Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 82, October 2020, Pages 233-241
Gait & Posture

Review
Effects of the use of mobile phone on postural and locomotor tasks: a scoping review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Conversing or sending messages while walking is often involved in accidental injuries

  • Forty-six studies were included in this work

  • They compared postural and locomotor tasks with and without the use of a smartphone

  • Only 4 studies included pathological subjects

  • The use of smartphones slows down movement and induces a systematic imbalance

Abstract

Background

Using a mobile phone while performing a postural and locomotor tasks is a common, daily situation. Conversing or sending messages (SMS) while walking account for a significant share of accidental injuries. Therefore, understanding the consequences of using a mobile phone on balance and walking is important, all the more so when these postural and locomotor tasks are aggravated by a disease.

Research question

Our objective was to conduct a scoping review on the influence of a dual-task situation – generated by the use of mobile phone – on users' postural and/or locomotor tasks.

Methods

The literature search was conducted in English on PubMed/Medline and CINHAL databases, using keywords associated with postural and locomotor tasks and with the use of mobile phone. Study location, population, number of subjects, experimental design, types of phone use, evaluated postural-locomotor tasks and expected effects were then analyzed.

Results and significance

46 studies were included in this work, 24 of which came from North America. All studies compared postural and locomotor tasks with and without the use of a smartphone. Ten studies also compared at least 2 groups with different characteristics. Only 4 studies included pathological subjects. Various modalities were tested, and most studies focused on walking. Results show that the use of smartphones slows down movement and induces a systematic imbalance, except when listening to music. The dual task of "using the smartphone during a postural or locomotor tasks" induces systematic disturbances of balance and movement, which must be taken into account in the rehabilitation approach. Future studies will have to extend the knowledge regarding pathological situations.

Introduction

In 2016, 77% of Americans owned a mobile phone, and this rate rose to 92% for the 18-29-year-olds [1]. Using of mobile phones during postural and locomotor tasks (e.g. balancing, walking) is a daily situation for most individuals at all stages of life and for a variety of environmental and health conditions [2]. Mobile phones are increasingly used in clinical practice by therapists thanks to applications that are being developed either to measure physiological parameters (e.g. range of motion, balance) [3], or to improve the follow-up of individuals (e.g. self-exercise at home, questionnaires) [4]. While many studies have been conducted on these applications, studies on the use of mobile phones during postural and locomotor tasks and the reciprocal interactions are more scarce. Considering the preponderance of these tasks in our daily lives, it is therefore essential to understand the influence of mobile phone use on postural-locomotor tasks, especially for people with motor and/or cognitive impairements that diminish their balance and motor skills during dual tasks [5].

Five to 30% of walking-related falls and accidents are directly attributable to the use of a mobile phone [1,6]. People under 30 – due to their frequency of use – and over 60 are more exposed to risks, particularly when writing a text message [7]. Mobile phone use appears to induce cognitive distraction, reduced visual attention to the environment and impaired musculoskeletal biomechanics through decreasing arm and head mobility – which may be the main factors of risk [8]. However, one study also showed altered walking behavior when crossing a street [9]. Therefore, the use of a mobile phone seems to induce multiple consequences that may explain functional disturbances and associated risks. Nevertheless, the consequences of mobile phone use on the functionality of individuals are still little known. As a result, they are little taken into account in rehabilitation, even though patients under treatment very often use their phone – a crucial social component of their lives – and given that rehabilitation must be a dynamic process that adapts to changing lifestyles.

A scoping review is an alternative to a systematic review. It is used when the main objective is to determine the scope of available studies in order to have an overview of a topic [10]. This methodological choice is appropriate when the evidence is still emerging and does not allow for a systematic review to be conducted because the number of studies with similar methodologies on the same issue is too small. Scoping reviews differ methodologically from systematic reviews in that the authors do not evaluate article quality; it also differs from narrative reviews by its clearly-defined method [11]. Since studying the impact of mobile phone use on postural and locomotor tasks is a recent topic, and since the tasks tested can be varied (balance and walking), a scoping review is appropriate to identify the types of available evidence, to examine how research is conducted in this fields, and to identify knowledge gaps [10]. Moreover, the extremely frequent use of a mobile phone in conjunction with daily activities makes understanding this dual task relevant for patient rehabilitation.

Our objective was to conduct a scoping review on the influence of a dual task situation – generated by the use of mobile phone – on users' postural and locomotor tasks.

Section snippets

Methods

The scoping review methodology followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)’s recommendations in 5 steps [12].

Article selection

The PRISMA flow chart (Fig. 1) shows the results for each selection stage. The literature search identified a total of 2,940 articles on PubMed/Medline, CINHAL and in other articles’ references. After selection, 46 articles were included in the synthesis.

Year of publication

The total number of studies published on PubMed/Medline responding to the keywords used has increased steadily since 2010 (Fig. 2). For the articles included, the two most represented years were 2015 (12 articles) and 2018 (9 articles), while

Discussion

The objective of this scoping review was to review studies on the effects of mobile phone use in conjunction with a postural and locomotor task. The main effects reported in the 46 studies included were consistent, with an observed instability in postural and locomotor tasks and a slowing down of dynamic tasks (including locomotor tasks) during mobile phone use.

The use of a mobile phone during a postural-locomotor task matches the dual task situation as defined in the review by McIssaac et al. [

Conclusion

Results show that many studies have already considered the effects of mobile phone use on spatial and temporal parameters during postural and locomotor tasks. The types of mobile phone use and the tasks explored were varied, with a predominant interest in texting and walking. The studies aimed to select tasks that represent daily life, but the experiments most often took place in a controlled environment (a laboratory, a clinic) rather than a living environment (ecological setting). Similarly,

Author contributions

ND: conceptualization; investigation; methodology; review process; data analysis and interpretation; writing original draft; final approval of the version to be submitted.

AVB: conceptualization; investigation; methodology; review process; data analysis and interpretation; writing original draft; final approval of the version to be submitted.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References (77)

  • E.M. Lamberg et al.

    Cell phones change the way we walk

    Gait Posture.

    (2012)
  • S. Haga et al.

    Effects of using a Smart Phone on Pedestrians’ Attention and Walking

    Procedia Manufacturing.

    (2015)
  • J.R. Marone et al.

    Frontal plane margin of stability is increased during texting while walking

    Gait Posture.

    (2014)
  • J. Lim et al.

    Dual task interference during walking: The effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability

    Gait Posture.

    (2015)
  • M.D. Grabiner et al.

    Performance of an attention-demanding task during treadmill walking shifts the noise qualities of step-to-step variation in step width

    Gait Posture.

    (2018)
  • R. Hashish et al.

    Texting during stair negotiation and implications for fall risk

    Gait Posture.

    (2017)
  • S.-H. Chen et al.

    Concurrent phone texting alters crossing behavior and induces gait imbalance during obstacle crossing

    Gait Posture.

    (2018)
  • D.C. Hinton et al.

    Everyday multitasking habits: University students seamlessly text and walk on a split-belt treadmill

    Gait Posture.

    (2018)
  • R.M. Magnani et al.

    Local dynamic stability and gait variability during attentional tasks in young adults

    Gait Posture.

    (2017)
  • D. Niederer et al.

    Specific smartphone usage and cognitive performance affect gait characteristics during free-living and treadmill walking

    Gait Posture.

    (2018)
  • H. Han et al.

    Head flexion angle when web-browsing and texting using a smartphone while walking

    Appl Ergon.

    (2019)
  • Z.C. Thumser et al.

    Handheld cellular phones restrict head movements and range of visual regard

    Hum Mov Sci.

    (2013)
  • D. Hamacher et al.

    The reliability of local dynamic stability in walking while texting and performing an arithmetical problem

    Gait Posture.

    (2016)
  • S.W. Muir-Hunter et al.

    Dual-task testing to predict falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review

    Physiotherapy.

    (2016)
  • G. Vervoort et al.

    Distal motor deficit contributions to postural instability and gait disorder in Parkinson’s disease

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2015)
  • L. Comber et al.

    Postural control deficits in people with Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Gait Posture.

    (2018)
  • I. Liu et al.

    Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies

    Brain Res.

    (2011)
  • N.J. Rosenblatt et al.

    Measures of frontal plane stability during treadmill and overground walking

    Gait Posture.

    (2010)
  • J.R. Watt et al.

    A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects

    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).

    (2010)
  • J.G. Wrightson et al.

    Dual-task prioritization during overground and treadmill walking in healthy adults

    Gait Posture.

    (2020)
  • J.G. Wrightson et al.

    Walking modality, but not task difficulty, influences the control of dual-task walking

    Gait Posture.

    (2017)
  • R. Penati et al.

    Cognitive performance during gait is worsened by overground but enhanced by treadmill walking

    Gait Posture.

    (2020)
  • E. Desrosiers et al.

    Gait adaptation during walking on an inclined pathway following spinal cord injury

    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

    (2014)
  • K. Smulders et al.

    Community-dwelling people with chronic stroke need disproportionate attention while walking and negotiating obstacles

    Gait Posture.

    (2012)
  • V. Miyasike-daSilva et al.

    A role for the lower visual field information in stair climbing

    Gait Posture.

    (2019)
  • C.S. Gary et al.

    Smartphone use during ambulation and pedestrian trauma: A public health concern

    J Trauma Acute Care Surg.

    (2018)
  • N. Shah et al.

    Novel Use of a Smartphone to Measure Standing Balance

    JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol.

    (2016)
  • B. Gialanella et al.

    Pain, disability and adherence to home exercises in patients with chronic neck pain: long term effects of phone surveillance. A randomized controlled study

    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (11)

    • A systematic review of observational studies investigating the influence of mobile phone distraction on road crossing behaviour of pedestrians

      2022, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      Investigating the interaction effects of these psychological predictors on pedestrian distraction will greatly help the policymakers in understanding the reasons behind the pedestrians’ engagement in mobile phone distraction and will be an interesting direction for future research. Moreover, distracted walking is known to impair gait stability of pedestrians (Bruyneel and Duclos, 2020; Lim et al., 2015); however, the extent of impairment may vary according to the activity of engagement (e.g., talking, texting, etc.). Future research can examine how the type of distracting activity influence the postural control and gait stability of pedestrians.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text