Elsevier

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volume 290, 1 December 2020, Pages 235-256
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Position-specific distribution of hydrogen isotopes in natural propane: Effects of thermal cracking, equilibration and biodegradation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.09.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Intramolecular isotope distributions, including isotope clumping and position specific fractionation, can provide proxies for the formation temperature and formation and destruction pathways of molecules. In this study, we explore the position-specific hydrogen isotope distribution in propane. We analyzed propane samples from 10 different petroleum systems with high-resolution molecular mass spectrometry. Our results show that the hydrogen isotope fractionation between central and terminal positions of natural propanes ranges from −102‰ to +205‰, a much larger range than that expected for thermodynamic equilibrium at their source and reservoir temperatures (36–63‰). Based on these findings, we propose that the hydrogen isotope structure of catagenic propane is largely controlled by irreversible processes, expressing kinetic isotope effects (KIEs). Kinetic control on hydrogen isotope composition of the products of thermal cracking is supported by a hydrous pyrolysis experiment using the Woodford Shale as substrate, in which we observed isotopic disequilibrium in the early stage of pyrolysis. We make a more general prediction of KIE signatures associated with kerogen cracking by simulating this chemistry in a kinetic Monte Carlo model for different types of kerogens. In contrast, unconventional shale fluids or hot conventional reservoirs contain propane with an isotopic structure close to equilibrium, presumably reflecting internal and/or heterogeneous exchange during high temperature storage (ca. 100–150 °C). In relatively cold (<100 °C) conventional gas accumulations, propane can discharge from its source to a colder reservoir, rapidly enough to preserve disequilibrium signatures even if the source rock thermal maturity is high. These findings imply that long times at elevated temperatures are required to equilibrate the hydrogen isotopic structure of propane in natural gas host rocks and reservoirs. We further defined the kinetics of propane equilibration through hydrogen isotope exchange experiments under hydrous conditions; these experiments show that hydrogen in propane is exchangeable over laboratory timescales when exposed to clay minerals such as kaolinite. This implies rather rapid transfer of propane from sources to cold reservoirs in some of the conventional petroleum systems. Propane is also susceptible to microbial degradation in both oxic and anoxic environments. Biodegradation of propane in the Hadrian and Diana Hoover oil fields (Gulf of Mexico) results in strong increases in central-terminal hydrogen isotope fractionation. This reflects preferential attack on the central position, consistent with previous studies.

Introduction

Natural propane and other volatile hydrocarbons in the subsurface are of great economic value and environmental significance. Compositional and stable isotope properties of these gases have been widely used to help trace their origins and fates (e.g., Berner and Faber, 1996, Whiticar, 1999). Recent studies of the intramolecular isotope structures of these gaseous compounds bring novel constraints to these processes (Stolper et al., 2014a, Wang et al., 2015, Young et al., 2017, Eiler et al., 2018, Piasecki et al., 2018, Clog et al., 2018, Xia and Gao, 2019). These new methods are revealing fundamental geochemical processes that control the geological distributions of hydrocarbons.

Propane (C3H8, or CH3—CH2—CH3) has two chemically nonequivalent sets of atomic sites: the central CH2 group and the terminal CH3 groups. The carbon and/or hydrogen isotope differences between these two positions have been analyzed by GC-pyrolysis-GC-IRMS (gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry) (Gilbert et al., 2016, Li et al., 2018), biochemical degradation with GC-IRMS (Gao et al., 2016b), high-resolution direct molecular mass spectrometry (Piasecki et al., 2016a, Xie et al., 2018) and nuclear magnetic resonance (Liu et al., 2018). It has been shown that site-specific isotopic measurements are able to differentiate abiotic propane sources from common thermogenic propane (Suda et al., 2017), track thermal maturation (Piasecki et al., 2018, Liu et al., 2019, Julien et al., 2020), and identify residues of subsurface microbial degradation (Gilbert et al., 2019). Position-specific hydrogen isotopes are especially interesting because hydrogen may undergo isotopic exchange at the conditions of some gas reservoirs, potentially driving propane to intramolecular hydrogen isotope equilibrium. The temperature dependence of equilibrium isotope fractionation between the central and terminal hydrogen positions has been theoretically predicted (Webb and Miller, 2014, Piasecki et al., 2016b) and experimentally calibrated (Xie et al., 2018). Therefore, position-specific hydrogen isotope distribution in propane can potentially work as a ‘geothermometer’ that could track the equilibration temperature at which propane has been generated and/or stored. And, because the approach to equilibrium may be time dependent, it is possible that site specific hydrogen isotope fractionation may serve as a kind of ‘geospeedometer’ for evaluating gas reservoir storage times. This kinetic property in the carbonate geothermometer has been shown to have significant value for constraining thermal histories of rock samples (e.g., Passey and Henkes, 2012, Shenton et al., 2015, Stolper and Eiler, 2015, Lawson et al., 2018, Mangenot et al., 2019, Ingalls, 2019). If such a property were demonstrated in propane, it would provide an opportunity to assess the thermal histories of fluids that migrate within sedimentary systems.

In this study, we explore what controls the position-specific hydrogen isotope distribution in propane via natural observations and laboratory experiments. We present a dataset of measurements of propane from produced natural gases in 10 different, globally distributed petroleum systems. In addition, we report isotope exchange experiments and hydrous pyrolysis experiments designed to investigate the timescales and mechanisms of hydrogen isotope exchange and the position-specific isotope effects of thermal cracking. Finally, we construct a model of the position-specific isotopic fractionations associated with kerogen cracking as a means of interpreting and extrapolating from laboratory cracking experiments. We show that the geochemistry of the source rock determines the primary position-specific hydrogen isotope signature in propane immediately after formation by thermal cracking, that exchange in relatively hot reservoirs brings the position-specific hydrogen isotope structure of propane close to equilibrium, and that biodegradation in shallow reservoirs leads to distinctive central-terminal hydrogen isotope fractionations.

Section snippets

Samples

We examined natural gas samples from 18 different wells belonging to the following 10 petroleum fields: Diana Hoover (U.S. Gulf of Mexico), Galveston 209 (U.S. Gulf of Mexico), Genesis (U.S. Gulf of Mexico), Hadrian North and South (U.S. Gulf of Mexico), Hogsback (Wyoming, USA), Eagle Ford (Texas, USA), Briggs (Texas, USA), Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) (California, USA), Sleipner Vest (North Sea, Europe), and Potiguar Basin (Brazil). Sampled well depths range from 1880 to 4618 m with reservoir

Nomenclature

The hydrogen isotope fractionation between central and terminal positions of propane (or, the ‘central-terminal fractionation’) can be expressed by the epsilon notation:εDC-T=1000DHCDHT-1whereDHC and DHT are the hydrogen isotope ratios of the central and terminal positions, respectively. Neglecting the non-statistical distribution of multiply deuterated propane (a trivial contribution to overall D abundance in natural samples; e.g., a 10‰ enrichment in the doubly deuterated propane would only

Results

Table 1 lists the position-specific hydrogen isotope compositions and Table 2 lists other geochemical data for the studied propane samples. δ13C values of propane range from −34.8 to −22.7‰ and δD values of propane from −169 to −74‰. Gas dry ratios (C1/(C2 + C3)) range from 1.4 to 76. These relatively wide ranges in composition reflect the diverse source kerogens and maturities of these gases. Note that we report two independent measurements of molecular-average δD: one based on our direct mass

Magnitude of fractionation

The wide range of central-terminal hydrogen isotope fractionation in propane indicates that isotope effects associated with irreversible, kinetically (rather than thermodynamically) controlled processes are common influences on propane hydrogen isotope distribution and site-specific structure. Plausible contributing processes include thermal ‘cracking’ of propane precursors, destruction of propane during secondary cracking or biological consumption, transport (e.g., by diffusion), or phase

Conclusions

We used high-resolution mass spectrometry to examine the position-specific hydrogen isotope distribution in propane from a diverse set of natural gas samples and laboratory experiments. We explored the effects of various processes of propane formation, storage, and destruction on intramolecular isotope fractionation, via both theory and experiment. The wide range of this central-terminal difference in natural samples suggests that catagenesis is dominated by kinetic fractionations and forms

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by an NSF-EAR instruments and facilities grant and Caltech. Additional funding is provided by Exxon Mobil. The kinetic Monte Carlo computations were conducted on the Caltech High Performance Cluster, partially supported by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We thank Nami Kitchen for assistance with the operation of the DFS mass spectrometer. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the

References (107)

  • M.D. Lewan et al.

    Comparison of petroleum generation kinetics by isothermal hydrous and nonisothermal open-system pyrolysis

    Org. Geochem.

    (2002)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Determination of position-specific carbon isotope ratios of propane from natural gas

    Org. Geochem.

    (2018)
  • K.D. Monson et al.

    Carbon isotopic fractionation in the biosynthesis of bacterial fatty acids. Ozonolysis of unsaturated fatty acids as a means of determining the intramolecular distribution of carbon isotopes

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1982)
  • B.H. Passey et al.

    Carbonate clumped isotope bond reordering and geospeedometry

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2012)
  • A. Piasecki et al.

    Prediction of equilibrium distributions of isotopologues for methane, ethane and propane using density functional theory

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • R.J. Robins et al.

    Non-statistical isotope fractionation as a novel “retro-biosynthetic” approach to understanding alkaloid metabolic pathways

    Phytochem. Lett.

    (2017)
  • N. Thiagarajan et al.

    Identifying thermogenic and microbial methane in deep water Gulf of Mexico Reservoirs

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2020)
  • P. Ungerer

    State of the art of research in kinetic modelling of oil formation and expulsion

    Org. Geochem.

    (1990)
  • P. Ungerer et al.

    Kinetic modelling of oil cracking

    Org. Geochem.

    (1988)
  • X. Xia et al.

    Isotope fractionation of methane during natural gas flow with coupled diffusion and adsorption/desorption

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2012)
  • P.H. Abelson et al.

    Carbon isotope fractionation in formation of amino acids by photosynthetic organisms

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1961)
  • C. Bousige et al.

    Realistic molecular model of kerogen’s nanostructure

    Nat. Mater.

    (2016)
  • A.L. Burlingame et al.

    Isoprenoid fatty acids isolated from the kerogen matrix of the Green River Formation (Eocene)

    Science (80-.)

    (1968)
  • A.P. Byrnes et al.

    Burial, maturation, and petroleum generation history of the Arkoma Basin and Ouachita Foldbelt, Oklahoma and Arkansas

    Nat. Resour. Res.

    (1999)
  • Charlou J. L., Donval J. P., Douville E., Jean-Baptiste P., Radford-Knoery J., Fouquet Y., Dapoigny A. and Stievenard...
  • S.C. Chen et al.

    Anaerobic oxidation of ethane by archaea from a marine hydrocarbon seep

    Nature

    (2019)
  • Chung H. M., Gormly J. R. and Squires R. M. (1988) Origin of gaseous hydrocarbons in subsurface environments:...
  • Clog M., Lawson M., Peterson B., Ferreira A. A., Santos Neto E. V. and Eiler J. M. (2018) A reconnaissance study of...
  • Dean A. M. (1985) Predictions of pressure and temperature effects upon radical addition and recombination reactions.,...
  • P.M.J. Douglas et al.

    Clumped Isotopes Link Older Carbon Substrates With Slower Rates of Methanogenesis in Northern Lakes

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2020)
  • Douglas P. M. J., Stolper D. A., Smith D. A., Walter Anthony K. M., Paull C. K., Dallimore S., Wik M., Crill P. M.,...
  • W.L. Dowdle et al.

    Static Formation Temperature From Well Logs - an Empirical Method. JPT

    J. Pet. Technol.

    (1975)
  • Dukov I. L. (2007) Nomenclature of inorganic chemistry - IUPAC recommendations 2005. Chemistry...
  • Ehlers I., Augusti A., Betson T. R., Nilsson M. B., Marshall J. D. and Schleucher J. (2015) Detecting long-term...
  • J.M. Eiler et al.

    The isotopic structures of geological organic compounds

    Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ.

    (2018)
  • Eiler J. M., Clog M., Magyar P., Piasecki A., Sessions A., Stolper D., Deerberg M., Schlueter H. J. and Schwieters J....
  • Gao C. W., Allen J. W., Green W. H. and West R. H. (2016) Reaction Mechanism Generator: Automatic construction of...
  • Gilbert A., Lollar B. S., Musat F., Giunta T., Chen S., Kajimoto Y., Yamada K., Boreham C. J., Yoshida N. and Ueno Y....
  • Gilbert A., Robins R. J., Remaud G. S. and Tcherkez G. G. B. (2012) Intramolecular 13C pattern in hexoses from...
  • Gilbert A., Yamada K., Suda K., Ueno Y. and Yoshida N. (2016) Measurement of position-specific 13C isotopic composition...
  • Giunta T., Young E. D., Warr O., Kohl I., Ash J. L., Martini A., Mundle S. O. C., Rumble D., Pérez-Rodríguez I., Wasley...
  • Gruen D. S., Wang D. T., Könneke M., Topçuoğlu B. D., Stewart L. C., Goldhammer T., Holden J. F., Hinrichs K.-U. and...
  • Hayes J. M. (2001) Fractionation of Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopes in Biosynthetic Processes. Rev. Mineral. Geochemistry...
  • Head I. M., Jones D. M. and Larter S. R. (2003) Biological activity in the deep subsurface and the origin of heavy oil....
  • Higley D. K., Cook T. A. and Pawlewicz M. J. (2014) Petroleum Systems and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the...
  • Hinrichs K. U., Hayes J. M., Bach W., Spivackl A. J., Hmelo L. R., Holm N. G., Johnson C. G. and Sylva S. P. (2006)...
  • W.A. Van Hook

    Vapor Pressures of the Deuterated Ethanes

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1966)
  • Höpfner A. (1969) Vapor Pressure Isotope Effects. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English 8, 689–699. Available at:...
  • Hunt J. (1996) Petroleum geology and geochemistry., Freeman, New...
  • Jaekel U., Vogt C., Fischer A., Richnow H.-H. and Musat F. (2014) Carbon and hydrogen stable isotope fractionation...
  • Cited by (14)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text