Abstract
Climate variability is one of the most powerful drivers that have resulted in loss of forest ecosystems. Quercus leucotrichophora (A. Camus) (Banj oak) is a keystone tree in moist temperate forests of Central Himalayas. Banj oak forests have high biodiversity, soil organic matter, and water holding capacity that supports human well-being. Climate variability coupled with anthropogenic pressure has affected the regeneration and succession patterns in these forests. Conservation of Banj oak is a socio-ecological challenge and will require an interdisciplinary approach. In the present study, we have assessed the impact of climate variability on the ecological niche of Q. leucotrichophora using the Maximum Entropy model (MaxEnt). The occurrence locations of the tree species were obtained from primary survey and published works (1984 to 2018). CMIP5 (Couple Model Inter-comparison Project)-derived bioclimatic variables were used as predictor variables in the modeling. The predictions were done following four IPCC RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) scenarios for the future periods of 2050 and 2070. Our results show that the estimated potential habitats of the Q. leucotrichophora are likely to decline by 84–99%. Shift of the species from its present habitats due to climate variability reflects unusual patterns and demands climate adaptive management for forest landscape restoration (FLR) through active community involvement in the region. The study provides information about the suitable niches for the species of Banj oak forests and addresses the growing concern of spring-shed rejuvenation using climate adaptive FLR in Central Himalayas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AUC:
-
Area under curve
- CCSM4:
-
The Community Climate System Model version 4
- CMIP5:
-
Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5
- DEM:
-
Digital Elevation Model
- FLR:
-
Forest Landscape Restoration
- FSI:
-
Forest Survey of India
- GBIF:
-
Global Biodiversity Information Facility
- GCM:
-
Global Climate Models
- GPS:
-
Global Positioning System
- HKH:
-
Hindukush Himalaya Assessment
- IHR:
-
Indian Himalayan Region
- IPBES:
-
Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- IPCC:
-
Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change
- IUCN:
-
International Union for Conservation of Nature
- MaxEnt:
-
Maximum entropy
- MoEF&CC:
-
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
- MSL:
-
Mean sea level
- NAPCC:
-
National Action Plan for Climate Change
- NMSHE:
-
National Mission on Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem
- RCP:
-
Representative concentration pathways
- SDG:
-
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDM:
-
Species distribution model
References
Ammer C (2019) Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. New Phytol 221(1):50–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15263
Angelieri CCS, Adams-Hosking C, Ferraz KMPMDB, de Souza MP, McAlpine CA (2016) Using species distribution models to predict potential landscape restoration effects on puma conservation. PLoS One 11(1):e0145232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145232
Antunez P, Suarez-Mota ME, Valenzuela-Encinas C, Ruiz-Aquino F (2018) The potential distribution of tree species in three periods of time under a climate change scenario. Forests 9(10):628. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100628
Arvai M, Morgos A, Kern Z (2018) Growth–climate relations and the enhancement of drought signals in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) tree-ring chronology in eastern Hungary. iForest-Biogeosci Forest 11(2):267–274. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2348-011
Bahuguna VK, Swaminath MH, Tripathi S, Singh TP, Rawat VRS, Rawat RS (2016) Revisiting forest types of India. Int For Rev 18(2):135–145. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816818966345
Bargali K, Joshi B, Bargali SS, Singh SP (2015) Oaks and the biodiversity they sustain. Int Oaks 26:65–76. https://www.internationaloaksociety.org/sites/default/files//files/IO/IOS%20Journal%20%2326/09-ios%20journal%2326-bargali.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019
Beatty CR, Cox NA, Kuzee ME (2018) Biodiversity guidelines for forest landscape restoration opportunities assessments. IUCN, Gland. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.10.en
Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 15(4):365–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
Bhatt J, Tewari A, Mittal A (2015) Regeneration problem in Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus in Nainital forest division of Kumaun Himalaya. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 3(3):284–290. http://www.ijpab.com/form/2015%20Volume%203,%20issue%203/IJPAB-2015-3-3-284-290.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019
Birch EL (2014) A review of “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability” and “Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change”. J Am Plan Assoc 80:184–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.954464
Bird Birdlife International (2019). Endemic areas factsheet: Western Himalayas. http://www.birdlife.org/. Accessed 9 October 2019
Bisht H, Prakash V, Nautiyal AR (2012) Factors affecting regeneration potential of Quercus semecarpifolia, Smith: a poor regenerated oak of Himalayan timberline. Res J Seed Sci 5(2):63–70. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjss.2012.63.70
Borah B, Bhattarcharjee A, Ishwar NM (2018) Bonn challenge and India: progress on restoration efforts across states and landscapes. IUCN and MoEFCC, Government of India, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.12.en
Caignard T, Kremer A, Firmat C, Nicolas M, Venner S, Delzon S (2017) Increasing spring temperatures favor oak seed production in temperate areas. Sci Rep 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09172-7
Chakraborty A, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK (2016a) Mapping long-term land use and land cover change in the central Himalayan region using a tree-based ensemble classification approach. Appl Geogr 74:136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.008
Chakraborty A, Joshi PK, Sachdeva K (2016b) Predicting distribution of major forest tree species to potential impacts of climate change in the central Himalayan region. Ecol Eng 97:593–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
Chakraborty A, Saha S, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK (2018) Vulnerability of forests in the Himalayan region to climate change impacts and anthropogenic disturbances: a systematic review. Reg Environ Chang 18(6):1783–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1309-7
Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Government of India, New Delhi
Chaturvedi RK, Gopalakrishnan R, Jayaraman M, Bala G, Joshi NV, Sukumar R, Ravindranath NH (2011) Impact of climate change on Indian forests: a dynamic vegetation modeling approach. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(2):119–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9257-7
Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR (2018) Decision support tools for forest landscape restoration: current status and future outlook. Volume 183. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006792
Chitale VS, Behera MD, Roy PS (2014) Future of endemic flora of biodiversity hotspots in India. PLoS One 9(12):e115264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115264
Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Hanson PJ, Irland LC, Lugo AE, Peterson CJ, Simberloff D, Swanson FJ, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances: climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. BioScience 51(9):723–734. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI, Prentice IC, Mace GM (2011) Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332(6025):53–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303
Devi RM, Patasaraiya MK, Sinha B, Saran S, Dimri AP, Jaiswal R (2018) Understanding the linkages between climate change and forest. Curr Sci 114(5):987–996. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i05/987-996
Dhyani S (2018) Impact of forest leaf litter harvesting to support traditional agriculture in Western Himalayas. Trop Ecol 59(3):473–488 ISSN 0564-3295
Dhyani S, Dhyani D (2016a) Significance of provisioning ecosystem services from moist temperate forest ecosystems: lessons from upper Kedarnath valley, Garhwal, India. Energy, Ecol Environ 1(2):109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-016-0008-9
Dhyani S, Dhyani D (2016b) Strategies for reducing deforestation and disaster risk: lessons from Garhwal Himalaya, India. In: Renaud F, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella M, Nehren U (eds) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and adaptation in practice. Advances in natural and technological hazards research, vol 42. Springer, Cham, pp 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_22
Dhyani S, Dhyani D (2020) Local socio-economic dynamics shaping forest ecosystems in Central Himalayas. In: Roy N, Roychoudhury S, Nautiyal S, Agarwal S, Baksi S (eds) Socio-economic and eco-biological dimensions in resource use and conservation. Environmental science and engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32463-6_3
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D (2011) Energy budget of fodder harvesting pattern along the altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Biomass Bioenergy 35(5):1823–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.022
Dhyani S, Kadaverugu R, Dhyani D, Verma P, Pujari P (2018) Predicting impacts of climate variability on habitats of Hippophae salicifolia (D. Don) (Seabuckthorn) in Central Himalayas: future challenges. Ecol Inform 48:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.09.003
Dhyani S, Bartlett D, Kadaverugu R, Dasgupta R, Pujari P, Verma P (2020a) Integrated climate sensitive restoration framework for transformative changes to sustainable land restoration. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13230
Dhyani S, Singh S, Kadaverugu R, Pujari P, Verma P (2020b) Habitat suitability modelling and nature-based solutions: an efficient combination to realise the targets of Bonn challenge and SDGs in South Asia. In: Dhyani S, Gupta A, Karki M (eds) Nature-based solutions for resilient ecosystems and societies. Disaster resilience and green growth. Springer, Singapore, pp 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4712-6_20
Elith JH, Graham CP, Anderson R, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2):129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Ellison D, Morris CE, Locatelli B, Sheil D, Cohen J, Murdiyarso D et al (2017) Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a hot world. Glob Environ Chang 43:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002
FSI. India State of Forest Report 2017. http://fsi.nic.in/. Accessed 4 June 2018
Gaston A, Garcia-Vinas JI, Bravo-Fernandez AJ, Lopez-Leiva C, Oliet JA, Roig S, Serrada R (2014) Species distribution models applied to plant species selection in forest restoration: are model predictions comparable to expert opinion? New For 45(5):641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9427-7
GBIF (2019) GBIF occurrence download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.76lghb. Accessed 15 June 2019
Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ, Holland MM, Hunke EC, Jayne SR, Lawrence DM, Neale RB, Rasch PJ, Vertenstein M, Worley PH, Yang Z, Zhang M (2011) The community climate system model version 4. J Clim 24(19):4973–4991. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1
Gomes VH, IJff SD, Raes N, Amaral IL, Salomao RP et al (2018) Species distribution modeling: contrasting presence-only models with plot abundance data. Sci Rep 8(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18927-1
Gosain BG, Negi GC, Dhyani PP, Bargali SS, Saxena R (2015) Ecosystem services of forests: carbon stock in vegetation and soil components in a watershed of Kumaun Himalaya, India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 41(3–4):177–188
Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J, Gordon A, Kujala H, Lentini PE, McCarthy MA, Tingley R, Wintle BA (2015) Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24(3):276–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12268
Hart R, Salick J, Ranjitkar S, Xu J (2014) Herbarium specimens show contrasting phenological responses to Himalayan climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(29):10615–10619. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403376111
Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J (2017) Dismo: species distribution modeling. R Package Version 1(4):1–1
Hughes AC (2017) Understanding the drivers of southeast Asian biodiversity loss. Ecosphere 8(1):e01624. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1624
IPBES (2018) The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific. Karki M, Senaratna Sellamuttu S, Okayasu S, and Suzuki W (eds). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3237373
Jetz W, McGeoch MA, Guralnick R, Ferrier S, Beck J, Costello MJ et al (2019) Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat Ecol Evol 3(4):539–551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0826-1
Kala R, Bhavsar D, Kumar A, Roy A, Rawat L (2018) Quantification of potential area of incursion of pine in oak forest in western Himalaya using fuzzy classification technique. J Appl Remote Sens 12(2):026032. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.026032
Krishnan R, Shrestha AB, Ren G, Rajbhandari R, Saeed S, Sanjay J et al (2019) Unravelling climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: rapid warming in the mountains and increasing extremes. In the Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_3
Kulkarni A, Patwardhan SKKK, Kumar KK, Ashok K, Krishnan R (2013) Projected climate change in the Hindu Kush–Himalayan region by using the high-resolution regional climate model PRECIS. Mt Res Dev 33(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00131.1
Kumar A, Ram J (2005) Anthropogenic disturbances and plant biodiversity in forests of Uttaranchal, central Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv 14(2):309–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5047-4
Kumar S, Kumar M, Sheikh MA (2013) Carbon stock variation of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. forest along altitudes of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Russ J Ecol 44(2):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413613020136
Kumar M, Singh H, Pandey R, Singh MP, Ravindranath NH, Kalra N (2019) Assessing vulnerability of forest ecosystem in the Indian Western Himalayan region using trends of net primary productivity. Biodivers Conserv 28(8–9):2163–2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1663-2
Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr 40(4):778–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12058
Locatelli B, Lavorel S, Sloan S, Tappeiner U, Geneletti D (2017) Characteristic trajectories of ecosystem services in mountains. Front Ecol Environ 15(3):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1470
LP DAAC (2018) The DEM were retrieved from the online application for extracting and exploring analysis ready samples (AppEEARS), courtesy of the NASA EOSDIS land processes distributed active archive center (LP DAAC), USGS/Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, US. https://lpdaacsvc.cr.usgs.gov/appeears/
Mamgain A, Uniyal PL (2018) Species distribution modeling of Rhododendron arboreum Sm.—a keystone species, in India and adjoining region. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 44(3):261–286. https://nieindia.org/Journal/index.php/ijees/article/view/1443. Accessed 19 Sept 2019
Manandhar NP (2002) Plants and people of Nepal. Timber Press, USA
Marchese C (2015) Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecol Conserv 3:297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.008
Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Kala CP, Rao KS, Saxena KG (2008) Wild leafy vegetables: a study of their subsistence dietetic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi biosphere reserve, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-4-15
Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D, Rao KS (2009) Assessment of traditional rights, local interference and natural resource management in Kedarnath wildlife sanctuary. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 16(6):404–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500903332008
Mondal PP, Zhang Y (2018) Research progress on changes in land use and land cover in the western Himalayas (India) and effects on ecosystem services. Sustainability 10(12):4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124504
Naeem S, Chazdon R, Duffy JE, Prager C, Worm B (2016) Biodiversity and human well-being: an essential link for sustainable development. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283(1844):20162091. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2091
Nagahama K, Satya L, Saito K (2016) The Van Panchayat movement and struggle for achieving sustainable management of the forest: a case study of Uttarakhand in North India. SDRP J Earth Sci Environ Stud 1:61–70. https://doi.org/10.15436/JESES.1.3.1
Negi GCS (2019) Forest fire in Uttarakhand: causes, consequences and remedial measures. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 45(1):31–37
Negi GCS, Joshi V (2004) Rainfall and spring discharge patterns in two small drainage catchments in the Western Himalayan Mountains, India. Environmentalist 24(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVR.0000046343.45118.78
NITI Ayog (2018) Composite water management index: a tool for water management. Ministry of Water Resources, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/2018-05-18-Water-Index-Report_vS8-compressed.pdf. Accessed 9 October 2019
Pandve HT (2009) India’s national action plan on climate change. Indian J Occup Environ Med 13(1):17–19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.50718
Paudyal K, Baral H, Lowell K, Keenan R (2017) Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits. Land Use Policy 63:342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.046
Paul S, Samant SS, Lal M, Ram J (2018) Population assessment and ecological niche modeling of Carpinus viminea Wall. Ex Lindl.—a multipurpose tree for conservation in the Indian Himalayan region. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 84(3):681–694. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2018/49345
Payne D, Spehn EM, Snethlage M, Fischer M (2017) Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 29:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.001
Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Walters M, Geller GN, Jongman RHG et al (2013) Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339(6117):277–278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229931
Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, Banff, Canada https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015412
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190(3–4):231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Piyoosh AK, Ghosh SK (2019) Identification and analysis of recent temporal temperature trends for Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Meteorog Atmos Phys 131(4):863–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-018-0608-3
Raina N, Rao KS, Sreekesh S (2013) Species distribution modeling of Berberis aristata in Dabka watershed, Uttarakhand. Vegetos 26:30–38. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2229-4473.26.2s.117
Ramachandran RM, Roy PS (2018) Vegetation response to climate change in Himalayan hill range: a remote sensing perspective. ISBN: 978-81-211-0946-8
Roy PS, Roy A, Joshi PK, Kale MP, Srivastava VK et al (2015) Development of decadal (1985–1995–2005) land use and land cover database for India. Remote Sens 7(3):2401–2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70302401
Saran S, Joshi R, Sharma S, Padalia H, Dadhwal VK (2010) Geospatial modeling of brown oak (Quercus semecarpifolia) habitats in the Kumaun Himalaya under climate change scenario. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(3):535–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0038-2
schulz JJ, Schröder B (2017) Identifying suitable multifunctional restoration areas for forest landscape restoration in Central Chile. Ecosphere 8(1):e01644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1644
Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, Martin-Benito D, Peltoniemi M et al (2017) Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 7(6):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303
Sharma E, Molden D, Rahman A, Khatiwada YR, Zhang L, Singh SP et al (2019) Introduction to the Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha A (eds) The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_1
Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS (2012) Widespread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. PLoS One 7(5):e36741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036741
Shrestha RB, Desai J, Mukherji A, Dhakal M, Kulkarni H, Mahamuni K, et al (2018) Protocol for reviving springs in the Hindu Kush Himalayas: a practitioner’s manual. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. ICIMOD, Kathmandu. ISBN 978-92-9115-607-8
Singh G, Rawat GS (2012) Quantitative analysis of tree species diversity in different oak (Quercus spp.) dominated forests in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Notulae Sci Biol 4(4):132–140. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb448200
Singh SP, Singh JS (1986) Structure and function of the central Himalayan oak forests. Proc: Plant Sci 96(3):59–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053301
Singh JS, Rawat YS, Chaturvedi OP (1984) Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature 311(5981):54–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/311054a0
Singh V, Thadani R, Tewari A, Ram J (2014) Human influence on Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora, A. Camus) forests of central Himalaya. J Sustain For 33(4):373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2014.899500
Singh G, Padalia H, Rai ID, Bharti RR, Rawat GS (2016) Spatial extent and conservation status of Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) forests in Uttarakhand, Western Himalaya. Trop Ecol 57(2):255–262
Singh P and Negi GCS (2016) Impact of climate change on phenological responses of major forest trees of Kumaun Himalaya. ENVIS Center Himalayan Ecol 24:112–116
R Core Team (2017) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2017. https://www.R-project.org/
Thadani R, Ashton PMS (1995) Regeneration of Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) in the central Himalaya. For Ecol Manag 78(1–3):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03561-4
Upadhyay RG, Ranjan R, Negi PS (2015) Climatic variability and trend at Ranichauri (Uttarakhand). J Agrometeorol 17(2):241–243
Upgupta S, Sharma J, Jayaraman M, Kumar V, Ravindranath NH (2015) Climate change impact and vulnerability assessment of forests in the Indian Western Himalayan region: a case study of Himachal Pradesh, India. Clim Risk Manag 10:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2015.08.002
Upreti N, Tewari JC, Singh SP (1985) The oak forests of the Kumaun Himalaya (India): composition, diversity, and regeneration. Mt Res Dev 5(2):163–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/3673255
Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348(6234):571–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984
USGCRP (2018) Fourth national climate assessment. https://nca2018.globalchange.gov. Accessed 9 October 2019
Van der Putten WH, Macel M, Visser ME (2010) Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Transact R Soc B: Biol Sci 365(1549):2025–2034. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0037
Verma AK, Garkoti SC (2019) Population structure, soil characteristics and carbon stock of the regenerating Banj oak forests in Almora, central Himalaya. For Sci Technol 15(3):117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2019.1620135
Wang Y, Stone L (2019) Understanding the connections between species distribution models for presence-background data. Theor Ecol 12(1):73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-018-0389-9
Whittaker RH, Likens GE (1975) The biosphere and man. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH (eds) Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_15
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that have helped to substantially improve the manuscript. The first author wishes to thank Dr. R.K. Maikhuri for encouragement and providing necessary facilities. The first author is also grateful to Dr. Deepak Dhyani for his help in field data collection. Field assistants Mr. Harsh Prakash Semwal, Mr. Birulal, and Mrs. Asha Semwal are acknowledged for their assistance during the field work. The second author is thankful to Dr. Ashok Kadaverugu for his help in language editing and proofreading. The authors thank the institutional manuscript processing services having the reference number CSIR-NEERI/KRC/2019/OCT/WTMD-CTMD/1 dated 04/10/2019. Financial support for the field work from Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (2002–2006); TSBF/GEF/CIAT/UNEP (2004–2007); DST SYSP (No. SP/YO/024/2008) (2009–2012), Rufford Small Grants Programme, UK (Grant No. 10326) (2014–2015); and NMCG (grant nos. G-1-2103 and G-1-2298) (2015-2020) is thankfully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Anne Bousquet-Melou
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 31.5 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dhyani, S., Kadaverugu, R. & Pujari, P. Predicting impacts of climate variability on Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) forests: understanding future implications for Central Himalayas. Reg Environ Change 20, 113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01696-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01696-5