Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon dioxide capture using liquid absorption methods: a review

  • Review
  • Published:
Environmental Chemistry Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is inducing global warming, ocean acidification, polar ice melting, rise in sea level, droughts and hurricanes, thus threatening human health and the global economy. Therefore, there is a need to develop cost-effective technologies for CO2 capture. For instance, solution absorption is promising due to a large processing capacity, high flexibility and reliability, and rich experience in engineering applications. Nonetheless, actual commercial solutions, solvents and processes for CO2 capture suffer from slow reaction kinetics, low absorption capacity, high-energy consumption, susceptibility to corrosion, toxicity, low stability and high costs. Therefore, current research focuses on developing more economical, effective, green and sustainable technologies. Here we review 2015–2020 findings on CO2 capture using liquid absorption methods. Methods are based on various solutions, solvents and processes such as carbonate solution, ammonia solution, amine-based solution, ionic liquid, amino acid salt, phase changing absorbent, microcapsulated and membrane absorption, nanofluids and phenoxide salt solution. We discuss absorption performance, absorption mechanism, enhancement pathways and challenges. Amine- and NH3-based absorbents are widely used, yet they are limited by high regeneration energy, corrosiveness and degradation, reagent loss and secondary pollution caused by NH3 escape. Phase changing absorbents are getting more attention due to their lower cost and lower energy penalty. The incorporation of membrane and microencapsulation technologies to absorbing solvents could enhance CO2 absorption performance by reducing corrosion and increasing selectivity. Adding nanoparticles to solvents could improve CO2 absorption performance and reduce energy requirement. Besides, solvent blends and promoter-improved solvents performed better than single and non-promoted solvents because they combine the benefits of individual solvents and promoters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCS:

Carbon capture and storage

[Cho][Pro]:

(2-Hydroxyethyl)-trimethyl-ammonium (S)-2-pyrrolidine-carboxylic acid salt

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

HER:

Hydrogen evolution reaction

K2CO3 :

Potassium carbonate

MWCNTs:

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

N2O:

Nitrous oxide

OH groups:

Hydroxyl (–) groups

References

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1710108; 51576094).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangxian Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ochedi, F.O., Yu, J., Yu, H. et al. Carbon dioxide capture using liquid absorption methods: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19, 77–109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01093-8

Keywords

Navigation