Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 383, 1 January 2022, Pages 320-329
Catalysis Today

Activation of n-pentane while prolonging HZSM-5 catalyst lifetime during its combined reaction with methanol or dimethyl ether

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.09.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The combined reaction of n-pentane with methanol or dimethyl ether is studied.

  • Synergies between cracking and dual cycle mechanisms over HZSM-5 are analyzed.

  • The catalytic cracking of n-pentane is activated by the presence of the oxygenates.

  • Dimethyl ether is more reactive than methanol for the paraffin activation.

  • Catalyst lifetime during the conversion of oxygenates is enhanced with n-pentane.

Abstract

This work explores the synergies during combined reactions of n-pentane (nC5) with oxygenates (methanol or dimethyl ether, OX). The experimental runs have been carried out in a packed bed reactor at 500 °C, using a high silica HZSM-5 zeolite-based catalyst with different oxygenate-to-n-pentane (OX/nC5) ratios in the feed. A significant enhancement of the n-pentane conversion occurs for low OX/nC5 ratios in the feed (0.1−0.25), especially when using dimethyl ether (DME). In addition, the presence of n-pentane reduces the rate of catalyst deactivation by coking during the conversion of oxygenates. These results have been explained on the grounds of a mechanistic interaction between the reactants: (1) the fast formation of methoxy and olefin intermediates from oxygenates, particularly from DME, could explain the promotion of n-pentane cracking, by facilitating the activation of the alkane by hydrogen transfer reactions; (2) the attenuation of deactivation during the conversion of oxygenates could be related to a lower extent of the arene cycle in the dual-cycle mechanism (limiting the polymethylbenzene formation). The analyses of used catalysts by means of temperature-programmed oxidation and confocal fluorescence microscopy have pointed out the higher reactivity of DME than that of methanol also for yielding coke structures.

Introduction

The catalytic cracking of paraffins is one of the most studied alternatives for producing olefins from the naphtha cut of the refineries (C5−12) [1], because it has lower energy requirement and higher propylene selectivity than those of the steam/thermal cracking [2]. Catalytic cracking is carried out over acid microporous sieves, being HZSM-5 zeolite the most studied due to its shape selectivity that maximizes the olefin production. Promising and encouraging results have been reported on the cracking of paraffins of relatively long carbon chains, such as C6−10 [[3], [4], [5]]. Nonetheless, the lightest paraffins contained in the naphtha (C5) or in gaseous fractions (C1−4) are much more difficult to crack [6]. High temperatures are recommended for promoting cracking but avoiding side reactions [7]. Steam catalytic cracking (SCC) has also been proposed for naphtha processing with enhanced selectivity to ethylene and propylene in the presence of water and high temperatures (up to 700 °C) [8]. However, the high temperature and presence of steam could also lead to an irreversible deactivation of zeolites by dealumination, with the corresponding increase of the catalyst makeup [9].

Within the possible process modifications for activating light paraffins and promoting a selective cracking to light olefins, Martin et al. [10,11] proposed the so-called coupled methanol and hydrocarbon cracking (CMHC). The first goal was to take advantage of the exothermic character of the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) process in order to overcome the energetic requirements of the catalytic cracking. The synergies between both reactions were also previously observed for a feed mixture of n-butane/methanol in the temperature range of 500−550 °C and low space time values [12]. The clearest evidences of Csingle bondC paraffinic bond activation using methanol were reported by Yu et al. [13] in experiments with propane and labeled carbon reactants. They saturated the HZSM-5 zeolite with labeled methoxy species at very controlled conditions and made them react directly with propane, which confirmed a promoted hydride transfer pathway between both species. The combined reactions of paraffins and methanol were studied aiming for the intensification of propylene in the methanol-to-propylene (MTP) process. A significant enhancement of its yield was reported by co-feeding i-butane at 470−500 °C under conditions of full conversion of methanol [14]. Likewise, a positive synergy was found when the C4−6 hydrocarbon byproducts were recirculated in the MTO process [15].

Coupling the reactions of paraffins and methanol means the coexistence of the two well-established mechanisms on the same acid sites of the HZSM-5 zeolite: the carbocationic mechanism of paraffin cracking [[16], [17], [18]] and the dual-cycle mechanism of MTO [19]. Chang et al. [20] related both mechanisms in combined reactions and suggested a faster route for the catalytic cracking of n-hexane due to the formation of intermediates from methanol. On the one hand, paraffin cracking mechanism follows a pathway involving the monomolecular cracking (via penta-coordinated carbonium ions that evolve towards light paraffins), the bimolecular cracking (via hydride transfer between the paraffin and an adsorbed carbenium ions) and the oligomerization-cracking (toward higher hydrocarbons and finally coke) [16,21,22]. On the other hand, in the dual-cycle mechanism of oxygenates, the methylation/β-scission of the olefin primary products (alkene cycle) is coupled with the methylation/dealkylation of methylbenzenes (arene cycle) through hydrogen transfer and cyclization pathways [19,23,24]. In this case, the formation of coke takes place from two different stages [25,26]: (i) the evolution of methylbenzene intermediates towards polyaromatic structures of coke and (ii) the olefin cyclization and condensation, which requires a high development of the first stage. Then, the acid properties (density and strength of the sites) and topology of the catalyst have a strong influence on the extent of each stage [27,28]. In this regard, HZSM-5 zeolite favors the diffusion of these methylbenzenes, thus allowing the two stages of coke formation to be distinguished [26].

Traditionally, dimethyl ether (DME) has been considered in thermodynamic equilibrium with methanol, assuming similar reactivities for both in the MTO process. Nonetheless, different studies have demonstrated that DME is more reactive than methanol [29]. Indeed, in-situ IR measurements pointed out its faster ability to form methoxy species, attributed to its higher affinity towards the Brønsted acid sites [30,31]. Despite the discrepancies in the literature about the formation of the first Csingle bondC bond, Li et al. [32] reported that DME reacts faster than methanol with methoxy species, forming methoxy-methyl cation intermediates. Moreover, this is applicable to the reaction of methoxy species from DME with other hydrocarbons, as was observed for the methylation of benzene [33]. The reactivity of DME presents a renewed interest in the context of its transformation into olefins (DTO, dimethyl ether-to-olefins process) [34].

In this work, we have analyzed the combined reactions of n-pentane with methanol or DME, comparing the reactivity of both oxygenates. Our aim is to progress towards the understanding of the advantages of co-feeding paraffins (n-pentane) and oxygenates, linking the mechanisms that drive their individual reactions. For this, a catalyst based on a high silica HZSM-5 zeolite embedded in a mesoporous matrix of γ-Al2O3 has been used. The benefits of coupling paraffin and oxygenate conversions on the activation of the n-pentane (selected as the lightest and less reactive compound in naphtha) and on the attenuation of coke formation from oxygenates have been studied by comparing the reactivity of individual and combined reactions in a packed bed continuous reactor at 500 °C. The effect of the oxygenate-to-paraffin ratio in the feed on conversion, product distribution and on their evolution with time on stream is discussed.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

HZSM-5 zeolite-based catalyst was synthesized by an agglomeration procedure using pseudoboehmite (Sasol Germany) as a binder and a colloidal dispersion of α-Al2O3 (Alfa Aesar, 22 wt%) as inert filler (30 and 20 wt% in the final catalyst, respectively). The commercial zeolite (Zeolyst International) with a Si/Al ratio of 140 was homogeneously mixed with the other components and then, extrudates of the resulting slurry were prepared. These extrudates were dried at room temperature for 12 h and

Results and discussion

The results of combined reactions of n-pentane (nC5) with methanol (MeOH) or dimethyl ether (DME) are compared with those of the individual reactants. First, an evaluation of the synergetic effect that leads to the activation of nC5 is made (section 3.1), followed by a study of the attenuation of catalyst deactivation by coking from oxygenates (section 3.2). These effects are discussed based on the proposed mechanism for each reaction, the relation between both of them and the deposition of

Conclusions

A cooperation has been observed when performing the combined reactions of n-pentane cracking with methanol (MeOH) or dimethyl ether (DME) at 500 °C in the presence of a high silica HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst (Si/Al = 140). In the optimum proportion of n-pentane and oxygenate, the individual reactions of each reactant are improved due to the combination of some steps of the different mechanism involved in the overall process.

The increase in n-pentane conversion for low amounts of MeOH or DME in the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Tomás Cordero-Lanzac: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Cristina Martínez: Resources, Writing - original draft, Supervision. Andrés T. Aguayo: Methodology, Formal analysis. Pedro Castaño: Supervision. Javier Bilbao: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Avelino Corma: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

Acknowledgements

TC-L, ATA, PC and JB acknowledge the financial support received by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness with some ERDF funds (CTQ2016-77812-R,CTQ2016-79646-P), theBasque Government (IT1218-19) and theEuropean Commission(HORIZON H2020-MSCA RISE-2018. Contract No. 823745). TC-L also acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport for the award of the FPU grant (FPU15-01666) and the additional mobility grant (EST17-00094). CM and AC acknowledge national and

References (62)

  • D. Mier et al.

    Synergies in the production of olefins by combined cracking of n-butane and methanol on a HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • G. Roohollahi et al.

    The joint reaction of methanol and i-butane over the HZSM-5 zeolite

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2013)
  • A. Kazemi et al.

    Influence of recycle streams of C5/C6 and C4 hydrocarbon cuts on the performance of methanol to propylene (PVM) reactors

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2017)
  • A. Corma et al.

    Product selectivity effects during cracking of alkanes at very short and longer times on stream

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (1996)
  • A. Corma et al.

    Current views on the mechanism of catalytic cracking

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2000)
  • M. Bjørgen et al.

    Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5: on the origin of the olefinic species

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • S. Kotrel et al.

    The Haag-Dessau mechanism of protolytic cracking of alkanes

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2000)
  • T. Cordero-Lanzac et al.

    Simultaneous modeling of the kinetics for n-pentane cracking and the deactivation of a HZSM-5 based catalyst

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Origin and evolution of the initial hydrocarbon pool intermediates in the transition period for the conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite

    J. Catal.

    (2019)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Methylbenzene hydrocarbon pool in methanol-to-olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5

    J. Catal.

    (2015)
  • D. Rojo-Gama et al.

    Structure–deactivation relationships in zeolites during the methanol–to-hydrocarbons reaction: complementary assessments of the coke content

    J. Catal.

    (2017)
  • J. Li et al.

    A route to form initial hydrocarbon pool species in methanol conversion to olefins over zeolites

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • J.S. Martinez-Espin et al.

    Benzene co-reaction with methanol and dimethyl ether over zeolite and zeotype catalysts: evidence of parallel reaction paths to toluene and diphenylmethane

    J. Catal.

    (2017)
  • P. Pérez-Uriarte et al.

    Deactivation kinetics for the conversion of dimethyl ether to olefins over a HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Critical role of formaldehyde during methanol conversion to hydrocarbons

    Nat. Commun.

    (2019)
  • D. Chen et al.

    The effect of crystal size of SAPO-34 on the selectivity and deactivation of the MTO reaction

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (1999)
  • D. Chen et al.

    A methanol to olefins review: diffusion, coke formation and deactivation on SAPO type catalysts

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2012)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Differences in the methanol-to-olefins reaction catalyzed by SAPO-34 with dimethyl ether as reactant

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • J. Valecillos et al.

    Slowing down the deactivation of H-ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst in the methanol-to-olefin (MTO) reaction by P or Zn modifications

    Catal. Today

    (2020)
  • S. Schallmoser et al.

    Impact of the local environment of Bronsted acid sites in ZSM-5 on the catalytic activity in n-pentane cracking

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • T.V.W. Janssens et al.

    Kinetic modeling of deactivation profiles in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons (MTH) reaction: a combined autocatalytic-hydrocarbon pool approach

    J. Catal.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Kinetic modeling and reactor design of the direct synthesis of dimethyl ether for CO<inf>2</inf> valorization. A review

      2022, Fuel
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of DME as a raw material for the production of light olefins, aromatics or gasoline offers good prospects. DME (with a greater capacity to generate methyl oxonium species on Brønsted sites) is more active than methanol for the production of light olefins [76], and allows using HZSM-5 as catalyst (with slower coke deactivation than industrially used SAPO-34 in the MTO (methanol-to-olefins) process) [74]. Therefore, the industrial implementation of the DTO (DME-to-olefins) process could be carried out using the mature technology of the MTO process, consisting of an interconnected reactor-regenerator system (fluidized bed) [228].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text