Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Character Synthesis of Ballet Archetypes on Robots Using Laban Movement Analysis: Comparison Between a Humanoid and an Aerial Robot Platform with Lay and Expert Observation

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imitation of human movement by robots is an important area of research to create expressive systems that are able to interact with humans in social settings. One lens through which imitation may be investigated is that of character archetypes, commonly found in human story-telling. Classical ballet, a form of story-telling through movement, makes extensive use of such archetypes. This paper reviews how Laban Movement Analysis creates a descriptive taxonomy in which features of interest may be identified and reported from human performers to robotic platforms, specifically for a BeBop aerial drone and a Nao humanoid platform. To determine the success of this approach, the paper also presents evaluation by lay human viewers that validates the character transfer. Moreover, this paper offers more nuance into this evaluation by querying two specialized groups of experts, which frequently deviated from lay ratings and, thus, offer deeper insight into both the success of the character transfer and the importance of prior training in movement perception. This work may be useful in human-facing scenarios where character archetypes facilitate engagement, identification, and understanding between robots and human counterparts. Further, it highlights nuances in working with expert artists to create broadly applicable designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe N, Laumond JP, Salaris P, Levillain F (2017a) On the use of dance notation systems to generate movements in humanoid robots: The utility of laban notation in robotics. Soc Sci Inf 56(2):328–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abe N, Laumond JP, Salaris P, Levillain F (2017b) On the use of dance notation systems to generate movements in humanoid robots: The utility of laban notation in robotics. Soc Sci Inf 56(2):328–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417694773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alaoui SF, Carlson K, Schiphorst T (2014) Choreography as mediated through compositional tools for movement: Constructing a historical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international workshop on movement and computing, ACM, p 1

  4. SoftBank Robotics (2018) NAO the humanoid and programmmable robot. https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/nao

  5. Ashton F (2020) Cinderella. Joffrey Ballet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkoD_1bvypM

  6. Ashton F (2018) The dream. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3APvyV9q2Q

  7. Bacula A, LaViers A (2018a) Character design and validation on aerial robotic platforms using laban movement analysis. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp 202–212

  8. Bacula A, LaViers A (2018b) Character recognition on a humanoid robotic platform via a laban movement analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2018 international workshop on movement and computing. ACM, p 17

  9. Bournonville A (2018) La sylphide. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ2AjuWxr3o

  10. Burton SJ, Samadani AA, Gorbet R, Kulić D (2016) Laban movement analysis and affective movement generation for robots and other near-living creatures. In: Dance notations and robot motion. Springer, pp 25–48

  11. Etemad SA, Arya A (2016) Expert-driven perceptual features for modeling style and affect in human motion. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 46(4):534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fokine M (2018a) Dying swan solo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T2UeKKac-s

  13. Fokine M (2018b) The firebird. Mariinsky Ballet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LHbPU-qSjA

  14. Fokine M (2018c) Petrushka. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvXlFKvpoOg

  15. Groff E (1995) Laban movement analysis: charting the ineffable domain of human movement. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance 66(2):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guest AH (2013) Labanotation: the system of analyzing and recording movement. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Homans J (2010) Apollo’s angels: a history of ballet. Penguin Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ikeuchi K, Ma Z, Yan Z, Kudoh S, Nakamura M (2018) Describing upper-body motions based on labanotation for learning-from-observation robots. Int J Comput Vis 126(12):1415–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knight H, Lee T, Hallawell B, Ju W (2017) I get it already! the influence of chairbot motion gestures on bystander response. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE

  20. Knight H, Simmons R (2014) Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban effort features for mobile robots. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, pp 267–273

  21. Knight H, Simmons R (2015) Layering laban effort features on robot task motions. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts. ACM, pp 135–136

  22. Knight H, Simmons R (2016) Laban head-motions convey robot state: a call for robot body language. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 2881–2888

  23. Knight H, Veloso M, Simmons R (2015) Taking candy from a robot: Speed features and candy accessibility predict human response. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 355–362

  24. Laban R, Ullmann L (2011a) Choreutics. Dance Books, Alton

    Google Scholar 

  25. Laban R, Lawrence FC (1947) Effort. Macdonald & Evans

  26. Larboulette C, Gibet S (2015) A review of computable expressive descriptors of human motion. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on movement and computing. ACM, pp 21–28

  27. LaViers A, Chen Y, Belta C, Egerstedt M (2011) Automatic sequencing of ballet poses. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(3):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LaViers A, Egerstedt M (2011) The ballet automaton: a formal model for human motion. In: American control conference, proceedings of the 2011

  29. LaViers A, Egerstedt M (2012) Style-based robotic motion. In: American control conference, proceedings of the 2012

  30. LaViers A, Egerstedt M (2014) Style-based abstractions for human motion classification. In: 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on cyber-physical systems (ICCPS). IEEE, pp 84–91

  31. Lavrovsky L (2020) Romeo and Juliet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCdjrmb6L6A

  32. Legat N, Sergei (2020) The fairy doll. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo7cemNhZr8

  33. Medvedev V, Burlaka Y (2018) The nutcracker. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCBd2Zkb4o0

  34. Mutlu B, Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Nonverbal leakage in robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction—HRI 09. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514110

  35. Nakata T, Mori T, Sato T (2002) Analysis of impression of robot bodily expression. J Robot Mechatron 14(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pakrasi I, Chakraborty N, Cuan C, Berl E, Rizvi W, LaViers A (2018a) Dancing droids: An expressive layer for mobile robots developed within choreographic practice. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, pp 410–420

  37. Pakrasi I, LaViers A, Chakraborty N (2018b) A design methodology for abstracting character archetypes onto robotic systems. In: Proceedings of the 2018 international workshop on movement and computing. ACM, pp 28–30

  38. Perrot J (2018) Giselle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqOm922Fhx8

  39. Perzanowski D, Schultz A, Adams W (1998) Integrating natural language and gesture in a robotics domain. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE international symposium on intelligent control (ISIC) held jointly with IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation (CIRA) intelligent systems and semiotics (ISAS) (Cat No98CH36262). https://doi.org/10.1109/isic.1998.713669

  40. Petipa M (2018a) La bayadere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEdDKxmpSzY

  41. Petipa M (2018b) Sleeping beauty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEH3N-S9v4U

  42. Petipa M (2018c) Sleeping beauty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTVPHGNog54

  43. Petipa M, Ivanov L (2018) Swan lake. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhEPjTTl_u0

  44. Rett J, Dias J (2007) Human–robot interface with anticipatory characteristics based on laban movement analysis and bayesian models. In: 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/icorr.2007.4428436

  45. Rizvi W, Pakrasi I, LaViers A (2019) Influence of variable environments and character-specific design on perception of virtual robots with affective labels. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer (to appear)

  46. Rv Laban, Ullmann L (2011b) The mastery of movement, 4th edn. Dance Books, Alton

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saint-Leon A (2018) Coppelia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRdKS30CBd

  48. Samadani AA, Burton S, Gorbet R, Kulic D (2013) Laban effort and shape analysis of affective hand and arm movements. In: 2013 Humaine Association conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction. IEEE, pp 343–348

  49. Sharma M, Hildebrandt D, Newman G, Young JE, Eskicioglu R (2013) Communicating affect via flight path: exploring use of the laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. IEEE Press, pp 293–300

  50. Smith ME (2000) Ballet and Opera in the age of Giselle, vol 13. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  51. Studd K, Cox LL (2013) Everybody is a body. Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tapus A, Mataric MJ (2008) Socially assistive robots: The link between personality, empathy, physiological signals, and task performance. In: AAAI spring symposium: emotion, personality, and social behavior, pp 133–140

  53. Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Koay KL (2007) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots 24(2):159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9058-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by DARPA Grant #D16AP00001 and National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant #1528036.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collaborative Robotics and Intelligent Systems Institute, Oregon State University, Corvalis, OR, 97331, USA

    A. Bacula

  2. Robotics, Automation, and Dance (RAD) Lab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    A. LaViers

Authors
  1. A. Bacula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. LaViers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bacula.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This work was conducted under IRB #16225.

Conflict of Interest

Amy LaViers owns stock in AE Machines, Inc. and caali, LLC. Alexandra Bacula has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bacula, A., LaViers, A. Character Synthesis of Ballet Archetypes on Robots Using Laban Movement Analysis: Comparison Between a Humanoid and an Aerial Robot Platform with Lay and Expert Observation. Int J of Soc Robotics 13, 1047–1062 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00695-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00695-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation