Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

S-Wave Attenuation Field and Seismotectonics of Eastern Anatolia

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work studies the characteristics of seismic coda waves attenuation in Eastern Anatolia. The short-period coda waves from about 400 earthquakes that occurred in Eastern Anatolia between 1989 and 2018 are analyzed. The three-component digital records of seismic events with M ≥ 3.5, recorded at epicentral distances of 10–600 kilometers, are used. S-wave attenuation was estimated from short-period coda envelopes (including those of Lg wave coda) at a frequency of ~1 Hz. The structural features of the S-wave attenuation field in the upper mantle of the Lake Van area are similar to those for other seismoactive zones. The attenuation field is represented by blocks, which have weak attenuation and are subisometric in plan view, and strong attenuation zones; in the case of blocks, attenuation decreases in the direction from the boundaries to the central of these blocks (Q-factor is up to 300–700). Among the zones of strong attenuation, which are usually linearly elongated, the most noticeable are the en echelon zone (north of 39° N), associated with the North Anatolian Fault; here, QS ~ 80–110 (up to QS ~ 60 in the north); and the Bitlis-Zagros fold and thrust belt (QS ~ 60–70). Sources of the strongest earthquakes with M > 6.0, including the 1976 Çaldıran–Muradiye and 2011 Van earthquakes, are confined to the boundaries of the blocks. The attenuation field structure corresponds to the velocity field structure: low-velocity anomalies correspond to low-Q zones. Vertically elongated volumes, with which intensive localized seismicity (earthquake swarms) is associated and along which deep fluids can migrate, are revealed. Seismic activation in such volumes precedes large seismic events (for example, the 2011 Van earthquake). It is assumed that such volumes can be interpreted as local seismogenic sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Akın, U. and Çiftçi, Y., Structural Discontinuties of Turkey: Geological and Geophysical Analysis (Gravity and Magnetic), General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Lazki, A.I., Seber, D., Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., Mohamad, R., and Barazangi, M., Tomographic Pn velocity and anisotropy structure beneath the Anatolian plateau (eastern Turkey) and the surrounding regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017391

  3. Alptekin, Ö., Nabelek, J., and Toksöz, M.N., Source mechanism of the Bartın earthquake of September 3, 1968 in northwest Turkey: Evidence for active thrust faulting at the southern Back Sea margin, Tectonophysics, 1986, vol. 122, pp. 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Angus, D.A., Wilson, D.C., Sandvol, E., and Ni, J.F., Lithospheric structure of the Arabian and Eurasian collision zone in eastern Turkey from S-wave receiver functions, Geophys. J. Int., 2006, vol. 166, pp. 1335–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aptikaeva, O.I., The use of short-period coda of aftershocks for studying peculiarities of source zones of strong earthquakes, Geofiz. Issled., 2007, no. 8, pp. 21–32.

  6. Aptikaeva, O.I., The attenuation field in the source zones of strong earthquakes in Garm, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2012a, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351312040015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aptikaeva, O.I., Peculiarities of cyclic variations in the S-wave attenuation field in weakened zones and blocks, Geofiz. Issled., 2012b, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aptikaeva, O.I., Variations in the block structure and seismicity of the Garm area in the background of inhomogeneous earth’s rotation, Vopr. Inzh. Seismol., 2012c, no. 4, pp. 55–64.

  9. Aptikaeva, O.I., The attenuation field in the focal zone of the 2003 Altai Earthquake, using the coda envelopes of the aftershocks, Seism. Instrum., 2015, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 367–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aptikaeva, O.I., Seismic activity and structures of the crust and upper mantle in the areas of source zones of the largest earthquakes in the Altai–Sayan Region, Seism. Instrum., 2018, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 184–198. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918020020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aptikaeva, O.I., Detailed structure of attenuation field in the Western Tien Shan based on short-period coda waves, Seism. Instrum., 2019a, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 185–195. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923919020038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aptikaeva, O.I., Peculiarities of the Van earthquakes of 1976 and 2011, swarm seismicity and S-wave attenuation field, Geol. Geofiz. Yuga Ross., 2019b, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aptikaeva, O.I. and Aptikaev, S.F., Attenuation of seismic waves from moderate earthquakes of the Vrancea zone, Seism. Instrum., 2017, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923917020037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aptikaeva, O.I. and Aptikaev, S.F., The S-wave attenuation field in the near area of NPP sites based on seismic monitoring data: Case study of the Akkuyu NPP, Turkey, Geofiz. Issled., 2019, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 56–72. https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2019.2-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aptikaeva, O.I. and Kopnichev, Yu.F., Fine structure of the lithosphere and asthenosphere in the Garm area and its relationship to seismicity, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 1991, vol. 317, no. 3, pp. 326–330.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aptikaeva, O.I. and Kopnichev, Yu.F., Detailed mapping of the lithosphere and asthenosphere of the Garm area from shear wave attenuation, Vulkanol. Seismol., 1992, nos. 5–6, pp. 101–118.

  17. Arpat, E. and Şaroğlu, F., The East Anatolian fault System: Thoughts on its development, Bull. Inst. Miner. Res. Explor. (Ankara, Turkey), 1972, vol. 78, pp. 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bagramyan, A.Kh., Geodakyan, E.G., and Papalashvili, V.G., Earthquake of November 24 in thea Lake Van area, in Zemletryaseniya v SSSR v 1976 g. (Earthquakes in the USSR in 1976), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 16–18.

  19. Barka, A. and Reilinger, R., Active tectonics of Eastern Mediterranean region: Deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data, Ann. Geofis., 1997, vol. XL, no. 3, pp. 587–610.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biryol, C.B., Beck, S.L., Zandt, G., and Özacar, A.A., Segmented African lithosphere beneath the Anatolian region inferred from teleseismic P-wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 2011, vol. 184, pp. 1037–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Catalog of the Caucasus region earthquakes with M ≥ 4.0 (K ≥ 11.0) from ancient times through 2000 (compiled by A.A. Godzikovskaya, last revision February 21, 2001). http://zeus.wdcb.ru/wdcb/sep/caucasus/. Accessed October 1, 2019.

  22. Dewey, J.F., Hempton, M.R., Kidd, W.S.F., Saroglu, F., and Sengor, A.M.C., Shortening of continental lithosphere: The neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia – a young collision zone, in Collision Zone Tectonics, vol. 19 of Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., Coward, M.P. and Ries, A.C., Eds. (London, 1986), pp. 3–36.

  23. Dilek, Y. and Sandvol, E., Seismic structure, crustal architecture and tectonic evolution of the Anatolian–African Plate boundary and the Cenozoic orogenic belts in the Eastern Mediterranean region, in Ancient Orogens and Modern Analogues, vol. 327 of Geol. Soc., London, Spec. Publ., Murphy, J.B., Keppie, J.D., and Hynes, A.J., Eds. (London, 2009), pp. 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP327.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duman, T.Y., Can, T., Emre, O., Kadirioglu, F.T., Basturk, N.B., Kılıc, T., Arslan, S., Ozalp, S., Kartal, R.F., Kalafat, D., Karakaya, F., Azak, T.E., Ozel, N.M., Ergintav, S., Akkar, S., et al., Seismotectonic database of Turkey, Bull. Earthquake Eng., 2018, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 3277–3316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9965-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gok, R., Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., Seber, D., and Barazangi, M., Sn attenuation in the Anatolian and Iranian plateau and surrounding regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018020

  26. Kaazik, P.B., Kopnichev, Yu.F., Nersesov, I.L., and Rakhmatullin, M.Kh., Analysis of the fine structure of short-period seismic fields from a group of stations, Fiz. Zemli, 1990, no. 4, pp. 38–49.

  27. Kadirioğlu, F.T. and Kartal, R.F., The new empirical magnitude conversion relations using an improved earthquake catalogue for Turkey and its near vicinity (1900–2012), Turk. J. Earth Sci., 2016, vol. 25, pp. 300–310. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1511-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kocyigit, A., Neotectonics and seismicity of East Anatolian, Workshop-2002 on the Geology of East Anatolian, Van, Turkey, 2002, Van: Yüzüncü Yıl Univ., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kocyigit, A., Yilmaz, A., Adamia, S., and Kuloshvili, S., Neotectonics of East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) and Lesser Caucasus: Implication for transition from thrusting to strike-slip faulting, Geodyn. Acta, 2001, no. 14, pp. 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kopnichev, Yu.F. and Sokolova, I.N., High S-wave attenuation anomalies and ringlike seismogenic structures in the lithosphere beneath Altai: Possible precursors of large earthquakes, Izv., Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 2016, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433816080077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kopnichev, Yu.F. and Sokolova, I.N., Temporal variations of the S-wave attenuation field in the area of the Lop Nor Nuclear Test Site, Seism. Instrum., 2018, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 691–694. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918060063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kopnichev, Yu.F. and Sokolova, I.N., Characteristics of the attenuation field of short-period S-waves in the source zone of the Tohoku earthquake of March 11, 2011 with Mw = 9.0, Geofiz.Protsessy Biosfera, 2019a, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 16–27. https://doi.org/10.21455/GPB2019.2-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kopnichev, Yu.F. and Sokolova, I.N., Inhomogeneities of the S-wave attenuation field in the lithosphere of Caucasus region and their relationship to seismicity, Geofiz.Protsessy Biosfera, 2019b, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 67–76. https://doi.org/10.21455/GPB2019.3-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., et al., Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2000, vol. 105, no. B3, pp. 5695–5719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McKenzie, D.P., Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1972, vol. 30, pp. 109–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rotstein, Y. and Kafka, A.L., Seismotectonics of the southern boundary of Anatolia, eastern Medi-terranean region; subduction, collision, and arc jumping, J. Geophys. Res., B, 1982, vol. 87, pp. 7694–7706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandvol, E., Turkelli, N., and Barazangi, M., The Eastern Turkey Seismic Experiment: The study of a young continent-continent collision, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018912

  38. Sargsyan, G.V., Abgaryan, G.R., Mugnetsyan, E.A., and Gevorgyan, A.A., Armenia, in Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii. 2011 god (Earthquakes of North Eurasia in 2011), Obninsk: Edinaya Geofiz. Sluzhba Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 63–69.

  39. Saroglu, F., Emre, O., and Kuscu, I., The East Anatolian Fault zone of Turkey, Ann. Tecton., 1992, no. 6, pp. 99–125.

  40. Şaroğlu, F. and Erdoğan, R., Observations on post seismic slip along Çaldıran Fault, Yeryuvarıve İnsan, 1983, no. 8, pp. 10–11.

  41. Sidorenkov, N.S., The Interaction between Earth’s Rotation and Geophysical Processes, Weinheim: Wiley, 2009, Table D.1.

  42. Shevchenko, V.I., Lukk, A.A., and Guseva, T.V., Avtonomnaya i pleittektonicheskaya geodinamiki nekotorykh podvizhnykh poyasov i sooruzhenii (Autonomous and Plate Tectonic Geodynamics of Some Mobile Belts and Structures), Moscow: GEOS, 2017.

  43. Shevchenko V.I., Lukk A.A., Prilepin, M.T., and Reilinger, R.E., Present-day geodynamics of the Mediterranean-Lesser Caucasus part of the Alpine-Indonesian Mobile Belt, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Spetsializirovannyi katalog zemletryasenii dlya zadach obshchego seismicheskogo raionirovaniya territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Specialized Earthquake Catalogue for the Purposes of General Seismic Zoning of the Territory of Russian Federation), Ulomov, V.I. and Medvedeva, N.S., Eds., Moscow: Inst. Fiz. Zemli Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2013. http://seismos-u.ifz.ru/documents/Eartquake-Catalog-%D0%A1%D0% 9A%D0%97.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tan, O., Tapirdamaz, M.C., and Yoruk, A. The earthquake catalogues for Turkey, Turk. J. Earth Sci., 2008, vol. 17, pp. 405–418.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tchalenko, J.S., A reconnaissance of the seismicity and tectonics at the northern border of the Arabian Plate (Lake Van region), Rev. Geol. Dyn. Geogr. Phys., 1977, vol. XIX, no. 2, pp. 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Trifonov, V.G., Neotektonika Evrazii (Neotectonics of Eurasia), Moscow: Nauchnyi mir, 1999.

  48. Vanacore, E.A., Taymaz, T., and Saygin, E., Moho structure of the Anatolian Plate from receiver function analysis. Geophys. J. Int., 2013, vol. 193, pp. 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vinnik, L.P. Erduran, M., Oreshin, S.I., Kosarev, G.L., Kutlu, Yu.A., Çakir, Ö., and Kiselev, S.G., Joint inversion of P- and S-receiver functions and dispersion curves of Rayleigh waves: The results for the Central Anatolian Plateau, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 622–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii. 2011 god (Earthquakes of North Eurasia in 2011), Obninsk: Edinaya Geofiz. Sluzhba Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017.

  51. Zor, E., Sandvol, E., Gurbuz, C., Turkelli, N. Seber, D., and Barazangi, M., The crustal structure of the East Anatolian plateau (Turkey) from receiver functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018192

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123242, Moscow, Russia

    O. I. Aptikaeva

Authors
  1. O. I. Aptikaeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. I. Aptikaeva.

Additional information

Translated by N. Astafiev

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aptikaeva, O.I. S-Wave Attenuation Field and Seismotectonics of Eastern Anatolia. Seism. Instr. 56, 106–120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S074792392001003X

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S074792392001003X

Keywords:

Search

Navigation