Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian Inference of Fire Evolution Within a Compartment Using Heat Flux Measurements

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamical evolution of a multiple fuel package fire leaves thermal signatures. For practical and theoretical reasons, it is important to determine conditions in which one can identify the path the system took by conducting a set of experiments that cover the space of all possible paths. An experimental fire compartment capable of producing repeatable and highly customizable fire-evolution scenarios is presented. Instrumented propane burners are configured in the compartment each with a simple critical heat flux ignition model. Heat flux sensors are located around the burner configuration to provide temporal incident heat flux measurements. Data from several hypotheses representing possible scenarios are compared to data generated using some true configuration using a Bayesian methodology. The Bayesian methodology is able to illicit the correct fire-evolution scenario from the set of hypotheses with a high degree of confidence. The information content provided by each sensor is analyzed to highlight the importance of sensor location in determining the fire-evolution. Posteriors for the hypotheses using two different error structures are also compared over the sensors to highlight the importance of choosing the correct error structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NFPA (2014) NFPA 921-guide for fire and explosion investigations. National Fire Protection Association

  2. Strengthening forensic science in the united states: A path forward. Technical report, National Research Council (2009)

  3. Gorbett GE, Chapdelaine W (2014) Scientific method-use, application, and gap analysis for origin determination. In: International symposium on fire investigation science and technology

  4. Cox A (2013) Origin matrix analysis: a systematic methodology for the assessment and interpretation of compartment fire damage. Fire Arson Investig 64(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorbett GE, Meacham BJ, Wood CB, Dembsey NA (2015) Use of damage in fire investigation: a review of fire patterns analysis, research and future direction. Fire Sci Rev 4:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40038-015-0008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorbett GE, Wood CB (2017) Structure and evaluation of the process for origin determination in compartment fires. Fire Technol 53:301–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopkins RL, Gorbett G, Kennedy P (1997) Fire pattern persistence and predictability on interior finish and construction materials during pre and post flashover compartment fires. Technical report

  8. Madrzykowski D, Fleischmann C (2012) Fire pattern repeatability: a study in uncertainty. J Test Evaluat 40(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madrzykowski D, Weinschenk C (2019) Impact of fixed ventilation on fire damage patterns in full-scale structures. Technical report, UL Firefighter Safety Research Institute

  10. Stauffer E (2019) Interpol review of fire investigation 2016–2019. Forensic Science International, pp 1–14

  11. Nordgaard A, Rasmusson B (2017) The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers. Fire Technol 53:301–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Zabaras N (2004) A Bayesian inference approach to the inverse heat conduction problem. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:3927–3941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C, Davison AC (2005) The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (part i): an approach using Bayesian networks. Forensic Sci Int 147(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C, Davison AC (2005) The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents. Part II. Practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks. Forensic Sci Int 147(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Overholt KJ, Ezekoye OA (2012) Characterizing heat release rates using an inverse fire modeling technique. Fire Technol 48:893–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Overholt KJ (2013) Forward and inverse modeling of fire physics towards fire scene reconstructions. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

  17. Overholt KJ, Ezekoye OA (2014) Quantitative testing of fire scenario hypotheses: a bayesian inference approach. Fire Technol 51(2):335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurzawski AJ, Cabrera JM, Ezekoye OA (2019) Model considerations for fire scene reconstruction using a bayesian framework. Fire Technol 56:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00886-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinschenk C, Beal CM, Ezekoye OA (2011) Modeling fan-driven flows for firefighting tactics using simple analytical models and CFD. J Fire Protect Eng 21:85–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Overholt K, Ezekoye OA (2014) Quantitative testing of fire scenario hypotheses, a bayesian inference approach. Fire Technol 51:335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurzawski AJ (2017) Inverse modeling and characterization of an experimental testbed to advance fire scene reconstruction. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

  22. Standard methods of fire tests for evaluating contribution of wall and ceiling interior finish to room fire growth. Standard, National Fire Protection Agency (2019)

  23. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. ASTM E 3057-16 Standard Test Method for Measuring Heat Flux Using Directional Flame Thermometers with Advanced Data Analysis Techniques (2016)

  24. Cabrera JM, Moser RD, Ezekoye OA (2020) A modified directional flame thermometer: development, calibration, and uncertainty quantification. J Verif Valid Uncertain Quant 5:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by U.S. National Science Foundation under Award No. 1707090.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Michael Cabrera.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabrera, JM., Ezekoye, O.A. & Moser, R.D. Bayesian Inference of Fire Evolution Within a Compartment Using Heat Flux Measurements. Fire Technol 57, 2887–2903 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01036-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01036-3

Keywords

Navigation