Skip to main content
Log in

A Neural Network-Based Rapid Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Systems in Partial Shading Conditions

  • DIRECT CONVERSION OF SOLAR ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
  • Published:
Applied Solar Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controller holds an important role in increasing the efficiency of the photovoltaic (PV) system. However, conventional MPPT techniques may fail to locate the global maximum power point (GMPP) under partial shading conditions (PSC). Hence, to optimize the efficiency of PV systems, we introduce a new MPPT technique for PSC. The proposed method employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the area of the GMPP, and the classic perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm to locate the exact position of the GMPP. We validated the effectiveness of the technique using computer simulations performed with the MATLAB/Simulink program, the results of which verified that it can track the GMPP faster than other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bastidas-Rodriguez, J.D., Spagnuolo, G., Franco, E., et al., Maximum power point tracking architectures for photovoltaic systems in mismatching conditions: a review, IET Power Electron., 2014, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1396–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao, W., Lind, M.G.J., Dunford, W.G., and Capel, A., Real-time identification of optimal operating points in photovoltaic power systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2006, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1017–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mouna, B.H. and Lassaâd, S., A maximum power tracking algorithm based on photovoltaic current control for matching loads to a photovoltaic generator, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2012, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 238–244. https://link.springer.com/journal/11949/48/4/page/1. Accessed January 25, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leyva, R., Alonso, C., Queinnec, I., et al., MPPT of photovoltaic systems using extremum-seeking control, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2006, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Padmanabhan, V., Beena, V., and Jayaraju, M., Fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracker for a photovoltaic system, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Power, Signals, Controls and Computation (EPSCICON), 2012.

  6. Messalti, S., Harrag, A.G., and Loukriz, A.E., A new neural networks MPPT controller for PV systems, in Proc. 6th Int. Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), 2015, pp. 1–6.

  7. Kurniawan, A., Koenhardono, E.S., Masroeri, A.A., et al., Optimizing solar-powered tourist boat with converter-based maximum power point tracker, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 2016, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 11142–11144. https://www.ripublication.com/Volume/ijaerv11n23.htm. Accessed January 10, 2017.

  8. Chaouachi, A., Kamel, R.M., and Nagasaka, K., A novel multi-model neuro-fuzzy-based MPPT for three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic system, Sol. Energy, 2010, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 2219–2229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurniawan, A., Masroeri, A.A., and Koenhardono, E.S., Neuro-fuzzy based maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system on a moving vehicle, IPASJ Int. J. Comput. Sci., 2016, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1–9. https://ipasj.org/issue1.php?vol=Volume4Issue10&Jname=0. Accessed November 6, 2016.

  10. Cheng, Z., Zhou, H., and Yang, H., Research on MPPT control of PV system based on PSO algorithm, in Proc. Chinese Control and Decision Conf. (CCDC), 2010, pp. 887–892.

  11. Motahhir, S., El Ghzizal, A., Sebti, S., and Derouich, A., Shading effect to energy withdrawn from the photovoltaic panel and implementation of DMPPT using C language, Int. Rev. Autom. Control, 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88–94. https://www.praiseworthyprize.org/jsm/index.php? journal=ireaco&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D= 18778. Accessed October 22, 2019.

  12. Li, X., Wen, H., Hu, Y., et al., Modified beta algorithm for GMPPT and partial shading detection in photovoltaic systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2018, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2172–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramli, M.A.M., Twaha, S., Ishaque, K., and Al-Turki, Y.A., A review on maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems with and without shading conditions, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 67, pp. 144–159, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolara, A., Leva, S., Magistrati, G., et al., A novel MPPT algorithm for photovoltic systems under dynamic partial shading—Recurrent scan and track method, in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Renewable Energy Research and Applications, 2016, pp. 1122–1127.

  15. Bouilouta, A., Mellit, A., and Kalogirou, S.A., New MPPT method for stand-alone photovoltaic systems operating under partially shaded conditions, Energy, vol. 55, 2013, pp. 1172–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi, J., Zhang, Y., and Chen, Y., Modeling and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) method for PV array under partial shade conditions, Renewable Energy, 2014, vol. 66, pp. 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sellami, A., Kandoussi, K., El Otmani, R., et al., A novel auto-scaling MPPT algorithm based on perturb and observe method for photovoltaic modules under partial shading conditions, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2018, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 149–158. https://link.springer.com/journal/11949/54/3. Accessed January 23, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hua, C.C. and Chen, Y.M., Modified perturb and observe MPPT with zero oscillation in steady-state for PV systems under partial shaded conditions, in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Energy Conversion (CENCON), 2017, pp. 5–9.

  19. Patel, H. and Agarwal, V., Maximum power point tracking scheme for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2008, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1689–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, L.L., Maskell, D.L., and Patra, J.C., A novel ant colony optimization-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions, Energy Build., 2013, vol. 58, pp. 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar, N., Hussain, I., Singh, B., and Panigrahi, B.K., Single sensor based MPPT for partially shaded solar photovoltaic by using human psychology optimisation algorithm, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2562–2574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Telbany, M.E.E., Youssef, A., and Zekry, A.A., Intelligent techniques for MPPT control in photovoltaic systems: A comprehensive review, in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology (ICAIET), 2014, pp. 17–22.

  23. Punitha, K., Devaraj, D., and Sakthivel, S., Artificial neural network based modified incremental conductance algorithm for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions, Energy, 2013, vol. 62, pp. 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang, L. and Maskell, D.L., A simple hybrid MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems under rapidly changing partial shading conditions, in Proc. 40th IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. (PVSC), 2014, pp. 782–787.

  25. Bouselham, L., Hajji, M., Hajji, B., and Bouali, H., A new MPPT-based ANN for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions, Energy Procedia, vol. 111, March 2017, pp. 924-933, 2017.

  26. El-Helw, H.M., Magdy, A., and Marei, M. I., A hybrid maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded photovoltaic arrays, IEEE Access, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 11900–11908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurniawan, A., Haryanto, E., and Masroeri, A.A., A neural network based maximum power point tracker with KY converter for photovoltaic system on a moving vehicle, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture, and Industrial Automation (ICAMIMIA), 2015, pp. 117–120.

  28. Chouder, A. and Silvestre, S., Automatic supervision and fault detection of PV systems based on power losses analysis, Energy Convers. Manag., 2010, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1929–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Villalva, M.G., Gazoli, J.R., and Ruppert Filho, E., Modeling and circuit-based simulation of photovoltaic arrays, Brazilian J. Power Electron., 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu, H. and Wilamowski, B.M., Levenberg–Marquardt Training, in The Industrial Electronics Handbook, Wilamowski, B.M. and Irwin, J.D., Eds., Boca Raton: CRC, 2011, ch. 12, pp. 12.1–12.16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kurniawan, A. and Shintaku, E., Control of photovoltaic system connected to DC bus in all-electric ship, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture, and Industrial Automation (ICAMIMIA), 2017, pp. 110–115.

  32. Ahmed, J. and Salam, Z., A maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for PVS system using cuckoo search with partial shading capability, Appl. Energy, 2014, vol. 119, pp. 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study is supported by the Hitachi Global Foundation as the scholarship provider for the first author. The authors express their sincere appreciation to this organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adi Kurniawan.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adi Kurniawan, Eiji Shintaku A Neural Network-Based Rapid Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Systems in Partial Shading Conditions. Appl. Sol. Energy 56, 157–167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X20030068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X20030068

Keywords:

Navigation