CFD simulation of fluidized magnetic roasting coupled with random nucleation model
Introduction
Compared with the metallurgical apparatus of rotary kiln, shaft furnace and sintering machine for the recovery of zinc, copper, nickel and other metals, the fluidized-bed roaster has been dominating the pyrogenic extraction industry for its lower energy consumption and higher production efficiency (Battle et al., 2015, Kunii and Levenspiel, 1991, Sohn and Wadsworth, 2013, Yang, 2003). Among the oxidizing, sulfatizing, chloridizing, reducing and other roasting processes, the fluidized magnetic roasting followed by magnetic separation, which has been recognized as the most effective treatment of low-grade/complex iron ores and attracted much more attentions from the economic and environmental aspects (Guo, 1979, Priestley, 1957, Uwadiale, 1992, Yu et al., 2019). A comprehensive investigation of flow hydrodynamics and reaction mechanism for the magnetic roasting process will be of great help to the design and integration of fluidized metallurgical engineering.
Until now, extensive researches have been carried out on the fluidized magnetic roasting for transforming nonmagnetic minerals of hematite (Fe2O3), limonite (FeO(OH)·nH2O) and siderite (FeCO3) into magnetite (Fe3O4), which involves gas-solid reaction at elevated temperature in a weakly reducing atmosphere (Fine and Prasky, 1966, Jacobs, 1970, Nabi and Lu, 1968, Yu and Qi, 2011). These studies either publish on the experimental analysis of reduction gas composition, detention time, particle size and roasting temperature for the optimum reaction conditions, or focus on the mathematical modeling of reduction kinetics with the rate-controlling mechanism interpreted in terms of nucleation, non-topochemical, phase boundary or contracting sphere models, all of which have provided the fundament for technology development and process control of the industrial fluidized magnetic roasting applications. Whereas, it should be admitted that the CFD is an efficient tool to study the complex gas-solid flow behavior and to predict the product quality under different operating conditions, which is able to obtain the constructive information about fluid dynamics, reaction behavior and reactant distribution throughout the bed that the traditional experimental study or mathematical modeling can hardly provide directly (Chung, 2010, Pannala, 2010). Until now, numerous benefits from the implementation of CFD have been reported in the fluidized applications of fluid catalytic cracking, biomass gasification, char combustion, food drying and so on (Davidson, 2001), but little information is available in the literature concerning the CFD simulation of fluidized mineral roasting, which hampers the equipment improvement and technology optimization in some degree.
For the simulation of fluidized reaction, the complex chemical kinetics is coupled with CFD model and determines the computed results directly. Generally speaking, the gas-solid reaction kinetics is hypothetically classified into the shrinking spherical/core model with the internal/external diffusion or chemical reaction control mechanism (Levenspiel, 1999). Whereas, numerous other factors of non-uniform temperature distribution, varied particle density/porosity, sintering phenomenon and nucleation behavior may also affect the overall reaction process and lead to different kinetic mechanisms in reality (Szekely, 2012). Based on the previous kinetics modeling study (Hurst et al., 1982), the reduction of some metal oxides (Fe2O3, NiO and CuO) is a typical nucleation-controlled process with the sigmoid (S) kinetic curve being characterized by an initial induction period of producing nuclei, followed by an acceleratory period of crystal growth before falling off in the final stage. This behavior is commonly observed for the topochemical reaction and mainly analyzed by the autocatalytic mechanism (Avrami, 1939, Bhatia and Perlmutter, 1979, Hurst et al., 1982, Tiernan et al., 2001), but it often overestimates the reaction rate for not considering the influence of mass transfer resistance during the actual reaction process (Piotrowski et al., 2007, Yu et al., 2017). Therefore, it is more reasonable to conduct the numerical investigation of fluidized magnetic roasting with taking account of random nucleation mechanism and mass transfer behavior, comprehensively.
In the present work, a CFD simulation integrated with random nucleation model and chemical reaction kinetics has been conducted to investigate the fluidized reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4. Based on the validation against experimental data and comparison with other computational model results, the characteristics of fluidized magnetic roasting are accurately predicted and extensively analyzed on account of the CFD coupling simulation, which is expected to give a thorough analyzing and further exploration of the overall gas-solid reaction behavior for the fluidized roaster design and optimization.
Section snippets
Simulated system
The fluidized reduction kinetics of natural hematite ore (containing 93.5 wt%-Fe2O3 and 6.5 wt%-SiO2) to Fe3O4 obtained from the doctoral dissertation of Yu (2017) is adopted to verify the CFD simulation of magnetic roasting based on random nucleation model and chemical reaction kinetics. The reduction process of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 can be represented by the following equations:
The experiments were conducted in a cylindrical quartz fluidized bed with an inner diameter of
Modeling approach
In this work, the multiphase flow model is used to perform CFD simulation with several new features. The random nucleation model integrates with intrinsic reaction kinetics, which also takes account of the mass transfers within both emulsion and bubble phases, is incorporated to calculate the fluidized roasting behavior.
Simulation setup
The simulation of fluidized magnetic roasting process was conducted in a 2D condition (0.025 × 0.10 m2, displayed in Fig. 4) for the large computational complexity of CFD coupled with the user-defined scalar (UDS) solving. The mass fractions of CO component in the emulsion and bubble phases (, ) were defined as UDS-0 and UDS-1 with the same initial value of 0.135. The mixed gaseous reactant was fed from the bed bottom distributor defined as a velocity inlet and escaped through the
Results and discussion
In order to validate the CFD simulation of fluidized magnetic roasting process conducted through combining the intrinsic chemical kinetics with random nucleation model, three typical reaction conditions for the reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 are selected and tabulated in Table 5. Furthermore, the characteristics of magnetic roasting reaction rate, effective reaction area, gas reaction rate within different phases, solid holdup distribution and relative gaseous reactant concentration within the bed
Conclusions
Combining the chemical reaction kinetics with random nucleation model, a CFD simulation based on the bubbling bed approach has been conducted to investigate the fluidized magnetic roasting process. It is proved that the numeration integrated with random nucleation model taking account of the mass transfers within both emulsion and bubble phases predicts more accurately than the other methods, which are lack of the consideration of mass transfer resistance, nucleation mechanism or reaction rate
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Zheng Zou: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Project administration. Jingyi Zhu: Data curation, Investigation. Dong Yan: Software, Investigation. Yitong Wang: Software, Validation. Qingshan Zhu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Hongzhong Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 21878304, 21736010 and 21908227, the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 21921005, and the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multiphase complex systems under Grant No. MPCS-2019-A-07.
References (46)
- et al.
Interphase mass transfer in a gas fluidized bed
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1976) - et al.
A structure-based drag model for the simulation of Geldart A and B particles in turbulent fluidized beds
Powder Technol.
(2015) - et al.
Relationship between flow structure and transfer coefficients in fast fluidized beds
Chem. Eng. J.
(2010) - et al.
Study on kinetics of iron oxide reduction by hydrogen
Chinese. J. Chem. Eng.
(2012) - et al.
A new structural parameters model based on drag coefficient for simulation of circulating fluidized beds
Powder Technol.
(2015) - et al.
Simulation of gas–solid flow in 2D/3D bubbling fluidized beds by combining the two-fluid model with structure–based drag model
Chem. Eng. J.
(2014) - et al.
Topochemical approach of kinetics of the reduction of hematite to wüstite
Chem. Eng. J.
(2007) - et al.
Effect of bubble interaction on interphase mass transfer in gas fluidized beds
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1981) - et al.
Interphase mass transfer coefficient in fluidized bed combustion by Eulerian CFD modeling
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2014) - et al.
CFD simulation of dense particulate reaction system: Approaches, recent advances and applications
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2016)
Two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of nitrogen and sulfur oxides emissions in a circulating fluidized bed combustor
Chem. Eng. J.
Kinetics of phase change. I General theory
J. Chem. Phys.
Kinetics of phase change. II transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei
J. Chem. Phys.
Drying, roasting, and calcining of minerals
A population balance approach to the modeling of solid phase reactions
Aiche J.
Computational fluid dynamics
The enterprise-wide application of CFD in the chemicals industry, the 6th World Congress of Chemical Engineering
Fluidised Particles
Magnetic roasting of iron ores with ferrous scrap
Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory descriptions
Fluidized roasting of oxidic Chinese iron ores
Sci. Sinica
Temperature programmed reduction
Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng.
Magnetic roasting and leaching for upgrading minnesota manganiferous iron ores
Cited by (9)
A process optimization method based on first principle model for the roasting process
2024, Minerals EngineeringA clouded bubble-based mass transfer model for the simulation of gas–solid bubbling fluidization
2023, Chemical Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :The simulated results revealed that the structural mass transfer model could obtain a good prediction on the species distribution, while large deviation was shown using the conventional model. It was concluded that the consideration of the heterogeneous mass transfer based on local structures was necessary, which has also been proved in the other studies [16–19]. It is worth noting that most mesoscale structure-based drag models or mass transfer models mentioned above are based on the multiscale resolution strategy, in which the virtual inter-phase is employed to describe the interaction between the bubble phase and the emulsion phase [10–13].
Growth behavior and kinetics of magnetite during magnetization roasting
2022, Journal of Industrial and Engineering ChemistryProgress in CFD Simulations of Fluidized Beds for Chemical and Energy Process Engineering
2022, Progress in Energy and Combustion ScienceMathematical modeling for bubbling fluidized bed CO-methanation reactor incorporating the effect of circulation and particle flows
2022, Chemical Engineering ScienceCitation Excerpt :In most bubbling fluidized bed models, the bubble size is an important parameter because it is the basis of the calculation for several fluidization parameters, such as the interphase mass transfer coefficient. According to the recent references (Shrestha et al., 2019; Chung, 2021; Hu and Liu, 2021; Zou et al., 2021), there are several classic types of correlation of the bubble size, such as Mori and Wen (1975), Werther (1976), Rowe (1977), Darton et al. (1977), and Cai et al. (1994) (the correlations can be seen in Table S6 of the Supporting information). These correlations were used to describe the bubble size for sensitivity analysis and the operating condition of Group A1 was considered.
CFD simulation of continuous non-catalytic gas–solid reaction with uniform particle size distribution
2022, Chemical Engineering ScienceCitation Excerpt :Because the rapid mixing of gas and solid fluids leads to the isothermal condition throughout the FBR, the heat balance is not calculated and the energy equation is not considered. Unlike the traditional two-phase model that generally assumes that all reactions occur only in the emulsion phase, the contribution of the bubble phase is also considered in this study and proven to play an important role in the non-catalytic reaction process (Zou et al., 2020b; Zou et al., 2021). Table 3 summarizes the other constitutive equations derived from the kinetic theory for granular flow to close the two-Eulerian model.