Abstract
Although universal social–emotional learning programs are increasingly implemented across the USA, few studies have examined the effects of sustained exposure to the same program across multiple grade levels. As such, the goal of this study was to isolate the effects of sustained exposure to a universal social–emotional learning program (Elliott & Gresham, Social skills improvement system: classwide intervention program [SSIS-CIP]. NCS Pearson, Bloomington, MN, 2007), on elementary students’ social, behavioral, and academic outcomes. Compared to students who experienced the SSIS-CIP in second grade only (N = 218), students exposed to the SSIS-CIP in first and second grade (N = 181) showed further gains in several social skill domain areas as well as academic engagement at the end of second grade. Interactions, however, indicated that some effects were potentially moderated by student or class-level skills at the beginning of second grade. Future research considerations and practical implications for universal social–emotional learning programming are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
N/A.
Code Availability
N/A.
Notes
Sixteen second-grade students initially received the program in first grade; however, their second-grade teachers participated in data collection only (i.e., did not implement the SSIS-CIP), so these students were included in the single exposure condition.
References
Beets, M. W., Flay, B. R., Vuchinich, S., Snyder, F. J., Acock, A., Li, K.-K., et al. (2009). Use of a social and character development program to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students in Hawaii. American Journal of Public Health, 99(8), 1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.142919.
Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(3), 508–544.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. Methodological, 57, 289–300.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302–306.
CASEL. (2019). District Theory of Action: Needs Assessment. Retrieved from https://casel.org/in-the-district/needs/
CASEL (Producer). (2013). Effective social and emotional learning programs: Preschool and elementary school. Retrieved from http://casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2013-casel-guide-1.pdf
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the beahvioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conderman, G., Liberty, L., & DeSpain, S. (2017). Understanding accommodations, modifications, and interventions. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1299545.
DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2000). Academic competence evaluation scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2015). Efficacy of the social skills improvement system classwide intervention program (SSIS-CIP) primary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000079.
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2016). Effects of a universal positive classroom behavior program on student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 53(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21891.
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Cheng, W., Hart, S. C., & Bellinger, J. (2018). A cluster randomized trial of the Social Skills Improvement System-Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) in first grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 1.
Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.
Elbertson, N. A., Brackett, M. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2009). School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programming: Current perspectives. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 1017–1032). Dordrecht: Springer.
Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social skills improvement system: Classwide intervention program. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 40, 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808.
Greenberg, M. T., & Abenavoli, R. (2017). Universal interventions: Fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1246632.
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Graczyk, P. A., & Zins, J. E. (2005). The study of implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice. Promotion of Mental Health and Prevention of Mental and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 21.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system: Rating scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., Vance, M. J., & Cook, C. R. (2011). Comparability of the social skills rating system to the social skills improvement system: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 27.
Hart, S. C., DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P.-W., & Cheng, W. (2020). Nothing lost, something gained? Impact of a universal social–emotional learning program on future state test performance. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19898721.
Hunter, L. J., DiPerna, J. C., Hart, S. C., & Crowley, M. (2018). At what cost? Examining the cost effectiveness of a universal social–emotional learning program. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 147.
January, A. M., Casey, R. J., & Paulson, D. (2011). A meta-analysis of classroom-wide interventions to build social skills: Do they work? School Psychology Review, 40(2), 242–256.
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and Emotional Learning in Schools: From Programs to Strategies and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33.
Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283–2290. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630.
Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Social validity. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1875–1876). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa632.
Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 449.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2011). Position statement: Grade retention and social promotion. Retrieved from https://www.nasponline.org/x26820.xml
Nelson, G., Westhues, A., & MacLeod, J. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Research on Preschool Prevention Programs for Children. Prevention & Treatment, 6(1), No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.631a
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76.
Renaissance Learning. (2009). STAR Math technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
Renaissance Learning. (2010). STAR Reading technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., Baroody, A. E., Curby, T. W., Ko, M., Thomas, J. B., et al. (2014). Efficacy of the responsive classroom approach: Results from a 3-year, longitudinal randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51(3), 567–603. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214523821.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: an analysis of US mathematics and science curricula. Paper presented at the US National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI.
Snider, V. E. (2004). A comparison of spiral versus strand curriculum. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4(1), 29–39.
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864.
Volpe, R. J., & DiPerna, J. C. (2010). Cooperative learning observation code for kids. Unpublished observation code.
What Works Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Find what works. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). Procedures Handbook Version 4.0. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_procedures_handbook_v4_draft.pdf.
Funding
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A090438 to The Pennsylvania State University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunter, L.J., DiPerna, J.C., Cheng, W. et al. Twice as Nice? Sustained Exposure to a Universal Social–Emotional Learning Program Across Multiple Grades. School Mental Health 13, 84–100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09392-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09392-9