Abstract
Co-localization analysis is a popular method for quantitative analysis in fluorescence microscopy imaging. The localization of marked proteins in the cell nucleus allows a deep insight into biological processes in the nucleus. Several metrics have been developed for measuring the co-localization of two markers, however, they depend on subjective thresholding of background and the assumption of linearity. We propose a robust method to estimate the bivariate distribution function of two color channels. From this, we can quantify their co- or anti-colocalization. The proposed method is a combination of the Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) and a Gaussian Copula, which we call the Maximum Entropy Copula (MEC). This new method can measure the spatial and nonlinear correlation of signals to determine the marker colocalization in fluorescence microscopy images. The proposed method is compared with MEM for bivariate probability distributions. The new colocalization metric is validated on simulated and real data. The results show that MEC can determine co- and anti-colocalization even in high background settings. MEC can, therefore, be used as a robust tool for colocalization analysis.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Parekh, SH, Lee, YJ, Aamer, KA, Cicerone, MT. Label-free cellular imaging by broadband coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Biophys J 2010;99:2695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.009.Search in Google Scholar
2. Thorn, K. A quick guide to light microscopy in cell biology. Mol Biol Cell 2016;27:219–22. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e15-02-0088.Search in Google Scholar
3. Hussain, SA. An introduction to fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET); 2009. arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.1815.Search in Google Scholar
4. Kobayashi, H, Ogawa, M, Alford, R, Choyke, PL, Urano, Y. New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem Rev 2009;110:2620–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900263j.Search in Google Scholar
5. Gonçalves, MST. Fluorescent labeling of biomolecules with organic probes. Chem Rev 2008;109:190–212. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0783840.Search in Google Scholar
6. Helmuth, JA, Paul, G, Sbalzarini, IF. Beyond co-localization: inferring spatial interactions between sub-cellular structures from microscopy images. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:372. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-372.Search in Google Scholar
7. Ronneberger, O, Baddeley, D, Scheipl, F, Verveer, PJ, Burkhardt, H, Cremer, C, et al.. Spatial quantitative analysis of fluorescently labeled nuclear structures: problems, methods, pitfalls. Chromosome Res 2008;16:523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-1236-4.Search in Google Scholar
8. Hess, ST, Girirajan, TP, Mason, MD. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys J 2006;91:4258–72. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.091116.Search in Google Scholar
9. Betzig, E, Patterson, GH, Sougrat, R, Lindwasser, OW, Olenych, S, Bonifacino, J. S, et al.. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 2006;313:1642–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127344.Search in Google Scholar
10. Manders, E, Verbeek, F, Aten, J. Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. J Microsc 1993;169:375–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x.Search in Google Scholar
11. Garini, Y, Young, IT, McNamara, G. Spectral imaging: principles and applications. Cytometry A 2006;69A:735–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20311.Search in Google Scholar
12. Seiler, DM, Rouquette, J, Schmid, VJ, Strickfaden, H, Ottmann, C, Drexler, GA, et al.. Double-strand break-induced transcriptional silencing is associated with loss of tri-methylation at h3k4. Chromosome Res 2011;19:883–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-011-9244-1.Search in Google Scholar
13. Solovjeva, LV, Svetlova, MP, Chagin, VO, Tomilin, NV. Inhibition of transcription at radiation-induced nuclear foci of phosphorylated histone H2AX in mammalian cells. Chromosome Res 2007;15:787–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-007-1162-x.Search in Google Scholar
14. Ayoub, N, Jeyasekharan, AD, Bernal, JA, Venkitaraman, AR. HP1-β mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature 2008;453:682–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06875.Search in Google Scholar
15. Baldeyron, C, Soria, G, Roche, D, Cook, AJL, Almouzni, G. HP1α recruitment to DNA damage by p150CAF-1 promotes homologous recombination repair. J Cell Biol 2011;193:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201101030.Search in Google Scholar
16. Barbaresco, F, Chevalier, P. Noncircularity exploitation in signal processing overview and application to radar. IET; 2008.10.1049/ic.2008.0743Search in Google Scholar
17. Demandolx, D, Davoust, J. Multicolour analysis and local image correlation in confocal microscopy. J Microsc 1997;185:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1470704.x.Search in Google Scholar
18. Valeur, B, Berberan-Santos, MN. Molecular fluorescence: principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.10.1002/9783527650002Search in Google Scholar
19. Manders, E, Stap, J, Brakenhoff, G, Van Driel, R, Aten, J. Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the s-phase, analysed by double labelling of dna and confocal microscopy. J Cell Sci 1992;103:857–62.10.1242/jcs.103.3.857Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Costes, SV, Daelemans, D, Cho, EH, Dobbin, Z, Pavlakis, G, Lockett, S. Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells. Biophys J 2004;86:3993–4003. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.103.038422.Search in Google Scholar
21. Tarantola, A. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM; 2005.10.1137/1.9780898717921Search in Google Scholar
22. Rüschendorf, L. Copulas, sklar’s theorem, and distributional transform. In: Mathematical risk analysis. Springer; 2013:3–34 pp.10.1007/978-3-642-33590-7_1Search in Google Scholar
23. Balakrishnan, N, Lai, CD. Continuous bivariate distributions. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.10.1007/b101765Search in Google Scholar
24. Genest, C, MacKay, J. The joy of copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Stat 1986;40:280–3. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684602.Search in Google Scholar
25. Genest, C, Rivest, LP. Statistical inference procedures for bivariate archimedean copulas. J Am Stat Assoc 1993;88:1034–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476372.Search in Google Scholar
26. Pougaza, DB, Djafari, AM. Maximum entropy copulas. In: AIP Conference Proceeding; 2011:2069–72 pp.10.1063/1.3573634Search in Google Scholar
27. Romeo, JS, Tanaka, NI, Pedroso-de Lima, AC. Bivariate survival modeling: a Bayesian approach based on copulas. Lifetime Data Anal 2006;12:205–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-006-9001-5.Search in Google Scholar
28. Botev, Z. The normal law under linear restrictions: simulation and estimation via minimax tilting. J Roy Stat Soc B 2017;79:125–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12162.Search in Google Scholar
29. Arbenz, P. Bayesian copulae distributions, with application to operational risk management–some comments. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 2013;15:105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-011-9224-0.Search in Google Scholar
30. Shannon, CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:623–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.Search in Google Scholar
31. Casella, G, Berger, R. Statistical inference 2. Duxbury, CA, USA; 2002.Search in Google Scholar
32. Ebrahimi, N, Soofi, ES, Soyer, R. Multivariate maximum entropy identification, transformation, and dependence. J Multivar Anal 2008;99:1217–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2007.08.004.Search in Google Scholar
33. Thomas, A, Cover, TM. Elements of information theory. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2006.10.1002/047174882XSearch in Google Scholar
34. Yari, G, Farsani, ZA. Application of the maximum entropy method for determining a sensitive distribution in the renewable energy systems. J Energy Resour Technol 2015;137:042006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030268.Search in Google Scholar
35. Fisher, RA. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philos Trans R Soc. A 1922;222:309–68. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1922.0009.Search in Google Scholar
36. Kendall, MG. Rank correlation methods; 1948.Search in Google Scholar
37. Tumanski, S. Principles of electrical measurement. CRC Press; 2006.10.1201/9780203961834Search in Google Scholar
38. Stein, DW. Detection of random signals in Gaussian mixture noise. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1995;41:1788–801. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.476307.Search in Google Scholar
39. Xu, W, Hou, Y, Hung, Y, Zou, Y. Comparison of spearman’s rho and kendall’s tau in normal and contaminated normal models; 2010. arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.2009.Search in Google Scholar
40. Shevlyakov, G, Vilchevski, N. Robustness in data analysis: criteria and methods, ser. Modern probability and statistics; 2002.10.1515/9783110936001Search in Google Scholar
41. Nelsen, RB. An introduction to copulas. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
42. Lange, OF, Grubmüller, H. Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2006;62:1053–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20784.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
