In-house method for direct bacterial identification in positive blood culture broths using microfiltration, bead beating, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106065Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Highly accurate method for direct bacterial identification in positive BC broths.

  • Microfiltration and mechanical disruption steps were used to remove blood cells.

  • Rapid, low-cost and chemical-free method using MALDI-TOF MS.

  • Performance of the IH method in the identification of clinical organisms was comparable to that of Sepsityper method.

Abstract

Rapid identification of bacterial pathogens facilitates earlier optimization of antibiotic treatment and reduces morbidity and mortality in sepsis patients. The aim of this research was to design an in-house chemical-free method for direct bacterial identification in positive blood culture (BC) broths and to compare the performance of this method with that of the commercial Sepsityper® kit. The overall species identification rates for the in-house and Sepsityper methods were 88.4% and 85.8%, respectively (n = 190). Among 146 facultative anaerobes, 92.5% and 95.9% were identified to the species level using the in-house and Sepsityper methods, respectively. For 32 anaerobic bacteria, the in-house method showed a higher species identification rate (75.0%) than the Sepsityper method (53.1%). The in-house method correctly identified more Bacteroides species (100.0%) than the Sepsityper method (18.2%). Our novel in-house method and the Sepsityper method showed a high accuracy for direct bacterial identification in positive BC broths using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Introduction

Bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients (Goto and Al-Hasan, 2013). The survival rate of patients with bacteremia depends on the initial administration of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy, which underscores the importance of rapid identification of microorganisms (Kollef, 2003; Lodise et al., 2003). The mortality rate of patients with anaerobic bacteremia who received adequate empirical treatment was observed to be significantly lower than that of patients who received inadequate empirical treatment (Kim et al., 2016). Hence, earlier and accurate species identification of the causative pathogen is important for selecting appropriate antibiotics before obtaining the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Seifert, 2009; Torres et al., 2020).

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), which enables the rapid identification of bacteria from fresh colonies grown on agar plates, is a routine method in clinical microbiology laboratories (Van Belkum et al., 2017). In addition, many laboratories have developed preparation methods for identifying pathogens directly from positive blood culture (BC) broths, which have shown diverse performances (Di Gaudio et al., 2018; Tanner et al., 2017; Van Belkum et al., 2017).

Furthermore, a commercial preparation kit (Sepsityper®; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) has been developed to simplify the processing steps required for the purification and extraction of bacterial components from positive BC broths (Jamal et al., 2013; Morgenthaler and Kostrzewa, 2015). A previous study has shown that the Sepsityper method could identify 67.3–95.1% of bacteria to the species level (Morgenthaler and Kostrzewa, 2015). We established an in-house (IH) preparation method, which involves the use of filters and beads for cell lysis, without requiring any chemical agents such as saponin. In this study, we compared the performances of the Sepsityper and IH methods for the direct identification of bacteria in positive BC broths.

Section snippets

Test samples

Two different sets of BC bottles were prepared as follows: (i) aerobic and anaerobic BC bottles, which were prospectively collected from the Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital during the study period; and (ii) anaerobic BC bottles, which were spiked with anaerobic reference strains. This study was performed in accordance with the protocol and procedures for specimen collection and data analysis approved by the institutional review board of the Korea University Medical Center (IRB

Distribution of samples

In total, 173 positive clinical and 21 positive contrived BC broths were analyzed, 190 of which were found to be monomicrobial. Gram-positive cocci, Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive bacilli, and Gram-negative cocci accounted for 49.0% (n = 93), 45.8% (n = 87), 4.7% (n = 9), and 0.5% (n = 1) of the monomicrobial cultures, respectively.

Performances of the IH and Sepsityper methods

The species- and genus-level identification results of the monomicrobial cultures are presented in Table 1.

The overall species identification rates of the IH

Discussion

For rapid identification of bacterial pathogens in positive BC broths, performances of the newly designed IH preparation method and the Sepsityper method were evaluated and compared in this study. Considering the different sizes of blood cells and bacteria, we used a syringe filter with a pore size of 5 μm in the IH method to remove blood cells and only isolate bacteria. In the cases of Gram-positive cluster-forming cocci, which were difficult to filter, disruption and lysis of blood cells were

Conclusion

Our novel IH method and the Sepsityper method showed a high accuracy in the direct identification of bacteria in positive BC broths. The performance of the IH method in the identification of clinical organisms was comparable to that of the Sepsityper method. Given its accuracy and short hands-on time, the IH method will be useful for the direct identification of bacterial pathogens in BC broths.

Funding source

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ji Hyun Han, M.T., for the assistance with the rapid identification of bacteria using MALDI-TOF MS.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text