Abstract
Bridges are susceptible to deterioration and damage as they age and should be routinely assessed to evaluate their integrity and safety for service. Traditionally, structural monitoring has comprised visual inspections, however this is both time and labor intensive. Researchers have shown that sensors on moving vehicles may provide insight into the dynamic behavior of bridges. Accelerometers within smartphones may serve as the sensors from which data is collected; thus, enabling massive data collection from a fleet of potential monitoring vehicles. This paper presents four postprocessing strategies for estimating bridge frequencies from smartphone acceleration data streams with no a priori information about the mass or stiffness of the bridge or vehicle. These techniques utilize the DFT and MUSIC algorithms to calculate vehicle acceleration frequency spectrums from which the fundamental bridge vibration frequency may be estimated. Both single-vehicle and crowdsourced postprocessing techniques are investigated. Utilizing the MUSIC algorithm within a crowdsourcing framework, the correct bridge frequency was identified in all analytical simulations within 4% error, representing a significant increase in performance over single-vehicle estimations made using MUSIC. The effect of user interaction with the smartphone is studied by including superimposed acceleration signals on 25–100% of analytical results; the superimposed user events included a dropped smartphone and talking on a smartphone. Increasing the percentage of noisy signals in the pool of evaluated accelerations generally reduces performance with the exception of crowdsourced estimations made using the MUSIC algorithm, which proved to be robust against user interaction with the smartphone.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
References
ASCE (2017) 2017 Infrastructure Report Card
Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB (1997) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jiang X, Ma ZJ, Ren W-X (2012) Crack detection from the slope of the mode shape using complex continuous wavelet transform. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 27:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00734.x
Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez F, Czarnecki J (2002) A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996–2001. Technical report. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Arangio S, Bontempi F (2010) Soft computing based multilevel strategy for bridge integrity monitoring. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 25:348–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00644.x
Mehrjoo M, Khaji N, Moharrami H, Bahreininejad A (2008) Damage detection of truss bridge joints using artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 35:1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.008
Zapico JL, González MP, Worden K (2003) Damage assessment using neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 17:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1547
Hazra B, Sadhu A, Roffel AJ, Narasimhan S (2012) Hybrid time-frequency blind source separation towards ambient system identification of structures. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 27:314–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00732.x
Story BA, Fry GT (2014) Methodology for designing diagnostic data streams for use in a structural impairment detection system. J Bridg Eng 19:04013020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000556
Story BA, Fry GT (2014) A Structural impairment detection system using competitive arrays of artificial neural networks. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 29:180–190
Xiang J, Liang M (2012) Wavelet-based detection of beam cracks using modal shape and frequency measurements. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 27:439–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00760.x
Cantero D, Hester D, Brownjohn J (2017) Evolution of bridge frequencies and modes of vibration during truck passage. Eng Struct 152:452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.039
Cantero D, O’Brien EJ (2013) The non-stationarity of apparent bridge natural frequencies during vehicle crossing events. FME Trans 41:279–284
Cerda F, Garrett J, Bielak J et al (2012) Indirect structural health monitoring in bridges: scale experiments. In: Proceedings of bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience, and sustainability. Lago di Como, pp 346–353
Kim C, Chang K, Mcgetrick PJ et al (2017) Utilizing moving vehicles as sensors for bridge condition screening. A laboratory verification. Sens Mater 29:153. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2017.1433
Kim C-W, Isemoto R, McGetrick P et al (2014) Drive-by bridge inspection from three different approaches. Smart Struct Syst 13:775–796. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.T.003
Kim J, Lynch JP (2012) Experimental analysis of vehicle bridge interaction using a wireless monitoring system and a two-stage system identification technique. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.12.008
Kong X, Cai CS, Kong B (2016) Numerically extracting bridge modal properties from dynamic responses of moving vehicles. J Eng Mech 142:04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001033
Li WM, Jiang ZH, Wang TL, Zhu HP (2014) Optimization method based on generalized pattern search algorithm to identify bridge parameters indirectly by a passing vehicle. J Sound Vib 333:364–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.021
Lin CW, Yang YB (2005) Use of a passing vehicle to scan the fundamental bridge frequencies: an experimental verification. Eng Struct 27:1865–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.016
Malekjafarian A, McGetrick PJ, O’Brien EJ (2015) A review of indirect bridge monitoring using passing vehicles. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/286139
Malekjafarian A, O’Brien EJ (2014) Application of output-only modal method in monitoring of bridges using an instrumented vehicle. In: Civil Engineering Research in Ireland. Belfast, UK
Malekjafarian A, O’Brien EJ (2014) Identification of bridge mode shapes using short time frequency domain decomposition of the responses measured in a passing vehicle. Eng Struct 81:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.007
Malekjafarian A, O’Brien EJ (2017) On the use of a passing vehicle for the estimation of bridge mode shapes. J Sound Vib 397:77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.02.051
McGetrick PJ, González A, OBrien EJ (2009) Theoretical investigation of the use of a moving vehicle to identify bridge dynamic parameters. Insight Non Destr Test Cond Monit 51:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2009.51.8.433
O’Brien EJ, Malekjafarian A (2015) Identification of bridge mode shapes using a passing vehicle. In: 7th International conference structure health monitor intelligence infrastructure, Torino, Italy, July, 2015
Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y (2012) Estimating bridge fundamental frequency from vibration response of instrumented passing vehicle: analytical and experimental study. Adv Struct Eng 15:417–433. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.3.417
Yang YB, Chang KC (2009) Extracting the bridge frequencies indirectly from a passing vehicle: parametric study. Eng Struct 31:2448–2459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.001
Yang YB, Chang KC (2009) Extraction of bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle enhanced by the EMD technique. J Sound Vib 322:718–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.028
Yang YB, Chang KC, Li YC (2013) Filtering techniques for extracting bridge frequencies from a test vehicle moving over the bridge. Eng Struct 48:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.025
Yang YB, Cheng MC, Chang KC (2013) Frequency variation in vehicle–bridge interaction systems. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 13:1350019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455413500193
Yang YB, Li YC, Chang KC (2014) Constructing the mode shapes of a bridge from a passing vehicle: a theoretical study. Smart Struct Syst 13:797–819. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.5.797
Yang YB, Lin CW (2005) Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications. J Sound Vib 284:205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.032
Yang YB, Lin CW, Yau JD (2004) Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle. J Sound Vib 272:471–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00378-X
Yang YB, Yang JP (2018) State-of-the-art review on modal identification and damage detection of bridges by moving test vehicles. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 18:1850025. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455418500256
Zhu XQ, Law SS (2015) Structural health monitoring based on vehicle–bridge interaction: accomplishments and challenges. Adv Struct Eng 18:1999–2015. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.12.1999
Sitton JD, Zeinali Y, Rajan D, Story BA (2020) Frequency estimation on two-span continuous bridges using dynamic responses of passing vehicles. J Eng Mech 146:04019115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001698
Oshima Y, Funamizu Y, Sugiura K (2015) Stochastic characteristics of estimated frequencies in bridge–vehicle interactions. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 5:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0101-3
Elhattab A, Uddin N, OBrien E (2016) Drive-by bridge damage monitoring using bridge displacement profile difference. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 6:839–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0203-6
Tan C, Elhattab A, Uddin N (2017) “Drive-by’’ bridge frequency-based monitoring utilizing wavelet transform. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 7:615–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0246-3
Feldbusch A, Sadegh-Azar H, Agne P (2017) Vibration analysis using mobile devices (smartphones or tablets). Procedia Eng 199:2790–2795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.543
McGetrick PJ, Hester D, Taylor SE (2017) Implementation of a drive-by monitoring system for transport infrastructure utilising smartphone technology and GNSS. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 7:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0218-7
Mei Q, Gül M, Boay M (2019) Indirect health monitoring of bridges using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and principal component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 119:523–546
Mei Q, Gül M (2019) Monitoring populations of bridges in smart cities using smartphones. Structures Congress 2019, Orlando, FL, April, 2019
Sadeghi Eshkevari S, Pakzad SN, Takac M, Matarazzo TJ (2020) Modal identification of bridges using mobile sensors with sparse vibration data. J Eng Mech 146:04020011
Salawu OS (1996) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 19(9):718–723
Moradalizadeh M (1990)Evaluation of crack defects in framed structures using resonant frequency techniquesM. Phil. Thesis, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Slastan J, Pietrzko S (1993) Changes of RC-beam modal parameters due to cracks. In: Proceedings of 11th international modal analysis conference, vol 1. pp 70–76
Brownjohn JMW (1988) Assessment of structural integrity by dynamic measurements. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol
Begg RD, Mackenzie AC, Dodds CJ, Loland O (1976) Structural integrity monitoring using digital processing of vibration signals. In: Proceedings of 8th offshore technology conference
Alampalli S, Fu G, Abdul Aziz I (1992) Modal analysis as a bridge inspection tool. In: Proceedings of 10th international modal analysis conference, vol 2. pp 1359–1366
Biswas M, Pandey AK, Samman MM (1990) Diagnostic experimental spectral/modal analysis of a highway bridge. Int J Anal Exp Model Anal 5(1):33–42
Schmidt RO (1986) Multiple emitter location and signal parameter. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 34:276–280
Barabell AJ, Capon J, DeLong DF et al (1998) Performance comparison of superresolution array processing algorithms. Lexington, Massachusetts
Jiang X, Adeli H (2007) Pseudospectra, MUSIC, and dynamic wavelet neural network for damage detection of highrise buildings. Int J Numer Methods Eng 71:606–629
Amezquita-Sanchez JP, Adeli H (2015) A new music-empirical wavelet transform methodology for time-frequency analysis of noisy nonlinear and non-stationary signals. Digit Signal Process A Rev J 45:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2015.06.013
Amezquita-Sanchez JP, Park HS, Adeli H (2017) A novel methodology for modal parameters identification of large smart structures using MUSIC, empirical wavelet transform, and Hilbert transform. Eng Struct 147:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.054
Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) OpenSees command language manual
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the undergraduate researchers Christopher Stenzel and Hussam Khresat in the SMU Structural Engineering Laboratory and the GISD Summer Research Fellows (Anthony Aiyedun, Joseline Contreras, Arath Dominguez, Michelle Mendoza, Sarina Mohanlal, Caleb Vinson) for assistance with vehicle customization and experimental design. This research is supported through a research and education partnership with Garland Independent School District.
Funding
Smart Infrastructure Innovation Initiative (S3i) Program with Garland ISD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to this research and the writing of this article. BS and DR conceptualized and developed the method. JS developed the numerical models and experimental setup and performed all simulations and experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: User interaction signals
Appendix: User interaction signals
In an ideal diagnostic scenario, a smartphone would be stationary within a vehicle traversing a bridge. In reality, user interaction may occur. As a first-order approximation to including user interaction among vehicle signals, several experiments were performed to investigate superposition of two user events (i.e., Talk and Drop events) on vehicular vibration signals. For both user events, the following acceleration responses were recorded experimentally from a smartphone in a vehicle:
- 1.
Driving along flat ground with no user events performed;
- 2.
The user event while the car was stationary;
- 3.
The user event while the car was driven along flat ground.
Figures
11 and
12 compare the superposition of signal types 1 and 2 with signal type 3 for both Drop and Talk events. To a first-order approximation, the superposition of individual events upon vehicle signals resembles the response of the smartphone to a user event during vehicle movement.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sitton, J.D., Rajan, D. & Story, B.A. Bridge frequency estimation strategies using smartphones. J Civil Struct Health Monit 10, 513–526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00399-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00399-z