The dynamics of design: exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes
Section snippets
Theoretical background
In this section we describe the theoretical context and dynamic character of team processes before outlining the conceptual framework used as the basis for the empirical work.
Method
This research aims to develop theory by refining understanding of the variables involved in team processes as well as their relationships and underpinning mechanisms of interaction in design (Cash, 2018). We thus draw on two contrasting cases (Handfield & Melnyk, 1998). The presented cases provided unique data access offering detailed and in-depth insights on dynamic team processes at the meso-scale (Gibbert et al., 2008, Yin, 2013).
Results
The work sampling data analysis revealed two major findings related to team process heterogeneity in product development. These are associated with goal/action composition and temporal heterogeneity, which together illustrate heterogeneous taskwork/teamwork interaction. As a basis for understanding these findings it is important to note that both cases reflected high performance teams with consistent and high levels of motivation, good understanding of established organisational structures and
Team process dynamics in design
This research delivers three key insights on team process heterogeneity and dynamics in the design context, by answering the RQs outlined in the introduction. First, team processes in design, linking taskwork and teamwork, show substantial compositional and temporal heterogeneity. This contrasts prior theory that has typically focused on modelling either taskwork or teamwork, with little consideration for heterogeneous interaction effects (Leenders et al., 2016). Second, despite this
Limitations and further work
The first limitation of note is the extent of the sampling data and the inherent limitations of work sampling as a method. Although the sampling session lasted for only two weeks, comparison of the two cases revealed a number of dimensions of alignment in terms of individual activity and team dynamics. Further, these results were found to fall within the scope of prior findings in the design domain, despite differences in context (Robinson, 2010a, Wasiak et al., 2010). As such, the reported
Conclusions
This work set out to examine the meso-scale team processes in design in order to address critical gaps in prior theory associated with assumed homogeneity in composition and progression over time, as well as bifurcation in discussion of taskwork and teamwork. Thus, the aim of this work was to develop theory by refining understanding of the variables and underpinning mechanisms shaping team process progression in design. We addressed this aim by contrasting two in-depth cases using work sampling
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to report.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the reviewers and editors for helping to develop this manuscript. This paper reports on work funded by the Croatian Science Foundation MInMED (http://www.minmed.org) and TAIDE Projects (http://www.taide.org). Croatian Science Foundation project IP-2018-01-7269: Team Adaptability for Innovation-Oriented Product Development – TAIDE (http://www.taide.org).
References (78)
- et al.
Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams
Design Studies
(2001) - et al.
Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: Two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution
Design Studies
(2009) - et al.
PATH: A work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work
Applied Ergonomics
(1996) Developing theory-driven design research
Design Studies
(2018)- et al.
Activity theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice
Design Studies
(2015) - et al.
Exploring uncertainty perception as a driver of design activity
Design Studies
(2018) The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication
Design Studies
(2005)- et al.
Investigating design cognition in the construction and enactment of team mental models
Design Studies
(2013) Crossfunctional teams in product development: Accommodating the structure to the process
Journal of Product Innovation Management
(1993)- et al.
The situated function–behaviour–structure framework
Design Studies
(2004)
Analysis of collaboration for project design management
Computers in Industry
The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM
Journal of Operations Management
Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing
Design Studies
Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects
Design Studies
Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing
Design Studies
Analysis of interaction dynamics in collaborative and distributed design process
Computers in Industry
Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in Work/Organizational Psychology
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
The dynamics of micro-conflicts and uncertainty in successful and unsuccessful design teams
Design Studies
How design engineers spend their time: Job content and task satisfaction
Design Studies
Surprises are the benefits: Reframing in multidisciplinary design teams
Design Studies
Uncertainty, reflection, and designer identity development
Design Studies
The reflective practice of design teams
Design Studies
On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology
Design Studies
Collaborative problem-solution co-evolution in creative design
Design Studies
The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, job characteristics, and experienced meaningfulness
Academy of Management Review
The systemic-structural theory of activity: Applications to the study of human work
Mind, Culture and Activity
Activity theory as a basis for the study of work
Ergonomics
Enhancing the creative performance of new product teams: An organizational configurational approach
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Empirical studies of design thinking: Past, present, future
A dendrite method for cluster analysis
Communications in Statistics
A foundational observation method for studying design situations
Journal of Engineering Design
Uncertainty driven action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity
Design Science
Dimensions of creative evaluation: Distinct design and reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originality judgments
Design Studies
A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork
Academy of Management Review
Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams
Academy of Management Journal
Developing design as a discipline
Journal of Engineering Design
Research in design thinking
Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design
Management Science
Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective
Journal of Applied Psychology
Cited by (14)
Tactile co-design tools for complex interdisciplinary problem exploration in healthcare settings
2021, Design StudiesCitation Excerpt :To establish transparent design traces, one needs to model how stakeholders interact in the process. Cash et al. (2019) call for meso-level understanding of team dynamics on the design process at a level that connects micro- and macro-scales and offers a lens for understanding design work. Capturing interactions between the team members allows better understanding of team processes and blockages in terms of knowledge interaction.
Understanding representation: Contrasting gesture and sketching in design through dual-process theory
2021, Design StudiesCitation Excerpt :Before discussing the implications there are two main limitations to be considered. First, while dual-process theory is relatively mature (Evans, 2008), its application to design is very limited (Badke-Schaub & Eris, 2014; Cash et al., 2019), and questions remain about its exact mechanisms. This means that there are a number of questions requiring further study regarding how exactly to operationalise dual-process hypotheses and measures relevant to design research.
DESIGN SPRINT: USE OF DESIGN METHODS AND TECHNOLOGIES
2023, Proceedings of the Design SocietyDIMENSIONS of MULTIDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION: A COMPARATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW within DESIGN CONTEXT
2020, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference