Skip to main content
Log in

3D printing of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffold with hierarchical porous structure for bone regeneration

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bio-Design and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D)-printed scaffolds have attracted considerable attention in recent years as they provide a suitable environment for bone cell tissue regeneration and can be customized in shape. Among many other challenges, the material composition and geometric structure have major impacts on the performance of scaffolds. Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP), as the major constituents of natural bone and teeth, possess attractive biological properties and are widely used in bone scaffold fabrication. Many fabrication methods have been investigated in attempts to achieve HA/TCP scaffolds with microporous structure enabling cell growth and nutrient transport. However, current 3D printing methods can only achieve the fabrication of HA/TCP scaffolds with certain range of microporous structure. To overcome this challenge, we developed a slurry-based microscale mask image projection stereolithography, allowing us to form a HA/TCP-based photocurable suspension with complex geometry including biomimetic features and hierarchical porosity. Here, the curing performance and physical properties of the HA/TCP suspension were investigated, and a circular movement process for the fabrication of highly viscous HA/TCP suspension was developed. Based on these investigations, the scaffold composition was optimized. We determined that a 30 wt% HA/TCP scaffold with biomimetic hierarchical structure exhibited superior mechanical properties and porosity. Cell proliferation was investigated in vitro, and the surgery was conducted in a nude mouse in vivo model of long bone with cranial neural crest cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. The results showed our 3D-printed HA/TCP scaffold with biomimetic hierarchical structure is biocompatible and has sufficient mechanical strength for surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu B (2017) Natural bone and tooth: structure and properties. In: Basu B, Ghosh S (eds) Biomaterials for musculoskeletal regeneration. Springer, Singapore, pp 45–85

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Q et al (2017) Artificial periosteum in bone defect repair—a review. Chin Chem Lett 28(9):1801–1807

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu JC et al (1996) An experimental study of the effects of craniofacial growth on the long-term positional stability of microfixation. J Craniofacial Surg 7(1):64–68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Stelnicki EJ, Hoffman W (1998) Intracranial migration of microplates versus wires in neonatal pigs after frontal advancement. J Craniofacial Surg 9(1):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macchetta A, Turner IG, Bowen CR (2009) Fabrication of HA/TCP scaffolds with a graded and porous structure using a camphene-based freeze-casting method. Acta Biomater 5(4):1319–1327

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miao X et al (2008) Mechanical and biological properties of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds coated with poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid). Acta Biomater 4(3):638–645

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CMB, Ng SH, Yoon Y-J (2015) A review on 3D printed bioimplants. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16(5):1035–1046

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):496–504

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rengier F et al (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(4):335–341

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim S-S et al (2006) Poly (lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(8):1399–1409

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sato M et al (2006) Increased osteoblast functions on undoped and yttrium-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 27(11):2358–2369

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shao H et al (2017) Bone regeneration in 3D printing bioactive ceramic scaffolds with improved tissue/material interface pore architecture in thin-wall bone defect. Biofabrication 9(2):025003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu S et al (2017) Effects of HAp and TCP in constructing tissue engineering scaffolds for bone repair. J Mater Chem B 5(30):6110–6118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cao H, Kuboyama N (2010) A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/β-TCP for bone tissue engineering. Bone 46(2):386–395

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rakovsky A et al (2014) β-TCP-polylactide composite scaffolds with high strength and enhanced permeability prepared by a modified salt leaching method. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 32:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakahira A et al (2005) Fabrication of porous hydroxyapatite using hydrothermal hot pressing and post-sintering. J Am Ceram Soc 88(5):1334–1336

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou S et al (2011) Fabrication of hydroxyapatite/ethylene-vinyl acetate/polyamide 66 composite scaffolds by the injection-molding method. Polym Plast Technol Eng 50(10):1047–1054

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bose S et al (2003) Pore size and pore volume effects on alumina and TCP ceramic scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng, C 23(4):479–486

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarafder S et al (2015) SrO-and MgO-doped microwave sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds: mechanical properties and in vivo osteogenesis in a rabbit model. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 103(3):679–690

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tarafder S et al (2013) Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 7(8):631–641

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng Y et al (2018) 3D printing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with good mechanical and biocompatible properties by digital light processing. J Mater Sci 53(9):6291–6301

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang W et al (2013) Fabrication of HA/β-TCP scaffolds based on micro-syringe extrusion system. Rapid Prototyp J 19(5):319–326

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nyberg E et al (2017) Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ɛ-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bio-oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 23(11–12):503–514

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leukers B et al (2005) Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(12):1121–1124

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cox SC et al (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng, C 47:237–247

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu C et al (2015) Graphene-oxide-modified β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics stimulate in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis. Carbon 93:116–129

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kon E et al (2000) Autologous bone marrow stromal cells loaded onto porous hydroxyapatite ceramic accelerate bone repair in critical-size defects of sheep long bones. J Biomed Mater Res 49(3):328–337

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim J et al (2012) Rapid-prototyped PLGA/β-TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a rabbit femoral defect model. Biofabrication 4(2):025003

    Google Scholar 

  29. Witek L (2015) Extrusion-based, three-dimensional printing of calcium-phosphate scaffolds. Dissertation of Oklahoma State University

  30. Diogo GS et al (2014) Manufacture of β-TCP/alginate scaffolds through a Fab@ home model for application in bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication 6(2):025001

    Google Scholar 

  31. He F et al (2017) Fabrication of β-tricalcium phosphate composite ceramic sphere-based scaffolds with hierarchical pore structure for bone regeneration. Biofabrication 9(2):025005

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castilho M et al (2014) Direct 3D powder printing of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds for substitution of complex bone defects. Biofabrication 6(1):015006

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y et al (2017) 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity. Biofabrication 9(2):025037

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trombetta R et al (2017) 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Ann Biomed Eng 45(1):23–44

    Google Scholar 

  35. Castilho M et al (2015) Fabrication of individual alginate-TCP scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by means of powder printing. Biofabrication 7(1):015004

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Nadeem D et al (2015) Three-dimensional CaP/gelatin lattice scaffolds with integrated osteoinductive surface topographies for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication 7(1):015005

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Di Luca A et al (2016) Toward mimicking the bone structure: design of novel hierarchical scaffolds with a tailored radial porosity gradient. Biofabrication 8(4):045007

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang Y et al (2018) Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: from materials to functional structures. Adv Mater 30(36):1706539

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holmes B et al (2016) A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair. Nanotechnology 27(6):064001

    Google Scholar 

  40. Salerno A et al (2017) Synthetic scaffolds with full pore interconnectivity for bone regeneration prepared by supercritical foaming using advanced biofunctional plasticizers. Biofabrication 9(3):035002

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang J-Z et al (2015) Structure design and manufacturing of layered bioceramic scaffolds for load-bearing bone reconstruction. Biomed Mater 10(4):045006

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yang Y et al (2018) 3D-printed biomimetic super-hydrophobic structure for microdroplet manipulation and oil/water separation. Adv Mater 30(9):1704912

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li X, Chen Y (2017) Micro-scale feature fabrication using immersed surface accumulation. J Manuf Process 28:531–540

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li X et al (2018) Mask video projection based stereolithography with continuous resin flow to build digital models in minutes. In: ASME 2018 13th international manufacturing science and engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  45. Zhou C, Chen Y, Waltz RA (2009) Optimized mask image projection for solid freeform fabrication. In: ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  46. Li X et al (2018) 3D printing temporary crown and bridge by temperature controlled mask image projection stereolithography. Procedia Manuf 26:1023–1033

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou C et al (2013) Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projection-based stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 19(3):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  48. Song X et al (2015) Ceramic fabrication using mask-image-projection-based stereolithography integrated with tape-casting. J Manuf Process 20:456–464

    Google Scholar 

  49. Song X et al (2017) Piezoelectric component fabrication using projection-based stereolithography of barium titanate ceramic suspensions. Rapid Prototyp J 23(1):44–53

    Google Scholar 

  50. Frisch U, Hasslacher B, Pomeau Y (1986) Lattice-gas automata for the Navier–Stokes equation. Phys Rev Lett 56(14):1505

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zissi S et al (1996) Stereolithography and microtechniques. Microsyst Technol 2(2):97–102

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping & manufacturing: fundamentals of stereolithography. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn

    Google Scholar 

  53. Griffith ML, Halloran JW (1993) Freeform fabrication of ceramics via stereolithography. J Am Ceram Soc 79(10):2601–2608

    Google Scholar 

  54. Song X et al (2017) Porous structure fabrication using a stereolithography-based sugar foaming method. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(3):031015

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hamad AJ (2017) Size and shape effect of specimen on the compressive strength of HPLWFC reinforced with glass fibres. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 29(4):373–380

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Miller RG Jr (1997) Beyond ANOVA: basics of applied statistics. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Jordan MM et al (2008) Influence of firing temperature and mineralogical composition on bending strength and porosity of ceramic tile bodies. Appl Clay Sci 42(1–2):266–271

    Google Scholar 

  58. Deng XG et al (2016) Effects of firing temperature on the microstructures and properties of porous mullite ceramics prepared by foam-gelcasting. Adv Appl Ceram 115(4):204–209

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rice RW (1993) Comparison of stress concentration versus minimum solid area based mechanical property-porosity relations. J Mater Sci 28(8):2187–2190

    Google Scholar 

  60. Heunisch A, Dellert A, Roosen A (2010) Effect of powder, binder and process parameters on anisotropic shrinkage in tape cast ceramic products. J Eur Ceram Soc 30(16):3397–3406

    Google Scholar 

  61. Boccaccini AR, Trusty PA (1998) In situ characterization of the shrinkage behavior of ceramic powder compacts during sintering by using heating microscopy. Mater Charact 41(4):109–121

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hollister SJ (2009) Scaffold design and manufacturing: from concept to clinic. Adv Mater 21(32–33):3330–3342

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kwok T-H et al (2017) Mass customization: reuse of digital slicing for additive manufacturing. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 17(2):021009

    Google Scholar 

  64. Xu K, Kwok T-H, Chen Y (2016) A reverse compensation framework for shape deformation in additive manufacturing. In: ASME 2016 11th international manufacturing science and engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  65. Leung Y-S et al (2019) Challenges and status on design and computation for emerging additive manufacturing technologies. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 19(2):021013

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chung I-H et al (2009) Stem cell property of postmigratory cranial neural crest cells and their utility in alveolar bone regeneration and tooth development. Stem Cells 27(4):866–877

    Google Scholar 

  67. Leucht P et al (2008) Embryonic origin and Hox status determine progenitor cell fate during adult bone regeneration. Development 135(17):2845–2854

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Alfred E. Mann Institute at University of Southern California as a grant to Yang Chai and Yong Chen. The authors also acknowledge the support of National Science Foundation (NSF) grants 1151191 and 1335476 and the Core Center of Excellence in Nano Imaging (CNI) at USC for the use of microscopic measuring equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The animal experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Southern California. All applicable guidelines and protocols for care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Yuan, Y., Liu, L. et al. 3D printing of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffold with hierarchical porous structure for bone regeneration. Bio-des. Manuf. 3, 15–29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-019-00056-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-019-00056-5

Keywords

Navigation