Quantifying regional trends in large live tree and snag availability in support of forest management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118554Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Satellite-based maps support monitoring of large tree and snag distributions.

  • Oregon and Washington have lost many forests supporting large trees and snags.

  • Recent increases have occurred primarily on public lands.

Abstract

In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, 20th century timber harvesting resulted in major declines in area of forests supporting large live and dead trees (i.e., snags), that are not only key habitat elements for many wildlife species but also critical components of ecosystem function. Regional forest management guidance, such as the Northwest Forest Plan (1994) and Eastside Screens (1995), may aim to conserve and foster the development of late-successional old-growth forests, characterized by large live and dead trees. Satellite remote sensing supports regional monitoring efforts of these habitat characteristics, but managers may require additional guidance in order to leverage these data for large landscape or regional assessments. In this study, our objectives were to assess long-term (historical vs. contemporary) and short-term (1993–2017) changes in lands supporting large live trees and snags across 10 wildlife habitat types (WHTs) – disparate vegetation conditions that support significantly different wildlife communities – in Oregon and Washington, USA. We generated 30-m, annual maps of large live trees (>50 cm, >75 cm, and >100 cm diameter) and snags (>25 cm and > 50 cm diameter) based on the gradient nearest neighbor (GNN) imputation method. GNN integrates Landsat satellite imagery, geospatial climatic and topographic data, and USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis data to predict forest attributes for all forested lands in the study area. GNN classification accuracy was poor to good for large live trees (Cohen’s kappa = 0.2 – 0.6) and poor to fair for snags (Cohen’s kappa = 0.1 – 0.3) in most WHTs, though performance was substantially lower in drier WHTs where large live trees and snags were rare. Our results highlighted long-term reductions in forest supporting large live trees and snags from historical to contemporary times, especially in wetter, more productive WHTs. In contrast, we observed short-term (1993–2017) increases in areas supporting large live trees and snags. Federal forests were both more similar to reference conditions and exhibited greater recent increases in areas supporting large live trees compared to nonfederal lands. Thus, Oregon and Washington have lost a substantial proportion of forests containing large live trees and snags and recent recruitment of these trees at regional scales is a slow process primarily occurring on federal lands. However, detecting such changes through current Landsat satellite mapping technologies remains challenging, highlighting the need for new mapping methods to aid in future management.

Introduction

The presence of large live trees and standing dead trees, or snags, is a defining characteristic of old-growth forest ecosystems in western North America (Franklin et al., 1981, Franklin et al., 2002, Kaufmann et al., 2007, Lindenmayer et al., 2012, Reilly and Spies, 2015). They provide structural elements supporting high quality habitat for many wildlife species (Hunter and Bond 2001). Since the mid-20th century, anthropogenic stressors, such as timber harvesting, land conversion, and wildfire, have greatly reduced the extent of old-growth forests in Oregon and Washington (Bolsinger and Waddell 1993). Many wildlife species in this region rely entirely or in part on the availability of large live and dead trees (Ohmann et al. 1994) and monitoring their availability over short (i.e., decades) and long (i.e., centuries) time-scales may highlight trends in the capacity of landscapes to support them. Both the changes in late successional and old-growth abundance and their importance in supporting ecosystem function motivated regional management plans contributing to the conservation of these forests, such as the Northwest Forest Plan implemented in 1994 (Spies et al. 2019) and the Eastside Screens implemented in 1995 (Steen-Adams et al. 2017). Therefore, tools that integrate reference conditions with contemporary vegetation patterns and trends increasingly form the basis for regional and sub-regional monitoring programs (Davis et al. 2016) and support decision making associated with, for example, the management of forests for wildlife and biodiversity (Marcot et al. 2010).

Short- and long-term landscape changes are not expected to be spatially uniform, with variation within the region in the divergence from historical conditions and/or differing rates of change during recent decades. There can be substantial regional variation in the abundance of large live trees and snags, with environmental conditions contributing to these patterns. Local climatic and topographic factors constrain, for example, site productivity (Latta et al. 2010) and maximum tree height (Ryan and Yoder, 1997, Koch et al., 2004, Swetnam et al., 2015). Tree mortality rates are constrained by environmental gradients, with higher mortality rates in high productivity forests (Franklin et al., 1987, Reilly and Spies, 2016), resulting in greater abundance of snags. Broad-scale patterns in the frequency and severity of disturbance regimes impacts distributions of large live trees and snags by modifying successional trajectories (Reilly and Spies 2015) and contributing structural legacies to regrown stands.

Succession and management also affect snag densities, with a greater frequency in older, unmanaged stands or for several years following moderate or high severity wildfire. Recent (i.e., following the Northwest Forest Plan [1994] and Eastside Screens [1995]) management of federal forests in Oregon and Washington have emphasized promotion of late succession and old-forest attributes, including large snags (e.g.; Davis et al. 2015). Other management goals can conflict with the aim to increase snag densities, such as thinning to accelerate old forest conditions in moister forests (northwestern OR, western WA), and fuel reduction treatments in drier forests (southwestern OR, eastern OR and WA).

Integration of remote sensing, forest inventory, and spatially-distributed environmental data through multivariate analysis provides a method for assessing temporal trends in large live tree and snag abundance at relevant spatial scales (i.e., landscape/watershed scales). In Oregon and Washington, gradient nearest neighbor (GNN) imputation mapping – a method for integrating Landsat multispectral imagery with forest inventory data to produce wall-to-wall 30-m maps of forest attributes (Ohmann and Gregory 2002) – has become a standard tool for quantifying landscape pattern and change in forest ecosystems, especially as it relates to Northwest Forest Plan monitoring for both old-growth forest structure (Davis et al. 2015) and wildlife habitat (e.g., Davis et al. 2016). Uncertainty in pixel-level predictions of snag densities generated using GNN can be high and vary considerably across forest regions (Bell et al. 2015). Regional assessments of area within differing vegetation categories appear to be comparable to sample-based estimates for the same areas (Pierce et al., 2009, Ohmann et al., 2014). However, explicit assessment of bias and precision in estimates have been lacking. Consequently, map uncertainty impacts the degree to which managers can leverage remotely-sensed vegetation data for landscape to regional assessments of wildlife habitat.

Our main objective was to explore trends in the forestland area supporting large live trees and snags in the various wildlife habitat types distributed across Oregon and Washington, USA. Wildlife habitat types (WHTs; Table 1) represent macrohabitat groupings of vegetation communities by geographic distribution, physical setting, landscape setting, structure, and composition in Oregon and Washington shown to have similar patterns of use by breeding species of wildlife (O’Neil and Johnson 2001). Some wildlife habitat types are further divided into geographic subregions to take into account variation in dead wood amounts (Marcot et al. 2010) and wildlife responses to dead wood habitat features (J. Ohmann, personal communication; Mellen-McLean et al. 2017). As opposed to other classification schemes that rely solely on abiotic factors, such as physiographic region, WHTs were used to summarize our results because they account for current forest structure and composition and are thus more relevant to wildlife managers in the study region. We assessed long-term changes in large live tree and snag availability by comparing predicted historical reference conditions (i.e., properties of undisturbed ecosystems available for direct evaluation of natural ecosystem structure, composition, and function, similar to those found prior to Euro-American settlement) (Kaufmann et al., 1994, Kaufmann et al., 2007) vs. contemporary forest area supporting large live trees and snags. We assessed short-term trends in large live tree and snag availability by examining interannual changes in mapped forest area supporting large live trees and snags following the initiation of the Northwest Forest Plan (1993) and Eastside Screens (1995).

Section snippets

Study region

Our study area included all forestlands, regardless of ownership, in Oregon and Washington (Fig. 1). This region exhibits substantial variation in climate, topography, and ownerships (public and private), as well as various histories of disturbance, forest conditions, and departure from historical conditions (Spies et al. 2018). Forests range from wet temperate rainforests that rarely burned historically, but tended to be larger with mixed severity, to semi-arid woodlands that burned at high

Results

Empirical density functions for the relative frequency of lands with differing densities of large live trees and snags varied by WHT (Fig. 2). As the diameter threshold for large live trees and snags increased, the frequency of reference plots with no such trees increased and the maximum densities decreased, reflecting increasing scarcity of large live trees and snags. Both the relative frequency with no large trees increased and maximum densities decreased as one shifted from wetter western

Discussion

Contemporary patterns of large live tree and snag distributions implied an important role for regional patterns of 19th and 20th century disturbance legacies, including widespread timber harvesting and historic wildfires, as well as contemporary land management. Forests in the wetter and warmer portion of the study region (WLCH_OCA, WLCH_WCA, WLCH_OCO, WLCH_OCO, and SWOMC; Table 1, Fig. 1), generally contained 20% to 60% of the forested area supporting large live trees and snags compared to

Conclusions

In part, the maintenance of forest biodiversity depends on the retention of existing and restoration of late-successional and older forest habitat for wildlife species to within natural or desired ranges. Our results indicate that the forests of Oregon and Washington have lost a substantial proportion of forests supporting large live trees and snags compared to reference conditions and that recruitment of these structural elements of wildlife habitat at regional scales is a slow process. Slow

CRediT authorship contribution statement

David M. Bell: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Steven A. Acker: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Matthew J. Gregory: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Raymond J. Davis: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Barbara A. Garcia: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research would not be possible without data collection by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program. This research was supported by Oregon Department of Forestry, California Natural Resources Agency (CCCA4-CNRA-2018-014), and the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station (PNW-JV-11261959-040).

References (55)

  • P. Olofsson et al.

    Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2013)
  • M.J. Reilly et al.

    Disturbance, tree mortality, and implications for contemporary regional forest change in the Pacific Northwest

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2016)
  • S.V. Stehman

    Estimating area from an accuracy assessment error matrix

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2013)
  • S.V. Stehman et al.

    Pixels, blocks of pixels, and polygons: choosing a spatial unit for thematic accuracy assessment

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2011)
  • H.S.J. Zald et al.

    Influence of lidar, Landsat imagery, disturbance history, plot location accuracy, and plot size on accuracy of imputation maps of forest composition and structure

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2014)
  • Battles, J.J., Bell, D.M., Kennedy, R.E., Saah, D.S., Collins, B.M., R.A. York, Sanders, J.E., Lopez-Ornelas, F., 2018....
  • Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L., 2005. The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program — National Sampling Design...
  • Bolsinger, C. L., and K. L. Waddell. 1993. Area of old-growth forests in California, Oregon, and Washington. Resource...
  • C.J.F. Ter Braak

    Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis

    Ecology

    (1986)
  • L. Breiman

    Random forests

    Mach. Learn.

    (2001)
  • E.P. Crist et al.

    A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data –- The TM Tasseled Cap

    IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.

    (1984)
  • C. Daly et al.

    Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States

    Int. J. Climatol.

    (2008)
  • Davis, R.J., Hollen, B., Hobson, J., Gower, J.E., Keenum, D., 2016. Status and trends of northern spotted owl habitats....
  • Davis, R.J., Ohmann, J.L., Kennedy, R.E., Cohen, W.B., Gregory, M.J., Yang, Z., Roberts, H.M., Gray, A.N., Spies, T.A.,...
  • M.S. Delheimer et al.

    If a tree falls in a forest: implications of forest structure persistence for the Pacific marten (Martes caurina)

    Ecosphere

    (2019)
  • T. DeMeo et al.

    Expanding Our Understanding of Forest Structural Restoration Needs in the Pacific Northwest

    Northwest Sci.

    (2018)
  • A.B. Edworthy et al.

    Tree cavity occupancy by nesting vertebrates across cavity age

    J. Wildl. Manage.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Trends in forest structure restoration need over three decades with increasing wildfire activity in the interior Pacific Northwest US

      2023, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Within the study area, there were 10 biophysical settings (Table 2) and 365 strata (i.e., unique combinations of biophysical setting and landscape level). Current forest structure conditions were mapped annually from 1986 to 2017 using gradient nearest neighbor (GNN) datasets from the Landscape Ecology, Modeling, Mapping and Analysis (LEMMA) lab at Oregon State University (https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data) (Bell et al., 2021). Three GNN-derived forest structure attributes (canopy cover, trees per acre, and quadratic mean diameter per diameter class; Table A.1) were used to develop rule-based criteria with which each 30-meter resolution pixel was classified as one of 5 structural/successional classes—early development, mid-development closed canopy, mid-development open canopy, late-development open canopy, and late-development closed canopy.

    • Uncovering forest dynamics using historical forest inventory data and Landsat time series

      2022, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      GNN is a well-known algorithm in the family of nearest neighbors techniques that relies on canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (ter Braak, 1986). It has been widely used across the Pacific Northwest (Bell et al., 2015, 2021; Kennedy, Ohmann, et al., 2018) and in other parts of the United States (Wilson et al., 2012) to simultaneously map distributions of various forest attributes. For the GEE implementation, we used a new library developed by the authors (GEE-KNN) which automates many of the steps in nearest neighbor techniques and allows comparative evaluation of different algorithms.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text