Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 14, 2020

Omega and the related counting polynomials of some chemical structures

  • Wei Gao , Saad Ihsan Butt , Muhammad Numan , Adnan Aslam EMAIL logo , Zeeshan Malik and Muhammad Waqas
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

Counting polynomials are mathematical functions having as coefficients the multiplicity of property partition and as exponent the extent of the corresponding partition. In this work, four counting polynomials are computed: omega, theta, sadhana, and Padmakar–Ivan (PI) polynomials of benzene ring embedded in the P-type surface on 2-D network and n-phenylene. Moreover, the closed formulas of the corresponding indices of these polynomials are also proposed. These results could help to better understand the topology of these important structures.

1 Introduction

Graph theory has found many application in chemistry, especially in mathematical modeling of the chemical structures [1,2,3]. In chemical graph theory, we often model a chemical structure by a graph, where the atoms correspond to the vertices and bonds to the edges between them. A graph H is an ordered pair (V(H),E(H)), where V(H) is the set of vertices and E(H) is the set of edges. The degree of any vertex u is denoted by du and is defined as the cardinality of set of neighbors of u. A path Pn is the graph with vertex set V(Pn)={v0,v1,,vn1,vn} and the edge set E(Pn)={v0v1,v1v2,vn1vn}. The distance between two vertices u and v, denoted by d(u,v) is the length of the shortest path between them. For undefined terminologies and notations, we refer the reader to [4].

The idea of counting polynomial was first introduced by Polya [5] in 1936. This concept received a little attention from chemists for a long time. However, the spectra of the characteristic polynomial of graphs were studied extensively by numerical means to find the molecular orbitals of unsaturated hydrocarbons [6]. In quantum chemistry, the levels of π electron energy in conjugated hydrocarbons can be computed by using Hückel theory, as a root of characteristic polynomial [7,8]:

(1)P(H,x)=det[xIA(H)]

where A(H) is the adjacency matrix of graph H and I is a unit matrix of order equal to the order of H. The characteristic polynomial is involved in the evaluation of the topological effect on molecular orbitals, topological resonance energy, the aromatic sextet theory, the Kekulé structure count, etc. [8,9,10]. The above equation can be written in a simplified form:

(2)P(H,x)=kη(H,k)xk

For a graph H, the coefficients η(H,k) of the polynomial can be calculated by using Sachs graphs, which are subgraphs of H. Equation (2) was independently established by Sachs, Harary, Milic, Spialter, Hosoya, etc. [11]. The extension of relation 1 was made by Hosaya [12] and others [13,14,15] by replacing the adjacency matrix of H with distance matrix and next by any square topological matrix. The general form of counting polynomial is given in Equation (2), where the exponent shows the extent of partition PH, pH=PH of a graph property PH and the coefficients m(H,k) are related to the occurrence of partitions of extent k. In mathematical chemistry, counting polynomials are related with Hosaya [16,17]: independent edge sets are counted by Z(H,x) and distances counted by (H,x) polynomials [18,19]. Their roots and coefficients are used for the characterization of topological nature of hydrocarbons. Hosoya also proposed the sextet polynomial [20,21,22] for counting the resonant rings in a benzenoid molecule.

In this article, we will compute four counting polynomials, namely, omega, theta, sadhana and Padmakar–Ivan (PI) polynomials of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface on 2-D network and n-phenylene. Before giving the formal definition of these counting polynomials, we need to define few basic concepts related to graph theory. Let H(V,E) be a planar bipartite graph. Two edges f=u1u2 and g=v1v2 are co-distant (briefly f co g) to each other if

d(u1,v1)=d(u2,v2)

and

d(u2,v1)=d(u1,v2)=d(u1,v1)+1=d(u2,v2)+1.

The relation co is reflexive and symmetric but in general it is not transitive. For instance, in the complete bipartite graph K2,3, the relation co is not transitive. If the relation co is transitive, then we call the graph co-graph. Let C(f)={gE(H):gcof} be the set of all edges of G which are co-distant to the edge fE(H). The set C(f) is called orthogonal cut of G with respect to edge f. If the co is an equivalence relation, then the set E(G) is the union of disjoint orthogonal cuts: E(H)=C1C2Ck and CiCj=,ij.

A subgraph KH is called isometric if dH(u,v)=dK(u,v) for any two vertices u,vE(H). Also, H is convex if for any u,vV(K), the shortest path between u and v in H is in K. In a planar graph H, two edges f and g are in relation opposite, denoted by f op g, if they are the opposite edges of an inner face of H. The relation f co g follows from the fact that the faces are isometric. Note that the relation op is defined only in faces. The relation op partitions the edges set of G into opposite edge strip ops. In general, the transitivity does not hold for the relations ops and qoc (quasi-orthogonal cuts).

Let η(H,k) be the number of qoc strips of length k. The omega polynomial Ω(H,x) of a graph G was introduced by Diudea [23] and is defined as

(3)Ω(H,x)=kη(H,k)×xk

The theta polynomial Θ(H,x) was introduced by Diudea [24] in 2008. It counts the number of edges equidistant to every edge f of G and is defined as

(4)Θ(H,x)=kη(H,k)k×xk

The (H,x) polynomial introduces by Diudea [24] counts the edges nonequidistant to the reference edges f and is defined as

(5)(H,x)=kη(H,k)×k×xfk

Sadhana polynomial denoted by sd(H,x) is related to ops of a graph G and counts the nonopposite edges in G. It was introduced by Ashrafi et al. [25,26] and is defined as

(6)Sd(H,x)=kη(H,k)×xfk

The first derivative of these counting polynomials computed at x=1 gives information on counting topological property:

(7)Ω(H,x)x=1=kk×η(H,k)=f=E(H)
(8)Θ(H,x)x=1=θ(H)=kk2×η(H,k)
(9)(H,x)|x=1=PI(H)=kk×(fk)×η(H,k)
(10)Sd(H,x)x=1=Sd(H)=k(fk)×η(H,k).

From the Equations (7) and (8), one can compute PI(G) as follows:

(11)PI(H)=f2kk2×η(H,k)=(Ω(H,x)|x=1)2Θ(H,x)|x=1

Also, the Cluj–Ilmenau index [27], denoted by Cl(H), can be computed from omega polynomial as:

(12)Cl(H)=(Ω(H,x)|x=1)2Ω(H,x)|x=1Ω′′(H,x)|x=1

The omega counting polynomial is proved to be useful in description of polyhedral coverings appearing in nanostructures [28]. The topological descriptor Cl has found utility in predicting the stability of small fullerenes as well as the resonance energy of planar benzenoids. Omega polynomial is also useful in describing the topology of tubular nanostructures. For more details of the computation of counting polynomial and topological indices, see ref. [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].

2 Omega-type polynomials of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface in 2D network

OKeeffe et al. [38] proposed a structure of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface which contains only one kind of carbon atoms. In these structures, six- and eight-membered rings occur in 2:3 ratio, and its primitive unit cell contains only 24 atoms. This structure is stable, comparable with C60 and can be described as a three-dimensional linkage of C8 rings. In this section, we are computing the omega-type polynomials of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface on 2D network. Let P[m,n] denote the molecular structure of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface on 2D network, where m and n are the numbers of unit cells in each column and row, respectively. The graph of P[m,n] is shown in Figure 1. It is easy to observe that P[m,n] contains 24mn vertices and 32mn2m2n edges. In the next theorem, we will compute the omega-type counting polynomials of P[m,n].

Figure 1 Molecular graph of P(m,n)P(m,n).
Figure 1

Molecular graph of P(m,n).

Figure 2 Quasi-orthogonal cuts of P[m,n]P{[}m,n].
Figure 2

Quasi-orthogonal cuts of P[m,n].

Figure 3 Quasi-orthogonal cuts of P[m,n]P{[}m,n].
Figure 3

Quasi-orthogonal cuts of P[m,n].

Theorem 1

Letm,n, then the omega, theta, sadhana andpolynomials ofP[m,n]are equal to:

  1. Ω(P(m,n),x)=12x2mn+(2m1)x2n+(2n1)x2m,

  2. θ(P(m,n),x)=24mnx2mn+2n(2m1)x2n+2m(2n1)x2m,

  3. (P(m,n),x)=24mnx30mn2m2n+2n(2m1)x32mn2m4n+2m(2n1)x32mn4m2n,

  4. Sd(P(m,n),x)=12x30mn2m2n+(2m1)x32mn2m4n+(2n1)x32mn4m2n.

Proof

To compute these omega-type polynomials of P[m,n], we need to find the quasi-orthogonal cuts (qocs) and count the number of edges used in the qocs. One unit cell of P[m,n] contains eight types of qocs as it is shown in Figures 2 and 3. We can generalize these quasi-orthogonal cuts to the whole graph. The total number of these cuts and the total edges used in these cuts are presented in Table 1. Now using the values from Table 1 in the definition of omega, theta, and sadhana polynomial, we get the required result.□

From the above theorem, it is easy to see that

Ω(P[m,n],1)=12×2mn+(2m1)×(2n)+(2n1)×(2m)=32mn2m2n=|E(P[m,n])|
θ(P[m,n])=48m2n2+4n2(2m1)+4m2(2n1)=8mn(6mn+m+n)4(m2+n2).
Sd(P[m,n])=12(30mn2m2n)+(2m1)(32mn2m4n)+(2n1)(32mn4m2n)=8mn(8m+8n+35)18(m+n)4(m2+n2).

The topological index PI(P[m,n]) can be computed by using Equation (11):

PI(P[m,n])=(32mn2m2n)2(8mn(6mn+m+n)4(m2+n2))=8mn(122mn17m17n)+8(m2+n2).

Finally, the Cluj–Ilmenau index can be computed by using Equation (12) as follows

Cl(P[m,n])=(32mn2m2n)2(32mn2m2n)(24mn(2mn1)+2n(2n1)(2m1)+2m(2m1)(2n1))=4mn(244mn34m34n+1)+8(m2+n2).

3 Omega-type polynomials of cyclic n phenylene

Analogous to catacondensed benzenoids, Berris et al. [39] introduced n-phenylenes, where n is the number of benzene rings. In n phenylenes, benzene rings are separated by a square called cyclobutadiene. Pericondensed benzenoids do not have analogous n phenylenes, but the catacondensed chain may close on itself to form a super-ring. Figure 4 depicts cyclic 4 phenylene. Now we compute the omega-type polynomial and the corresponding topological indices of n-phenylenes. It is easy to do that since the numbers of vertices and edges of n phenylenes are 6n and 8n, respectively. For simplicity, we denote the molecular graph of n phenylenes by Rn.

Table 1

Co-distant edges in P[m,n]

Classes of qocsClasses of edgesNumber of co-distant edgesNumber of qocs
T1e12mn2
T2e22mn2
T3e32mn2
T4e42mn2
T5e52mn2
T6e62mn2
T7e72n2m1
T8e82m2n1
Figure 4 Molecular graph of R4{R}_{4}.
Figure 4

Molecular graph of R4.

Theorem 2

Letn3, then the omega, theta,and sadhana polynomials ofRnare equal to

  1. Ω(Rn,x)=2nx4,

  2. θ(Rn,x)=8nx4.

  3. (Rn,x)=8nx8n4

  4. Sd(Rn,x)=2nx8n4.

Proof

We use the idea of orthogonal cuts to count the number of equidistance edges. There are two types of orthogonal cuts in Rn. They are denoted by C1 and C2 as it is shown in Figure 5. The C1 and C2 orthogonal cuts cover all edges of Rn. The total number of quasi-orthogonal cuts and total number of edges in these quasi-orthogonal cuts are presented in Table 2. Using the values from Table 2 in the definition of omega, theta, and sadhana polynomials, we get the required results.□

From the above theorem, it is easy to see that

Ω(Rn,1)=4×2n=8n=|E(Rn)|.
θ(Rn)=8n×n=8n2.
Sd(Rn)=2n(8n4)=16n28n.

The topological index PI(Rn) can be computed by using Equation (11):

PI(Rn)=(8n)2(32n))=64n232n.

Finally, the Cluj–Ilmenau index can be computed by using Equation (12) as follows:

Cl(Rn)=(8n)28n24n=64n232n.
Figure 5 Quasi-orthogonal cuts of R4{R}_{4}.
Figure 5

Quasi-orthogonal cuts of R4.

Table 2

Co-distant edges in Rn

Types of qocsNo. of qocsNo. of edges in qoc’s cuts
C1n4
C2n4

4 Conclusion

Omega and theta polynomials count the equidistant edges in a graph H, while PI polynomial counts nonequidistant ones. In this article, we computed omega, theta, and sadhana polynomials of benzene ring embedded in P-type surface in 2D network and cyclic n phenylene. Furthermore, the exact expressions for the topological indices associated with these polynomials have been computed.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors hereby declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

  2. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  3. Data availability statement: No data are required for this study.

References

[1] Bablan AT. Applications of graph theory in chemistry. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1985;25(3):334–43.10.1021/ci00047a033Search in Google Scholar

[2] Amigo JM, Galvez J, Villar VM. A review on molecular topology: applying graph theory to drug discovery and design. Naturwissenschaften. 2009;96:749–61. 10.1007/s00114-009-0536-7.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Domenech RG, Galvez J, de Julian-Ortiz JV, Pogliani L. Some new trends in chemical graph theory. Chem Rev. 2008;108(3):1127–69.10.1021/cr0780006Search in Google Scholar

[4] Rosen KH, Krithivasan K. Discrete mathematics and its applications: with combinatorics and graph theory. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Polya G. Kombinatorische Anzahlbestimmungen fiir Gruppen, Graphen und chemische Verbindungen. Acta Math. 1936;68:145–253.10.1007/BF02546665Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hückel E. Quanten theoretische Beitrsge zum Benzolproblem. I Z Phys. 1931;70:204–72.10.1007/BF01339530Search in Google Scholar

[7] Diudea MV, Gutman I, Jäntschi L. Molecular Topology. New York: NOVA; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Trinajstic N. Chemical graph theory, vols. 1, 2, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gutman I, Milun M, Trinajstic N. Topological definition of delocalisation energy. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 1975;1:171–5.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gutman I, Milun M, Trinajstic N. Non-parametric resonance energies of arbitrary conjugated systems. J Am Chem Soc. 1977;99:1692–704.10.1021/ja00448a002Search in Google Scholar

[11] Diudea MV, Gutman I, Jäntschi L. Molecular Topology. New York: NOVA; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hosoya H, Murakami M, Gotoh M. Distance polynomial and characterization of a graph. Natl Sci Rept Ochanomizu Univ. 1973;24:27–34.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Diudea MV, Ivanciuc O, Nikolic S, Trinajstic N. Matrices of reciprocal distance, polynomials and derived numbers. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 1997;35:41–64.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ivanciuc O, Diudea MV, Khadikar PV. New topological matrices and their polynomials. Indian J Chem. 1998;37A:574–85.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ivanciuc O, Ivanciuc T, Diudea MV. Polynomials and spectra of molecular graphs. Roum Chem Quart Rev. 1999;7:41–67.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hosoya H. Topological index. A newly proposed quantity characterizing the topological nature of structural isomers of saturated hydrocarbons. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1971;44:2332–9.10.1246/bcsj.44.2332Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hosoya H. On some counting polynomials in chemistry. Discret Appl Math. 1988;19:239–57.10.1016/0166-218X(88)90017-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] Konstantinova EV, Diudea MV. The Wiener polynomial derivatives and other topological indices in chemical research. Croat Chem Acta. 2000;73:383–403.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gutman I, Klavžar S, Petkovšek M, Zigert P. On Hosoya polynomial of Benzoid graphs. MATCH Commun Math Chem. 2001;43:49–66.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hosoya H, Yamaguchi T. Sextet polynomial. A new enumeration and proof technique for the resonance theory applied to the aromatic hydrocarbons. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975;4659–62.10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91045-1Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ohkami N, Hosoya H. Topological dependency of the aromatic sextets in polycyclic benzenoid hydrocarbons. Recursive relations of the sextet polynomial. Theor Chim Acta. 1983;64:153–70.10.1007/BF00551393Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ohkami N, Motoyama A, Yamaguchi T, Hosoya H, Gutman I. Graph-theoretical analysis of the Clar’s aromatic sextet. Tetrahedron. 1981;37:1113–22.10.1016/S0040-4020(01)92040-XSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Diudea MV. Omega polynomial. Carpath J Math. 2006;22:43–47.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Diudea MV, Cigher S, John PE. Omega and related counting polynomials. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 2008;60:237–50.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ashrafi AR, Ghorbani M, Jalali M. Computing sadhana polynomial of V-phenylenic nanotubes and nanotori. Indian J Chem. 2008;47A:535–7.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ashrafi AR, Jalali M, Ghorbani M, Diudea MV. Computing PI and omega polynomials of an infinite family of fullerenes. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 2008;60:905–16.Search in Google Scholar

[27] John PE, Vizitiu AE, Cigher S, Diudea MV. CI index in tubular nanostructures. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 2007;57:479–84.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Diudea MV, Cigher S, Vizitiu AE, Florescu MS, John PE. Omega polynomial and its use in nanostructure description. J Math Chem. 2009;45:316–29. 10.1007/s10910-008-9408-1.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Baig AQ, Imran M, Ali H, Rehman SU. Computing topological polynomial of certain nanostructures. J Optoelectron Adv Mat. 2015;17(5–6):877–83.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Nadeem M, Yousaf A, Alolaiyan H, Razaq A. Certain polynomials and related topological indices for the series of benzenoid graphs. Sci Rep 2019:9:9129.10.1038/s41598-019-45721-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Diudea MV, Szefler Omega B. Polynomial in Nanostructures. In: Ashrafi A, Diudea M, editors. Distance, Symmetry, and Topology in Carbon Nanomaterials. Carbon Materials: Chemistry and Physics. vol 9, Cham: Springer; 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-31584-3_2Search in Google Scholar

[32] Asif F, Zahid Z, Zafar S. Leap Zagreb and leap hyper-Zagreb indices of Jahangir and Jahangir derived graphs. Eng Appl Sci Lett. 2020;3(2):1–8.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Shah A, Bokhary SAU. On chromatic polynomial of certain families of dendrimer graphs. Open J Math Scineces. 2019;3(1):404–16.10.30538/oms2019.0083Search in Google Scholar

[34] Aslam A, Bashir Y, Ahmad S, Gao W. On topological indices of certain dendrimer structures. Z Naturforsch. 2017;72(6):a: 559–66.10.1515/zna-2017-0081Search in Google Scholar

[35] Aslam A, Ahmad S, Gao W. On certain topological indices of boron triangular nanotubes. Z Naturforsch. 2017;72(8):711–6.10.1515/zna-2017-0135Search in Google Scholar

[36] Aslam A, Jamil MK, Gao W, Nazeer W. Topological aspects of some dendrimer structures. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(2):123–8.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0184Search in Google Scholar

[37] Aslam A, Ahmad S, Binyamin MA, Gao W. Computing topological indices of certain OTIS interconnection networks. Open Chem. 2019;17(1):220–8.10.1515/chem-2019-0029Search in Google Scholar

[38] OKeeffe M, Adams GB, Sankey OF. Predicted new low energy forms of carbon. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(15):23–25.10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2325Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Berris BC, Hovakeemian GH, Lai Y-H, Mestdagh H, Vollhardt KPC. A new approach to the construction of biphenylenes by the cobalt-catalyzed cocyclization of o-diethynylbenzenes with alkynes. Application to an iterative approach to [3]phenylene, the first member of a novel class of benzocyclobutadienoid hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:5670–87.10.1021/ja00306a013Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-09
Revised: 2020-06-24
Accepted: 2020-07-04
Published Online: 2020-09-14

© 2020 Wei Gao et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2020-0074/html
Scroll to top button