A new approach to study the friction-reduction characteristics of viscous/conventional slickwater in simulated pipelines and fractures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103620Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Integrated friction reduction test equipment for pipelines and fractures.

  • Model fitting of friction factor for power-law fluid in pipe and fracture.

  • Visualization of dynamic sand carrying performance in fractures.

Abstract

Viscous slickwater have been successfully applied as an alternative to conventional ones. However, it is still not clear whether these two types of slickwater show the same friction-reduction characteristics when migrated into pipelines and fractures. In this study, the friction-reduction performances of a conventional friction reducer (FR-800) and a highly viscous friction reducer (HVFR-900) in pipelines and fractures were tested through independently designed pipeline and visual crack modules. The corresponding λ (Darcy friction factor) values were calculated based on the friction pressure drop and used to fit a friction factor calculation model. Finally, the dynamic sand-carrying performance of the two friction reducers were obtained through a visual crack module. The results showed that, as the concentration of two friction reducers increased, the friction-reduction performance of FR-800 gradually weakened in the pipeline, while that of HVFR-900 gradually increased; meanwhile, the performances of the two chemicals varied similarly in the fractures. The λ values of FR-800 and HVFR-900 in the pipe and fractures can be calculated by using equations similar to the power-law D&M formula which is usually applied to fluids, various results mainly induced from the type of friction reducer and its concentration. Additionally, it was noted that the dynamic sand-carrying performance of viscous slickwater at a concentration of 0.60 wt% was significantly better than that of conventional slickwater.

Introduction

Shale oil and gas are among the most important energy resources in the world (EIA, 2016). Due to the low permeability of shales, treatments like horizontal well drilling and hydraulic fracturing are often taken to reach commercial production. Different methods are used to fracture unconventional and conventional reservoirs: complex networks composed of fractures with relatively low permeability are usually created in the former type of reservoirs, while long and highly permeable fractures are usually created in the latter (Guo et al., 2018; Song et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019a, 2019b). Numerous indoor and wellsite operations have shown that, compared with the fluids used in traditional hydraulic fracturing, those used in slickwater fracturing facilitate the formation of complex fracture networks in unconventional oil/gas reservoirs (Warpinski et al., 2008; Scanlon et al., 2014; Gallegos et al., 2015). Slickwater is a water-based fracturing fluid that contains a friction reducer (typically, a high molecular weight polypropylene or its copolymer). The friction reducer usually exists in the form of an oil-in-water emulsion, containing polymers in both their water and oil phases. When a friction reducer is added to water, the emulsion quickly reverses and releases polymers into the water, forcing its further hydration. Other types of additives (e.g., flowback aids, clay stabilizers, biocides, and scale inhibitors) can also be added to slickwater (Liang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018).

The friction reducer's concentration of a conventional slickwater can vary between 0.05 wt% and 0.20 wt%, while the viscosity of the base liquid oscillates between 1 mPa s and 7 mPa s; these characteristics show as a 70–80% reduction of the friction during the pumping process (Zhao et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018). Compared to guar gum fracturing fluids, slickwater implicate a lower residue damage but lesds to a lower sand-carrying capacity. The sand-carrying capacity can be improved by increasing the pump speed and the following turbulent flow; this process, however, also implies a higher friction loss (Sun et al., 2014, 2017). To overcome the shortcomings of conventional fracturing fluids, a new viscous slickwater to be injected at a relatively low pressure was proposed; this slickwater implies a low friction reduction and good sand-carrying properties as well. Shales fractured in this way can be broken easily (without leaving solid residues) and get a particularly high fracture conductivity (Zhao et al., 2018).

Until present, relatively few studies have focused on viscous slickwater. In recent years, some authors have summarized the applications of viscous slickwater in unconventional reservoirs and statistics on their concentrations, viscosities, and temperature ranges (Zhao et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2018; Brannon and Bell et al., 2011; Van Domelen et al., 2017). The viscoelasticity, static sand-carrying performance, and friction-reduction properties of viscous slickwater have also been studied, while their dynamic sand-carrying properties were not fully considered (Aften, 2018; Motiee et al., 2016; Quintero et al., 2019). Additionally, other authors have studied the viscoelasticity, dynamic sand-carrying visualization process, and friction-reduction performance of viscous slickwater (Ba Geri et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2018 & 2019; Dahlgren et al., 2018).

In this paper, the friction-reduction performances of a conventional friction reducer (FR-800) and a highly viscous friction reducer (HVFR-900) in a pipeline and fractures were tested through independent R &D friction loop and visual crack modules. First, we calculated the friction factor (λ) based on experiments; then, we fitted the friction factor equations for FR-800 and HVFR-900. Finally, we observed the corresponding dynamic sand-carrying properties by means of a visual crack module.

Section snippets

Friction reducers

For this study, we selected a conventional friction reducer (FR-800) and a highly viscous friction reducer (HVFR-900), both consisting of polyacrylamide or polyacrylamide copolymers. The friction reducers (0.05–0.60 wt%) were both prepared with fresh water in the laboratory under room temperature. We then measured their shear stress at different concentrations using a ZNN-D6 type six-speed rotating viscometer (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).

The rheological curves of FR-800 and HVFR-900 at different

Relationship between pressure drop and linear flow rate in the pipe

The frictional pressure drops of FR-800 and HVFR-900 measured in the 8-mm tube are shown in Fig. 7, Fig. 8. Under the same linear flow rate and an increasing concentration of FR-800, the pressure drop in the pipe gradually increased: the friction-reduction effect gradually weakened for increasing concentrations of friction reducer. The opposite mechanism was observed in the case of HVFR-900, indicating that the friction-reduction effect was enhanced for increasing concentration of this friction

Conclusions

In this paper, the friction-reduction performances of a conventional friction reducer (FR-800) and a highly viscous friction reducer (HVFR-900) in pipes and fractures were tested by using independent R &D friction loop and visual crack modules. First, we calculated the values of λ based on experiments; then, we fitted the corresponding equations for FR-800 and HVFR-900 in the pipe and fracture; finally, we analyzed the dynamic sand-carrying properties of FR-800 and HVFR-900 through the visual

Credit author statement

Special gratitude is owed to Professor Zhou Fujian and Hao Bai. Professor Zhou Fujian, as the corresponding author of this paper, provided research ideas, funding and laboratory; Wang Jie is the data analysist and first author; Hao Bai, Jilong Ma, Pengcheng Yang, Feng Zhang, Lishan Yuan and Dongya Wei are the key accomplishers of the laboratory experiment.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51804033), the National Science and Technology Major Projects of China (Grant Nos. 2016ZX05051, 2016ZX05014-005, and 2017ZX05030).

References (34)

  • D.W. Dodge et al.

    Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems

    AIChE J.

    (1959)
  • N. El-Emam et al.

    New equation calculates friction factor for turbulent flow of non-Newtonian fluids

    Oil Gas J.

    (2003)
  • Initial Production Rates in Tight Oil Formations Continue to Rise - Today in Energy - U.S

    (2016)
  • T.J. Gallegos et al.

    Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2015)
  • G.W. Govier et al.

    The flow of complex mixtures in pipes

    J. Appl. Mech.

    (1973)
  • S. Gul et al.

    Frictional pressure losses of Non-Newtonian fluids in helical pipes: applications for automated rheology measurements

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2020)
  • S. Gul et al.

    A Data Driven Approach to Predict Frictional Pressure Losses in Polymer-Based Fluids

    (2019, March 4)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Migration and sedimentation of proppant and its influencing factors in a visual plate fracture model

      2023, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    • Stimulation mechanism and model establishment of enhanced imbibition oil recovery for A nano fracturing fluid

      2023, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, many fields choose high-viscosity slickwater for hydraulic fracturing operation, such as the HVFR in the Bakken area and Eagle Ford, and the EM30 in the Changqing field (McIntyre et al., 2021; Van Domelen et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2017). However, these slickwater are not easy to mix with water, and their drag reduction efficiency is not high (Wang et al. 2020a, 2020b). To address these issues, the Changqing field developed an NSI–B variable-viscosity slickwater.

    • Optimization and friction reduction study of a new type of viscoelastic slickwater system

      2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      That is, the relationship between friction coefficient λ, Reynolds number Re and other influencing factors are studied. The power-law D&M formula commonly used in hydrodynamics is mainly used [44–46]. Among them, f = 0.25λ, which is the friction coefficient of Fanning; n is the rheological index determined by the experimental data; ξ is a comprehensive parameter, which is related to the concentration, temperature, salinity, and molecular structure of friction reducer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text