Skip to main content
Log in

Robust evaluation method of communication network based on the combination of complex network and big data

  • S.I. : ATCI 2020
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The essence of big data may be the science of complex network, which should be one of the basic theories of big data, and the direct object of mobile communication network is big data. The purpose of this paper is to study the evaluation method of communication network robustness based on the combination of cloud edge computer and big data. Firstly, the technical system of big data technology and the basic concept and model of complex network are studied. Secondly, it analyzes the robustness of single-layer network and multi-layer network to lay a solid foundation for the following experiments. Set up the experiment code, and test each experiment several times to get the final data. The experimental results show that the change of R (LCC) from 0 to non-0 occurs at the reciprocal of the average for different network averages, that is, the critical value of network robustness P is equal to the reciprocal of the average. Random networks are not robust to regular networks. Even if the average order of the random network is the same as that of the regular network, the random network is not robust to the regular network. There are 5 × 104 nodes in each of the random networks ER1 and ER2. ER1 and ER2 are one to one connected. The average value of ER1 is set to be the same as the average value of ER2. The multi-layer random network is not stable without single-layer random network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang C, Zhang F-M, Wang Y (2015) Method to analyse the robustness of aviation communication network based on complex networks. Syst Eng Electron 37(1):180–184

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Z, Zhang P, Yuan Y et al (2015) A robust power allocation scheme for relay communication networks based on seller-buyer game. Wirel Pers Commun 96(4):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang C, Luo A, Deng Y et al (2019) Building a smart lecture-recording system using MK-CPN network for heterogeneous data sources. Neural Comput Appl 31:3759–3777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura Y, Hasegawa O (2016) Nonparametric density estimation based on self-organizing incremental neural network for large noisy data. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tao S, Way SF, Garland J (2017) Ablation as targeted perturbation to rewire communication network of persistent atrial fibrillation. PLoS One 12(7):e0179459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Z, Zhang P, Yuan Y (2017) A robust power allocation scheme for relay communication networks based on seller-buyer game. Wirel Pers Commun 96(4):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ting Y, Bo Y, Chengli Z (2015) Bisection algorithm of edge augmentation for electrical power communication network. J Tianjin Univ 48(6):481–487

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lou Guannan, Wei Gu, Yinliang Xu (2017) Stability robustness for secondary voltage control in autonomous microgrids with consideration of communication delays. IEEE Trans Power Syst 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y-L, Han Q-L (2016) Network-based fault detection filter and controller coordinated design for unmanned surface vehicles in network environments. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 12(5):1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hyodo S, Ohnishi K (2015) A method for allocation of system model in communication disturbance observer considering unstable network. IEEJ Trans Ind Appl 135(3):192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Àlvarez Carme, Díaz Josep, Petit J et al (2016) High level communication functionalities for wireless sensor networks. Theor Comput Sci 406(3):240–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwager M, Vitus MP, Powers S et al (2017) Robust adaptive coverage control for robotic sensor networks. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 4(3):462–476

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sood Neeraj (2018) Integrating physics-based wireless propagation models and network protocol design for train communication systems. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang F, Li H, Chen G et al (2019) Cluster lag synchronization of delayed heterogeneous complex dynamical networks via intermittent pinning control. Neural Comput Appl 31:7945–7961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertelli R, Bonanni A, Di Donato A (2015) Regulatory T cells and minimal change nephropathy: in the mid of a complex network. Clin Exp Immunol 183(2):166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi L, Zhou Y, Meng Q et al (2015) A context-aware weighting method for historical records in web service evaluation. J Comput Theor Nanosci 12(12):5310–5317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qi Lianyong, Zhang Xuyun, Dou Wanchun (2017) A distributed locality-sensitive hashing-based approach for cloud service recommendation from multi-source data. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhuiyan MZA, Wang G, Jie W (2017) Dependable structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 14(4):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhuiyan MZA, Jie W, Wang G (2017) e-Sampling: event-sensitive autonomous adaptive sensing and low-cost monitoring in networked sensing systems. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst 12(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Fei S, Zhou F (2018) Sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis with multiple atypical features: a case report and literature review. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 61(1):94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlin DA, Caster RW, Wang X (2016) Kinetic characterization of 100 glycoside hydrolase mutants enables the discovery of structural features correlated with kinetic constants. PLoS One 11(1):e0147596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Piccialli F, Chianese A (2016) Cultural heritage and new technologies: trends and challenges. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 21(2):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Michele P, Maiorano F, Marcellino L (2017) A GPU implementation of OLPCA method in hybrid environment. Int J Parallel Prog 46(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wei Wei, Fan Xunli, Song Houbing (2016) Imperfect information dynamic stackelberg game based resource allocation using hidden Markov for cloud computing. IEEE Trans Services Comput 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li W, Song H (2016) ART: an attack-resistant trust management scheme for securing vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(4):960–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foudation of Hunan Province, China (No. 2017JJ2237). Author wishes to express gratitude to the Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institution of Hunan Province. This work was supported by Public Projects of Wenzhou Science & Technology Bureau (Grant Nos. G20150020 & G20160007) and also supported by Zhejiang public welfare technology application research project (No. LGG19F020004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no potential competing interests in our paper. And all authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. We confirm that the content of the manuscript has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, C., Zhu, L. Robust evaluation method of communication network based on the combination of complex network and big data. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 887–896 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05264-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05264-0

Keywords

Navigation