Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 285, 1 February 2021, 119143
Fuel

Full Length Article
Catalytic co-pyrolysis of polycarbonate and polyethylene/polypropylene mixtures: Promotion of oil deoxygenation and aromatic hydrocarbon formation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119143Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

The co-pyrolysis of polycarbonate (PC) and polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) in the presence of HZSM-5 catalyst was studied in a two-stage tube reactor with the objective of promoting simultaneous deoxygenation and aromatic hydrocarbon formation, at atmospheric pressure and without external hydrogen addition. As the blending ratio of PE/PP increased, the yield of oil phase product, coke, and solid decreased, and the yield of gas phase increased significantly. At the blending ratio of 75% PP, the concentration of oxygenates in the oil was reduced to 2.9% and that of aromatic hydrocarbons increased to 97.1%. Increasing the reaction temperature from 500 °C to 700 °C increased the yield of aromatic hydrocarbons further to 98.1%. Catalyst regeneration decreased the acidity of the HZSM-5 catalyst, resulting in a slight decrease in the deoxygenation and aromatization effects. The results showed that PP is an effective hydrogen donor in the catalytic deoxygenation and aromatization process; the hydrogen provided enhanced the adsorption of phenols produced by the pyrolysis of PC on HZSM-5 and their direct deoxygenation to form new aromatic hydrocarbons.

Introduction

Polycarbonate (PC) is a thermoplastic resin widely used in electrical and electronic appliances, packaging, manufacturing, etc. [1], [2]. The total global PC demand was up to 4.1 million tons in 2017 [3], which made it one of the main oxygen-containing plastics. Most plastic products are non-degradable and readily discarded after use, and usually, their lifetimes are no more than one month [4], [5], which leads to the accumulation of post-recycling plastic wastes. It is neither economical nor environmentally friendly to dispose waste PC products by traditional incineration methods due to its high oxygen content and low calorific value.

“Plastic-to-oil”, as a cost-effective valorization technology, has gained continuously increasing attention in recent years. This technology usually uses pyrolysis to realize the conversion of plastic wastes to fuel oil like jet fuel and diesel-like oil or high-value chemicals, which could alleviate the problem of fossil oil depletion at relatively low cost [6]. Some researchers have summarized the pyrolysis behavior of PC in previous studies. Achilias et al. [7] found that pyrolysis of PC at 550 °C yielded 6.6% pyrolysis gas, 63% oil products, and 30.4% solid residues; the main constituents of the oil were 32% phenols, 16% bisphenol A, and 5.6% p-isopropylphenol. The presence of various oxygenates such as phenol leads to an increase in the viscosity, corrosivity, and thermal instability of the pyrolysis oil and a decrease in its calorific value [8]. This is particularly critical when the pyrolysis oil is used for fuel or chemical production. Therefore, the deoxygenation of oxygenate-enriched oil is one of the grand challenges in oil upgrading at present [9].

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is the main deoxygenation pathway for oxygenates such as phenols, mainly including hydrogenation-dehydration (HYD) route and direct deoxygenation (DDO) routes [10]. Compared with HYD, DDO may convert phenols to aromatic hydrocarbons by direct cleavage of aromatic C-O without hydrogenating the aromatic ring [11]. Thus, DDO is a better deoxygenation route, with low hydrogen consumption and maximized carbon retention in target products [12]. Also, the resulting products, aromatic hydrocarbons like benzenes and naphthalenes, are in high demand, as crucial additives or raw materials in the fuel, chemical, pharmaceutical, printing, and dyeing industries [13], [14]. Especially in the field of fuel production, aromatics could act as important octane enhancers and are significant parts of all the fuels, the content of which in gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel could be up to 35%, 30%, and 25%, respectively [15]. In the traditional commodity chemical industry, the cost of raw materials usually accounts for 60–70% of the total cost [16]. Therefore, recovering aromatic hydrocarbons from wastes would bring remarkable environmental and economic benefits. Nelson et al. [17] investigated the DDO of phenol over Ru/TiO2 catalyst, in the presence of H2O at 573 K and 550 psig H2, and the conversion rate reached 30%. Yoosuk et al. [18] compared the DDO and HYD routes of phenol, catalyzed by MoS2 and CoMoS2, and a maximum conversion rate of 83.4% was reached at 350 °C and 2.8 MPa H2. Zhu et al. [19] used bi-functional Pt/HZSM-5 in the DDO of m-Cresol at 400 °C with an H2/m-cresol molar ratio of 50, and the yield of aromatic hydrocarbons was up to 99%. It should be noted that these studies on catalytic deoxygenation of phenols used external H2 as the hydrogen source and rare metals as catalysts.

In more recent studies, hydrogen-rich materials instead of H2 were used as hydrogen donors, and DDO was carried out in catalytic co-pyrolysis, using less costly catalysts. Xue et al. [20] carried out the catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignin and tetralin, using HZSM-5 and HY zeolite catalysts, and the yield of aromatic hydrocarbons was increased from 48.8% to 66.2%. Ding et al. [21] studied the co-pyrolysis of corn stove and polyethylene (PE) catalyzed by CeO2 and HZSM-5, and the deoxygenation efficiency increased by around 13%. However, there has been no systematic analysis on the low-cost and high-yield catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of PC co-pyrolysis products.

In this study, PE and polypropylene (PP) were used as hydrogen donors, and HZSM-5 was used in the catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of the PC oil produced by the co-pyrolysis of PC with PE and PP, two major components of waste plastics, used as cheap hydrogen sources [22]. HZSM-5 is a commercial catalyst with high catalytic aromatization performance and high deoxygenation activity [23]. The co-pyrolysis behavior and the possible hydrodeoxygenation mechanism of PC and PE/PP were explored in detail. The results of this study can provide new ideas for the upgrading of oils with high oxygen content produced by the pyrolysis of non-recycled plastics.

Section snippets

Materials and catalyst

PC was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, US. PE and PP were obtained from Guanbu Electromechanical Technology Company, China. The as-received plastics were ground and sieved to a particle size less than 0.18 mm (80 mesh).

HZSM-5 powder (100–200 mesh, Si/Al = 28), provided by Tianjin Yuanli Chemical Company, China, was used as the catalyst in this study. The as-received HZSM-5 was activated at 550 °C for 4 h in a tubular furnace in air.

Experimental setup and analysis methods

A two-staged tubular furnace was used to conduct the catalytic

Thermal decomposition characteristics of various blends of PC and PE/PP

The TG and DTG curves of PC and PE/PP are shown in Fig. 1, and the comparison between experimental and predicted curves of various blends, in Fig. S1. The DTG curves showed that as the percentage of PE/PP increased from 0 to 100%, the maximum weight loss rate increased, as well as the peak temperature, from 423.2 °C to 462.1/441.4 °C, respectively. This indicated that PE and PP have higher thermal decomposition temperatures and narrower weight loss temperature ranges than PC. The TG data showed

Conclusions

Catalytic co-pyrolysis of PC and PE/PP in the presence of HZSM-5 catalyst was conducted with the objective of promoting simultaneous deoxygenation and aromatic hydrocarbon formation. The effect of HZSM-5, the PE or PP to PC blending ratio, catalytic temperature, and catalyst regeneration on the product yield and oil components were investigated. The main conclusions are as follows:

  • (1)

    The phenols in the oil produced by the pyrolysis of PC accounted for 84.4%. HZSM-5 promoted the deoxygenation of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Kai Sun: Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Wanli Wang: Investigation, Writing - original draft. Nickolas J. Themelis: Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Visualization. A.C. Thanos Bourtsalas: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Qunxing Huang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Key Research and Development Program of China, China (2018YFC1901300), the National Key Research and Development Program of China, China (2016YFE0202000), Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province, China (2020C03084) and Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province, China (2019JZZY020806), the China Scholarship Council, China, and the ZJU Scholarship for Outstanding Doctoral Candidates, China. Some of the

References (52)

  • M. Tagliabue et al.

    Study on the stability of a Ga/Nd/ZSM-5 aromatisation catalyst

    Appl Catal A

    (2004)
  • B. Yoosuk et al.

    Unsupported MoS2 and CoMoS2 catalysts for hydrodeoxygenation of phenol

    Chem Eng Sci

    (2012)
  • K. Ding et al.

    Improving hydrocarbon yield via catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic over ceria and HZSM-5: An analytical pyrolyzer analysis

    Bioresour Technol

    (2018)
  • L. Fan et al.

    Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignin and low-density polyethylene with HZSM-5 and MgO for improved bio-oil yield and quality

    Bioresour Technol

    (2017)
  • A. Bayat et al.

    Production of green aromatics via catalytic cracking of Canola Oil Methyl Ester (CME) using HZSM-5 catalyst with different Si/Al ratios

    Fuel

    (2016)
  • E.V. Antonakou et al.

    Catalytic and thermal pyrolysis of polycarbonate in a fixed-bed reactor: The effect of catalysts on products yields and composition

    Polym Degrad Stab

    (2014)
  • F. Ates et al.

    Comparision of real waste (MSW and MPW) pyrolysis in batch reactor over different catalysts. Part I: product yields, gas and pyrolysis oil properties

    Bioresour Technol

    (2013)
  • J.F. Mastral et al.

    Catalytic degradation of high density polyethylene over nanocrystalline HZSM-5 zeolite

    Polym Degrad Stab

    (2006)
  • G. Elordi et al.

    Role of pore structure in the deactivation of zeolites (HZSM-5, Hβ and HY) by coke in the pyrolysis of polyethylene in a conical spouted bed reactor

    Appl Catal B

    (2011)
  • M. Ibáñez et al.

    Identification of the coke deposited on an HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst during the sequenced pyrolysis–cracking of HDPE

    Appl Catal B

    (2014)
  • M. Guisnet et al.

    Prevention of zeolite deactivation by coking

    J Mol Catal A Chem

    (2009)
  • A.T. To et al.

    Role of a phenolic pool in the conversion of m-cresol to aromatics over HY and HZSM-5 zeolites

    Appl Catal A

    (2014)
  • P. Lu et al.

    Synergistic effects on char and oil produced by the co-pyrolysis of pine wood, polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • M. Brebu et al.

    Co-pyrolysis of LignoBoost® lignin with synthetic polymers

    Polym Degrad Stab

    (2012)
  • H.Y. Shen et al.

    Comparative studies on alkylation of phenol with tert-butyl alcohol in the presence of liquid or solid acid catalysts in ionic liquids

    J Mol Catal A Chem

    (2004)
  • P. Castaño et al.

    Insights into the coke deposited on HZSM-5, Hβ and HY zeolites during the cracking of polyethylene

    Appl Catal B

    (2011)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Catalytic pyrolysis of waste polyethylene into benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX)-enriched oil with dielectric barrier discharge reactor

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The greater the mass loss temperature at the peak, the greater is the C/H ratio of the carbon deposition process (Cerqueira et al., 2008; Elordi et al., 2011). Coke was oxidized at a lower temperature maintained higher activity (Sun et al., 2021). Accordingly, the carbon deposition was most easily removed at a PE/(Ga/HZSM-5) ratio of 1:1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text