Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nature of Science and Nature of Scientists

Implications for University Education in the Natural Sciences

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The past decade has seen multiple debates and discussions over the appropriate framing of Nature of Science (NOS) for science education. These debates have stemmed from a diversity of philosophical views on what science fundamentally is. In post-secondary STEM education, the goals of a science education rest in having students socialize into scientific STEM communities by engaging in research. In this paper, we highlight how NOS is taken up by individuals within scientific communities, drawing on historical and concurrent examples of STEM communities. Terming this the Nature of Scientist (NOSist), we argue that a post-secondary NOS education must take into account how the individual’s participation within a community of practice is predicated on the possession of a different set of epistemic aims, values, and practices than what is typically characterized within NOS frameworks. The switch in analytical lens from the collective as a whole to the individual within a collective contributes to an understanding of how scientists function within scientific communities. We conclude with recommendations and a call for further studies to characterize how individual scientists negotiate practice within the dialectic of the scientific communities that they are members of.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun, S., & Kaya, E. (2020). How do university students perceive the nature of science? Science and Education, 29(2), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00105-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: an educational perspective. Science & Education, 8(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. S. (1994). The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science. Research in Higher Education, 35(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, L., & Redish, E. F. (2002). Understanding probabilistic interpretations of physical systems: a prerequisite to learning quantum physics. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1447541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtle, P., Plehn, T., & Sander, C. (2015). The status of supersymmetry after the LHC Run 1. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03091.

  • Campbell, R. A. (2003). Preparing the next generation of scientists: the social process of managing students. Social Studies of Science, 33(6), 897–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312703336004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, M. (2013). Values and objectivity in science: value-ladenness, pluralism and the epistemic attitude. Science and Education, 22(10), 2547–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Créplet, F., Dupouët, O., & Vaast, E. (2003). Episteme or practice? Differentiated communitarian structures in a biology laboratory. In M. Huysman, E. Wenger, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Communities and technologies (pp. 43–63). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dine, M. (2015). Supersymmetry and string theory: beyond the standard model. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science and Education, 22(9), 2109–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. (1989). Graduate school and the self: a theoretical view of some negative effects of professional socialization. Teaching Sociology, 17(2), 200–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Contemporary trends and issues in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9057-4.

  • Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: the participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972–1977). Vintage.

  • Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: the process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K., & Barnes, B. J. (2007). Graduate student involvement: socialization for the professional role. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: an exploration (pp. 55–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L., & Burns, L. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2009). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, G. (1999). Are there scientific goals? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 30(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00018-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G. (2009). Interpretations of probability in quantum mechanics: a case of “experimental metaphysics.”. In W. C. Myrvold, J. Christian, & P. Pearle (Eds.), Quantum reality, relativistic causality, and closing the epistemic circle (pp. 211–227). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

  • Hodson, D. (2014). Nature of science in the science curriculum: origin, development, implications and shifting emphases. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 911–970). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science and Education, 20(7), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation (pp. 99–117). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

  • Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1.

  • Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461640.

  • Kelly, G. J., Mcdonald, S., & Wickman, P. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. pp. 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7.

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). Epistemic cultures. Cumberland: Harvard University Press.

  • Koster, E., & de Regt, H. W. (2020). Science and values in undergraduate education. Science and Education, 29(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00093-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., McNeill, K., & Reiser, B. (2007). Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. (Producer & Director), Kaplan, D. E. (Producer), Miller, A. (Producer), Solomon, C. (Producer) & Levinson. (2014). Particle fever [motion picture]. Pleasantville: Abramorama.

  • Liu, F., Seligman, J., & Girard, P. (2014). Logical dynamics of belief change in the community. Synthese, 191(11), 2403–2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0432-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (1995). Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 104, 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1996). Text and discourse in education: an introduction to critical discourse analysis. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education. Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantai, L. (2017). Feeling like a researcher: experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2015). Framework for understanding the patterns of student difficulties in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1942). The normative structure of science. In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. (2007). Ethical issues of research and education. In K. Tirri (Ed.), Values and foundations in gifted education (pp. 9–14). Bern: Peter Lang.

  • Niiniluoto, I. (2020). Social aspects of scientific knowledge. Synthese, 197(1), 447–468). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1868-7.

  • Nye, M. J. (1980). N-rays: an episode in the history and psychology of science. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11(1), 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (2010). The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Resnick, L. B., Pontecorvo, C., & Säljö, R. (1997). Discourse, tools, and reasoning: essays on situated cognition. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: essays on situated cognition (pp. 1–20). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Russ, R. S. (2014). Epistemology of science vs. epistemology for science. Science Education, 98(3), 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A., & Redman, E. H. (2015). The contextual nature of scientists’ views of theories, experimentation, and their coordination. Science and Education, 24(9–10), 1079–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9787-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. (2003). Forms of resistance: Foucault on tactical reversal and self-formation. Continental Philosophy Review, 36(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026072000125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. P. (1910). The Life of William Thomson, Baron Kelvin of Largs (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Traweek, S. (2009). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Van Eijck, M., Hsu, P. L., & Roth, W. M. (2009). Translations of scientific practice to “students” images of science. Science Education, 93(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N. G. (2008). The scandal of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 989–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Weiss, C. S. (1981). The development of professional role commitment among graduate students. Human Relations, 34(1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In A. Hanson (Ed.), Supporting lifelong learning (pp. 121–136). Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Wickman, P. O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: a study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. W. (1904). The n-rays. Nature., 70(1822), 530–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA

    Ashwin Mohan & Gregory J. Kelly

Authors
  1. Ashwin Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory J. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwin Mohan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohan, A., Kelly, G.J. Nature of Science and Nature of Scientists. Sci & Educ 29, 1097–1116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00158-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00158-y

Search

Navigation