Original PaperRecruitment filtering by a moss layer disadvantages large-seeded grassland species
Introduction
During community assembly, environmental filters and biotic interactions drive plant establishment and population persistence (Cornwell and Ackerly, 2009, Kraft et al., 2015). In grasslands, the presence of gaps, litter and moss act as environmental filters for germination and seedling establishment. Interactions between mosses and vascular plants mainly concern seeds and seedlings (During & van Tooren, 1990; Špacková, Kotorová, & Lepš, 1998); a summary of studies on moss effects was compiled by During and van Tooren (1990).
Inhibition of seedling recruitment by moss is caused by (i) a physical barrier leading to desiccation (Drake, Grimshaw-Surette, Heim, & Lundholm, 2018; van Tooren, 1988), (ii) competition for nutrients (Gornall, Woodin, Jónsdóttir, & van der Wal, 2011; Zamfir, 2000), (iii) reduced light supply (Donath & Eckstein, 2010; Keizer, van Tooren, & During, 1985), and (iv) allelopathic effects (Soudzilovskaia et al., 2011, van Tooren, 1990). Facilitation can be due to (i) buffering of soil temperature and moisture (Donath and Eckstein, 2010, Soudzilovskaia et al., 2011), (ii) accumulation of organic debris (Jeschke & Kiehl, 2006), and (ii) protection from predation (van Tooren, 1988). Additionally, mosses trap seeds, causing clumped recruitment (van Tooren, 1988).
Small-scale recruitment filters often interact with other environmental conditions (Cingolani, Cabido, Gurvich, Renison, & Díaz, 2007; Grman, Bassett, Zirbel, & Brudvig, 2015). Moss layer effects vary with shading, soil moisture, nutrients (Otsus and Zobel, 2004, Zamfir, 2000), and layer thickness (Donath and Eckstein, 2010, Gornall et al., 2011). Moss–seedling interactions are also moderated by seed size (Donath and Eckstein, 2010, van Tooren, 1990), which is associated with germination requirements for light (Milberg, Andersson, & Thompson, 2000) and humidity (Boyd & van Acker, 2004), while effects of seed shape have not been documented.
In central Europe, moss layers often hinder regeneration of vascular plant species in semi-natural grasslands that are managed for conservation (Jeschke and Kiehl, 2008, van Tooren, 1990). Moss effects are also significant in restoration ecology, since moss dominance often occurs in restored grasslands (Drake et al., 2018; Eichberg, Storm, Stroh, & Schwabe, 2010; Jeschke & Kiehl, 2008). We suspect that desiccation and the barrier to the ground hamper recruitment in large and aspherical seeds, which tend to be trapped on moss surfaces. Round and/or lightweight seeds may penetrate moss layers and reach the soil, but reduced light intensity may hinder their germination.
This study aimed to find evidence for these mechanisms and to determine their net effects on recruitment of vascular plants with differing seed traits. Donath and Eckstein (2010) showed that seed size interacts with the initial vertical position of seeds in moss, indicating that seed size controls penetration into the moss layer. We adopted their approach and extended it to seed shape. We further investigated how moss affects different aspects of seedling recruitment along gradients of seed size and shape, since Jeschke and Kiehl (2008) showed germination to be more strongly influenced than mortality in three plant species. On those grounds, our hypotheses on recruitment effects of moss layers in calcareous grassland were:
- 1.
Seedling establishment is negatively affected by a moss layer.
- 2.
Recruitment effects of mosses are driven by germination rather than by seedling mortality.
- 3.
Seed size and shape determine how moss presence and the initial seed position within moss control net recruitment.
- 4.
Establishment of species with heavy-aspherical seeds is altered by the position of seeds in the moss layer, while species with small-round seeds are unaffected by their initial position as they tend to penetrate to the ground surface in any case.
Section snippets
Study species
We chose 15 vascular plant species from ten families to represent the Festuco-Brometea species pool in southern Germany. They displayed a more or less homogenous distribution along log-transformed scales of seed size and shape (Fig. A1). Seeds of regional provenances were supplied by a local producer (J. Krimmer, Pulling).
We used two moss species with the highest covers in the ‘Garchinger Heide’ restoration sites (Jeschke & Kiehl, 2008): Abietinella abietina (Hedw.) Fleisch. with dense stands
Control of establishment based on emergence and mortality
Seedling numbers were markedly higher in the glasshouse than in the field, where several species hardly emerged on moss cushions (see Appendix A: Table 2). In the glasshouse, seeds on moss had a lower probability of emerging than seeds under moss or seeds in the absence of moss (χ2 = 392.7, df = 2, p < 0.0001, R2 = 4.1%). In the field, sowing on moss affected seedling emergence negatively as well (χ2 = 79.2, df = 1, p < 0.0001, R2 = 15.3%). Mortality ranged from 0 to 100% in both experiments depending on
Control of emergence, mortality and establishment
There was less seedling emergence in the field compared to the greenhouse experiment, most likely due to overall heavier drought, especially on water-depleted moss cushions (Sand-Jensen, Hammer, Madsen-Østerbye, Dencker, & Kragh, 2015). Together with the physical barrier function, water stress on moss explains the inhibitive effect of placing seeds on moss. This result is in accordance with other studies in semi-dry grasslands (Jeschke and Kiehl, 2008, Keizer et al., 1985, Otsus and Zobel, 2004
Conclusions
Moss layers in calcareous grasslands can inhibit seedling recruitment and hence reduce plant regeneration and ultimately jeopardize conservation value. More specifically, seedling emergence suffered from moss, while mortality was hardly affected. Sowing seeds onto moss led to an increasingly reduced seedling establishment, the larger the seeds were. The same species’ emergence reacted positively to placing seeds underneath moss, so this was linked to conditions exclusively found on moss
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the government of Upper Bavaria and the district administration of Freising for their approval of the field experiment. Many thanks to the Bavarian Botanical Society and the Association of Heathlands in the North of Munich (‘Heideflächenverein Münchner Norden’) for support of the research. We thank PD Dr. Harald Albrecht for commenting, and the staff of the Chair of Restoration Ecology and Dürnast Laboratory Center at TUM for advice and practical help with our experiments.
References (43)
- et al.
Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2009) - et al.
Mosses inhibit germination of vascular plants on an extensive green roof
Ecological Engineering
(2018) - et al.
Effects of a dense moss layer on germination and establishment of vascular plants in newly created calcareous grasslands
Flora – Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
(2008) - et al.
Population structure and population dynamic of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. in relation to vegetation characteristics
Flora – Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
(2006) Package ‘MuMIn’
(2019)- et al.
Package ‘lme4’
(2019) - et al.
Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: Indicators of seed longevity
Functional Ecology
(1998) - et al.
Imbibition response of green foxtail, canola, wild mustard, and wild oat seeds to different osmotic potentials
Canadian Journal of Botany
(2004) - et al.
Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: Are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits?
Journal of Vegetation Science
(2007) - et al.
Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California
Ecological Monographs
(2009)
Seed mass variation potentially masks a single critical water content in recalcitrant seeds
Seed Science Research
Effects of bryophytes and grass litter on seedling emergence vary by vertical seed position and seed size
Plant Ecology
Bryophyte interactions with other plants
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
Is the combination of topsoil replacement and inoculation with plant material an effective tool for the restoration of threatened sandy grassland?
Applied Vegetation Science
Balancing positive and negative plant interactions: How mosses structure vascular plant communities
Oecologia
Dispersal and establishment filters influence the assembly of restored prairie plant communities
Restoration Ecology
Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution
PeerJ
Impact of red: Far red ratios on germination of temperate forest herbs in relation to shade tolerance, seed mass and persistence in the soil
Functional Ecology
Cryptogams in calcareous grassland restoration: Perspectives for artificial vs. natural colonization
Tuexenia
Vergleich der Kryptogamenvegetation alter und junger Kalkmagerrasen im Naturschutzgebiet “Garchinger Heide”
Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft
Effects of bryophytes on seedling emergence and establishment of short-lived forbs in chalk grassland
Journal of Ecology
Cited by (5)
Nature conservation and ecosystem restoration in central Europe—The value of human-shaped ecosystems
2020, Basic and Applied EcologyVegetation monitoring in a 100-year-old calcareous grassland reserve in Germany
2020, Basic and Applied EcologyCitation Excerpt :In the Garchinger Heide, particularly the litter of graminoids could have reduced gaps for the germination of light demanding small-seeded species. Furthermore, a dense moss layer could have reduced germination of such plants (Huber & Kollmann, 2020). In addition, it is likely that the decline of Rhinanthus aristatus, which is a hemiparasite feeding on grasses, partly contributed to the increased abundance of graminoids (Heer et al., 2018).