Abstract
Reclamation of abandoned mines to grassland may benefit non-target wildlife like pollinators by providing conservation habitat. Co-colonization of wildflowers and pollinators has been used to measure ecological recovery in other disturbed herbaceous habitats. Revegetated surface coal mines in eastern North America are a unique system in which to study re-establishment of plant–pollinator interactions because they are field islands isolated by forest. Using a time series of 10 grassland-reclaimed mines (aged < 10, 10–20, or > 20 years) in Ohio, USA, we evaluate whether former mines provide habitat for bees, seek insights into species accumulation as sites mature, and examine the consequences for bee conservation and plant–pollinator interactions. In 120 h of netting over two consecutive years, we documented 7749 bees of 139 species visiting 117 wildflower species. Bee richness did not differ between young and mature sites, suggesting that diverse communities established rapidly following reclamation and persisted. Bee species assemblage, however, differed between sites < 10 versus > 10 years post-reclamation, and was influenced by vegetation and the amount of nearby forest. Plant–bee networks on sites > 10 years old had more links per species and greater network nestedness than new reclamations, suggesting the development of a core community of interacting species that stabilize pollination services over time. Reclamation grasslands are not typically considered high-quality pollinator conservation habitat, but we found that they harbor a diverse bee fauna similar to other regional meadow habitats. Reclaimed mines remain undeveloped for many years, and can accumulate pollinator species and export bees to the surrounding landscape.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
Akala VA, Lal R (2001) Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed mine soils in Ohio. J Environ Qual 30:2098–2104
Albrecht M, Riesen M, Schmid B (2010) Plant–pollinator network assembly along the chronosequence of a glacial foreland. Oikos 119(10):1610–1624
Albrecht J, Berens DG, Jaroszewicz B, Selva N, Brandl R, Farwig N (2014) Correlated loss of ecosystem services in coupled mutualistic networks. Nat Commun 5:3810
Arduser M (2010) Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of the Kitty Todd Preserve, Lucas County. Ohio Great Lakes Entomol 43(1):45–68
Brady JK (2016) Salamander diversity of reforested abandoned surface coal mines in the Appalachian Region, USA. Restor Ecol 24(3):398–405
Brenner FJ, Werner M, Pike J (1984) Ecosystem development and natural succession in surface coal mine reclamation. Miner Environ 6:10–22
Burger JA, Mitchem DO, Zipper CE, Williams R (2005) Herbaceous ground cover effects on native hardwoods planted on mine land. Proc Am Soc Min Reclam 2005:136–146
Cavender N, Byrd S, Bechtoldt CL, Bauman JM (2014) Vegetation communities of a coal reclamation site in Southeastern Ohio. Northeast Nat 21(1):31–46
Carvell C, Bourke AFG, Osborne JL, Heard MS (2015) Effects of an agri-environment scheme on bumblebee reproduction at local and landscape scales. Basic Appl Ecol 16:519–530
Cusser S, Goodell K (2013) Diversity and distribution of floral resources influence the restoration of plant–pollinator networks on a reclaimed strip mine. Restor Ecol 21(6):713–721
Cusser S, Goodell K (2014) Using a centrality index to determine the contribution of restored and volunteer plants in the restoration of plant–pollinator mutualisms on a reclaimed strip mine. Ecol Restor 32(2):179–188
De Palma A, Abrahamcyzk S, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Basset Y, Bates A, Blake RJ, Boutin C, Bugter R, Connop S, Cruz-Lopez L, Cunningham SA, Darvill B, Diekötter T, Dorn S, Downing N, Entling MH, Farwig N, Feliciolo A, Fonte SJ, Fowler R, Franzén M, Goulson D, Grass I, Hanley ME, Hendrix SD, Herrmann F, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Joker B, Kessler M, Knight ME, Kruess A, Lavelle P, Le Féon V, Lentini P, Malone LA, Marschall J, Pachón EM, McFrederick QS, Morales CL, Mudri-Stojnic S, Nates-Parra G, Nilsson SG, Öckinger E, Osgathorpe L, Parra-H A, Peres CA, Persson AS, Petanidou T, Poveda K, Power EF, Quaranta M, Quintero C, Rader R, Richards MH, Roulston T, Rousseau L, Sadler JP, Samnegård U, Schellhorn NA, Schüepp C, Schweiger O, Smith-Pardo AH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stout JC, Tonietto RK, Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Verboven HAF, Vergara CH, Verhulst J, Westphal C, Yoon HJ, Purvis A (2016) Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: effects of geographic and taxonomic biases. Sci Rep 6:31153
Devoto M, Bailey S, Craze P, Memmott J (2012) Understanding and planning ecological restoration of plant–pollinator networks. Ecol Lett 15:319–328
Dicks LV, Corbet SA, Pywell RF (2002) Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs. J Anim Ecol 71:32–43
Dinno A (2017) Dunn.test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package. version 1.3.3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dunn.test/index.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2017
Dormann CF, Fründ J, Blüthgen N, Gruber B (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J 2:7–24
Dormann CF, Fründ J, Schaefer HM (2017) Identifying causes of patterns in ecological networks: opportunities and limitations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 48:559–584
Elle E, Elwell SL, Gielens GA (2012) The use of pollination networks in conservation. Botany 90:525–534
ESRI (2018) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.6.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California
Evans FC (1984) Bee–flower interactions on an old field in southeastern Michigan. In: Proceedings of ninth North American Prairie Conference, pp 103–109
Exeler N, Kratochwil A, Hochkirch A (2009) Restoration of riverine inland sand dune complexes: implications for the conservation of wild bees. J Appl Ecol 46:1097–1105
Forup ML, Memmott J (2005) The restoration of plant–pollinator interactions in hay meadows. Restor Ecol 13(2):265–274
Forup ML, Henson KSE, Craze PG, Memmott J (2008) The restoration of ecological interactions: plant–pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathlands. J Appl Ecol 45:742–752
Geroff RK, Gibbs J, McCravy KW (2014) Assessing bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity of an Illinois restored tallgrass prairie: methodology and conservation considerations. J Insect Conserv 18:951–964
Gibbs J (2010) Revision of the metallic species of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) on Canada (Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Halictini). Zootaxa 2591:1–382
Gibson RH, Knott B, Eberlein T, Memmott J (2011) Sampling method influences the structure of plant-pollinator networks. Oikos 120:822–831
Giles V, Ascher JS (2006) A survey of bees of the Black Rock Forest Preserve, New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). J Hymenopt Res 15(2):208–231
Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, 2nd edn. The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx
Gonzalez AM, Dalsgaard B, Olesen JM (2010) Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks. Ecol Complex 7:36–43
Goulson D, Darvill B (2004) Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees; are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers? Apidologie 35:55–63
Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botias C, Rotheray EL (2015) Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347:1255957
Griffin SR, Bruninga-Socolar B, Kerr MA, Gibbs J, Winfree R (2017) Wild bee community change over a 26-year chronosequence of restored tallgrass prairie. Restor Ecol 25(4):650–660
Grixti JC, Packer L (2006) Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario revisited after 34 years. Can Entomol 138:147–164
Grundel R, Jean RP, Frohnapple KJ, Gibbs J, Glowacki GA, Pavlovic NB (2011) A survey of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of the Indiana Dunes and Northwest Indiana, USA. J Kansas Entomol Soc 84(2):105–138
Harmon-Threatt AN, Hendrix SD (2015) Prairie restorations and bees: the Potential ability of seed mixes to foster native bee communities. Basic Appl Ecol 16:64–72
Harrison T, Winfree R (2015) Urban drivers of plant–pollinator interactions. Funct Ecol 29:879–888
Hendrychová M, Bogusch P (2016) Combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites is the best practice for protection of aculeate Hymenoptera species on brown coal spoil heaps. J Insect Conserv 20:807–820
Heneberg P, Bogusch P, Řehounek J (2013) Sandpits provide critical refuge for bees and wasps (Hymenoptera: Apocrita). J Insect Conserv 17:473–490
Holl KD (1996) The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. J Appl Ecol 33:225–236
Holl KD (2002) Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J Appl Ecol 39:960–970
Holl KD, Cairns J (1994) Vegetational community development on reclaimed coal surface mines in Virginia. B Torrey Bot Club 121(4):327–337
Hopwood J (2008) The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv 141:2632–2640
Hung K-LJ, Ascher JS, Holway DA (2017) Urbanization-induced habitat fragments erodes multiple components of temporal diversity in a Southern California native bee assemblage. PLoS ONE 12(8):e0184136
Hung K-LJ, Kingston JM, Albrecht M, Holway DA, Kohn JR (2018) The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2140
Jha S, Kremen C (2013) Urban land use limits regional bumble bee gene flow. Mol Ecol 22(9):2483–2495
Jordan WR, Peters RL, Allen EB (1988) Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity. Environ Manag 12(1):55–72
Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2006) The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 173–199
Joshi NK, Leslie T, Rajotte EG, Kammerer MA, Otieno M, Biddinger DJ (2015) Comparative trapping efficiency to characterize bee abundance, diversity, and community composition in apple orchards. Ann Entomol Soc Am 108(5):1–15
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Memmott J, Müller CB (2009) Community structure of pollination webs of Mauritian heathland habitats. Per Plant Ecol Evol S 11:241–254
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Traveset A, Hansen DM (2010) Conservation and restoration of plant–plant–animal mutualisms on oceanic islands. Per Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:131–143
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Vázquez DP, Stang M, Ghazoul J (2014) Determinants of the microstructure of plant–pollinator networks. Ecology 95(12):3314–3324
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Blüthgen N (2015) Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation. AoB Plants 7:plv076
Kammerer MA, Biddinger DJ, Rajotte EG, Mortensen DA (2016) Local plant diversity across multiple habitats supports a diverse wild bee community in Pennsylvania apple orchards. Environ Entomol 45(1):32–38
Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112
Krauss J, Alfert T, Steffan-Dewenter I (2009) Habitat area but not habitat age determines wild bee richness in limestone quarries. J Appl Ecol 46:194–202
Kremen C, M’Gonigle LK, Ponisio LC (2018) Pollinator community assembly tracks changes in floral resources as restored hedgerows mature in agricultural landscapes. Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00170
Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren LG, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vasquez D, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein A, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314
Larkin JL, Maehr DS, Krupa JJ, Cox JJ, Alexy K, Unger DE, Barton C (2008) Small mammal response to vegetation and spoil conditions on a reclaimed surface mine in eastern Kentucky. Southeast Nat 7(3):401–412
Lomov B, Keith DA, Hochuli DF (2010) Pollination and plant reproductive success in restored urban landscapes dominated by a pervasive exotic pollinator. Landsc Urban Plan 96:232–239
Mallinger RE, Gibbs J, Gratton C (2016) Diverse landscapes have a higher abundance and species richness of spring wild bees by providing complementary floral resources over bees’ foraging periods. Landsc Ecol 31:1523–1535
Marrero HJ, Torretta JP, Medan D (2014) Effect of land use intensification on specialization in plant–floral visitor interaction networks in the Pampas of Argentina. Agr Ecosyst Environ 188:63–71
McLeod K (2013) Native bee (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) response to ecological restoration in southern Ontario. Thesis, University of Waterloo
Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW (2011) Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends Plant Sci 16(1):4–12
M’Gonigle LK, Ponisio LC, Cutler K, Kremen C (2015) Habitat restoration promotes pollinator persistence and colonization in intensively managed agriculture. Ecol Appl 25(6):1557–1565
Mitchell TB (1960) Bees of the eastern United States. I. Tech Bull N C Agric Exp Station 141:1–538
Newcomb L (1989) Newcomb’s wildflower guide. Little Brown Caompany, Boston
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, US Department of the Interior (2017) Laws and regulations. https://www.osmre.gov/lrg.shtm. Accessed 1 May 2017
Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Division of Mineral Resources (2017) Abandoned mine land reclamation. https://minerals.ohiodnr.gov. Accessed 1 May 2017
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2016) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 1 May 2017
Onuferko TM, Skandalis DA, León Cordero R, Richards MH (2018) Rapid initial recover and long-term persistence of a bee community in a former landfill. Insect Conserv Divers 11:88–99
Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Stefanos PS, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11(6):564–575
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 1 May 2017
Potts SG, Vuilliamy B, Dafni A, Neeman G, O’Toole C, Roberts S, Willmer P (2003) Response of plant–pollinator communities to fire: changes in diversity, abundance, and floral reward structure. Oikos 101:103–112
R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. v3.5.2. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, https://www.r-project.org
Richards MH, Rutgers-Kelly A, Gibbs J, Vickruck JL, Rehan SM, Sheffield CS (2011) Bee diversity in naturalizing patches of Carolinian grasslands in southern Ontario Canada. Can Entomol 143:279–299
Roberts DW (2016) Labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.8-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv
Robson DM (2008) The structure of the flower-insect visitor system in tall-grass prairie. Botany 86:1266–1278
Saville NM (1993) Bumblebee ecology in woodlands and arable farmland. Dissertation, University of Cambridge
Schuh RT, Hewson-Smith S, Ascher JS (2010) Specimen databases: a case study in entomology using web-based software. Am Entomol 56:206–216
Sheffield CS, Pindar A, Packer L, Kevan PG (2013) The potential of cleptoparasitic bees as indicator taxa for assessing bee communities. Apidologie 44:501–510
Spring M, Lustofin KS, Lin C, Gardiner MM, McShaffrey D (2017) Quantifying bee diversity and resource use in the Appalachian foothills near Marietta, Ohio. Ohio Biol Surv Notes 7:1–13
Spring M (2017) Impacts of urban greenspace management on beneficial insect communities. Thesis, the Ohio State University
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, Pub.L. 95-87 (1977) United States Code, Title 30, Chap. 25. https://uscode.house.gov. Accessed 1 May 2017
Sydenham MAK, Moe SR, Kuhlmann PSG, Roberts SPM, Totland O, Eldegard K (2017) Disentangling the contributions of dispersal limitation, ecological drift, and ecological filtering to wild bee community assembly. Ecosphere 8(1):e01650
Tarrant S, Ollerton J, Rahman ML, Tarrant J, McCollin D (2012) Grassland restoration on landfill sites in the East Midlands, United Kingdom: an evaluation of floral resources and pollinating insects. Restor Ecol 21(5):560–568
Tonietto RK, Ascher JS, Larkin DJ (2017) Bee communities along a prairie restoration chronosequence: similar abundance and diversity, distinct composition. Ecol Appl 27(3):705–717
Tonietto RK, Larkin DJ (2017) Habitat restoration benefits wild bees: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:582–590
Townsend PA, Helmers DP, Kingdon CC, McNeil BE, deBeurs KM, Eshleman KN (2009) Changes in the extent of surface mining and reclamation in the Central Appalachians detected using a 1976–2006 Landsat time series. Remote Sens Environ 113:62–72
Tropek R, Cerna I, Straka J, Cizek O, Konvicka M (2013) Is coal combustion the last chance for vanishing insects of inland drift sand dunes in Europe? Biol Conserv 162:60–64
Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batary P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Christ T, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Fründ J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindemayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes: eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685
Tuell JK, Fiedler AK, Landis D, Isaacs R (2008) Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to Eastern US native plants for use in conservation programs. Environ Entomol 37(3):707–718
Tuell JK, Ascher JS, Isaacs R (2009) Wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) of the Michigan highbush blueberry agroecosystem. Ann Entomol Soc Am 102(2):275–287
Williams NM (2011) Restoration of nontarget species: Bee communities and pollination function in riparian forests. Restor Ecol 19(4):450–459
Williams N, Minckley R, Silveira F (2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26271796
Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vazquez D, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90(8):2068–2076
Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Homer CG, Gass L, Bender SM, Case A, Costello C, Dewitz JA, Fry JA, Funk M, Granneman BJ, Liknes GC, Rigge MB, Xian G (2018) A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 146:108–123
Zipper CE, Burger JA, McGrath JM, Rodriguez JA, Holtzman GI (2011a) Forest restoration potentials of coal mined lands in the eastern United States. J Environ Qual 40:1567–1577
Zipper CE, Burger JA, Skousen JG, Angel PN, Barton CD, Davis V, Franklin JA (2011b) Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environ Manag 47:751–765
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Prairie Biotic Research’s Small Grants Program and the Ohio State University Newark. We appreciate the cooperation of private landowners in Hocking and Perry Counties, Ohio, and wildlife biologists at Wayne National Forest who provided access to study sites. Steven Novotny, Collin Ries, and Alyssa Stahlgren assisted with field and laboratory work. Keng-Lou James Hung, Andrew Lybbert, and John Ballas provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We thank Jason Gibbs for identifying to species a synoptic collection of our metallic sweat bees in the genus Lasioglossum.
Funding
This study was funded by Prairie Biotic Research’s Small Grants Program and the Ohio State University Newark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KG and JN conceived of this research. JN conducted field work, preserved and identified bee and plant specimens, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. KG and JN revised the manuscript, and read and approved the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
This manuscript is the authors’ own original research and has not been submitted or published elsewhere simultaneously.
Consent to participate
All authors consent to the submission of this manuscript to the Journal of Insect Conservation.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to the publication of this manuscript if accepted in the Journal of Insect Conservation.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novotny, J.L., Goodell, K. Rapid recovery of plant–pollinator interactions on a chronosequence of grassland-reclaimed mines. J Insect Conserv 24, 977–991 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00268-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00268-6