Skip to main content
Log in

Untangling the influence of soil moisture on root pullout property of alfafa plant

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Root pullout property of plants was of key importance to the soil reinforcement and the improvement of slope stability. To investigate the influence of soil moisture on root pullout resistance and failure modes in soil reinforcement process, we conducted pullout tests on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) roots at five levels (40, 30, 20, 10 and 6 kPa) of soil matric suction, corresponding to respectively 7.84%, 9.66%, 13.02%, 19.35% and 27.06% gravimetric soil moisture contents. Results showed that the maximal root pullout force of M. sativa decreased in a power function with increasing soil moisture content from 7.84% to 27.06%. Root slippage rate increased and breakage rate decreased with increasing soil moisture content. At 9.66% soil moisture content, root slippage rate and breakage rate was 56.41% and 43.58%, respectively. The threshold value of soil moisture content was about 9.00% for alfalfa roots in the loess soil. The maximal pullout force of M. sativa increased with root diameter in a power function. The threshold value of root diameter was 1.15 mm, because root slipping force was greater than root breaking force when diameter >1.15 mm, while diameter ≤1.15 mm, root slipping force tended to be less than root breaking force. No significant difference in pullout forces was observed between slipping roots and breaking roots when they had similar diameters. More easily obtained root tensile force (strength) is suggested to be used in root reinforcement models under the condition that the effect of root diameter is excluded as the pullout force of breaking roots measured in pullout tests is similar to the root tensile force obtained by tensile tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy B, Rutherfurd I D. 2001. The distribution and strength of riparian tree roots in relation to riverbank reinforcement. Hydrological Processes, 15(1): 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J M, Wang G Y, Hu S H, et al. 2018. Experimental study on effects of geometric characteristics of shrub roots on pulling force. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(6): 67–73. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Schwarz M, Or D. 2011. An analytical fiber bundle model for pullout mechanics of root bundles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 116: F03010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comino E, Marengo P. 2010. Root tensile strength of three shrub species: Rosa canina, Cotoneaster dammeri and Juniperus horizontalis: Soil reinforcement estimation by laboratory tests. Catena, 82(3): 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui P, Lin Y M. 2013. Debris-flow treatment: The integration of botanical and geotechnical methods. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4(2): 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A. 2005. A numerical investigation into factors affecting the anchorage of roots in tension. European Journal of Soil Science, 56(3): 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos A R. 1990. The anchorage of leek seedlings: the effect of root length and soil strength. Annals of Botany, 65(4): 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan C C, Tsai M H. 2016. Spatial distribution of plant root forces in root-permeated soils subject to shear. Soil & Tillage Research, 156: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund D G, Xing A, Fredlund M D, et al. 1996. The relationship of the unsaturated soil shear strength to the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33(3): 440–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giadrossich F, Schwarz M, Cohen D, et al. 2017. Methods to measure the mechanical behaviour of tree roots: A review. Ecological Engineering, 109: 256–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giadrossich F, Schwarz M, Cohen D, et al. 2013. Mechanical interactions between neighbouring roots during pullout tests. Plant and Soil, 367(1–2): 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D H, Sotir R B. 1996. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilisation: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. New York: Wiley, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales T C, Miniat C F. 2017. Soil moisture causes dynamic adjustments to root reinforcement that reduce slope stability. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(5): 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett P D, Newson T A. 2005. Describing soil crack formation using elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. European Journal of Soil Science, 56(1): 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan R L. 1973. Analysis of coupled heat-fluid transport in partially frozen soil. Water Resources Research, 9(5): 1314–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X D, Cong X, Dai X Q, et al. 2018. Studying the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface using the pullout test method. Journal of Mountain Science, 15(4): 882–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapen A, Kitutu M G, Poesen J, et al. 2006. Landslides in a densely populated county at the footslopes of Mount Elgon (Uganda): Characteristics and causal factors. Geomorphology, 73(1–2): 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S C, Sun H L, Yang Z R, et al. 2006. Mechanical characteristics of interaction between root system of plants and rock for rock slope protection. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 25(10): 2051–2056. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang T, Bengough A G, Knappett J A, et al. 2017a. Scaling of the reinforcement of soil slopes by living plants in a geotechnical centrifuge. Ecological Engineering, 109: 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang T, Knappett J A, Bengough A G, et al. 2017b. Small-scale modelling of plant root systems using 3D printing, with applications to investigate the role of vegetation on earthquake-induced landslides. Landslides, 14(5): 1747–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski S B, Bengough A G, Bransby M F, et al. 2007. Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. European Journal of Soil Science, 58(6): 1471–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan L, Shi S, Zhang J. 2014. Study on root system development ability of different root-type alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 23(2): 117–124. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris J E, Greenwood J R. 2008. An introduction to types of vegetated slopes. In: Norris J E, Stokes A, Mickovski S B, et al. Slope Stability and Erosion Control: Ecotechnological Solutions. Amsterdam: Springer, 9–15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollen N, Simon A. 2005. Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resources Research, 41: W07025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollen N. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks: Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena, 69(3): 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. 2010. Root-soil mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 115: F04035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. 2011. Pullout tests of root analogs and natural root bundles in soil: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 116: F02007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter A H, et al. 1996. An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Annals of Botany, 78(4): 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs J C, Cook D D, Niklas J K. 2019. A general review of the biomechanics of root anchorage. Journal of Experimental Botany, 70(14): 3439–3451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergani C, Giadrossich F, Buckley P, et al. 2017. Root reinforcement dynamics of European coppice woodlands and their effect on shallow landslides: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 167: 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron L J. 1977. The shear resistance of root permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America, 41(5): 843–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T H. 1979. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 16(1): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz A, Graf F, Rickli C, et al. 2018. Determination of the shearing behaviour of root-permeated soils with a large-scale direct shear apparatus. Catena, 166: 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C B, Zhou X, Jiang J, et al. 2019. Root moisture content influence on root tensile tests of herbaceous plants. Catena, 172: 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Watts D P, Li Y H, et al. 1998. A case study of effect of lateral roots of Pinus yunnanensis on shallow soil reinforcement. Forest Ecology and Management, 103(2–3): 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600582), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China (201701D221224), the Program for the Outstanding Innovative Teams of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi Province of China (2017), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions of Shanxi Province, China (2019L0175), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0407803).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaobo Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Liu, P. et al. Untangling the influence of soil moisture on root pullout property of alfafa plant. J. Arid Land 12, 666–675 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0017-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0017-6

Keywords

Navigation