Introduction

Fe-based amorphous alloys have been extensively studied due to their very soft magnetic properties such as high saturation magnetization and near-zero coercivity (Ref 1,2,3). Due to their soft magnetic properties, these materials are used in production of magnetic cores, wires and shields. Since the amorphous structure of metallic glasses is metastable, crystallization processes of these alloys have been reported in many papers. It has been proved that the soft magnetic properties and the saturation magnetization of Fe-based amorphous materials can be improved by nanocrystallization of these materials (Ref 4, 5). The best magnetic properties have been shown for alloys with nanometer size of grains (Ref 1, 4, 6). That means, since a growing grain size leads to a deterioration of soft magnetic properties, the goal is to produce nanocrystalline alloys (Ref 6). Unfortunately, the traditional heat treatment of FeSiB alloys leads to micrometer size of dendrites (Ref 3). On the other hand, annealing lead softens to a decrease in hardness and Young’s modulus, and consequently in a brittle crystalline state that makes the handling of the samples difficult (Ref 7). A proper heat treatment that leads to nanocrystallization is difficult to achieve due to the simultaneous formation and growth of a crystalline phase which is characterized by harder magnetic properties than amorphous materials (Ref 8). Several unconventional techniques have been investigated to obtain nanostructured alloys (Ref 9,10,11,12,13,14). The pulsed laser interference process is based on the interference of at least two laser beams. The laser beams affect and create an interference pattern on the sample surface (Ref 15,16,17). This process results in periodically arranged laser-heated microislands with changed structure and magnetic properties (Ref 18, 19).

The present study is focused on the microstructure evolution of Fe-based amorphous ribbons after pulsed laser interference heating and crystallization during annealing. The structure after laser and heat treatment is related to the magnetic properties of these alloys.

Experimental Materials and Methods

Fe-based amorphous alloys Fe80Si11B9, Fe77Cu1Si13B9 and Fe75Cu1Nb2Si13B9, with a thickness of 30 µm and a width of 25 mm and 10 mm, respectively, were studied. The chemical composition is well known as Metglass and Finemet alloys. Since these alloys are well investigated, it could well describe the influence of PLIH process on the structure and magnetic properties of these alloys. The amorphous alloys were fabricated by melt spinning (Ref 6, 20). Pulsed laser interference heating (PLIH) was performed using a Nd:YAG (12 mm bar) laser with basic wavelength (1064 nm), 8-ns pulse time duration and 1 Hz frequency. The interference pattern was generated by a quartz tetrahedral prism with an apex angle of 172°. The device to perform PLIH process was described in (Ref 21). During the PLIH process, the number of consecutive laser pulses in the same area varied from 50 to 500, with 120 mJ energy. The laser beam parameters were selected to avoid ablation and cause maximum structure changes. Series of pulsed laser interference heating performed (Ref 19) and 120 mJ energy provided the most hopeful results. The samples were prepared by further heating the amorphous materials to 873 K at a rate of 20 K/min and slow cooling down to room temperature. Phase transformation of amorphous ribbon was tested using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC 800 Perkin Elmer) in a nitrogen atmosphere with 20 K/min heating rate. The structure of amorphous, laser-heated and annealed samples was studied using scanning (SEM—FEI Inspect S50) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM—Jeol JEM 2010-ARP). A Zeiss Libra 200 MC Cs STEM was used for structure characterization. The TEM samples were prepared by electro-polishing of disks, cut from plain view. The magnetic properties were described by magnetic hysteresis loop measurements using a superconducting quantum interference device: (SQUID) magnetometer Quantum Design, MPMS, by applying an external field up to 4 T. The magnetic moment was determined with accuracy of 2% or better. The samples for SQUID measurements were cut as 3-mm disks and weighed to reference magnetization to the sample mass.

Results and Discussion

Phase Transformation

The DSC measurement of as-cast FeSiB amorphous ribbon indicates the presence of two exothermic peaks (Fig. 1): First at 785 K (onset 775 K) was observed crystallization by the formation of primary BCC α-Fe(Si) phase, and second at 831 K (onset 825 K) it corresponds to the precipitation of intermetallic phases like Fe-B. It has been reported that at about 831 K, Fe3B intermetallic phase is formed (Ref 2, 22). It has been reported that copper addition decreases primary crystallization temperature (Ref 23). The alloys with copper and niobium addition were characterized by higher primary crystallization temperature (Ref 24). The temperature of crystallization by annealing was selected 40 K above the peak of the precipitation intermetallic phase. Reason of this was crystallization after completed phase transformations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DSC curve of FeSiB amorphous ribbon

Microstructure

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed a two-dimensional structure composed of periodically arranged microislands fabricated by laser (Fig. 2). The distance between the microislands was about 16 µm. An increase in the number of laser pulses applied to the FeSiB alloy melted the surface and caused ablation of material (Fig. 2 and 3). Irradiation with 500 consecutive laser pulses led to the formation of ripples in the laser-heated microislands (Fig. 2d and 3b). According to Jia et al. (Ref 25), the creation of ripples is caused by the interference of the incident laser light and the scattered tangential light. The distance between the ripples is equal to the basic wavelength of Nd:YAG laser beam (~ 1064 nm) (Ref 18).

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of FeSiB alloy after PLIH process with 120 mJ energy and variable laser pulses: (a)—100, (b)—200, (c)—300, (d)—500

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM images of Fe-based alloys after PLIH process with 120 mJ energy and variable laser pulses: FeSiB (a)—200, (b)—500, FeCuSiB (c)—200, (d)—500, FeCuNbSiB (e)—200, (f)—500

Ripples were also observed at the FeCuSiB sample irradiated with 500 laser pulses (Fig. 3d) and at the FeCuNbSiB alloy after 200 laser pulses (Fig. 3e). The FeCuNbSiB alloy, laser heated with 500 laser pulses, was the alloy with the most heavily damaged surface in the microislands (Fig. 3f). This is probably due to thermophysical changes of alloys caused by Cu and Nb additions. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the FeSiB laser-heated alloy showed nanocrystalline regions in the amorphous matrix (Fig. 4). Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns can be attributed to the [− 103] zone axis of α-Fe(Si). The FeSiB amorphous alloy annealed at 873 K was characterized by a dendritic structure (Fig. 5a and b), with a variable dendrite size from 100 to 500 nm. The SAED patterns indicate the occurrence of the α-Fe(Si) structure. Conventional crystallization of FeCuSiB and FeCuNbSiB alloys caused single nanocrystals in the amorphous matrix (Fig. 5c, d, e and f). Alloy additions (Cu and Nb) to FeSiB alloy resulted in crystal refining during annealing. The FeCuSiB alloy was characterized by crystals of a size from 50 to 100 nm, the FeCuSiB alloy by about 20 nm crystals size. As for the ternary alloy, the SAED patterns of these alloys indicate to presence of α-Fe(Si) structure.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TEM images of FeSiB alloy after PLIH process with 120 mJ energy and 500 laser pulses (a)—bright field and SAED, (b)—dark field

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM images of annealed sample at 873 K: bright field with SAED (a, c, e) and dark field (b, d, f) FeSiB—(a, b) FeCuSiB—(c, d) FeCuNbSiB—(e, f)

High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

HRTEM of FeSiB alloys after laser irradiation with 120 mJ energy and 500 laser pulses showed a [111] α-Fe(Si) structure for one single nanocrystal (Fig. 6). At the boundary between the amorphous matrix and the crystals, a partial crystallization of the amorphous material can be observed (Fig. 7). The laser heating of the FeSiB alloy results in the formation of nanometer-sized crystals. The FeSiB sample after conventional crystallization by heating to 873 K shows a [001] α-Fe(Si) structure (Fig. 8). Annealing of this alloy resulted in large crystalline regions. Annealing of the alloy with copper addition led to the creation of α-Fe(Si) nanocrystals [111] oriented (Fig. 9a, b and c). The matrix was amorphous (Fig. 9d); however, partially crystallized material in the vicinity of crystals was observed (Fig. 9e). The alloy with copper and niobium additions contains the smallest size of nanocrystals. The HRTEM image shows nanocrystals with a size of a few nm (Fig. 10a). The structure of nanocrystals was α-Fe(Si) with [111] orientation in the HRTEM (Fig. 10b and c). Annealing of the FeSiB results in the creation of the highest size of crystals. The smallest size of crystals observed in alloys with copper and niobium addition can be explained according to Yoshizawa by the creation of Cu and Nb clusters which becomes nuclei for bcc Fe solid (Ref 1). The Fe grains were surrounded by Cu and Nb rich regions, which make grain growth difficult. Different treatments lead to the creation of different structures. The laser heating, as well as the annealing of the FeCuSiB and FeCuNbSiB alloys at 873 K, created nanocrystals in the amorphous matrix. The created structure was α-Fe(Si) [111] oriented. Conventional crystallization of the base alloy was with a dendritic structure composed of [001] α-Fe(Si) dendrites. The different orientation of dendrites may be caused by the preferred crystallographic orientation for dendritic growth which is [100] for α-Fe.

Fig. 6
figure 6

HRTEM images of FeSiB laser-heated material with 120 mJ energy and 500 laser pulses: (a)—HRTEM of crystals, (b)—magnification of selected area, (c)—FFT from 5a image

Fig. 7
figure 7

HRTEM images from boundary between FeSiB laser-heated material with 120 mJ energy and 500 laser pulses and amorphous matrix: (a)—HRTEM of the amorphous matrix, (b)—magnification of selected area, (c)—FFT from 6a image

Fig. 8
figure 8

HRTEM images of FeSiB annealed sample at 873 K: (a)—HRTEM image, (b)—magnification of selected area, (c)—FFT from 7a image

Fig. 9
figure 9

HRTEM images of FeCuSiB annealed sample at 873 K: (a)—HRTEM image, (b)—FFT from 8a image, (c, d, e)—magnification of selected areas

Fig. 10
figure 10

HRTEM images of FeCuNbSiB annealed sample at 873 K: (a)—HRTEM image, (b)—magnification of selected area, (c)—FFT from 9a image

Magnetic Properties

To determine the magnetic properties of materials, magnetic hysteresis loop measurements were carried out. A FeSiB amorphous alloy shows the highest saturation magnetization at about 1.53 T (Fig. 11). The FeCuSiB alloy has a 1.36 T saturation magnetization and the FeCuNbSiB alloy 1.3 T (Fig. 11b). The addition of copper and niobium leads to a decreased saturation magnetization of these alloys. Annealing at 873 K led to a decrease in the saturation magnetization of FeSiB and FeCuSiB alloys. The coercivity of amorphous alloys was 1.5 kA/m. After conventional crystallization, an increase in coercivity to 3 kA/m was observed. The FeCuNbSiB alloy after conventional crystallization was characterized by unchanged coercivity (Fig. 11c). The reason for this distinct behavior may be due to crystals’ size change; as Herzer (Ref 2) showed, increasing grain size led to increased coercivity of Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys, as observed here for FeSiB and FeCuSiB alloys. Niobium addition strongly decreases the size of crystals as discussed above: after crystallization, the crystals in FeCuNbSiB alloy were smaller than 20 nm (Fig. 10). The PLIH process led to a decreased saturation magnetization of these alloys except for the alloy with copper addition (Fig. 12). The FeSiB and the FeCuNbSiB alloys showed a saturation magnetization of 1.45 T and 1.27 T, respectively, after PLIH with 120 mJ and 300 laser pulses. The FeCuSiB alloy after laser heating was characterized by a saturation magnetization that was 0.13 T higher than for the amorphous alloy (Fig. 12b). The coercivity of 1.5 kA/m was unchanged for these materials after the laser heating process (Fig. 12c).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Magnetic hysteresis loops of amorphous and crystalline materials: (a)—full view, (b)—magnification of saturation magnetization area, (c)—magnification of coercivity area

Fig. 12
figure 12

Magnetic hysteresis loops of amorphous and laser-heated material with 120 mJ energy and 300 laser pulses: (a)—full view, (b)—magnification of saturation magnetization area, (c)—magnification of coercivity area

Conclusions

The application of the pulsed laser interference heating process formed two-dimensional structures. SEM images showed periodically arranged laser-heated microisland. The crystalline α-Fe(Si) structures were observed in these microislands. The matrix remained amorphous. HRTEM of the FeSiB alloy after the PLIH process showed single α-Fe(Si) nanocrystals and a partially crystallized amorphous matrix. Similar structures were obtained by Wu et al. (Ref 12) as well as Katakam et al. (Ref 13). It allows concluding that by the focused beams it is possible to obtain nanostructures, but only in laser-heated microisland. The crystallization during annealing led to the creation of a dendritic structure of the FeSiB alloy. The dendrites were characterized by a [001] α-Fe(Si) structure. The FeCuSiB and FeCuNbSiB alloys were characterized by single nanocrystals in the amorphous matrix with different crystal sizes. The alloy with copper addition was characterized by 50 to 100 nm crystal size and with additional niobium addition by 20 nm crystal size. Alloying of the ribbons resulted in a [111] α-Fe(Si) structure.

The SQUID measurement showed very soft magnetic properties of the amorphous ribbons. The materials that were crystallized during annealing were characterized by a deteriorated saturation magnetization and coercivity, except for the FeCuNbSiB alloy. This could be correlated with the structure of these alloys. FeSiB alloy and FeCuSiB alloy were characterized by coarse dendrite/crystals structure, but FeCuNbSiB alloy had a nanocrystalline structure. The laser heating does not influence to the coercivity of these alloys, but it led to lower saturation magnetization for the FeSiB and FeCuNbSiB alloys. The volume of laser crystallized material must be not enough to increase the soft magnetic properties of these alloys. The FeCuSiB alloy showed higher saturation magnetization after the PLIH process than before the laser heating. Katakam et al. (Ref 13) also showed deteriorated coercivity after furnace treatment, but they observed higher saturation magnetization after laser crystallization.

The laser beam energy is delivered at only 8 ns and is not enough to heat the higher volume of material, so the structural changes are observed only in laser-affected areas. Magnetic properties correlate with a structure so insufficient evolution of the structure will not change the magnetic properties. Perhaps the higher supplied energy to the material will increase the soft magnetic properties. It could be realized by increasing the laser beam energy or the number of laser pulses, as well as the time of laser pulse. The higher number of laser pulses, as well as the higher laser beam energy [our previous investigation (Ref 19)], leads to undesirable ablation. Changes of the laser pulses time could provide different structures, but it should be proved.