Quantitative risk assessment for human Taenia saginata infection from consumption of Australian beef
Introduction
Traditional organoleptic post-mortem inspection (PMI) was developed in the late 19th and early 20th century to control important zoonotic diseases such as tuberculosis, taeniasis and trichinosis in Europe and North America when these diseases were relatively prevalent (Von Ostertag, 1892). Among these foodborne zoonoses, PMI for Taenia saginata cysticercus, more commonly referred to as Cysticercus bovis which is used throughout this text, has been a quintessential example of the effectiveness of veterinary public health which has led to substantial improvements in animal health management, whereby retention of traditional procedures is now questionable in the context of consumer risk (van der Logt, Hathaway, Vose, 1997, Dupuy, Hendrikx, Hardstaff, Lindberg, 2012, Hill, Horigan, Clarke, Dewéb, Stärk, O’Brien, Buncic, 2014). Adoption of Codex Alimentarius Commission principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment and the Code of Hygienic Practice for Meat (CAC, CAC) now provide a framework for taking an evidence-based approach for the allocation of food safety resources commensurate with risk. Accordingly, risk managers increasingly utilize quantitative assessments of risk for justifying new regulation and equally for the removal of regulation when no longer applicable or effective.
This applies for Cysticercus bovis in industrialised countries where animals are generally not grazed on pastures that have been irrigated by sewage due to the risk of T. saginata infection (Rickard, Adolph, 1977, Seddon, 1967). As a result the prevalence of C. bovis in cattle tends to be low (Pearse, Traub, Davis, Cobbold, Vanderlinde, 2010, van der Logt, Hathaway, Vose, 1997) and associated infections tend to be light, i.e. involving only few cysts. For this reason it is widely acknowledged that the organoleptic inspection procedure for C. bovis lacks sensitivity (Griffiths, 1950, Murrell, 2005, Dorny, Vercammen, Brandt, Vansteenkiste, Berkvens, Geerts, 2000, Kyvsgaard, Ilsøe, Henriksen, Nansen, 1990, Pearse, Traub, Davis, Cobbold, Vanderlinde, 2010).
Based on these observations, and the low prevalence of C. bovis in New Zealand (NZ), van der Logt et al. (1997) reported the results of a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for human infection from T. saginata from the consumption of New Zealand beef produced under the following PMI models (i) Traditional PMI using one or two incisions of the masseters (depending on market), one deep incision is made into each internal pterygoid muscle and several incisions of the heart and (ii) No PMI for cysts. Under the traditional PMI, the estimated mean number of human infections in NZ domestic and export markets were 1.10 and 0.50, respectively. Undertaking no PMI for C. bovis resulted in a marginal increase in these estimates to 1.30 and 0.61, respectively. This model was adapted (Skjerve, 1999) to the Norwegian situation to investigate the effect on human illness in Norway from importing beef from T. saginata endemic areas.
Similar to NZ, the prevalence of C. bovis in Australian cattle is estimated to be very low. The purpose of this project was to adapt the NZ QRA for C. bovis in beef to the Australian context, incorporating updates to the scientific evidence. In particular, the aim was to estimate the number of infections per year and the mean probability of human T. saginata infection from the consumption of Australian beef meat, in the domestic and key export markets in 2015. The scope of this QRA was to model C. bovis in low-risk Australian beef cattle, i.e. those reared on non-sewage irrigated pasture, slaughtered in accredited Australian abattoirs and under routine PMI practices, from slaughter to consumption in Australia and the top 5 beef export markets, and to provide evidence for adoption of alternative post-mortem inspection procedures.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Under the Australian Standard for the Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption (Food Regulation Standard Committee (FRSC), 2007), inspection of cattle at slaughter requires examination for the presence of lesions caused by C. bovis. Sites inspected routinely are the heart (I=incision), masticatory muscles (I), and the tongue (P=Palpate). When C. bovis is detected or suspected (because of the origin of the animal), the tongue and diaphragm are incised (I) and
Risk characterisation
A summary of the risk estimates for the domestic and export markets for the three scenarios is provided in Table 6. Under the current PMI procedures a median of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.04–15.8) illness per year is expected domestically and 0.97 (95% Credible Interval: 0.05–13.4) illness per year in all export markets combined. On a per serve basis, noting the 300 g portion size, the median probability of illness is 0.37 per 1 billion portions domestically and 0.27 per 1 billion serves in all export
Discussion
The estimates of human T. saginata infections from the consumption of Australian beef, reared on non-sewage irrigated pasture, slaughtered in accredited Australian abattoirs and under current routine PMI practices are 0.56 and 0.97 illnesses per year, or 0.37 and 0.27 infections per billion portions, in the domestic and top 5 export markets (Table 6), respectively. As such, these findings are similar to those of van der Logt et al. (1997), who estimate 5.0 and 0.5 per billion portions for NZ
Conclusions
This quantitative risk assessment demonstrates that the vastly improved health status of the Australian beef herd in relation to C. bovis is now reflected in its negligible risk to consumers. In Australia, management of the domestic standard Hygienic Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption (Food Regulation Standard Committee (FRSC), 2007) is conducted by the Australian Meat Regulators Group (AMRG) comprised of state (domestic) and federal (export)
Declaration of interest
None
Funding
Funding for this project was provided by Meat and Livestock Australia project number V.RBP.0021.
Acknowledgments
Members of the expert panel are thanked for their contributions. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their helpful comments and suggestions.
References (55)
- et al.
Contribution of meat inspection to animal health surveillance in bovine animals
Technical Report
(2012) 2007 U.S. Cold Temperature Evaluation: Design and Summary Pages
Technical Report
(2008)The incidence of Cysticercus bovis in cattle in Victoria and Tasmania
Aust. Vet. J.
(1967)A review of the incidence of cysticercus bovis in cattle in great britain, together with a consideration of some aspects of Taenia saginata infection in man
Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol.
(1950)- et al.
Freezing times and temperatures required to kill cysticerci of Taenia saginata in beef
Vet. Parasitol.
(1978) Rinderfinnen, ein problem?
Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift
(1983)- et al.
Unidentified parasitic cysts in cattle
Veterinary Record
(2000) - et al.
Preferential infection sites of cysticercus bovis in cattle experimentally infected with Taenia saginata eggs
Res. Vet. Sci.
(2011) - et al.
Distribution of Taenia saginata cysts by muscle group in naturally infected cattle in tanzania
Prev. Vet. Med.
(1996) - et al.
Recovery rate and distribution of cysticercus bovis in calves artificially infected with Taenia saginata eggs.
Res. Vet. Sci.
(1972)
Distribution of Cysticercus bovis in lightly infected young cattle
Aust. Vet. J.
Prevalence of Cysticercus bovis in Australian cattle
Aust. Vet. J.
Prevalence and geospatial distribution of bovine cysticercosis in the state of mato grosso, brazil
Prev. Vet. Med.
Distribution of Taenia saginata cysticerci in tissues of experimentally infected cattle
Vet. Parasitol.
Diseases of domestic animals in Australia: Part 1 helminth infestations
A risk assessment model for Escherichia coliO157:H7 in ground beef and beef cuts in canada evaluating the effects of interventions
Food Control
Distribution of Taenia saginata metacestodes: a comparison of routine meat inspection and carcase dissection results in experimentally infected calves
Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol.
Visual diagnosis of Taenia saginatacysticercosis during meat inspection: is it unequivocal?
Parasitol. Res.
The thermal death point of cysticerci of Taenia saginata
J. Parasitol.
AS4696:2007—Australian Standard for the Hygienic Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption
AS
Taeniasis (tapeworm)
Australian Meat Regulators Group Guideline for Assessment and Amendment to an Australian Standard
Parasitic hazard with sewage sludge applied to land
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Antemortem diagnosis of bovine cysticercosis due to Taenia saginata
Proceedings, Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association
Cited by (6)
Bovine cysticercosis epidemiology and the economic impact of the triceps brachii incision in a South African export abattoir
2023, Preventive Veterinary MedicineThe probability of cysticercus bovis detection in livestock from exposure to recycled water in non-endemic countries
2021, Microbial Risk AnalysisCitation Excerpt :Others have also shown that concentrations of HE in biosolids are low in parts of Australia (O'Connor et al., 2017). These low concentrations of Taenia spp. are also supported by additional controls for transmission in Australia via appropriate meat inspection procedures at the abattoir, and the freezing and/or cooking of the meat prior to consumption (Kiermeier et al., 2019). Over the ten-year period of sampling, no Taenia spp. eggs were detected in any sewage samples by either laboratory, including the additional 35 recycled water samples assessed (data not shown).
A systematic review of beef meat quantitative microbial risk assessment models
2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBeef Freezing Optimization by Means of Planck Model Through Simulation
2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental ScienceImprovement of log reduction values design equations for helminth egg management in recycled water
2021, Water (Switzerland)