young Scholar Fund
Funding source: East China Normal University
Award Identifier / Grant number: 111 Project, B12024
Acknowledgments
Z.G. thanks S. Jiang, P. Saurabh, G. Zhu for valuable discussions.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: Z.G., V.O. and K.E.D. gratefully acknowledge the support from National Science Foundation of China (No. 11934011), Zijiang Endowed Young Scholar Fund, East China Normal University and Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project, B12024). K.D. is grateful for the support of “Fédération Doeblin”. P.G., R.S., and G.B. acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement no. 639109).
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] P. Genevet, F. Capasso, F. Aieta, M. Khorasaninejad, and R. Devlin, “Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces,” Optica, vol. 4, pp. 139–152, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000139.Search in Google Scholar
[2] W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, V. Sanjeev, et al., “A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 13, pp. 220–226, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-017-0034-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, et al., “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science, vol. 334, pp. 333–337, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210713.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] I. Kim, G. Yoon, J. Jang, et al., “Outfitting next generation displays with optical metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 5, pp. 3876–3895, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00809.Search in Google Scholar
[5] A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, R. L. Eriksen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Broadband focusing flat mirrors based on plasmonic gradient metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, pp. 829–834, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl304761m.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, “Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, pp. 937–943, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.186.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, R. C. Devlin, et al., “Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging,” Science, vol. 352, pp. 1190–1194, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6644.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] A. Arbabi, E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, et al., “Miniature optical planar camera based on a wide-angle metasurface doublet corrected for monochromatic aberrations,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 13682, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13682.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[9] W. T. Chen, K. Yang, C. Wang, et al., “High-efficiency broadband meta-hologram with polarization-controlled dual images,” Nano Lett., vol. 14, pp. 225–230, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403811d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] G. Zheng, H. Muhlenbernd, M. Kenney, et al., “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, pp. 308–312, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] H. Ren, G. Briere, X. Fang, et al., “Metasurface orbital angular momentum holography,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, pp. 1–8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11030-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] J. Lin, J. P. B. Mueller, Q. Wang, et al., “Polarization-controlled tunable directional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons,” Science, vol. 340, pp. 331–334, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233746.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] F. Ding, Y. Chen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Metasurface-based polarimeters,” Appl. Sci., vol. 8, p. 594, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040594.Search in Google Scholar
[14] N. A. Rubin, G. Daversa, P. Chevalier, et al., “Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,” Science, vol. 365, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1839.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] S. M. Kamali, A. Arbabi, E. Arbabi, Y. Horie, and A. Faraon, “Decoupling optical function and geometrical form using conformal flexible dielectric metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 11618, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] J. Burch, D. Wen, X. Chen, and A. D. Falco, “Conformable holographic metasurfaces,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, p. 4520, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04482-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] J. Burch and A. Di Falco, “Surface topology specific metasurface holograms,” ACS Photonics, vol. 5, pp. 1762–1766, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01449.Search in Google Scholar
[18] K. Wu, P. Coquet, Q. J. Wang, and P. Genevet, “Modelling of free-form conformal metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 9, pp. 1–8, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05579-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] M. Dehmollaian, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Wave scattering by a cylindrical metasurface cavity of arbitrary cross section: theory and applications,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 67, pp. 4059–4072, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2019.2905711.Search in Google Scholar
[20] C. Roberts, S. Inampudi, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Diffractive interface theory: nonlocal susceptibility approach to the optics of metasurfaces,” Opt. Express, vol. 23, pp. 2764–2776, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.002764.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] K. Achouri and C. Caloz, “Design, concepts, and applications of electromagnetic metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, pp. 1095–1116, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0119.Search in Google Scholar
[22] A. Momeni, H. Rajabalipanah, A. Abdolali, and K. Achouri, “Generalized optical signal processing based on multioperator metasurfaces synthesized by susceptibility tensors,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, p. 064042, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.064042.Search in Google Scholar
[23] A. Khanikaev, N. Arju, Z. Fan, et al., “Experimental demonstration of the microscopic origin of circular dichroism in two-dimensional metamaterials,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 12045, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12045.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[24] S. Sun, Q. He, S. Xiao, Q. Xu, X. Li, and L. Zhou, “Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves,” Nat. Mater., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 426–431, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3292.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Y. Vahabzadeh, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Generalized sheet transition condition FDTD simulation of metasurface,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 271–280, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2017.2772022.Search in Google Scholar
[26] F. J. G. De Abajo, “Colloquium: light scattering by particle and hole arrays,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 1267–1290, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1267.Search in Google Scholar
[27] R. Czaplicki, H. Husu, R. Siikanen, et al., “Enhancement of second-harmonic generation from metal nanoparticles by passive elements,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, p. 093902, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.093902.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] W. Liu, Z. Li, H. Cheng, S. Chen, and J. Tian, “Momentum analysis for metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 8, p. 014012, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.8.014012.Search in Google Scholar
[29] D. R. Smith, Y. Tsai, and S. Larouche, “Analysis of a gradient index metamaterial blazed diffraction grating,” IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Propag., vol. 10, pp. 1605–1608, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/lawp.2011.2179632.Search in Google Scholar
[30] S. Larouche and D. R. Smith, “Reconciliation of generalized refraction with diffraction theory,” Opt. Lett., vol. 37, pp. 2391–2393, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.37.002391.Search in Google Scholar
[31] J. P. B. Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, p. 113901, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] S. Pancharatnam, “Generalized theory of interference, and its applications: part I. coherent pencils,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A, vol. 44, pp. 247–262, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03046050.Search in Google Scholar
[33] M. V. Berry, “The adiabatic phase and Pancharatnam’s phase for polarized light,” J. Mod. Opt., vol. 34, pp. 1401–1407, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500348714551321.Search in Google Scholar
[34] H. Kuratsuji and S. Kakigi, “Maxwell–Schrodinger equation for polarized light and evolution of the Stokes parameters,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp. 1888–1891, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.80.1888.Search in Google Scholar
[35] K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, “Conservation of angular momentum, transverse shift, and spin hall effect in reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave packet,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, p. 073903, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.073903.Search in Google Scholar
[36] T. Zhu, Y. Lou, Y. Zhou, et al., “Generalized spatial differentiation from the spin hall effect of light and its application in image processing of edge detection,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, p. 034043, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.034043.Search in Google Scholar
[37] W. Luo, S. Xiao, Q. He, S. Sun, and L. Zhou, “Photonic spin hall effect with nearly 100% efficiency,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 3, pp. 1102–1108, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201500068.Search in Google Scholar
[38] L. Huang, X. Chen, H. Muhlenbernd, et al., “Dispersionless phase discontinuities for controlling light propagation,” Nano Lett., vol. 12, pp. 5750–5755, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303031j.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Space-variant Pancharatnam–Berry phase optical elements with computer-generated subwavelength gratings,” Opt. Lett., vol. 27, pp. 1141–1143, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.27.001141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science, vol. 345, pp. 298–302, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253213.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed., Amsterdam, Pergamon, 1984.10.1016/B978-0-08-030275-1.50007-2Search in Google Scholar
[42] J. Zhou, H. Qian, C. Chen, et al., “Optical edge detection based on high-efficiency dielectric metasurface,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 116, pp. 11137–11140, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820636116.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] P. Georgi, M. Massaro, K. Luo, et al., “Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors,” Light Sci. Appl., pp. 81–87, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0182-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[44] X. Yin, Z. Ye, J. Rho, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Photonic spin hall effect at metasurfaces,” Science, vol. 339, pp. 1405–1407, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231758.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] I. Liberal and N. Engheta, “Nonradiating and radiating modes excited by quantum emitters in open epsilon-near-zero cavities,” Sci. Adv., vol. 2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600987.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[46] R. Sokhoyan and H. A. Atwater, “Quantum optical properties of a dipole emitter coupled to an ϵ-near-zero nanoscale waveguide,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, pp. 32279–32290, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.032279.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] X. Ren, P. K. Jha, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Nonconventional metasurfaces: from non-Hermitian coupling, quantum interactions, to skin cloak,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, pp. 1233–1243, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0006.Search in Google Scholar
[48] K. E. Dorfman, P. K. Jha, D. V. Voronine, et al., “Quantum-coherence-enhanced surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 111, p. 043601, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.043601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[49] P. K. Jha, X. Ni, C. Wu, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Metasurface-enabled remote quantum interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, p. 025501, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.115.025501.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[50] E. Lassalle, P. Lalanne, S. Aljunid et al., Long-Lifetime Coherence in a Quantum Emitter Induced by a Metasurface. Preprint, 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.02409v1.10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013837Search in Google Scholar
[51] T. Stav, A. Faerman, E. Maguid, et al., “Quantum entanglement of the spin and orbital angular momentum of photons using metamaterials,” Science, vol. 361, pp. 1101–1104, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0365).
© 2020 Zhanjie Gao et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.